A.k.a. the last time Demøcrooks held fewer seats in our House of Representatives.
T
heir 183 number of seats is the third lowest for them in its entire 435-member history. Over the last hundred years, only the 67th and 71st Congresses were plagued by less House DemØfascists. The next Congress will be tying the 69th for third least infestation of House Demøcommies.
Not only was this election not "nothing," it was historic. "A big freakin' deal," to paraphrase foul-mouthed racist Vice Presentdunce Joe Biden.
Make no mistake™: According to His High-Crimes-and-Misdemeanors-ness Baracrook Øbola, every single one of his failed, lawless policies were on the ballot. Indeed, as the election results clearly show, every single one of them have been rejected outright by the American people.
The Republican leadership would do well to show just as clearly they reject every single one of His Lawlessness's policies, too.
If you Google or Bing "Sarah Palin 1400 Pennsylvania Avenue," you'll find story after story on it from leftist news organizations from ABC to Talking Points Memo and Right Wing Watch. Heck, the Daily Beast even thought they'd work in a play on the words uttered by comedian Tina Fey on Saturday Night Live that the leftist media convinced the American people Sarah Palin actually said. Their headline reads "You Can See Russia from 1400 Pennsylvania Avenue..."
Do a search for "Barack Obama calls Michelle 'Michael.'" What do you turn up? Not much, right? There's not lefty news organization after organization that has story after story about this major flub. Not only could he not remember his wife's name, he referred to her by the male version of Michelle! But, he had no worries. His media friends protected him and worked hard to keep that under cover.
That is, Mayberry's Barney Fife. Not the purple and green dinosaur.
C
omparing His Emptychairness Baracrook Hammer'n'sickle Øbaron von Münchhausen to a bumbling, inept deputy sheriff is completely unfair. Deputy Fife never released extremely dangerous prisoners on purpose, or gave in to the demands of our mortal enemies — let alone swap numerous top-level terrorist savages for a single filthy defector and traitor.
Barney, unlike Barry, takes his oath to defend the public seriously, always doing his best to uphold the law, protect the good citizens he serves, and bring honor to his office. No, nobody can accuse Bernard Milton Fife of refusing to enforce any laws he doesn't like, or of outright and unilaterally altering their provisions for his own personal, political gain, or of ever adhering to America's enemies, giving them aid and comfort.
When the people of his town are threatened, Barn the Lawman rushes out selflessly to confront that threat.
Barry the Incoherent just rushes to the nearest microphone to declare,
But I don't want to put the cart before the horse. We don't have a strategy yet. I think [sic] what I've seen in some of the news reports suggests that folks are getting a little further ahead of where we're at than we currently are.... We need to make sure that we've got clear plans, that we're developing them....
We are going to work politically and diplomatically with folks in the region. And we're going to cobble together the kind of coalition that we need for a long-term strategy as soon as we are able to fit together the military, political and economic components of that strategy.
Before rushing to three political fundraisers and the wedding of one of his media lapdogs, of course.
Deputy Fife never takes as many taxpayer-funded vacations or trips to the golf course as Dictator Øfascist does, either. Also, the most tyrannical thing Barney ever does is tell Floyd the Barber not to loiter in front of his own shop. Bareich Totalitarian Øbrownshirt would scream at him, "You didn't build that!" and demand he pay an even higher "fair share" of taxes before siccing the EPA on him to scrutinize his hair-disposal methods, while ordering the NSA to monitor all his emails, calls, and financial transactions as well as those of each of his customers.
So stop comparing the stuttering, thin-skinned, whiny egomaniac to one of Mayberry's finest.
"The bargain that any president strikes with is, you give me this office and in turn my... need for... vacations, leisure is gone. I am giving myself to you."
Obama didn't want Bush's war in Iraq to have resulted in a stable democracy there.
This wasn't supposed to happen, either, but Iraq was never supposed to be secure. That's why Obama didn't want to leave any troops there, so he used this phony Status of Forces Agreement. But the Iraqis did promise immunity [for our Troops], and the New York Times reported that in June of this year. Obama's just making it up or lying about it. [Indeed.]
