aracrook Øbandit's save-worth measure was "even one life," on which his transportation department placed a monetary value of $9.6 million. So at the very least, a $5.7 billion border wall will have to save about six hundred lives for it to be worth it. Even less if using his EPA's value.
Given "28,000 victims [a quarter of them kids] of Chinese fentanyl smuggled across the border by Mexican drug cartels last year alone" — 80 percent of which passed through the San Diego region — in addition to other violent deaths more directlycaused by undocumented Democrats, in all likelihood an effective border wall would save about 80-100 lives a day. Those of innocent American citizens and aliens alike.
After a week, the border wall will have paid for itself.
Crisis ended. That is, outside of the Democrooks' wretched hives of scum and sanctuary.
Liberofascists always demand, "We have to do something to make a difference for the children!"
Their misleaders in Congress have the chance now to do just that.
Democrats hate to stand up for America and her greatness.
L
ast night, President Donald J. Trump shined the nation's spotlight on a veritable host of his and others' accomplishments that should make every America-loving freedom fighter proud and jump for joy. Of course, since those accomplishments are most clearly benefiting the country over their party, Democrooks demonstrated they have absolutely no reason to feel either pride or joyfulness. Loving America or fighting for her people's freedom just ain't a Demofascist Party thing.
They could, if they wish to appear less childishly surly and selfish, claim they — the members of the Party of Slavery & Jim Crow™ — had no choice but to pout like sourpusses and remain stuck in their seats: President Trump's State of the Union speech had them all crapping their pants the whole night.
Yeah, that's it. That's the ticket.
So give their cud-chewing misleader Nancy Pelosi another Depends®.
In an interview with ABC's George Stephanopoulos that aired on Friday's broadcast of Good Morning America, Obama declared that he didn't believe ISIS (also known as ISIL) was gaining strength.
'What is true is that from the start, our goal has been first to contain and we have contained them.'
With profascistives, there's always a "but" after anything decent, moral, or that cries for common humanity.
...we have terrorists in USA Called KKK #Mizzou. Gov got work to do
7:40 PM - 13 Nov 2015 [20 retweets, 7 hearts]
Typical sniveling coward overpampered selfish greedy libflake, deleted her own tweet while "thinking" feeling the Interwebnetstube isn't forever in her pwecious widdle case. Same kind of mindlessly macroaggressive self-absorbed prozi who'd suckerpunch you for even mentioning how cravenly violent she and her Democollectivist comrades canget if they either don't get everything they want when they want it or simply hear, see, or read something they don't like, and then fail to see the irony.
After all, the word "peace," to a liberofascist, means everybody totally and unconditionally surrendering to, and never, ever, ever challenging his/her/whatever's regressive way of "thinking."
ho hates normal Americans? Liberofascist Demøcrooks(birm), the lapdog mediots humping their legs, and every other degenerate, deviant, demented demagogue desperately trying to turn America into a third-world-overrun, weak-kneed, debt-crushed, overly taxed and bureaucratized hellhole in which yes they can tyrannically reign rather than a heaven in which, Ohhnoooes!, they might have to selflessly serve — along with all the craven "Republicans" wittingly enabling these destroyers of our country and our very way of life.
Who threatens those who hate normal Americans? That is, who best shows yes he can thwart them and undermine their holds on power? That's right. The Donald.
Normal Americans have been able to figure it out. Not surprised the haters haven't.
ot a fetal ma$$, until your mommy host's body walks into a Planned Genocide "Parenthood" abortion "clinic" chop shop. Then you become a mere "line item™" in its revenue budget.
Listen, endoparasite kid. Your mommy's host's body's lady parts — not you baby parts — enjoy the full and equal protection of the laws. So quit your muffled "non-person" whining. Nobody wants to feel your pain. Just suck it up as you get sucked out.
