irst and foremost, I am thankful for being born, raised, and hope to die an American. There is no other country on the face of the earth, now or at anytime in the past, which has done more or given so much for the cause and advancement of individual human freedom. Some have tried. A few of those were remarkably successful. Compared to the United States of America, even the best of them still around are so far behind us in this monumental endeavor that their best hope of moving forward is to follow our lead and embrace our example. God bless our wonderful country. She is more precious to us fallible, stumbling human beings than any but the most purely appreciative could ever know.
Which brings me to our Troops, especially those fighting on battlefields as far from these freedoms we in this country enjoy as anyone could ever get before entering Hell itself, battling the very forces of it which would like nothing more than to destroy not only all such freedoms but even the least possibility of anyone enjoying them ever again. You are our heroes. In every sense a noble word like that — which you, by your inordinate acts of courage and sacrifice, always make much too inadequate — could have. Your grateful nation thanks you, appreciates you, remembers you on this and every other day, and prays for you and your family, and for your quick and safe return to them.
To our brave Combat Soldiers, Sailors, Marines, Airmen, and Guardsmen, thank you for keeping us all free and safe. You, more than anyone else, have kept this dream we call America alive and well. You are the best Americans, better than we have a right to hope but the merest deserving of were not for God amply blessing us and our country with such incomparable men as yourselves.
Because of what our Troops are doing for all of us I am able to be with my family today, warmed and renewed by that crowded, semi-crazed gathering known as Thanksgiving Dinner and just otherwise being in their presence, all the while secure in the knowledge they each will continue to live in a country that each and every day gives each and every one of us more reasons than I could possibly spell out during only this one date on the calendar, to say, "Thank you, Lord, for Your grace in creating and protecting for Your children the greatest country on earth."
That's because she's the leading purveyor of Brown Privilege™ in our her al-Qongress. Which makes her one of its topmost racists.
How else is a race-based panderer going to get the Racist Vote® for her Demoracist Party if she can't engage in blatant acts of protective racism?
It's been less than a week since New York's Sen. Hillary Clinton and Gov. Eliot Spitzer had to climb down from their support of driver's licenses for illegal aliens. Now House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has moved to kill an amendment that would protect employers from federal lawsuits for requiring their workers to speak English.
Being a staunch anti-English racist, Screecher Peloseri hates "you people" who speak only English. So it's no surprise she would abuse her high office and its powers to protect her fellow racists and their racist aims.
She just wants her al-Qongress to stay the racially-driven Peculiar Institution of extremists it inevitably became, to everyone's growing disgust, after Americans remorsefully allowed her Demoslaverat Party to be its master.
Among the employers targeted by such lawsuits: the Salvation Army.
Being a staunch anti-Christian bigot as well, Segregator Pelooni can't stand the Christian-connoted "salvation" in that organization's name.
But she has no problem marching right out there with the Brown Privilege™ Army, standing in all the doorways of her al-Qongress to block the admittance of anyone so uppity as to demand nothing more than the truly equal protections of America's laws.
Sen. Lamar Alexander, a moderate Republican from Tennessee, is dumbstruck that legislation he views as simple common sense would be blocked.
That's because Missa Peloopi's racism, like that exhibited by her racist colleagues, trumps common sense, Senator Alexander.
She'll lose her racist grip over her plantation House if she doesn't viciously block all common-sense efforts such as yours to end racial discrimination against English-speaking people.
He noted that the full Senate passed his amendment to shield the Salvation Army by 75-19 last month, and the House followed suit with a 218-186 vote just this month. "I cannot imagine that the framers of the 1964 Civil Rights Act intended to say that it's discrimination for a shoe shop owner to say to his or her employee, 'I want you to be able to speak America's common language on the job,'" he told the Senate last Thursday.
Nor did the Civil Rights Act's framers intend there to be a protected Brown Privilege™ that discriminates against People of Common Language, either.
Of course they never expected an overtly racist speaker like Ninny Proracist (D-KKKalifexico) would ever be running the House of Representatives and turning it into her own racially-divided plantation.
But that's exactly what the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is trying to do. In March the EEOC sued the Salvation Army because its thrift store in Framingham, Mass., required its employees to speak English on the job. The requirement was clearly posted and employees were given a year to learn the language. The EEOC claimed the store had fired two Hispanic employees for continuing to speak Spanish on the job. It said that the firings violated the law because the English-only policy was not "relevant" to job performance or safety.
Your government at "work," Mr. & Mrs. America.
Let's see how speaking English isn't "relevant" in an English-speaking country:
Prospective Donor: I'd like to contribute a million dollars to the Salvation Army today.