Speaking of the Lying Liar-n-Thief and the Lies He Tells:
[B]ack in 2009 the administration authorized a $1.7 billion bailout to autoparts maker Delphi as it reorganized in bankruptcy and reincorporated overseas.
"If I like your corporation, you can keep your corporation's inversion. Period."
Her Nibs surrounded by more security at her book signing than she ever allowed Ambassador Stevens to have at his assaulted compound in Libya.
Jason Mattera caught up with Hillary Clinton at one of the DC stops on her book tour this week, and asked the former Secretary of State if she would mind signing a copy of Hard Choices… but with a twist. "If you could make it out to Christopher Stevens," Mattera queried. "I think you knew him."
Christopher Stevens, of course, was the U.S. ambassador to Libya who was murdered along with three other Americans on Clinton's watch, when Jihadists attacked two U.S. outposts in Benghazi on September 11, 2012.
Hillary, surprised by the request, replied, "Yeah, I'm not gonna make it out to Chris Stevens." Mattera followed-up with, "What difference does it make?" a reference to Clinton's infamous 2013 Senate testimony before the Foreign Relations Committee.
Three, five, and seven out of every ten of its white, Latino, and black members, respectively, born outside of marriage.
T
he bastardization of America does not come without a particularly unsavory brew of unintended consequences. Most discernible among its more potent ingredients is an upwardly-trending crime rate, which yields a highly disagreeable aftertaste (see state-by-state comparison below).
Between 1980 and 2012 incarceration rates have more than doubled in the U.S. and are now more than six times that of the typical nation in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
Perhaps because we are not throwing the original offenders in jail, Mary? As commenter Francis Schultz puts it,
One of the few times I have been disappointed in a Heritage Foundation article. The vast, vast majority of inmates who are sentenced to state and federal prison are there because they have earned it. If federal and state legislatures want to reduce crime and the number of inmates they need to quit paying women to have babies. I have been a prosecutor for 17 years and I see a huge correlation between crime and the breakdown of the family.
Exactly. The furthest thing from being in the best interests of any child is allowing him or her to reside with the most irresponsible person imaginable: A "mother" who had that child out of wedlock. We all know or should know the facts.
For example, examination of families with the same race and same parental education shows that, when compared to intact married families, children from single-parent homes are:
More than twice as likely to be arrested for a juvenile crime;
Twice as likely to be treated for emotional and behavioral problems;
Roughly twice as likely to be suspended or expelled from school; and
A third more likely to drop out before completing high school.
The effects of being raised in a single-parent home continue into adulthood. Comparing families of the same race and similar incomes, children from broken and single-parent homes are three times more likely to end up in jail by the time they reach age 30 than are children raised in intact married families. Compared to girls raised in similar married families, girls from single-parent homes are more than twice as likely to have a child without being married, thereby repeating the negative cycle for another generation.
Finally, the decline of marriage generates poverty in future generations. Children living in single-parent homes are 50 percent more likely to experience poverty as adults when compared to children from intact married homes. This intergenerational poverty effect persists even after adjusting for the original differences in family income and poverty during childhood.
Another state-by-state comparison bears out that effect:
Indeed, out-of-wedlock births appear to be far more accurate predictors of crime-rate trends than the extremely mindless poverty-rate excuse psychotically touted by every excessively emoting liberal(birm).
There is nothing brave or noble about chronically subjecting any child to such a dastardly form of abuse. It is cruel, selfish, unfair, heartless, unjust, immature, careless, neglectful, and yes, immoral. The turpitude of it alone should raise that abuse to the level of an infamous crime.
The thoughtlessly irresponsible claim, "But my choosing to be an unwed mother doesn't hurt anybody!" Really? In addition to the innocent newborn on whom you are about to inflict decades of otherwise preventable abuse, you can include all the individuals and society at-large forced to suffer and endure the extreme selfishness, disregard for others, self-entitlement, and overall lack of basic empathy and morals you will no doubt impart to him or her and he or she will, in turn, far more likely than others, callously and even violently inflict on them, who are going to be needlessly and fundamentally harmed. But you do not care, else you would have never been a willing partner in the commission of so selfish and grievous an offense. If no one forced you to conceive and birth a bastard, then no, you cannot force others to face any of the messy consequences directly stemming from your grossly negligent choice.