Besides, "specimen" kid, Planned Genocide "Parenthood" can fetch a good price — about $100 a non-crush pop — for any of your "intact tissue" it can scrape out its Multi-Baby Body Bag®. All for research and medical progress and women's health, of course.
ascists can't read. They alone enacted a statute that clearly says only states that establish "exchanges" under it may receive subsidies. They have no one to blame but themselves for enacting it that way.
Once the Supreme Court frees you and all other Americans from the shackles of this dictatorial dungeon, Congress should pass a law that limits government's role in your health care to no more than allowing you to take a 100 percent tax credit for all insurance premiums and unreimbursed medical expenses you receive bills for during the year. This would amount to a tax refund if your bills exceed your taxes owed. There would be no other subsidies, no HealthCare.trainwreck, no exchanges, no Medicaid expansion, and no government-mandated "shared responsibility payments" punitive tax hikes. The free market — composed of providers, consumers, and insurers — would set supply and demand. Any group of states wishing to enter into interstate insurance compacts would receive Congress's approval.
The new law would be abundantly readable and understandable, even for fascists.
bamalign your police officers. Overcharge them with crimes every chance you get. Coddle and appease your Baracriminal Øbamasons' violent supporters. What could possibly go wrong?
Blares BarackimoreCity.gov: "Mayor Rawlings-Blake Requests Federal Investigation of Baltimore Police Department." "Mayor, Health Commissioner deliver medication to customers affected by riots (and) the aftermath of 13 looted pharmacies."
Before and during the riots, these people demanded that the police go away. Now, they demand they come back, but police them selectively. Screw that. Officers are now being surrounded in their cars by 30 to 50 thugs when they stop. You think these officers don't fear for their own lives? And when they are not in physical jeopardy, they've got the Mayor and the DOJ, led by Al Sharpton, breathing down their necks and threatening them. Tell me how their paltry salaries are worth this? I wouldn't blame every damn one of them for walking away. Baltimore[Barackimore] can rot, most of it already has and the soaring murder spree continues.
Public slaves "Citizens" chose these Barace Øbaiters to be their masters "public servants." Now they're enjoying the fruits of their lubricious thUgtopia.
This is a leaked copy of a secret memo (from the future) written by the Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus, dated Nov. 10, 2014:
Dear Fellow Republicans:
I hate to say that I told you so, but I told you so.
I warned you almost two years ago that the Republican Party had to extend its appeal to Hispanics. Instead, we kicked up a s**tstorm over stalling on immigration reform, and we lost the House because of it. And now, we've got a big, fat load of nothing.
Wrong.
U.S. Senate and House and an overwhemling majority of state governorships and legislatures now in Republican hands. The last time DemØcriminals held less House seats, your grandfather was a kid; and the Civil War was breaking out when they controlled fewer state legislatures.
Perhaps I'm the only who noticed that:
(a) The Hispanic vote is the fastest-growing part of the electorate, increasing its percentage of the total vote by one percent every year; (b) The Hispanic vote is concentrated in states like Texas and Florida that we must hold in order to be considered a national party; and (c) In the 2012 Presidential election cycle, we lost the Hispanic vote by a ridiculous 68 percent to 30 percent.
So we already were skating on thin ice, going into the 2014 midterm elections. And what did we do? We started jumping up and down on that thin ice, we crashed through it, and we drowned.
Wrong.
It appears your bloated corpses are the ones washing up en masse on that frozen beach.
It should have told us something when Senators like Rubio, McCain and Flake, Republicans representing states with lots of Hispanic voters, said that we needed immigration reform. The Tea Party kept yelling that we would lose big if the undocumented won a path to votership. Yet the Republican Senators who supposedly had the most to lose from this, those very ones, spoke out for immigration reform.
Wrong.
Even more than they are.
Pandering to this or that group or class to get their votes is for losers. Governing for the benefit of and in the interests of all Americans is what winners do.