Brown Privilege™ Employee: No entiendo su lengua.
Prospective Donor: What?
Brown Privilege™ Employee: Hable en español, por favor.
Prospective Donor: Oh, never mind.
Manager: Don't pick up that box of donated food. We just found out it's full of deadly botulism.
Brown Privilege™ Employee: No entiendo su lengua.
Brown Privilege™ Employee: Hable en español, por favor.
Manager: Oh, never mind.
Obviously, there's no reason anyone enjoying the Brown Privilege™ deliberately protected by Nanny Panderi's al-Qongress has to actually intermingle with those people at his job.
"If it is not relevant, it is discriminatory, it is gratuitous, it is a subterfuge to discriminate against people based on national origin," says Rep. Charles Gonzalez of Texas, one of several Hispanic Democrats in the House who threatened to block Ms. Pelosi's attempts to curtail the Alternative Minimum Tax unless she killed the Alexander amendment.
One of Speaker of the House Racist of the Plantation Bigoti's racist colleagues saying and doing racist-based things?
Did the sun rise in the east that morning or something?
Just as unsurprising, we're seeing on Missa Pethugi's Plantation the first rumblings of a wide-scale revolt coming from her own beaten and whipped servants.
The confrontation on the night of Nov. 8 was ugly. Members of the Hispanic Caucus initially voted against the rule allowing debate on a tax bill that included the AMT "patch," which for a year would protect some 23 million Americans from being kicked into a higher income tax bracket.
Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, a moderate from Maryland, was beside himself. Congressional Quarterly reports that he jabbed his finger on the House floor at Joe Baca, the California Democrat who chairs the Hispanic Caucus, and yelled, "How dare you destroy this party? This will be the worst loss in 10 years."
Well, seems Missa Nincompoopi's racially-motivated protection of Brown Privilege™ and pandering to race-baiting racists in her racism-steeped party's Plantation House will have one positive outcome after all.
The racist, extremist, separatist Race-Based Caucus chair Massa Joe Baca's wild-eyed responses are described in the remainder of Mr. Fund's article.
urtle Bay (Asssocialisted Press) – United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-moon[bat] today announced the formation of a new international secretariat to create and operate an alternative global Internet system which would compete directly with the current, US-based one accessed by millions of users every microsecond.
Mr. Ki-moon[bat] said the US-based system is "monopolistic and corrupt and impossibly unreformable." The new system, he says, would be "run completely by an international body that will use United Nations resources [funded mostly at US taxpayers' taxedsuckers' expense, of course] to offer a more world-friendly Internet experience for everyone."
The new body, titled the United Nations World Online Resource and Knowledge Access Base Using Localless Lines (or simply UNWORKABULL), would run a separate Internet infrastructure headed by a special UN deputy secretary.
Calling it "New World Online," Mr. Ki-moon[bat] expects that the UN-managed system will eventually replace the US-based one and become the sole means of all peoples' access to the Internet.
"We will control it. We will run it. But most importantly, you[We] will like it," he said.
Users of the new Internet — or "HumaNET," as it would be known [™'s be damned] — will notice some very substantial differences between it and the current Internet.
Most noticeably, all users are charged a "fee for access" paid directly to the United Nations every time they log on to the HumaNET. The amount of that fee is still being discussed, but many observers close to the discussions feel it "won't be unreasonable — a few pennies or so at the most, that's all."
Also, no private company will be allowed to offer consumers telephone, cable, or wireless access to the HumaNET. Instead, UNWORKABULL will set up branches in every country for opening "world citizen accounts," with each account directly managed and monitored by a central office at United Nations headquarters.
Web-site ownership will be a thing of the past as well. Instead of a World Wide Web, the "World Wide Commons[Commune]" is what people are going to browse.
According to UNWORKABULL's published rulebook, domains are alloted only to "those persons and organizations committed to promoting world peace and unity." Further, no domain "trustee" may ever claim "any ownership whatsoever beyond that which the Deputy Secretary for UNWORKABULL deems absolutely necessary over any of the material offered anywhere by him/her/other" on the domain. This rule, Mr. Ki-moon[bat] says, is needed to ensure a "totally share and share alike" environment across the HumaNET.
Everything users see and hear on the HumaNET will respectively have a new look and sound, too.
Under UNWORKABULL's rules, "Every World Wide Commons[Commune] site, page, document, file, image, video, power point presentation, or other screen-viewable material must visibly and prominently display at all times the official United Nations logo." Music and other audio files, such as MP3 downloads, would each contain an officially approved 10-second snippet of either "It's A Small World (After All)" or "I'd Like To Teach The World To Sing (In Perfect Harmony)" at the beginning.
