Or not.
Hamas violates its own cease-fires. It declares cease-fires and then denies that it declared them. It seems to have almost as many positions on cease-fires as John Kerry does on Iraq. Israel's unilateral cease-fires with Hamas are as worthless as its unilateral withdrawal from Gaza which allowed Hamas to take over the area. The cease-fires don't stop the fighting. They don't bring an end to the violence. That's what war is for. But John Kerry is almost as obsessed with cease-fires as he is with finding a toupee that stays put during intense windsurfing sessions. The complete uselessness of the cease-fires hasn't stopped the completely useless top diplomat from constantly proposing new ones.
orry, Hamassholes. The version 2 two-state Final Solution doesn't work when your would-be victims are better armed and won't board any cattle cars headed for death camps.
Labels: grossly negligent liberals (BIRM), liberalism: THE ideology of hate, liberals are always extreme, Obama's War on Jews, Religion of Decease, socialist injustice, Useless Nitwits, Worst. pResident. Ever.
Film at eleven.
he media on that side are, to put it politely, overtly ignorant. If our solar system had a Mt. Ignorance named felicitously in their honor, Rep. Jackson-Lee, D-Outer Space, would be asking NASA officials whether "a mere speed bump like Olympus Mons" could obstruct a rover's view of those flags our astronauts planted on the Red Planet. If a laboratory could create an element as dense as them — call it idiotardium — a yoctogram of it would be sufficient to yank Jupiter and all the other gas giants out of their orbits. If the San Andreas Fault equaled that in each one's reasoning, Sen. Harry Reid, D-Dementia, would be setting up land scams up and down Nevada's Pacific coastline. If medical science systematically studied their brainwave activity, the term "persistent vegetative state" would be redefined to mean "not as bad as it gets." If a Geiger counter could be calibrated to detect radioactive stupidity, switching it on anywhere within a thousand-mile radius of the New York Slimes building would instantly break its meter. If neuroelectricity could be harnessed to power a Taser, the total wattage inside all their craniums combined just might make it useful for mildly annoying a runt-sized amoeba. If the amount of sense they make could be transformed into a steady stream of water, it would take between now and the ending of the universe before it halfway filled up the Smallest. Thimble. Ever.
Labels: anti-America liberals (BIRM), clue-challenged liberals (BIRM), grossly negligent liberals (BIRM), idiot liberals (BIRM), liberals are always extreme, minionstream media, miserably failing liberals (BIRM)
Presippy-cup Øbangy dwoes nwot lwike mweanowel Rwepubwicans nwot gwiving hwim evwery thwing hwee wWAAAAAAAAA!!!!nts!
f being a total embarrassment were a high crime or misdemeanor, this extremely spoiled, petulant Øbamanchild would leave even Democrooks no choice but to begin immediate impeachment proceedings against him. Prestompy-foot says lies he's "trying to help people out." (Unless, by "people," he means solely himself.) Yet under his WAAAAAAAAA!!!!tch, our economy and workforce are shrinking massively. His VA is systematically mass-murdering our Vets. Iraq is in utter turmoil. Pisslamic terrorists are on the march. Contagious disease carriers are streaming freely across our southern border. Part-time jobs are replacing and about to overtake full-time ones. His "affordable" "care" act is causing health insurance premiums and deductibles to skyrocket — with millions upon millions still uninsured or losing insurance. People are losing doctors they like. Public assistance, disability rolls, and child poverty are at all-time highs. His "official" unemployment rates are over 60 percent higher than President Bush's. There's no real "recovery." He keeps irresponsibly and unpatriotically piling on our and our descendants' shoulders mountains upon mountains of debt. His own party all but unanimously condemns his so-called budgets. The Supreme Court is unanimously condemning his lawlessness. His IRS systematically suppresses the free-speech activities of his political "enemies" before his reelection, then destroys the evidence showing its full extent. He leaves an American ambassador behind to die in Libya and a Marine to rot unjustly in a Mexican prison. He trades away five top Taliban terrorist leaders for a single treasonous deserter. Golfing and vacationing appear to be his primary "job." He keeps re-proposing things that have already been tried and never worked. He's waged a cruel war on our coal industry. He's dithered away a major jobs-making pipeline and forced Canada to sell its affordable oil to Asia instead of us. He keeps letting foreign leaders walk all over us. He bows to them while telling us to kiss his butt. Clearly, what he's really been trying to do is hurt the American people. Again, can we yes impeach this treasonous, high crimes-committing felon now?
Labels: clue-challenged liberals (BIRM), greedy and selfish liberals (BIRM), grossly negligent liberals (BIRM), Impeach.Obama.Now., liberals are always extreme, lying liberals (BIRM), Worst. pResident. Ever.