And it should have been obvious what we had to do, when a substantial number of Republican Senators came out in favor of a sane and rational immigration bill. The Tea Party was hoping that the immigration bill would meet the same fate as the April 2013 gun control bill — death by filibuster. They were wrong. Sen. McConnell couldn't hold the Republican Senators together in a filibuster, because even at that early point, the polling showed that there were a lot more single-issue pro-immigration voters than there are single-issue pro-gun-control voters. And that was before all the fun started, in 2014, in the House of Representatives.
Boehner told us, "Don't worry, I've got this." And then he went into the usual Orange Man routine: lots of bills, lots of hearings, lots of meetings with "stakeholders," lots of letters back and forth between House Committee Chairs and Obama Administration officials, lots of amendments, mark-ups in three different committees, etc., etc.
All while the Hispanic vote was coming to a slow boil.
And then the party-line House Floor vote, and Boehner's refusal to put any Senate bill up for a vote, and Boehner's refusal to appoint House-Senate conferees. At which point, the Hispanic vote boiled over.
Wrong.
Your share dropped this election. It was the same as the 2010 midterms'. The only boiling over going on around here is what appears to be an Ebola-like fever melting away the last few viable micrograms of grey matter clinging for dear life to the insides of your otherwise empty skull.
For once, the White House communications staff got it right. Instead of the president assailing "Congress," the president assailed the Republicans. And he hit us where it hurt, calling out Republicans as heartless and soulless. The "Mean Party." I particularly well-recall when our supposedly "Muslim" president quoted Matthew 25:40 from the King James Bible: "Truly I say to unto you, inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these, my brethren, ye have done it unto me." Plenty of Hispanics came right out and called us racists.
Wrong.
Perpetually aggrieved self-haters like you can only "think" of calling whoever opposes their insane words and deeds that. Not winning the argument? Then accuse the other person of being a racist, sexist, homophobe, bigot, heartless, mean, etc., etc., etc.! How original.
Besides, Demøcrasshole, "Hispanics" aren't a race. Unless you "think" feel "Americans" are too.
Actually, the American people have a rich and vital heritage that, unlike you and your divide-and-conquer party, Republicans love truly and completely and are working hard to universally and faithfully promote, preserve, protect, and defend.
And then, as the clock ticked down, the protests — Oh God, the protests. Undocumented workers saying that they had worked for weeks and never been paid. That they had worked 70 hours each week in the hot sun, and hadn't been paid enough to feed their hungry babies. Teenagers pleading for the chance to remain in the only country that they could remember, and not be exported like farm animals to a place that they had never known. Women testifying that they had been raped, but were afraid to go to the police, because they feared deportation and permanent separation from their own families.
And then the Tea Party lunatics started showing up at the protests with guns, and threatening "citizen arrests."
And then crazy Sheriff Arpaio started making real arrests.
Every night, on the news. For weeks. Then months. While the House Republicans engaged in vigorous onanism.
Wrong.
Your so-called president and party's mindless refusal to enact or enforce any laws that would prevent all these Dire Consequences™ from ever happening is the real culprit. Not that self-gratification you're projecting onto Republicans.
Lawless, open borders invite nothing but false hopes and massive exploitation ultimately for the tens of millions of people whose greatest dreams your nationally suicidal "executive actions" and "reforms" can only crush. Just wave after unsustainable wave of them left withering underneath those cruel rays of your monotonously stellar promises.
Speaking of projection, why don't you break precedent and be honest with the American people for a change? Tell them that "path to [Demøcriminal] votership" is the sole thing you soulless bastards are after with your supercharged magnets.
We thought that we had a lock on the House of Representatives. We had that huge 10-to-1 post-Citizens United advantage in sewer money. We had the ridiculously gerrymandered congressional boundaries that in 2012 had delivered lopsided Republican House delegation majorities of:
13 to five in Pennsylvania; 12 to four in Ohio; 8 to three in Virginia; 9 to five in Michigan; and 17 to 10 in Florida,
— all states that President Obama had won in the same year. (How else could we lose the national House vote by 1.6 million, and still end up on top by 35 seats? Hah!)