"This World Wide Commons[Commune] is everyone's," Mr. Ki-moon[bat] said. "Our job is to make sure it stays that way."
Part of that job, he says, is prohibiting "hate speech of any kind" on the HumaNET. Filters and methods for blocking and eliminating what he describes as "undesirable" material or even whole sites on the World Wide Commons[Commune] would be a mandatory feature.
An example Mr. Ki-moon[bat] gives is the presence and propagation of "climate-change denial" sites and messages on the current Internet. "The United Nations has, in effect, declared such denial to be criminally irresponsible. So it will find no place on our[Our] World Wide Commons[Commune]."
UNWORKABULL plans to start opening world-citizen accounts for users as soon as the United Nations approves its initial budget[bilks US taxpayers taxedsuckers — again].
But like a battered, frightened, and intimidated spouse, every al-jazeernalist rationalizes it all away and says to herself, "My spouse really loves me. Look, I have the cuts and bruises to prove it!"
ichael Crowley, in his New Republicarticle subtitled "Clinton's strategy for crushing the media," says,
In January 1993, Hillary Clinton granted her first newspaper interview as First Lady. But, rather than agreeing to sit down with a national reporter to discuss issues of substance, Hillary would only meet with a food reporter from The New York Times — and then only to discuss her hostess duties. Later, other reporters who wanted to question her about policy were told to submit written questions. "Her ground-zero assumption is that [a reporter is] an asshole," a senior Hillary aide told her biographer, Carl Bernstein.
Clinton's wariness was forged by her husband's nightmarish experience on the 1992 campaign trail. Battered by stories about Bill's mistresses and financial dealings, Hillary seethed at the press and resolved to control their coverage. Bill disliked the press, too — but not with the loathing of his wife, who even tried to throw the press out of the White House itself. In January 1993, she and her friend Susan Thomases proposed to move the White House press room next door, to the sleepy Old Executive Office Building. When that scheme was deemed untenable, aides closed off a hallway connecting the press room to the West Wing. Outraged reporters pounced on press secretary George Stephanopoulos, who later recalled thinking, "I'm not your problem; Hillary is. ... [Bill] Clinton seems to be on my side. He asked me again this morning why we were closing the door. Um, have you talked to your wife about this, Mr. President?"
Hillary's first instinct was usually to stonewall the press. When New York Times reporter Jeff Gerth was first reporting on Whitewater in early 1992, rather than work with Gerth, Hillary insisted on giving him the figurative finger. Likewise, Hillary balked when The Washington Post asked to see private Whitewater documents in 1993. Bill Clinton favored compliance with the Post — but was overruled by Hillary, who implied she would rather "throw them all in the Potomac." [Or "off with their heads!" in the original German.] Former Clinton White House adviser David Gergen has called the decision "the decisive turning point" that convinced Washington the Clintons had something to hide.
To be fair, when Hillary did engage the press, she often got burned. When she ruminated to the The New York Times Magazine's Michael Kelly about spirituality, he produced a mocking cover story titled "Saint Hillary." Hillary later wrote that she had been "raw with grief" over her dying father, implying that Kelly had exploited her emotional vulnerability. In 1994, with questions swirling about a big profit she turned selling cattle futures, she agreed to meet with a clamoring media. Donning a memorable pink suit, she endured an hour of harsh[softball] questioning. Afterward, according to Gerth and Don Van Natta's recent book Her Way, Hillary told her aides the exercise had been futile. "They're not going to let up. They're just going to keep coming at us, no matter what we do." The sordid Monica Lewinsky scandal only affirmed Hillary's firm belief that the "vast right-wing conspiracy" had immense power over mainstream media coverage.
When Hillary embarked on her 2000 run for Senate in New York, she brought her antipathy toward the press with her and set new standards for media control. After the campaign, AP reporter Beth Harpaz wrote a book about her experience in which she described feeling at various times "humiliated," "paranoid," and "so worn down and so exasperated by the lack of access and the lack of news in this campaign that I'd given up fighting." Once, when Hillary sent a candy basket to the press van, the downtrodden reporters were incredulous, Harpaz wrote: "[N]one of us could believe that Hillary was being so nice to us."
[Emphases and links supplied.]
