Ask him about his unprecedented, disastrous debt and he changes the subject, passes the buck, and... wait for it... Blames Teh Bush!!!11!!1!™
nything bad that happens, even a hundred years from now, no doubt will be all Bush's Fault!® according to this clØwn.
Only one problem with his extreme "I didn't build that, somebody else made that happen" buck-passing version of events: George Bush wasn't in office these last 1,346 days; and ØLiar and his fellow extremist Demøfascists need only look in a mirror to find out who's really at fault.
Which party controlled Congress the two years previous to Obama's election as President? Why, it was the Democrats. Who passed that budget that Obama "inherited"? The Democrat-controlled House and Senate — including a Senator named Barack Obama. And which President signed it into force with an omnibus spending bill in March 2009? Obama did, which means he inherited the budget and its deficit from himself.
Baracklueless Kardashian Øbuckpasser did build that. No one else made that happen.
"The future must not belong to Behead those who slander the prophet of Islam." Of course, the future can't belong to anyone who's dead.
Obama needs to understand that Islamic law does not merely frown upon particularly loud and insulting criticisms of Mohammed, and it doesn't recommend believers refute "insults" through the vigorous exercise of their own free speech. No one is burning down U.S. embassies to protest unflattering depictions of Jesus Christ or Holocaust denial.
Putting all of this on the same plane of equivalency is offensive. That "crude and disgusting video" does not occupy the same solar system of outrage as violent mobs, let alone organized terror attacks on American embassy officials. Every religion must, to some degree, grapple with the issue of "tolerating" those of different faiths, but in the modern world, only one of them routinely expresses its intolerance through large-scale violence.
owardly liberals(birm) never bow and scrape to insulted Christians the way they always do to insulted muslims.
In fact, most of the time it's liberals who're the ones demonstrating overt disrespect and intolerance towards the Christian faithful. Witness, for examples, the Nürnberger Gesetze Øfascist"Care" prejudicial prohibition against any exercise of their religion which is substantively in conflict with that dictatorial law's "free" abortion and birth control provisions; as well as the extremely bigoted view of intolerant liberal Øfascist himself that "it's not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to religion as a way to explain their frustrations."
It is now abundantly clear that all concessions liberals must be ever willing to make are reserved solely for the manifestly violent members of liberals' most protected class: the cult of islam.
Were Christians as bloodthirsty as muslims, no doubt craven liberals would be bending over backwards just as far in the hopes of appeasing them too.
rom "he paid no taxes" to "he paid too much taxes," crazed deluded freak liberals(birm) have shown they'll be angry at soon-to-be President-elect Mitt Romney no matter what he does.
Indeed, no liberal in history ever hated anybody else because he paid more than he had to in taxes.
No, the real reason fascist deranged liberals(birm) rabidly hate him has to do with something they'll never come to grips with while they still allow it to eat themselves away from inside.
Clearly, an overwhelming portion of their intensely demonstrated animosity toward soon-to-be President Mitt Romney is based on the fact that he is a white man.
Make no mistake: It's why liberal "reporter" propagandist Brian Williams, "quoting" unnamed "sources," asked the soon-to-be 45th President whether he was going to pick "an incredibly boring white guy" as his running mate.
Yes we can see now that "taxes" is just the latest code word these hate-filled liberacists are using to stir up racial hatred against our next president.
This is Crackerization™: "You are not one of us, you are like the scary white man who we've been trained to fear."
First, on a regular and continuing basis she used her Cambridge office for the practice of law without being licensed in Massachusetts. Second, in addition to operating an office for the practice of law without being licensed in Massachusetts, [Demøliar] Warren actually practiced law in Massachusetts without being licensed....
[Demøliar] Warren is not licensed to practice law in Massachusetts. [Demøliar] Warren's name does not turn up on a search of the Board of Bar Overseers attorney search website (searches just by last name or using Elizabeth Herring also do not turn up any relevant entries).... [According to that Board,] there was no record of [Demøliar] Warren ever having been admitted to practice in Massachusetts.
[Demøliar] Warren's own listing of her Bar admissions is consistent with not being licensed in Massachusetts....
Regardless... [Demøliar] Warren consistently since the late 1990s has held herself out as having her professional address for legal representation at her Harvard Law School office in Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Forked-tongue Eliarbeth of the Cheatokee's Anissahole Clan is in heap big doo-doo.