Well, we learned that we didn't have a lock on the House. And we lost it in a way that nobody expected, except that one guy in Central Florida. (For sure, the Three Stooges, Rothenberg, Cook and Sabato, never saw it coming.) We got the Hispanics so incensed that they voted 90-to-10 against us, just like the African Americans do, every time.
Wrong.
Your total obsession with race continues to be your undoing. Have you bothered to ask what really incenses them — besides, of course, your taking them entirely for granted? After you Demøcriminals took over the House and Senate in 2007, did you do anything about poverty, underemployment, wage gaps, welfare dependence, or prime working-age participation — besides, of course, making them all worse? Did you show you care far more about creating a government that's helpful and accountable to all of us than a party that just counts on helping itself to this or that group's votes?
After the 2012 election, there were 19 House Republican seats in districts that were 25 percent Hispanic or more. We managed to lose them all. Every single one of them.
Ileana Ros-Lehtinen — gone, after 25 years.
Ken Calvert, Buck McKeon and Ed Royce — all gone, after 22 years. (McKeon must have seen it coming; he retired.)
Hispanics were so riled up against Republicans that even tokenism didn't work for us. Diaz-Balart and Nunes (Portuguese, actually) were swept out, along with Pearce and Farenthold.
At the last minute, there was a Republican push in Texas to remove party identification from the ballot, but that went nowhere. So Farenthold, Neugebauer, Conaway, Poe and Culbertson all kicked the bucket.
Wrong.
All who sought reelection are alive and kicking, Dumbøcrass. And you spelled Culberson's name wrong to boot.
And it turned out that our great Republican "victory" in taking redistricting away from the Democratic-controlled California Legislature (while keeping control in all the states where we're on top) didn't help us at all. In California, we lost Valadao, Miller, Nunes, Denham, Calvert, McKeon, McCarthy, Cook, Royce and Hunter. We went from 34 Democrats and 19 Republicans in California to 44 Democrats and 9 Republicans. Could the Democrats in the California Legislature possibly have done any worse to us? (Answer: "No.")
Wrong.
All those running bested you. Plus Buck McKeon along with John Campbell were succeeded by Republicans.
You should've mentioned that Gary Miller announced his retirement months before HuffPost let you puke your unsightly, slanderous drivel up on it. But since his successor is the only one in California you can vigorously self-gratify to before going blind, that means you went from 38 (not 34) to 39 (not 44) Demøcriminals there. Whoopee.
Part of the problem was that a lot of our people just didn't know how to run in a competitive race. Take Randy Neugebauer — please. Maybe it wasn't such a good idea to shout out "Baby Killer!" at another Member of the House in the midst of a debate on health care — when 40 percent of all Hispanics in America have no health coverage whatsoever. In 2012, Neugebauer won by 70 points. In 2014, he lost by eight. (Luckily for Rep. Joe Wilson, someone else given to vigorous expostulation at inopportune moments, Wilson's district is less than five percent Hispanic.)
Wrong.
He won by over 54 points. You were off by 62. (Luckily for America, Rep. Wilson won by over 25 points.)
Losing those 19 seats just killed Republicans in the House. (We had only 17 to spare.) The Democrats actually gained seats in the Senate — including one in Texas, which is now just under 40 percent Hispanic. Farewell, GOP filibusters in the Senate!
Wrong.
Unless by "gain" you mean bidding farewell to eight nine of those seats.
But we still have the Supreme Court, right? Well, maybe not, since Justice Scalia, now 78 years old, went into the hospital last month, and he hasn't come out yet.
Wrong.
But if it helps you engage in a lot of that vigorous onanism, don't mind us. We're not your optometrist.
In the last few days, I've spoken to a lot of lobbyists (or as I like to call them, "the owners") — at least the ones who still take my calls. They weren't happy even before the election. Nothing was moving through Congress, which means that nothing was moving for them. But now, with the Democrats holding the White House, the House, and a filibuster-proof majority in the Senate, I've got nothing to offer them.