More about the Victim Candidate™:
Hillary has been angry for over 40 years. It's not my job to make up for her poor marital choices by electing her President. Instead of owing her my vote because she's female, I owe the rest of my gender a vote against her because she sets a terrible example for all. — Mary McLemore Pike Road, Alabama
It was a maneuver that seemed suspiciously aimed at detracting from Hillary's lackluster showing whilst simultaneously shoring up her female support. But, ironically, it has had the opposite effect. Rather than fostering a sense of solidarity between women and the first credible female presidential candidate, Hillary's cries of discrimination have left many women cold, and with good reason. We've come a long way, baby — and Team Hillary seems not to have noticed. — Liz Mair "Big Girls Don't Cry," American Spectator (11/9/2007)
Despite an orchestrated Hillarygate defense, the American public seems not to be buying the argument that all is aboveboard when it comes to Whitewater and the 1993 firings and prosecutorial harassment of the White House Travel Office staff. In a just published NBC opinion poll, 53 percent of respondents agree with New York Times columnist William Safire that the first lady is lying about her personal finances and involvement in Whitewater, with just more than a quarter believing she is telling the truth. — Susan Crabtree, Jamie Dettmer et al. "Hillary and Bill: what is the state of their union?" Insight on the News (2/12/1996)
Then there's Her Nibs' victimization by, of all people, a little old lady. According to the New York Slimes,
A spokesman for Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton declined to comment on Mr. McCain's response [to a little old lady calling Mrs. B.J. al-Qlinton a b*tch]. But some of her advisers said they were surprised that he had not defused the moment more artfully [Like this, perhaps?], given the possibility that it might stir sympathy or outrage on Mrs. [BiIsIs] Clinton's behalf in some quarters.
Some of her allies have accused her male Democratic opponents of ganging up on her in their last televised debate.
"Whaaaaah. A bunch of wussified males and a little old lady are victimizing me! Whaaaaah."
Way to show you're "tough," Your Nibs.
If you can't stand the heat, go back in your kitchen and bake a few more cookies for your lying, cheating "husband" on whose career you've been riding piggyback all these years.
If slings and arrows from either these "males" or a little old lady are enough to wither you and leave you crying, what're going to do when terrorist-in-chief Osama bin Laden starts flinging very real ones at you?
Maybe we can find you a frailer, 100-year-old lady who won't have any chance of turning you into a complete and total wreck. Or, better yet, simply let you again beat up a battered and abused spouse "a**hole" reporter, like you did Wolf Bootslicker & "Gang" last night in your rigidly scripted, questions-plantedpresidential "debate" al-Qlinton Nibs Network "God Save Our Queen" sycophancy.
That'd be more your speed, Ms. HillI-R-Victim al-Qlinton.
Never forget that the first woman ever chosen prime minister of Great Britain could be no one less than the independent, self-made Iron Lady, Margaret Thatcher. Lest we become embarrassingly shallow and frivolous by comparison, the first woman president of the United States of America and first woman leader of the free world (rather than disgraceful laughingstock of it) should at the very least and truly be just as self-made and independent.
A 30-second television commercial called "Tough on Terror" began running in Iowa this week in advance of the January caucuses. Paid for by the funds from presidential candidate Rep. Tom Tancredo, the commercial depicts a hooded terrorist leaving a backpack at a shopping mall followed by a loud explosion[.] The commercial ends with "Tancredo ... before it's too late." Regardless of your political persuasion or feelings about the 2008 presidential candidate, Mr. Tancredo knows what he is talking about and his ad must be taken seriously.
According to current law enforcement threat assessments issued within the last several weeks, the threat of such an event is — play on words intended — dead-on accurate. Hence, Mr. Tancredo should win a first-place award for truth in advertising during a presidential campaign, and a medal of honor for taking on enemy fire for telling it like it is. In fact, contact last week with a high ranking member of a "mission-specific" Joint Terrorism Task Force verified that the amount of high-level intelligence that suggests such an event is likely to happen is atanall-timehigh.
BAGHDAD, Iraq — Coalition forces killed 25 suspected terrorists and detained 21 suspects, four of whom were wounded, late Tuesday and early Wednesday during operations targeting senior terrorist leaders in central Iraq.
During a series of coordinated operations west of Tarmiyah, Coalition forces targeted associates of senior al-Qaeda in Iraq leaders believed to be in the area.
Coalition forces observed several armed men in the target area and, perceiving hostile intent, called for supporting aircraft to engage.
The supporting aircraft fired on the target, but intelligence reports indicated the men unloaded an anti-aircraft weapon from the target and moved to a secondary location.
The ground force engaged the armed men, killing one, wounding another and detaining one suspect.
Upon securing the area, the ground force found a weapons cache, to include anti-aircraft weapons and artillery.
Supporting aircraft was used to safely destroy an associated building, vehicle and site believed to be used for anti-aircraft attacks against Coalition forces.