Intentionally or negligently having a child out of wedlock should be prima facie evidence of child endangerment.
As alluded to earlier, except in the alleged minds of liberals and other criminal enablers, a prevailing state of poverty does not create crime. If it did, Mississippi would have the highest crime rate and Washington, D.C. close to the lowest.
In light of available data, the far more reasonable place to start finding an explanation for increasing incidences of criminal activity across any group of states is their respective rates of out-of-wedlock births. Crime rates themselves, like the proverbial canary in the coal mine, act only as sentinels, able to warn us of a present danger that usually affects them first. Once it does, however, it is too late to prevent the danger. Rather, you immediately focus all your concerns on your own survival, seeking nothing more than some means of escape. That danger will remain there, of course, until either you go back and remove it or nature gets around to sending something else in to displace it.
Clearly, taking the necessary steps to prevent this danger would save yourself all that extra grief and effort during your next forward push.
“The rights of children are what are at stake here. As society makes decisions as to what's best for everyone, children's rights cannot and must not be ignored, what's best for them needs to be put first and foremost in a legal sense.”
If a consenting man and woman have a certain unalienable right to conceive a child, there must be a general expectation both will exercise personal responsibility before, when, and after they do, since such inextricably involves the rights of another person. So we may, in order to secure these rights as well as the blessings of liberty to their posterity, choose to include among our state governments' just powers a new illegitimacy law that promotes primarily at all times and in all cases the rights of the child. For examples, it would provide that the custody of every child born out of wedlock be temporarily granted to a lawfully married man and woman — the most tried and true, safe and stable environment humankind has ever known for promoting the best interests of children — or to the state if it cannot find a suitable couple who may agree to accept such custody. Within one year, if the biological parents lawfully marry each other, or either marries someone else of the opposite sex, that married couple would have sixty days to file a custody claim. Otherwise, permanent guardianship would be granted to the foster parents if they agree to accept it, or else to another married man and woman. Whatever the case, the rights and best interests of the child would always be paramount to those of any other person or persons.
It is our choice. We may either do something like the above or continue trying and failing to live with the clearly, inevitably, and increasingly dangerous consequences to our general welfare which the bastardization of America must and always will brew for us.
Perhaps Øliar should "promise" Mexico, "If you like our Marine, you can keep our Marine, period!" Then, undoubtedly, Sgt. Tahmooressi would be freed from this nightmare tomorrow.
Øliar has already kept our Marine on a secret waiting list for 53 days. Will Øliar "not stand for it" and "not tolerate it, period!" now?
“It’s rather telling that @BarackObama has told ‘journalists’ at least 3 times in this [White Spite House presstitute conference] that they’ve made great points in their questions.”
"'Liberal Mass-Murdering Shooters(birm)' for eight hundred."
"On this map, it shows a perfect match between high incidents of gun violence and high incidents of Øbraindead voters."
"What is blue?"
"Right."
"'Liberal Mass-Murdering Shooters(birm)' for a thousand, Alex."
"Their so-called 'commen sense' restrictions wouldn't have done a damned thing to stop Liberal Mass-Murdering Shooters(birm), but would've only infringed even further on the rights and safety of law-abiding citizens."
"Who are liberals?"
"Yes. Other acceptable responses include 'fascists,' 'socialists,' 'Demøcrooks,' 'communists,' 'tyrants,' 'insane people,' 'liars,' 'anti-America traitors,' and 'shredders of the U.S. Constitution.' Clearly they all mean the same thing here."
Adhereing to our enemies, giving them aid and comfort.
I
n short, treason. Throw in the dock with him al-MqQain, al-Qraham, and all the other terrorist enablers in al-Qongress who can't wait to force our men and women in uniform to fight against the enemies of our enemies until the following flag's flying over every capital city in the Middle East.
With all their talk about children, you might think they'd at least try to remember the eight their "rebel" al(-Qaeda)lies brutally murdered twelve years ago. But that would mean they'd have to be willing and able to see the world as it is rather than the Glorious People's Utopia of Next Tuesday™ they'd like it to be. Only in the latter can they see the al-Qaeda-led "rebels" as moderates instead of the child-dismembering butchers they really are.