The Chamber of Commerce doesn't care about abortion. It doesn't care about the Second Amendment, or about gay marriage, or about prayer in the schools. The Chamber of Commerce cares about tax breaks and drilling rights and deregulation and no-bid contracts and bailouts. And now, we here in the GOP have no way to help them.
And the electorate? They now see us Republicans exactly as so many of us really are: as callous, bigoted tools.
Wrong.
You're also forgetting to slander the millions upon millions of regular Americans who voted for these "callous, bigoted tools" as well. Then again, you might somehow actually "think" feel mindlessly belittling others isn't the most surefire way of persuading them to cast their ballots for you and your ilk next time, instead.
Nah, that's giving you too much credit. Must be HuffPost simply forgot to provide you enough space to accommodate your entire scurrilous screed.
Gentlemen, we have taken the biggest special-interest money machine in the history of the world, and we have destroyed it. By defeating some immigration bill that millionaires and billionaires and multinational corporations actually would have benefited from.
Stupid is as stupid does.
Wrong.
It's you and your extremely overpaid multimillionaire minions who still "think" feel yes you can benefit from, in their own words, "the stupidity of the American voter."
No, don't bother lying that you never heard of your party's Gruber Rule™.
Speaker-Elect Nancy Pelosi already has told us what she, personally, will introduce H.R. 1: The Immigration Reform Act of 2015. With an 18-month path to citizenship that leaves several months to register all of those undocumented Democrats before the 2016 election. Consolidating the permanent Democratic majority.
Goodbye, Texas. Goodbye, New Mexico, Arizona, Nevada, Colorado and Florida. In every national election from Day One, the Democrats now start with 30 percent of the national vote from African-Americans and Hispanics, and then they see how far they can run up the score. In other words, the Grand Old Party is now the Grand Dead Party.
Stick a fork in us. We're done.
Wrong.
We've only just begun.
But it was nice of you to finally admit in your parting shot there the real reason you "care" about the unlawfully-present aliens your unctuous pandering and unkeepable promises help bring here.
In case you couldn't tell, this is fiction, at least today. But by November 2014, it might be fact. We shall see. – Rep. Alan Grayson
Wrong.
You and you so-called president and party still don't see.
e'll give you what they have. How? By pointing big guns at them and demanding they either hand over what they have or *BANG!* Then we'll give it to you — after taking our huge cut, of course. All you have to do is show up at the nearest polling booth(s) every Election Day and say you want only us to have those guns. And once you and we — mostly we, of course — have every last thing that yes we can take from them, then we'll have 'equality.' Which means you'll have the same opportunity as everybody else to either do every last thing that yes we can command everybody — excepting ourselves, of course — must do or *BANG!* Why? Because 'Forward!' 'Change!' 'Stronger!' 'Prosperity!'"
r doesn't like them. Those who aren't, or don't, become the "intolerable" exception to their "tolerance."
Convenient, that.
"Tolerance" means never having to say you're sorry for hating others. This leads to "diversity" — which, of course, excludes everybody your "tolerance" allows you to hate. The more people yes you can hate and exclude, the more "progressive" you'll be.
It's the ultimate in Us Versus Them™. You get to wholly condemn and dehumanize others for behaving even partially like you.
So in truth, liberal "tolerance" is all about extreme self-hatred and denial. Accordingly, their groupthink communes are the only places where such projection may be completely tolerated.
It's the difference between chowing down a good, healthy meal and choking on lollipops. We're the country that pulled off the Berlin Airlift. Yes we can fly a hundred thousand foreign children back where they truly belong.
For too many of them it's literally become a matter of repatriate or die.
“The Secretary of Homeland Security, in conjunction with the Secretary of State, the Attorney General, and the Secretary of Health and Human Services, shall develop policies and procedures to ensure that unaccompanied alien children in the United States are safely repatriated to their country of nationality or of last habitual residence.”