The ground force also followed suspects from the initial meeting to several buildings in the area.
As Coalition forces approached the target areas, they were engaged by enemy fire from both locations.
Responding in self-defense, ground forces called for supporting aircraft to engage, killing 24 and wounding three.
As the ground forces secured the areas, they found two substantially large weapons caches, which were safely destroyed by supporting aircraft to prevent further use by terrorists.
The caches included numerous anti-aircraft machine guns, surface-to-surface missiles, rifles, pistols, grenades, mortar rounds and artillery shells.
Coalition forces also found a large quantity of ammunition and components used to manufacture improvised explosive devices.
Coalition forces also detained 16 suspects at the two locations.
All of the injured received immediate medical treatment on site by Coalition forces medical experts and were taken to a near-by military medical facility for further treatment.
"Al-Qaeda is being hit continually by Iraqi and Coalition Forces, so their networks are disrupted and their manpower pool diminishing, thus limiting their ability to strike innocent Iraqis," said Maj. Winfield Danielson, MNF-I spokesman.
Or, to paraphrase al-Qerry: Big Government socialists going into the homes, schools, and workplaces of Americans in broad daylight, terrorizing kids and children, women, breaking sort of the customs, the historical customs, religious customs, whether you like it or not.
here's a big problem. A really big problem. So big it literally boggles the mind. Not only is it big enough to wipe everyone out, but it's too big to really be solved by anyone.
Anyone, that is, besides the big, kind, friendly, big-hearted Qrisis Qommissars of — you guessed it — Big Government. Because they care — about you, the Little Guy®, and about The Children™ — big time.
But they can't solve this really big problem for you or — if you won't think of yourself — for The Children™, unless you give them all the power they need to create and run a really Big Government. Because there's really nothing else big enough that can really solve such a problem.
That means they're also going to need some really big bucks. Because it's a really big problem. But you're going to give them that, too, because it's for something really much bigger than yourself. Bigger than all the Little Guy®s put together. Bigger, perhaps, than even them. It's all for The Children™.
You aren't against them helping The Children™, are you? Of course you aren't, because you're really much bigger than that.
That means you feel you don't really need to keep all that money and power you still have all to yourself, where it can't really do anyone any good — especially when it would be much better spent and used by expert, professional Qrisis Qommissars who can solve this really big problem before it wipes you and The Children™ all out.
So who're you going to believe? The Qrisis Qommissars who only want to help The Children™, or those big, mean, selfish Problem Deniers™ who only want to stop the Qrisis Qommissars from ever helping any of The Children™? That's right, you're going to believe what the Qrisis Qommissars are telling you.
Now you might be saying to yourself that you don't feel any of the big effects of this really big problem yourself right now. That's because you're only one of the Little Guy®s who only sees a little part of it. But the Qrisis Qommissars see the Big Picture of this really big problem that's only going to Get Worse® unless you give them the much bigger Big Government that they want so they can solve the problem before it wipes everyone out. Because they care.
See? Once you look at the big picture, it's all really very simple.
Still, if you don't understand everything about this really big problem like they do, don't worry. Be happy that they're indoctrinating educating a whole New Generation of Little Guy®s in the Big Government Skewls Schools who are all going to have to accept whatever they say there about this really big problem, whether you or The Children™ — or even any of the Underpaid Teachers™ — like it or not.
The only thing you really need to know is that it's all for the bigger greater good. And it's for The Children™. After all, you can't really be expected to ever understand big, complex things like this. You're only a Little Guy® who has to hold down eight jobs just to make your really big mortgage payments. That's because all the really big Tax Cuts For The Rich Who Aren't Paying Their Fair Share™ have left you having to decide whether you get to buy groceries this month and eat a little bit of food or you cancel what little bit of health insurance you've still got for all The Children™ you have while worrying yourself sick about any of them getting afterwards really, really sick.
But that's another al-Qrisisa the Qrisis Qommissars of even bigger Big Government are going to solve for you and The Children™, too. But only if you give them all the power and money they need for themselves that as well. Because they really care big time, and they don't ever want you to have to go it alone. In fact, there's no problem big enough or small enough which the Qrisis Qommissars won't always be there telling you that you have which only they can solve.
That's really very big of them, isn't it?
So what is the problem exactly? Silly, it doesn't matter. The solution to whatever problem the Qrisis Qommissars of Big Government are forever telling you you've got is always the same.
A really big one.
“Your denial of global warming and the Kyoto accord are evidence of your crimes.”
“You have destroyed nature with your industrial waste and gases more than any other nation in history. Despite this, you refuse to sign the Kyoto agreement so that you can secure the profit of your greedy companies and industries.”