Three, five, and seven out of every ten of its white, Latino, and black members, respectively, born outside of marriage.
he bastardization of America does not come without a particularly unsavory brew of unintended consequences. Most discernible among its more potent ingredients is an upwardly-trending crime rate, which yields a highly disagreeable aftertaste (see state-by-state comparison below). The problems bemoaned by Heritage Foundation researcher Mary Clare Reim and liberals only get worse with each succeeding batch. - Between 1980 and 2012 incarceration rates have more than doubled in the U.S. and are now more than six times that of the typical nation in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
Perhaps because we are not throwing the original offenders in jail, Mary? As commenter Francis Schultz puts it, - One of the few times I have been disappointed in a Heritage Foundation article. The vast, vast majority of inmates who are sentenced to state and federal prison are there because they have earned it. If federal and state legislatures want to reduce crime and the number of inmates they need to quit paying women to have babies. I have been a prosecutor for 17 years and I see a huge correlation between crime and the breakdown of the family.
Exactly. The furthest thing from being in the best interests of any child is allowing him or her to reside with the most irresponsible person imaginable: A "mother" who had that child out of wedlock. We all know or should know the facts. For example, examination of families with the same race and same parental education shows that, when compared to intact married families, children from single-parent homes are: - More than twice as likely to be arrested for a juvenile crime;
- Twice as likely to be treated for emotional and behavioral problems;
- Roughly twice as likely to be suspended or expelled from school; and
- A third more likely to drop out before completing high school.
The effects of being raised in a single-parent home continue into adulthood. Comparing families of the same race and similar incomes, children from broken and single-parent homes are three times more likely to end up in jail by the time they reach age 30 than are children raised in intact married families. Compared to girls raised in similar married families, girls from single-parent homes are more than twice as likely to have a child without being married, thereby repeating the negative cycle for another generation. Finally, the decline of marriage generates poverty in future generations. Children living in single-parent homes are 50 percent more likely to experience poverty as adults when compared to children from intact married homes. This intergenerational poverty effect persists even after adjusting for the original differences in family income and poverty during childhood.
Another state-by-state comparison bears out that effect: Indeed, out-of-wedlock births appear to be far more accurate predictors of crime-rate trends than the extremely mindless poverty-rate excuse psychotically touted by every excessively emoting liberal(birm). There is nothing brave or noble about chronically subjecting any child to such a dastardly form of abuse. It is cruel, selfish, unfair, heartless, unjust, immature, careless, neglectful, and yes, immoral. The turpitude of it alone should raise that abuse to the level of an infamous crime. The thoughtlessly irresponsible claim, "But my choosing to be an unwed mother doesn't hurt anybody!" Really? In addition to the innocent newborn on whom you are about to inflict decades of otherwise preventable abuse, you can include all the individuals and society at-large forced to suffer and endure the extreme selfishness, disregard for others, self-entitlement, and overall lack of basic empathy and morals you will no doubt impart to him or her and he or she will, in turn, far more likely than others, callously and even violently inflict on them, who are going to be needlessly and fundamentally harmed. But you do not care, else you would have never been a willing partner in the commission of so selfish and grievous an offense. If no one forced you to conceive and birth a bastard, then no, you cannot force others to face any of the messy consequences directly stemming from your grossly negligent choice. Intentionally or negligently having a child out of wedlock should be prima facie evidence of child endangerment. As alluded to earlier, except in the alleged minds of liberals and other criminal enablers, a prevailing state of poverty does not create crime. If it did, Mississippi would have the highest crime rate and Washington, D.C. close to the lowest. In light of available data, the far more reasonable place to start finding an explanation for increasing incidences of criminal activity across any group of states is their respective rates of out-of-wedlock births. Crime rates themselves, like the proverbial canary in the coal mine, act only as sentinels, able to warn us of a present danger that usually affects them first. Once it does, however, it is too late to prevent the danger. Rather, you immediately focus all your concerns on your own survival, seeking nothing more than some means of escape. That danger will remain there, of course, until either you go back and remove it or nature gets around to sending something else in to displace it. Clearly, taking the necessary steps to prevent this danger would save yourself all that extra grief and effort during your next forward push. “The rights of children are what are at stake here. As society makes decisions as to what's best for everyone, children's rights cannot and must not be ignored, what's best for them needs to be put first and foremost in a legal sense.” If a consenting man and woman have a certain unalienable right to conceive a child, there must be a general expectation both will exercise personal responsibility before, when, and after they do, since such inextricably involves the rights of another person. So we may, in order to secure these rights as well as the blessings of liberty to their posterity, choose to include among our state governments' just powers a new illegitimacy law that promotes primarily at all times and in all cases the rights of the child. For examples, it would provide that the custody of every child born out of wedlock be temporarily granted to a lawfully married man and woman — the most tried and true, safe and stable environment humankind has ever known for promoting the best interests of children — or to the state if it cannot find a suitable couple who may agree to accept such custody. Within one year, if the biological parents lawfully marry each other, or either marries someone else of the opposite sex, that married couple would have sixty days to file a custody claim. Otherwise, permanent guardianship would be granted to the foster parents if they agree to accept it, or else to another married man and woman. Whatever the case, the rights and best interests of the child would always be paramount to those of any other person or persons. It is our choice. We may either do something like the above or continue trying and failing to live with the clearly, inevitably, and increasingly dangerous consequences to our general welfare which the bastardization of America must and always will brew for us.