What happens when a "free" press won't fight for freedom of the press? This:
The rules are very stringent. Number one: You can't ask questions. Number two: There can be no recording devices. Number three: You can't talk to any of the staff. You can't talk to the children. You can't talk to the medical personnel. And if you have questions, you can send an e-mail. You can't take any pictures, but after the tour, they will send pictures to you. But there can be no pictures during the tour. This is not what we expect in the United States of America, and certainly the media here needs to stand up for itself.
“In unprecedented criticism of the White House, 38 journalism groups have assailed the president’s team for censoring media coverage, limiting access to top officials and overall ‘politically-driven suppression of the news.’”
He's already lied about the costs of "taking care" of a serious health crisis that's directly the result of his failing to take care that the laws be faithfully executed.
The Obama administration is asking for $3.7 billion — much more than the original projections of $2 billion — in emergency funding to address the wave of young illegal immigrants coming to the country [all thanks to Øfascist's policy of Rampant, Open Lawlessness at the Border and Everywhere Else™].
He's also creating around 50,000 "children currently projected to come into the custody of the Department of Homeland Security"wards of the state.
So it comes as no surprise to anybody but a "journalist" that he has absolutely no intention of honestly responding to any inquiries from a formerly free press.
You've made that bed for him, Øbamedia. Now get back lying in it with him.
tep 1: Declare, in effect, open borders for any and all Central American kiddies.
Step 2: Herd them into Ølawless's kiddie internment camps.
Step 3: Once the packed-in kiddies spread contagious diseases amongst themselves, send them out to homes and schools all across America.
Step 4: After Americans infected by these kiddies start dying en masse, blame Republicans for "not having any compassion" or something.
Call it the Baracloward-Øpiven Stragedy™. Overwhelm and destroy every vestige of the rule of law in this country, then replace it with the establishment of an absolute tyranny over our states.
Former Junior Senator Ølawless, King George III is now calling from the grave to ask for his fascist policy back.
f being a total embarrassment were a high crime or misdemeanor, this extremely spoiled, petulant Øbamanchild would leave even Democrooks no choice but to begin immediate impeachment proceedings against him.
Prestompy-foot says lies he's "trying to help people out." (Unless, by "people," he means solely himself.) Yet under his WAAAAAAAAA!!!!tch, our economy and workforce are shrinking massively. His VA is systematically mass-murdering our Vets. Iraq is in utter turmoil. Pisslamic terrorists are on the march. Contagious disease carriers are streaming freely across our southern border. Part-time jobs are replacing and about to overtake full-time ones. His "affordable" "care" act is causing health insurance premiums and deductibles to skyrocket — with millions upon millions still uninsured or losing insurance. People are losing doctors they like. Public assistance, disability rolls, and child poverty are at all-time highs. His "official" unemployment rates are over 60 percent higher than President Bush's. There's no real "recovery." He keeps irresponsibly and unpatriotically piling on our and our descendants' shoulders mountains upon mountains of debt. His own party all but unanimously condemns his so-called budgets. The Supreme Court is unanimously condemning his lawlessness. His IRS systematically suppresses the free-speech activities of his political "enemies" before his reelection, then destroys the evidence showing its full extent. He leaves an American ambassador behind to die in Libya and a Marine to rot unjustly in a Mexican prison. He trades away five top Taliban terrorist leaders for a single treasonous deserter. Golfing and vacationing appear to be his primary "job." He keeps re-proposing things that have already been tried and never worked. He's waged a cruel war on our coal industry. He's dithered away a major jobs-making pipeline and forced Canada to sell its affordable oil to Asia instead of us. He keeps letting foreign leaders walk all over us. He bows to them while telling us to kiss his butt.
Clearly, what he's really been trying to do is hurt the American people.
Again, can we yes impeach this treasonous, high crimes-committing felon now?
Because it is such good stewards of our money and never would intentionally waste it on anything that detracts from its ability to provide us quality services.
Because it hires such good people and never would intentionally give them the green light to deny anybody his or her rights or punish him or her on account of his or her political affiliations.
Three, five, and seven out of every ten of its white, Latino, and black members, respectively, born outside of marriage.