So I'll blast these two useless Demoblamerratsbirm instead.
Muckority Leaper jeREmIaD, here's a novel concept for you: How about you ask not what your country shouldn't have been doing in a past neither you nor anyone else can ever change — ask what you can do for your country now and in the immediate future. This means, rather than you rasping out any more risibly regressive rants, you tell us all the wondrous things President Screed would be doing if he were slithering around the Oval Office instead of the Senate floor to oh, so magically create for all mankind the Perfectest. World. Ever.™ Don't blamingly bleat, "By staying so bogged down in Iraq's civil war, President Bush has made it harder to respond to the Pakistani problem and other challenges throughout the world." Your sophistic lie does absolutely no one any good and is utterly useless to everyone except our country's wartime enemies.
Stinker of the House Pipsqueaki, here's an equally novel concept for you: How about you start letting every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe, in order to assure the survival and the success of liberty. This means, rather than you attempting to alienate any more of our wartime allies — each of whom would be fighting all-out against us instead of with us to defeat our common enemies if we ever unnecessarily or foolishly assign, like you're trying now, the sins of a long-extinct, World War I Ottoman Empire to today's Republic of Turkey or any truth whatsoever to the propaganda of terrorists who are exploiting every rift and weakness they can find, or which you and your ilk keep progressively giving them, for the sole purpose and effect of helping them bring about the swift extinction of the present Islamic Republic of Pakistan and establish in its place the next Taliban state — and rather than you kowtowing to Syria's terrorist regime and otherwise trying to set up your own personal renegade Ministry of Foreign Affairs, you tell us all the miraculous things Secretary of State SinFringeNinny would be doing if she were oozing out of Air Force Two in Islamabad and not the Speaker's chair in Washington to oh, so wondrously accomplish for international diplomacy the Marvelousest. Feats. Ever.™ Don't complainingly cluck, "The Bush Administration enabled Musharraf's delusion by ignoring his undemocratic acts and lack of internal support in exchange for his assistance in efforts against terrorism." Your wedge-driving lie does absolutely nothing except give further aid and comfort to one of our country's worst wartime enemies by increasing the perception we're abandoning one of our country's best but most besieged wartime allies.
Not that either of you care, of course. It just would be a remarkable change of pace to hear something other than your sanctimonious condemnation of our wartime president for strictly your own selfish partisan purposes each and every time our nation is most in need of presenting a unified front.
Hillyingly Liedham al-Liarton, a liar? Is this now the Rhetorical Questions blog? (Covenant News)
"Remember, I've never met you or discussed any pardons with you. Got it, Mr. FJB?"
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, announced today that its researchers obtained 34 photos from the Clinton Presidential Library of Hillary Rodham Clinton, then-President Bill Clinton and Grand Rabbi David Twersky at a White House meeting during which the Grand Rabbi and other community leaders allegedly lobbied the Clintons to commute the jail sentences of four Hasidic men convicted of stealing $30 million in government education aid. The meeting took place in December 2000, just after the New York based Hasidim sect delivered 1,400 votes to Hillary Clinton's Senate 2000 campaign and only 12 to her opponent Rick Lazio.
This was the second meeting between Hillary Clinton and representatives of the Hasidic men. Prior to the election, in August 2000, Hillary Clinton visited New Square, the Hasidic community just outside of New York City....
A picture is worth a thousand words. These new photos undermine Hillary Clinton's claim that she played no role in the commuted sentences granted these criminals. If that is true, then why attend a White House meeting evidently set up to discuss the pardons? How did these community leaders get an invitation to the Clinton White House?....
Judicial Watch is now pursuing a lawsuit against the U.S. National Archives and Records Administration to obtain Hillary Clinton's White House official calendar, schedule, and day planner, and related documents.
ew York state law says everyone, without exception, must present a valid Social Security number before receiving any driver's license.
VAT - Vehicle and Traffic Title 5 - DRIVERS' LICENSES Article 19 - LICENSING OF DRIVERS
§ 502. Requirements for licensing. 1. Application for license. Application for a driver's license shall be made to the commissioner. The fee prescribed by law may be submitted with such application. The applicant shall furnish such proof of identity, age, and fitness as may be required by the commissioner. The commissioner may also provide that the application procedure shall include the taking of a photo image or images of the applicant in accordance with rules and regulations prescribed by the commissioner. In addition, the commissioner also shall require that the applicant provide his or her social security number and provide space on the application so that the applicant may register in the New York state organ and tissue donor registry under section forty-three hundred ten of the public health law....