How quickly they forget. How long before al-Qaeda, backed by its pals al-Qbama et al., captures enough new strongholds that it's able to plan and carry out attacks on American soil again?
Our own government's leaders are overtly and actively betraying us.
If our immigration system is broken, should we be buying any "fix" from the very people who broke it?
C
an anybody be that stupid? Does Mr. Amnesty 1986 Chuck Schumer still think we are?
Last time they "promised" that if we just let them grant amnesty to legalize millions of illegal aliens identity thieves our immigration system will be "fixed," they wound up breaking it even worse. Over four times more broken to be precise.
Now these same people are promising the exact same things. Do they really think feel we're so dumb as to fall for their lying "promises" again?
Fool us twice, shame on us.
What are they going to tell us after 36 million moreillegal aliens identity thieves invade our country? "Oops, our immigration system is broken [again], we need to 'fix' it"?
Fool us thrice, shame on our parents for ever feeling they could have any children with actual working brains.
How about this deal, Messrs. Amnesty 2013? Provide us with an objectively verifiable trigger. Like the hundreds of miles of two-layer border fencing you "promised" us years ago that you'd have fully built by now but, as it unsurprisingly turns out, you haven't yet gotten around anywhere near to even a tenth of the way completing. So finish the remaining 600 miles, then we might — repeat, might, and only if we're in an extremely generous mood — start trying to believe any of the rest of your repeatedly broken "promises."
No, leaving it to the discretion of Janet Napolitano, the one you "promise" will "enforce" your 1986 amnesty rehash new law even after she's already proclaimed "a so-called 'trigger' is not the way to go," won't ever qualify as any sort of objective verification. Our border agents working under her have sworn in court, and the federal judge agreed, that the "very oath they took to enforce the law is being blocked by rules and regulations and policies established from on high, and that this is undermining their ability to do what they are sworn to do." Don't even try to make her your "Miss" Trigger 2013.
None of you are in any position now to make even a single believable promise to anybody but total fools and complete idiots who are both hopelessly stupid and terminally dumb and whose only discernible purpose in life is dramatically lowering humanity's overall IQ.
You keep getting a raw deal, while His Lyingness only deals from the bottom of the deck.
B
aracrook Øliar has stacked the deck against you.
More of you joined the ranks of the disabled than could find jobs last month. You haven't bet on finding any other way to survive in Der Fübar's non-recovery "recovery." Clearly it's a giant leap in the wrong direction.
It should now be more than painfully obvious to everyone except the fiddytarders still drowning in their own drool, this joker's wild, out of control spending sprees have built up a pot that yes only his extremist commierad pals can win. He's addictively and recklessly gambled with your money, and you've lost. Big time. Not just you, but your children and grandchildren too. And every bet it's the same old thing:
First, he'll grin as he deals you and your employer and customers a dead man's hand. Then, before you even see it, he'll sneak up and shoot you all from behind with clip after clip after clip of job-killing taxes.
Make No Mistake®: Øfascist has every card marked for America's economic death. He, like all other enemies of America's free markets, are betting only on America's fiscal destruction and financial demise. How else can they, yes, finish "fundamentally transforming" the game into Soviet Socialist Severe-Crud Stud™?
So the stakes couldn't be higher this election.
In the Cheater-n-Thief's hand are only the executive privilege card, the class warfare card, and, of course, the race card.
But you still have an ace in the hole: Your voter registration card.
I'm not worried, though, because liberals are telling me I don't have a spending-binge problem.
W
hen you're a fact-challenged lying fascist — or liberal, for short — your bitterly clung-to system of so called beliefs has to face, usually sooner rather than later, its three mortal enemies; namely, any kind of relevant facts, any sort of truth, and any type of personal freedom.
Let's start with relevant facts. Also known as Things Liberals Willfully and Completely Ignore.
It's a fact liberals don't think that government spending can ever be a problem, unless it's on our national defense. Leave out every word after and including "that" in the previous sentence and you'll really get the picture.
In inflation-adjusted dollars (2005 constant dollars), federal government spending in 2012 is expected to be (drum roll) the highest in history, peacetime or wartime.