OK, so spontaneous protesters didn't build that military-class arsenal used to kill our ambassador and three other Americans in Libya. Somebody else made that happen.
But let me be absolutely clear: No, we can't figure out who, other than maybe perhaps some person or persons we may or may not at this point, or one in the future, characterize as Man Caused Disasterers™ "terrorists" or not.
What a jØke. No wonder al-Qaeda is moving FORWARD® with such brazen attacks on U.S. citizens and interests. What do they have to fear from this overly apologetic clØwn? Their ears bleeding from hearing the word "sorry" too much?
peaking of used car salesmen, they may want to take a pass on all the ØbamaVolts® that are about the hit the pre-owned market. The U.S. Department of General Motors can't even give away any of the new ones now. Regular consumers with IQs higher than artichokes' just aren't buying. So the demand for earlier models undoubtedly is going to be, in economic terms, zilch.
As for consumers with IQs less than artichokes': Well, just remember, car dealers, liberals never like spending any of their own money. Just other people's. After all, Østingy and Bidunce gave only 15 percent of their combined incomes to charity. Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan gave a whopping 29 percent. So if any liberals ever do come on your lot it won't be to buy but to øbnoxiously bleat on and on about how it's their Living-Constitutional Right™ to Get and Drive ØbamaVolts®. And don't even think about asking they pay you something other than a backhanded compliment on your incredible luck at being the dealership — you know, the one "you didn't build" — which they'd decided oh so generously to grace with their exalted presence. Otherwise they'll call you a Big Evil Greedy Corporation that wants to steal from the poor and, of course, racist!
Because thieves liberals always think feel they're "entitled" to take what somebody else has.
Lying Baracrook ØLiar's lying attempt to Blame Bush!™ for Øbamurderer's deadly, unaccountable Get Mexican Civilians & U.S. Border Patrol Agents Horribly Killed Fast & Furious program is just another in an endless stream of desperate and pathetic buck passing, cover ups, and lies.
I think it's important for us to understand that the Fast and Furious program was a field-initiated program begun under the previous administration.
ou lie, ØLiar!
That entirely different program ended two years before you became Liar-in-Chief. It even had a different name. It was far smaller. But most importantly, it had infinitely more accountable procedures in place and no one died as a result.
Your murderous program, on the other hand, which you built and made happen by your lonesome, was and still is totally unaccountable, and hundreds of Mexican civilians and at least one U.S. Border Agent have died because of what you yourself did.
Should the families of those gunned-down Mexican civilians and our Border Agent be thanking you too for getting their loved ones killed? Should you be "amused" by them also?
If President Bush had done anything close to what you did, you'd have been the first one to shoot his mouth off about it every chance he could, demanding the president's immediate resignation — if not arrest, trial, and conviction — for clearly being such a top accomplice to so many innocent people's murders.
But, no. You have to lie and shift blame and try to cover up your homicidal deed. That's not responsible leadership. That's the mark of a contemptible failure. A heinous crook whose only regret is that he got caught.
Yes, that's really the only thing we can expect of you now, isn't it?
What's actually important for us to understand is that, no, you just can't bring yourself to take responsible for anything you did build and made happen.
Lied when he said "protesters" massacred our ambassador and his fellow Americans in Libya. Now this:
ppearing on the Letterman Show Øbamasskissing Spectacle™, after he stood up the head of state of America's strongest ally in the Middle East in the middle of an evolving international crises over there, lying ØLiar lied that—
One thing I've never tried to do is – and I think none of us can do in public office – is suggest that because someone doesn't agree with me that they're victims, or they're unpatriotic, or they don't have a sense of responsibility.
Never tried to do that, lying ØLiar? Have you already forgotten this?—
Number 43 added four trillion dollars by his lonesome – that's irresponsible, that's unpatriotic.
Was that your equally evil twin brother who said that about President Bush?
So, if it was "irresponsible" and "unpatriotic" for him to add four trillion dollars to our national debt, what does that make you? You've added nearly six trillion to it!
Bill Wilson, president of Americans for Limited Government, criticized the president for adding "more debt in a single term than any president in American history."