But laws mean nothing to Hilliary al-Qrookton, New York's lawbreaking governor El Idiot Spitter (on citizens' rights), Dictatorats at large, and other liberals. Especially when those laws mean they won't be able to pervert the meaning and intent of our federal Motor Voter Act so they can use it as the means for allowing illegal immigrants invaders to gratefully vote for them.
THE CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ARTICLE I - Bill of Rights
§ 11. Equal protection of laws; discrimination in civil rights prohibited. No person shall be denied the equal protection of the laws of this state or any subdivision thereof. No person shall, because of race, color, creed or religion, be subjected to any discrimination in his or her civil rights by any other person or by any firm, corporation, or institution, or by the state or any agency or subdivision of the state. ["Civil rights," by the way, don't mean ability to possess unlawfully issued drivers' licenses.]
Clearly, New York's constitution requires equal protection of the laws; which means, more than anyting else, everyone's equal treatment by government. It also means nothing to Hillarity Rahdumb al-Qackleton, al-Idiot Spitter on civil liberties, Dictatorats in general, and other liberals.
Of course, disrespecting our laws and security and supporting lawbreakers — in this case, rounding up the votes of illegal criminal invaders and stuffing our ballet boxes with those votes, rather than rounding up such invading lawbreakers and turning them over to proper federal authorities for deportation — is precisely what it means to be Howardy Deanham al-Qlinton, El'idiot Spitter on citizens, Dictatorats as a whole, and all other liberals.
Not an original thought in her corrupt, pointy head.
e've already read Karllary Marxham al-Qlinton's Socialist's Digest version of murderous Communist ideology — her "we're going to take things away from you (according to ability) on behalf of the common good (according to need)."
But stealing ideas retched by that regressive, obsolete, blood-soaked, cultist religion and claiming them as her own, is what she's done all her "adult" life.
Unfortunately for her, there are only so many ways you can say "do as Omnipotent Government® controlled by me and mine decrees or be severely punished." So the Communistress in Chief has recently extended her thievery to swiping the ideas of her fellow comrade party candidates, also.
On April 28, Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois delivered what was later dubbed the "turn-the-page" speech to California Democrats, saying: "I'm running for president because the time for the can't-do, won't-do, won't-even-try style of politics is over. It's time to turn the page."
Less than two weeks later, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York said on MSNBC that she thinks voters "are so anxious to turn the page."
In May, Mrs. Clinton gave a speech on economic prosperity that decried the Bush administration.
"They call it the ownership society. But it's really the 'on-your-own' society," she said.
Mr. Obama used similar language first, in a speech honoring the late Sen. Robert F. Kennedy in November 2005.
"We know this as the ownership society. But in our past there has been another term for it — social Darwinism — every man or woman for him — or herself," Mr. Obama said. "It allows us to say ... tough luck ... pull yourself up by your bootstraps ... you're on your own."
New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson got big laughs at an ABC debate last month, saying: "Senator Obama does represent change. Senator Clinton has experience. Change and experience — with me, you get both."
Mrs. Clinton has her version, telling New Hampshire voters Sunday: "I know some people think you have to choose between change and experience. With me, you don't have to choose."
Since HilldeeBiden's dull, do-nothing record as a Jr. Senator, even after seven years, contains no grand substantive material for her, she can't very well go around touting her Designate the United States Courthouse Located at 40 Centre Street in New York, New York, As the "Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse," her Provide for the Expedited Payment of Certain Benefits for a Public Safety Officer Who Was Killed or Suffered a Catastrophic Injury As a Direct and Proximate Result of a Personal Injury Sustained in the Line of Duty in Connection with the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001, her Extend the Period of Availability of Unemployment Assistance Under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act in the Case of Victims of the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001, her Designate the Facility of the United States Postal Service Located at 375 Carlls Path in Deer Park, New York, As the "Raymond M. Downey Post Office Building," her Provide for the Establishment of Investigative Teams to Assess Building Performance and Emergency Response and Evacuation Procedures in the Wake of any Building Failure That Has Resulted in Substantial Loss of Life or That Posed Significant Potential of Substantial Loss of Life, and for Other Purposes, or her Designate the Facility of the United States Postal Service Located at 380 Main Street in Farmingdale, New York, As the "Peter J. Ganci, Jr. Post Office Building" bills in the 107th Congress; her Establish the Kate Mullany National Historic Site in the State of New York, her Award a Congressional Gold