Since World War II, it has never been higher in proportion to our Gross Domestic Product.
Annual spending under the Bush administration was an average 19.6 percent of GDP. That's lower than it was under the preceding eight administrations.
“The private sector is so foreign to our pResident that he would need a passport to go there and a translator to understand what is happening.”
But under the extremely out of touch Øfubar fascistration, it's now 24.4 percent. That's higher than it was under all the other post-war administrations.
“Headwind” is that sound Øbraindead hears when the air inside his otherwise empty skull changes position.
None of that matters to liberals, of course. They and their Minionstream Media are repeating over and over a massive, bald-faced Big Lie and are expecting you'll believe it.
"Spending problem? What spending problem?"
You just keep right on maxing out all your credit cards. You haven't put any more on them than you did last year.
After you go bankrupt — as you inevitably will — don't worry.
Yes, you can always Blame Bush!™.
Yeah, that's a Change®.
Which brings us to truth. Also known as the Thing Liberals Willfully and Completely Refuse to Tell.
Calling a liberal truthful is worse than describing water as dry.*
Emotion is their only real "truth." In their "minds," it's sufficient to just feel that something's true. So to make you feel it is, too, all liberals need do is find a way to manipulate your emotions as effectively as theirs have been.
Certainly the most predictable means of manipulating you emotionally are the same old tired ones liberals always use. That is, those that somehow make you feel it's extremely wrong to even question what they're telling you.
"Know why all those people are against government spending? They just don't want the government to be able [sic] to help [sic] poor starving women and black children! Why have they declared war on women? When are they going to stop being such hate-filled racists?"
So you believe you have a royal flush of irrefutable truth? Too bad, because liberals will then throw down the Ace of R. That's a card, multiple duplicates of which they always keep stashed up and down the full lengths of their frilly sleeves, that cheating liberals have ever standing by to turn everything you're holding into a losing hand.
“Obama does accept donations from Wall Street executives. Campaign finance records show that Democrats collect more money from Wall Street than does the GOP.”
The truth also reveals that one of Øliar's rich, fat cat "vulture capitalist" campaign bundlers, Jonathan Lavine, was a director of Bain Capital when it laid off steelworkers in 2001. That's two years after Mitt Romney left that company to rescue the failing Winter Olympics.
You could almost say liberals have no problem with the truth, per se. They simply won't speak it.
Their only real problem with truth is, yes, it can and should be told.
Make no mistake: What penetrates even liberals' thick, empty pointy skulls is that actual truth thrives where all reasonable perspectives may be openly expressed and fairly and freely examined. Normal people call this robust debate.
Except what sounds like robust debate to liberals is indistinguishable from this.
Therefore, whenever you tell the truth about liberals, exposing who they really are, their sole response is to try to shut you up.
No doubt, if you wrote a book titled "Truths and the Truthful Truth Tellers Who Speak Them," liberals would all instantly try to get their fascist comrades in government to declare it a hate crime and order every copy burned.
Which brings us, finally, to personal freedom. Also known as the Thing Liberals Are Willfully and Completely Bent on Destroying.
Explicit in liberals' "defense" of, in effect, limitless government spending is their extreme, cult-like devotion to limitless government.
According to their constitution-unhindered worldview, if the government isn't outright controlling something or otherwise entirely and inextricably involved in it, that thing must be inherently bad.
Of course, first and foremost among such control and involvement are the perpetual bribes — what liberals euphemistically call "benefits" — which they incessantly demand government more and more "freely" dole out to the governed so the latter will, in return, perpetually elect more and more liberals to run the former. That is to say, liberals promoting their own government-"job" security.
It's why liberals reserve their most extreme, vitriolic attacks for whoever has the audacity to suggest even slightly scaling back any exorbitant increase of those "benefits" bribes. No matter these same "entitlements" and "free" handouts keep insidiously reducing whole populations of Americans to one big, degradingly dependent class. What's all important to liberals is forcing all us taxpayers, against our own and our country's best interests, to finance all such expansions of their personal vote-buying racket.
After all, being a liberal means everything is all about you. So whatever helps you personally is always a Good Thing™, regardless who or what gets hurt by it. Even when it significantly damages the security of "your" nation, it's still a GT™.