"By the time his fiscal year 2013 spending has fully gone into effect, Obama will have added a full $5.823 trillion to the debt," he said. "Obama cannot blame his predecessors. By his policies alone ... Obama will have increased the national debt by 46.9 percent by the end of calendar year 2012."
Of course that all pales in comparison next to how much more of a pathologically lying liar you are than he could — including inside any of your and your lying comrade fascist liberal liars' pathetic psychotic fantasies — ever even try to be.
Now we are engaged in a great clash of wills, testing whether that deception, or any deception so conceived and so dedicated, can long fool us. We are met on a great campaign-trail between those wills. We have come to dedicate the last leg of that trail as the best new starting place for those who here solemnly vow that that deception must die. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this.
But, in a larger sense, we cannot dedicate — we cannot consecrate — we cannot hallow — this ground. Our brave Troops, living and dead, who struggled to support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic, have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note, nor long remember what Øgabe read off his teleprompter, but it can never forget or forgive what he did here. It is for us the lovers of Liberty, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who are fighting overseas have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us — that from these sacrificers of everything except Duty, Honor, Country we take increased devotion to that cause for which they are willing to gave, and too often have given the last full measure of devotion — that we here highly resolve that lyingdespotØbraindead'sself-serving,dangerouslyincompetent,miserablyfailed political "career" and his whole disgraceful,extremely harmful regime shall die horribly and in vain — that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom — and that government of the people, by the people, for the people (who shall never "belong" to it) shall not perish from the earth.
If not a ridiculously bald-faced lie, why are they also invading other countries' embassies when those countries never had anything to do with the film?
big Lie Number Two:
The rocket propelled grenades and other military-issue weapons the protesters [sic] used are plentiful over there. Every corner grocery store sells them.
Except the regulation of guns in Egypt is extremely restrictive, and the possession or sale of guns by any civilian in Libya is absolutely prohibited.
Øbig Lie Number Three:
The protests [sic] were all spontaneous. No one saw them coming.
Except CNN is reporting that "three days before the deadly assault on the United States consulate in Libya, a local security official says he met with American diplomats in the city and warned them about deteriorating security." Oh, and the interim leader of that country is saying the protests invasions and assassinations do appear preplanned.
Or does ØLiar "think" feel the "protesters" just "spontaneously" found out about the ambassador's top-secret "safe" house where they launched military rockets at him and his party? If so, he's worse than a big liar. He's a total Øbamoron.
Øbig Lie Number Four:
It was completely wrong of Mitt Romney to call Øbamiserable Failure's miserable failure a miserable failure!
Except that Øbamiserable Failure did the same thing right after the 2008 attack in Iraq which left nine of our Soldiers dead. "You know, was it a wise thing to go in there and what are the costs and benefits of staying there indefinitely?" he rudely asked while their bodies were still warm.
According to senior diplomatic sources, the US State Department had credible information 48 hours before mobs charged the consulate in Benghazi, and the embassy in Cairo, that American missions may be targeted.
nstead of taking appropriate actions, Øbungler's minion in Cairo "neutralized any US military capability that was dedicated to preserve her life and protect the US Embassy."
Instead of asking the Capitulator-in-Chief about his unprecedented miserable failures, his Lap Dog Media® are desperately tying to divert the American people's attention away from those failues: "It's all Romney's fault!" they scream.
"Mobs" in Egypt viciously attack our embassy, and, no, Ødither can't tell whether they're our enemy or not?
Baracklueless, how about just apologizing to Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood again? When you roll out the red carpet for them next week, give them one of your famous bows and offer them more of your extremely panderous and predictable fluff.
ur diplomats massacred. Our embassies invaded, occupied, and destroyed. Our enemies emboldened. Our allies abandoned and betrayed.
"This is what democracy looks like"?
If it's hordes of violent, marauding islamøfascists taking over county after country and ambushing and killing defenseless American officials because somebody "hurt the religious feelings of Muslims," then the whole Øbamaladministration wouldn't be as fantastically wrong, misguided, pigheaded, weak, and gutless as its failure-in-chief and his policies of appease first, surrender later keep making it appear to the entire world.
Perhaps Øbower ought to personally bow lower to these islamurdering animals. In the Hope™, of course, they'll eatsodomize him last.
ow did members of the "mob" in Lybia know exactly where our ambassador would be so yes they could go butcher him and other American citizens?