Labels: a Republic if we can keep it, greedy and selfish liberals (BIRM), grossly negligent liberals (BIRM), inconvenient facts, liberals are always extreme, out-of-touch liberals (BIRM), socialist injustice
Saturday, December 29, 2012 |
Read Our Lips: No New Spending
o let the rich pay their Fair Share™. Except that every "little bit" more they pay must be used exclusively to reduce the national debt. That means no more raises in the debt ceiling. We better start living within our means for a change, else sooner rather than later, everything will go over the cliff. Let us be absolutely clear: All money from all these new taxes, which may not be spent on anything new, will actually make our federal budget less unbalanced. It really would mean A More Balanced Approach®. Make no mistake: The smaller the budget deficit the less new debt is added to the nation's books. Of course, with the debt ceiling permanently pegged at its current record level, real spending cuts would be the only alternative greedy spendaholics in Washington could consider for decreasing that deficit even further. As every credit card owner who's financially in trouble knows, when you've maxed out all your cards and no card company will give you another credit increase, you simply can't keep spending more than you take in. You have to finally start paying off that debt. Which means you have to cut down on your overall spending. This compromise isn't an ideal solution to the out-of-control spending problem we're facing. Higher taxes will slow down and in all likelihood damage, for years to come, vital portions of our economy, and thus significantly hinder every effort to achieve a full recovery. Under the present circumstances, however, it is the most effectual means at our disposal to get Washington to spend less and act more responsibly. And if that doesn't work, we're all doomed.
Labels: greedy and selfish liberals (BIRM), grossly negligent liberals (BIRM), liberals are always extreme, socialist injustice, tax'n'spend liberals (BIRM), thieving liberals (BIRM), Worst. pResident. Ever.
Baracrook Insane Øgutless not only didn't, but cowardly abandoned them the moment he heard they were in trouble.
on't count on Øbamemyselfandi bothering to help you even when yes he can and should. If helping you would interfere in any way with his constant campaigning for political office, you're on your own. Got al-Qaeda terrorists breathing down your neck? Sorry, he's off to Vegas. Desperately need back-up? Without it you'll die? Too bad. Don't even hope he'll change his schedule. He has time only to raise money for his campaign, not to save anyone's life. The most "help" you'll ever get from him is when you come home in a body bag, and he has his sidekick come over and compliment your grieving family on your now lifeless balls. What, you don't find any comfort in that? I would say "go tell it to the Marines" (at least while you still can). But he's made that impossible for you, too. After all, he had to privatize and outsource their jobs. The only real hope for justice you'll find is posthumously, when someone — either your family or President Romney's attorney general, or both — drags Øbamurderer and his whole lying crew of liars into court for their criminal negligence which led directly to your wrongful death.
Labels: 2012: end of an err0r, grossly negligent liberals (BIRM), liberals are always extreme, lying liberals (BIRM), Obama hates military people, Obama's War on Americans, Worst. pResident. Ever.
As his son's flag-draped casket was being taken off the plane from Libya.
irst ØLiar willfully and knowingly neglected to take any action to save our heroes in the hours they were under enemy attack, before their selfless sacrifice. Then he and his regime intentionally dishonored them and their families with crudities and lies. Utterly defeating Baracrook Øbloquy in eleven days is the only way to keep the stain of that dishonor from indelibly attaching itself to our whole nation.
Labels: 2012: end of an err0r, aided and comforted enemies, al-Qaeda in Libya, grossly negligent liberals (BIRM), justice delayed, liberals are always extreme, lying liberals (BIRM), Worst. pResident. Ever.
Unprecedented failure in real time.
ere you blind, Øblew-it? Why did you miserably fail to step in and save our own ambassador and his three American colleagues when you literally saw them dying right before your eyes? Were their screams that you must have heard over your phone too un-"optimal" to interfere with your beddy-bye time? Was it more important for you to get a good night's sleep before your campaign fundraiser and TV appearance the next day rather than do your flukin' duty and act like a president? At 3 AM, the phone rang and the surveillance videos were playing in real time, but where were you? Getting your "beauty" "eye-candy" sleep? Don't worry. After November 6, you'll be getting plenty more chances to blissfully enjoy such uninterrupted sleep. Except then it won't have any chance to cause even more needless American deaths, because you'll be out of a "job." We'll have a new president who'll be putting out the flames you made happen — one who will not rest until he has actually rebuilt our country.
Labels: 2012: end of an err0r, grossly negligent liberals (BIRM), liberals are always extreme, miserably failing liberals (BIRM), narcissist liberals (BIRM), Obama's War on Americans, Worst. pResident. Ever.
|
Jackie Bruchi