On the other hand, anything that can't or won't, in some satisfactorily measurable way, either help you and yours or harm your enemies, or both, is always Teh Most Eeeeeevil Thang Evah!™.
Thus, people realizing the change they need isn't government controlling or otherwise involving itself in every aspect of their lives and livelihoods doesn't help liberals at all. Those people are now evil; mainly because they no longer believe in the liberals' "New" same old tired worn out Four Free-dumbs™:
Free-ride
Free-load
Free-lunch
Free-bies
Indeed, the reason more and more people no longer do is they're finally realizing all that "free" stuff comes at an extremely high price: real freedom.
When you choose to sell your votes to the highest spenders it doesn't only make you nearly as greedy and selfish as the liberals buying them, it also shows what an extremely easy mark you are. You're willing to exchange the most precious possession you have — a possession others bought for you with their own life's blood — for those few crumbs liberals "promise" they'll "redistribute" to you once they cut a supersize slice of wealth cake from America's economy. Provided, that is, there are any crumbs left after they and their ravenous fat cat comrades have gobbled up the lion's share of that megaslice.
Don't worry. You'll also get handfuls and handfuls of even more of their crummy promises that you'll get more. But only on one condition: You keep re-electing them. And that, dear fools, is the full extent to which liberals "care" about you.
It's quite some bargain you've made with these corrupt liberal devils(birm). They get your votes and more and more power. You wind up less free and inhumanly dependent. All for the meagerest of crumbs, while the real redistribution of wealth is from Teh Evil Rich® to evil rich liberal dictators(birm). Indeed, the cost of all their vote buying is just barely a pittance compared to what liberals are actually stealing.
Now if you think feel you've been cruelly cheated, too bad. You set yourself and your liberties on the liberals' auction block. You shouldn't be surprised when you find out you've been extremely short-changed.
Heartbreaking are Professor [Eric] Foner's recitations of the horrific acts of terror inflicted by Democrats on black and white Republicans. Recounted on pages 184-185 of his book is one such act of terror: "Jack Dupree, a victim of a particularly brutal murder in Monroe County, Mississippi — assailants cut his throat and disemboweled him, all within sight of his wife, who had just given birth to twins — was 'president of a republican club' and known as a man who 'would speak his mind.'"
As in the past, no one except your new racist masters may speak their "minds."
But as long as you serve unquestioningly their selfish, greedy purposes, liberals won't bother to destroy you... today.
Tomorrow, of course, that may very likely Change®.
The moment you begin to exhibit any inkling of rational and independent thought, you're no longer a reliably mindless vote dispenser for liberals. They'll become increasingly suspicious of everything you do or say. One wrong act or word, no matter how manifestly innocent, will immediately trigger the next violently extreme episode of their innate paranoia. No, not even after you've shown them your complete lack of means, motive, and opportunity, liberals can never acquit you of what they feel has to be the most infamous of capital offenses; specifically, thinking for yourself. From that point on, you're forever dead to them.
“We shouldn’t allow people to educate their own children.”
– LiberalNazi Fascist Bastard caller,
Sean Hannity Show, 6/14/2012.
What it all boils down to is trust. No, liberals can never trust others to actually know any facts, speak any truth, or responsibly exercise any personal freedom. Because, "try" as they might, liberals can never do any of those things themselves. Worse, this collective projection of theirs impels them to render everyone else's ability to do so as pathetically nonexistent as theirs. Yes, unless they can completely tear all others fully down, even the least capable of the latter would, by any comparison, reduce all liberals to nothing but the most obscene objects of extremely deserved mockery and ridicule yes anyone can imagine.
However, rather than wallow unobtrusively in their extremely meaningless lives, bankrupt liberalism, and worthless pursuits of unremitting misery, each created solely of, by, and for themselves, liberals think feel it only "fair" that we also share in such eternally insufferable and damnable hollowness. Indeed, not even they can ignore the fact that that is the only thing they want truly "spread around." Freely so, by unfettered force of government, until it becomes universal.