He was being "secretly" moved to a "safe" location when that "small and savage group" ambushed him. Clearly, they were tipped off.
Now, Her Nibs the Secretary of State says "we're working with the government of Libya to secure our diplomats." Are there any left who can be secured? More importantly, why would she want to work with a government that failed so miserably to provide security?
The dangerous incompetence of this misadministration is simply staggering.
It apologizes to violent Muslims while condemning peaceful Americans.
It does nothing to stop the threats to our and our allies' security.
White House spokeswoman Jen Psaki confirmed that the administration pegs the current deficit at $1.3 trillion, or 9.2% of the overall [dismal] economy, and projects that in four years the deficit will be down to $533 billion, or 3% of the economy as measured by the gross domestic product.
"The budget will cut the deficit that the president inherited upon assuming office at least in half by the end of his first term," said Kenneth Baer, a spokesman for the Office of Management and Budget.
ast førward43 straight months of 8 percent or higher unemployment:
But the budget deficit projected for 2012 in his latest budget is $1.327 trillion ["revised" late last month to $1.1 trillion], the fourth year in a row with deficits that high. Until President Obama, no federal deficit had ever been anywhere near $1 trillion. The previous all time record was $458.6 billion, less than half one trillion, in 2008 in the depths of the financial crisis.
In sharp contrast, under [upcoming Vice President Paul] Ryan's budget, even with CBO's static scoring, the federal deficit would be reduced by at least 86% by 2017, in just 5 years, to $182 billion. That deficit under Ryan's budget would be less than 1% of GDP by 2017, at 0.9%, where it stabilizes for 6 years to the end of the 10 year budget window. Most importantly, given the sharp tax rate cuts in Ryan's budget, with dynamic scoring the budget would probably be balanced by that 5th year, 2017. That is because in the real world the rate cuts will not lose nearly as much revenue as CBO scores.
So the American people can now decide. Do they want to move rapidly towards a balanced budget? Or do they want to maintain ongoing record deficits?
WH spokesliar: "No, the pResident can't count to 4 because he lost two fingers on his counting hand during his personal hand-to-hand combat with bin Laden."
Even President Bush weighed in. On Thursday, he said that both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac needed to complete a "robust reform package" before they expanded their mortgage portfolios.
The statement drew fire from many Democratic lawmakers on Capitol Hill.
Christopher J. Dodd, the chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, called upon President Bush to "immediately reconsider his ill-advised" position as problems in the housing market worsen.
In an interview yesterday, Barney Frank, the chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, said that the president's comments were "inane."
"Tell the Republicans to stop blocking the bill," Mr. Frank said. If the president "is saying that 'I don't want to support any increase until we pass the reforms,' then you pass the bill and the bill takes care of that."
Mr. Frank, like many Democrats, argued that increasing Fannie Mae's mortgage portfolio was important because the government-sponsored enterprises could provide both liquidity to the market and were more willing to work out problem loans.
But others suggested that the move would mainly help Fannie Mae's financial performance.
Josh Rosner, a managing director at Graham Fisher & Company, said that it was unclear whether Fannie would be using the portfolio to generate profits for shareholders by buying illiquid secondary market securities or help potential homeowners.
"Their spreads are still pretty tight. They don't need the portfolios to do business," Mr. Rosner said. "They are one of the only places in the mortgage world that can actually securitize."
Besides, he said, it would be absurd to increase the size of their holdings until the extent of their exposure to subprime loans and other exotic mortgage products, like interest-only and negative-amortization loans, was better known.
"We don't know the true condition of their books, because they still aren't current in their filings; they still have internal- control weaknesses," Mr. Rosner said.
"They are sort of saying: raise our cap. Trust us. It wasn't too long ago, frankly a couple of years ago, that we had them say trust us only to find out they were untrustworthy.
Have Demøgoof-offs passed any budget to control federal spending in the last three years?
The only thing Demøfascists want to do is fundamentally transform all Americans into a Vast Left-Wing Collective™ in which "the only thing we all belong to" is government.
Except the only collective they'll be seeing in this lifetime is the sigh of relief all freedom-loving Americans will be breathing the day after 11/6, when Demøcrooks start packing en masse for their long overdue moves out of Washington and out of power and out of our lives and livelihoods forever.