T
he bastardization of America does not come without a particularly unsavory brew of unintended consequences. Most discernible among its more potent ingredients is an upwardly-trending crime rate, which yields a highly disagreeable aftertaste (see state-by-state comparison below).
Between 1980 and 2012 incarceration rates have more than doubled in the U.S. and are now more than six times that of the typical nation in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
Perhaps because we are not throwing the original offenders in jail, Mary? As commenter Francis Schultz puts it,
One of the few times I have been disappointed in a Heritage Foundation article. The vast, vast majority of inmates who are sentenced to state and federal prison are there because they have earned it. If federal and state legislatures want to reduce crime and the number of inmates they need to quit paying women to have babies. I have been a prosecutor for 17 years and I see a huge correlation between crime and the breakdown of the family.
Exactly. The furthest thing from being in the best interests of any child is allowing him or her to reside with the most irresponsible person imaginable: A "mother" who had that child out of wedlock. We all know or should know the facts.
For example, examination of families with the same race and same parental education shows that, when compared to intact married families, children from single-parent homes are:
More than twice as likely to be arrested for a juvenile crime;
Twice as likely to be treated for emotional and behavioral problems;
Roughly twice as likely to be suspended or expelled from school; and
A third more likely to drop out before completing high school.
The effects of being raised in a single-parent home continue into adulthood. Comparing families of the same race and similar incomes, children from broken and single-parent homes are three times more likely to end up in jail by the time they reach age 30 than are children raised in intact married families. Compared to girls raised in similar married families, girls from single-parent homes are more than twice as likely to have a child without being married, thereby repeating the negative cycle for another generation.
Finally, the decline of marriage generates poverty in future generations. Children living in single-parent homes are 50 percent more likely to experience poverty as adults when compared to children from intact married homes. This intergenerational poverty effect persists even after adjusting for the original differences in family income and poverty during childhood.
Another state-by-state comparison bears out that effect:
Indeed, out-of-wedlock births appear to be far more accurate predictors of crime-rate trends than the extremely mindless poverty-rate excuse psychotically touted by every excessively emoting liberal(birm).
There is nothing brave or noble about chronically subjecting any child to such a dastardly form of abuse. It is cruel, selfish, unfair, heartless, unjust, immature, careless, neglectful, and yes, immoral. The turpitude of it alone should raise that abuse to the level of an infamous crime.
The thoughtlessly irresponsible claim, "But my choosing to be an unwed mother doesn't hurt anybody!" Really? In addition to the innocent newborn on whom you are about to inflict decades of otherwise preventable abuse, you can include all the individuals and society at-large forced to suffer and endure the extreme selfishness, disregard for others, self-entitlement, and overall lack of basic empathy and morals you will no doubt impart to him or her and he or she will, in turn, far more likely than others, callously and even violently inflict on them, who are going to be needlessly and fundamentally harmed. But you do not care, else you would have never been a willing partner in the commission of so selfish and grievous an offense. If no one forced you to conceive and birth a bastard, then no, you cannot force others to face any of the messy consequences directly stemming from your grossly negligent choice.
Intentionally or negligently having a child out of wedlock should be prima facie evidence of child endangerment.
As alluded to earlier, except in the alleged minds of liberals and other criminal enablers, a prevailing state of poverty does not create crime. If it did, Mississippi would have the highest crime rate and Washington, D.C. close to the lowest.
In light of available data, the far more reasonable place to start finding an explanation for increasing incidences of criminal activity across any group of states is their respective rates of out-of-wedlock births. Crime rates themselves, like the proverbial canary in the coal mine, act only as sentinels, able to warn us of a present danger that usually affects them first. Once it does, however, it is too late to prevent the danger. Rather, you immediately focus all your concerns on your own survival, seeking nothing more than some means of escape. That danger will remain there, of course, until either you go back and remove it or nature gets around to sending something else in to displace it.