Yes liberals can never be satisfied with anything that hasn't left our country absolutely destroyed and her citizens totally destitute. In those absolute-zero, forever-unlit voids known as their "hearts," they feel nothing less has any hope of sufficiently distracting us from noticing, whether we have any wish to or not, the inundating instances in which liberals clearly reveal just how utterly laughable and useless they and their always fraudulent ideas invariably were, are, and ever will be.
* Water droplets hiding inside artificially created shells of glass may be called "dry water." But it is deceiving. Like liberals, what lies beneath their carefully crafted outward appearances is still all wet.
our Øbamajesty's own øbaminister of prØpaganda said it best:
The impression you got was that he was out of touch with the experience of average people.
Make no mistake®: Presidents Eisenhower and Wilson actually had a private sector that was "doing fine." So they could afford taking time off to play golf. You? Let me be absolutely clear®: Not so much.
Also, federal spending under Eisenhower was, on average, 18 percent of our gross domestic product. Under Wilson, 8 percent — and that includes The Great War. Under You it's "skyrocketed" to an extremely whopping 24 percent.
Congratulations, Spender-in-Chief!
Worse, under Your extremistration, working-age American women are suffering their lowest labor-participation rate in 20 years.
"Whatever power plants are being built, they would have to meet the rigors of... the ratcheted-down caps that are imposed every year. So if somebody wants to build a coal-powered plant, they can. It's just that it will bankrupt them because they're going to be charged a huge sum for all that greenhouse gas that's being emitted." –Øfascist, 01/17/2008
The dictatorship says "yes you can" do something it rather you not. But it's going to cost you. Big.
And not just you, but everyone else will be punished as well. Out of "fairness," you know.
At least the Senate will be trying this week to defend us against the dictatorship's deadly and unnecessary Operation Skyrocket bombardment of our country's energy supply lines.
The road from 7.8% to 8.3% unemployment. The road from $10.7 trillion to $15.3 trillion national debt. The road from $1.84/gal. to $3.79/gal. gas prices.
T
he only way yes we can get off this roadSuperhighway to Hell™ is to take our Exit '12 off-ramp!
can make a firm pledge: Under my plan, no family making less than two hundred fifty thousand dollars a year will see any form of tax increase — not you income tax, not your payroll tax, not your capital gains taxes, not any of your taxes."
Except now we're seeing this form of tax increase:
"High gas prices are like a tax straight out of your paycheck."
But not to worry...
"You got a bunch of algae out here, right? If we can figure out how to make energy out of that, weh– weh– we'll be doin' a'ight!"
In fifty years or so, "weh– weh– we'll be doin' a'ight!"
Until then, yes you can keep right on paying your higher and higher gas prices Goin' Øbroke Tax™.
A'ight?
VS.
"The reason I wanted to come to a gas station is I don't think the president quite gets it.
"There is no algae that's going to come out of this (pump) this summer. This is the dominant device by which the American people fill their cars and trucks. And this, in fact, requires gasoline....
"The only way that you fix the price of this is by dramatically expanding supply.
"And the point which I keep making, and the president doesn't want to deal with, is an eleven percent increase in the supply of natural gas led to a dramatic decline in the cost of natural gas.
"If the president would sign three things — the Keystone Pipelines for seven hundred thousand barrels a day, reopening the Louisiana-Texas Gulf area for about four hundred thousand barrels a day, and reopening, or opening areas of Alaska for about a million two hundred thousand barrels a day — those three steps would increase Americans' supply by two million three hundred thousand barrels a day, or about eight hundred million barrels a year.
"My only point being, this is real. This isn't a theory, it's not a fantasy, it's not a fundraiser in San Francisco.
"It is the way the American people fill their cars, fill their trucks.
"They deserve a president who pays attention to reality, and who tries to help them with reality.
"And all I ask the president to do is read his own speech. Look at the part on natural gas where even he admits that drilling works, because he says natural gas is going to create six hundred thousand new jobs in this decade.
"None of it from algae. All of it from drilling.
"So, I just wanted to stop and say to everybody who's watching that I think we have a real chance to change things.
Packages and school supplies raised through these organizations are transported to Iraq, free of charge, by FedEx, then distributed to Iraqi children by our brave freedom fighters.
Jackie Bruchi