Medal to Dr. Dorothy Height, in Recognition of Her Many Contributions to the Nation, her Amend the Safe Drinking Water Act to Reauthorize the New York City Watershed Protection Program, her Designate the Facility of the United States Postal Service Located at 10 West Prospect Street in Nanuet, New York, As the "Anthony I. Lombardi Memorial Post Office Building," or her Designate the Facility of the United States Postal Service Located at 555 West 180th Street in New York, New York, As the "Sergeant Riayan A. Tejeda Post Office" bills in the 108th Congress; her Designate Certain National Forest System Land in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico As a Component of the National Wilderness Preservation System, her Amend the Public Health Service Act to Establish a Program to Assist Family Caregivers in Accessing Affordable and High-Quality Respite Care, and for Other Purposes, her Designate the Facility of the United States Postal Service Located at 80 Killian Road in Massapequa, New York, As the "Gerard A. Fiorenza Post Office Building," her Designate the Facility of the United States Postal Service Located at 170 East Main Street in Patchogue, New York, As the "Lieutenant Michael P. Murphy Post Office Building," her Designate the Facility of the United States Postal Service Located at 2951 New York Highway 43 in Averill Park, New York, As the "Major George Quamo Post Office Building," her Designate the Facility of the United States Postal Service Located at 100 Pitcher Street in Utica, New York, As the "Captain George A. Wood Post Office Building," or her Direct the Joint Committee on the Library to Accept the Donation of a Bust [i.e., no overly busty one like Hilldaboob's in the NY Sex Museum — thankfully] Depicting Sojourner Truth and to Display the Bust in a Suitable Location in the Capitol bills in the 109th Congress; or especially her zero — zip — noda — bills in the 110th Congress 1st al-Qongress.
Only the two bills in bold above can Hilliary Bore'em al-Qluelesston claim as her own because all the others wound up passing as entirely separate and distinct House bills. However, she won't be shouting on the campaign trail, "I passed my Establish the Kate Mullany National Historic Site in the State of New York and Designate the Facility of the United States Postal Service Located at 2951 New York Highway 43 in Averill Park, New York, As the 'Major George Quamo Post Office Building' acts! (insert Thunderous Applause™ here!)" Both are only slightly less dull and non-substantive than she is.
Nor has HerNibsy Racketeer al-Qorruption run anything larger than a greedyleftistfeminazicadre of radical liberal government-sponging socialist ideologue lawyers (but I vastly repeat myself).
Riding piggyback atop her "hubby's" career to get where she is. That's not the sort of profile in courage or exhibition of leadership Americans will be looking for in 2008.
In addition, she can't even get her numbers straight. Hilliary lyingly lied when she said, "When my huzbind left office... the projection was that Social Security was solvent until 2055." No, Hilloose-with-the-factsary. Its projected solvency was until the year 2037, not 2055. That's a whopping 18 years — or an entire generation — about which you lying liar lied! With big fat lies"math" like that, why should any voter believe anything you say about this or any other government program or trust you anytime you say your "ideas" wouldn't impose on and harass us all with any ravenous, swarming slew (as in "a lot" as well as past tense of "slay") of new ones? Moreover, President Bush's actions have added four more years to Social Security's solvency, saving that program until at least the year 2041. In words even you should understand: George W. Bush has done a much better job saving Social Security than you or your "husband" BiIsIs 'Jaculatorson al-Qlitongue ever did.
Her Nibs also feels giving every invading illegal alien a state driver's license "makes a lot of sense." Of course, Hillvote-fraudery knows her "husband's" Motor Voter Act allows any such non-citizen invader to vote — no questions asked — for, say, her self-serving, pandering, flip-flopping, nonsensical self. So in just this sense it does "make a lot of sense" — to just The Hilldabeast.
Equally bad, Hilldissembleast won't release her Office of First "Lady" records which you and I paid for. Who does she think feel she is? Trickery Duck'em Qlinixon?
And when Clinton was asked why she wouldn't release her White House records from the time she was First Lady, her answer was, "Well, that's not my decision to make." Baloney, whose decision is it, the Easter Bunny's? Come on.
Here's the question: why won't Hillary Clinton give a straight answer to the questions she's being asked?
Thus, seeing how Hilliary Hohum al-Qlintern's left with no grand idea or substantive achievement she can truly call her own, it's no wonder she's had to pilfer her comrade opponents' campaign statements and try attaching her wrinkly visage to their words.
While those wearing it yesterday evening were expecting handout after handout of free goodies from their cries of "trick or treat," the response of every good voter next year to the model of that beastly mask Hilliary Rob'em al-Qlinton — even before she's able to reach any of our doorsteps with "her" ghastly bag of stolen ideas — will be to send her empty-headed self away empty handed.
Apart from, of course, our delivering her a chorus or two of "Hail To The Thief!"