Clearly, taking the necessary steps to prevent this danger would save yourself all that extra grief and effort during your next forward push.
“The rights of children are what are at stake here. As society makes decisions as to what's best for everyone, children's rights cannot and must not be ignored, what's best for them needs to be put first and foremost in a legal sense.”
If a consenting man and woman have a certain unalienable right to conceive a child, there must be a general expectation both will exercise personal responsibility before, when, and after they do, since such inextricably involves the rights of another person. So we may, in order to secure these rights as well as the blessings of liberty to their posterity, choose to include among our state governments' just powers a new illegitimacy law that promotes primarily at all times and in all cases the rights of the child. For examples, it would provide that the custody of every child born out of wedlock be temporarily granted to a lawfully married man and woman — the most tried and true, safe and stable environment humankind has ever known for promoting the best interests of children — or to the state if it cannot find a suitable couple who may agree to accept such custody. Within one year, if the biological parents lawfully marry each other, or either marries someone else of the opposite sex, that married couple would have sixty days to file a custody claim. Otherwise, permanent guardianship would be granted to the foster parents if they agree to accept it, or else to another married man and woman. Whatever the case, the rights and best interests of the child would always be paramount to those of any other person or persons.
It is our choice. We may either do something like the above or continue trying and failing to live with the clearly, inevitably, and increasingly dangerous consequences to our general welfare which the bastardization of America must and always will brew for us.
Because, Øbama whines, it puts fascist totalitarians like them "at a disadvantage."
M
ake no mistake, the putzident would that it read—
I the Tyrant of the United States, in order to form a more absolute dictatorship, establish just us Democrats in permanent power, insure domestic spying on My political enemies, provide for the gutted defense, promote the generous welfare handout, and secure the bossiness of liberalism to Myself and My Democrat Party, do with My phone and My pen profane and abolish the old Constitution for the United States of America and in lieu thereof insert the following:
Article I.
Section 1. All legislative, executive, and judicial powers, both of the United States and of the several states, shall be vested in Me.
Section 2. I shall have power to do anything I wish, at any time and any place and in any manner I may wish to do it.
Article II.
I shall never be removed from office. Period!
Done in a golf course clubhouse by My consent the twenty-fourth day of May in the Year of Me fifty-three and of the despotism of the United States of America the sixth. In witness whereof I have hereunto subscribed My Name,
he biological purists argue that marriage is naturally between one man and one woman of different families, that it is meant to support a naturally stable structure in which children are created and raised and by which our species best propagates and thrives.
A few well-shopped jurists have said, in effect, "What do the laws of nature and of nature's God know?" Marriage, they and other non-biological purists counter, is between any two (or more) consenting persons. Whether opposite-sex, same-sex, or even same-kin, it should not matter. The homophobes, incestophobes, and other bigots have no case under the laws of enlightened nations.
With the issue being defined in terms of rights, not nature, it won't be long before all persons are free to choose to marry whomever they respectively wish. A man may marry his father(s), his adult brother(s), and/or his adult son(s); a woman her mother(s), adult sister(s), and/or adult daughter(s). Similarly, a woman may marry her father(s), her adult brother(s), and/or her adult son(s); a man his mother(s), adult sister(s), and/or adult daughter(s). Their right to choose should not be curtailed by bigotry, superstition, or fear.
We all have heard the propaganda of incestophobes that a same-kin marriage is more likely to produce physically or mentally challenged children than a non-kin one. "Inbreeding" is the derogatory term they use. Yet their beliefs are based solely on historical anecdote or biased "studies" that allegedly show the "dangers" of it; and their clichés and stereotypes promote only ignorance and hatred. Of course, such "concerns" are irrelevant with respect to same-sex-same-kin marriages.
Our modern view of tolerance demands that anything goes. Nothing should stop it. This is becoming especially true for the evolving construct of marriage.
Packages and school supplies raised through these organizations are transported to Iraq, free of charge, by FedEx, then distributed to Iraqi children by our brave freedom fighters.
Jackie Bruchi
