Bar graphs showing each state or other jurisdiction's population density per square land mile (range 0-highest, DC), out-of-wedlock births (0-100%), median household income ($0-highest, MD), property crime rate per 100,000 inhabitants (0-highest, DC), violent crime rate per 100,000 inhabitants (0-highest, DC), White population (0-100%), Hispanic population (0-100%), and Black population (0-100%).
Labels: inconvenient facts, Washington D(istrict of )C(rooks)
Since replies to the Tenth Amendment Center post by Randy Barnett are moderated, I'll include mine here.
n explaining the supreme court's opinion in Windsor, Barnett says, "By adopting this federalism approach to identifying protected liberty, however, states remain free to continue deciding the marriage question. Of course, this assumes that what the Court today says about the irrationality of DOMA (Defense of Marriage Act) at the federal level is not used to undermine the constitutionality of refusals to recognize same-sex marriage by states — as Justice Scalia predicts will flow from the majority's reasoning." In my reply, I question that assumption: Given the supreme court says it's unconstitutional at the federal level to define marriage in a manner that violates equal protection vis-à-vis a state's looser definition, how long before the court invokes the supremacy, full faith and credit, and perhaps privileges and immunities clauses to say it's unconstitutional at the state level to define marriage in a likewise manner? What difference, at that point, does any legal definition of marriage make when, under this lowest common denominator doctrine, the court may adjudge it "improperly motivated by animus" in light of an anything-goes one? Had Congress, in DOMA or another law, applied the appellate jurisdiction clause so that such cases would never reach the supreme court and that the court would never be at liberty to inquire into Congress's motives, any damaging affects could be confined to no more than a few judicial circuits. As it stands, the 39 traditional marriage states's legislatures must act themselves if they wish to preserve and protect their laws; viz., 34+ make application to Congress to call a convention for the specific and exclusive purpose of proposing a defense of marriage amendment, then 38+ ratify the proposed amendment. The amendment may be as simple as: The power to give in one State full faith and credit to the public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of another with respect to marriages and other domestic relations contrary therein to the laws of such State, is reserved to the States respectively. Or it may go further to include the federal government's treatment of such relations. Whichever they decide to settle on, the time for those states to develop their response is now.
Labels: a Republic if we can keep it, anti-America liberals (BIRM), elitist despot liberals (BIRM), good versus evil, greedy and selfish liberals (BIRM), Nation of lawyers, Washington D(istrict of )C(rooks)
source: Human Events, "Top 10 Politicians Receiving Donations from Goldman Sachs," 04/25/2010 (Based on Federal Election Commission filings during the 2008 election cycle)- $996,595 Sen. Barack Obama (presidential candidate)
- $411,150 Sen. Hillary Clinton (presidential candidate)
- $234,275 Mitt Romney (presidential candidate)
- $230,095 Sen. John McCain (presidential candidate)
- $155,098 Rep. Jim Himes (D.-Conn.)
- $112,500 Sen. Chris Dodd (D.-Conn.)
- $111,750 Rudy Giuliani (presidential candidate)
- $66,450 John Edwards (presidential candidate)
- $47,600 Sen. Arlen Specter (R.-Pa.)
- $37,750 Rep. Rahm Emanuel (D.-Ill.)
Labels: fascist totalitarian liberals (BIRM), Impeach.Obama.Now., liberal hypocrites (BIRM), neither Hope nor Change, Washington D(istrict of )C(rooks)
Friday, September 11, 2009 |
Been denied economic and øther stimulus due to pre-existing cørruptiøn? Want a pubic (sic) "øptiøn" for your "dependent" 'hø's? Need the Øfascist Incriminatiøn's bureaucrøøks to define all "acceptable" stimulus for your Jøhns Juans? Then yes, you can and must support Pimpsident Øfascist and Madam Mistress Pedøphiløsi's new (w)H(o)R(e) 69ØØ bill now søliciting its way-underage self through the stDemøclap's Høuse of Ill-Reputatives on Capibrøthel Hill.e won't even go into their beastial Trigger stuff. Or their tart reform "experiment." Or their kinky Co- Bi-Øps.
No, people are "hurting" and urgently crying out for gøvernment-mandated reførm nøw!™
Starting with removing each Jøhn's Juan's handcuffs.
So write or call, girls and boys, the Pimpsident and tell him you're aroused "fired up" and want to prøstitute yourself help him ram his "urgent" limping-along package down every American's throat:
The White Whøre Høuse
(don't write "Brøthel" or the Cøngress might get it instead)
Ø69Ø 16ØØ Pennsylvania Avenue ØbamACØRNue, N.W.
(no need to tell you what the W. stands for)
Washington, D.C.
("District of Crøøks" if you want to spell it out)
zipper ZIP code: 2Ø5ØØ
hot'n'heavyline: (2Ø2) 456-1414
Also, don't forget to forward the fishy details down there below to his flag@whørehøuse.gøv realitycheck@whørehøuse.gøv undercøver sna- snitch email:
ACORN ØbamACØRN Øfficials Videotaped Telling 'Pimp,' 'Prostitute' How to Lie to IRS- Thursday, September 10, 2009
FOXNews.com
Øfficials with the controversial cømmuni[s]ty ørganizing grøup ØbamACØRN were secretly videotaped offering to assist two individuals posing as a pimp and a prostitute, encouraging them to lie to the Internal Revenue Service and providing guidance on how to claim underage girls from South America as dependents.
The videotape was made public Thursday on BigGovernment.com....
The couple told ØbamACØRN staffers they wanted to secure housing where the woman could continue to maintain a prostitution business.
ØbamACØRN — the [Øbam]Assøciatiøn øf Cømmuni[s]ty Ørganazitiøns før Reførm Nuts Nøw — bills itself as the [Øbama]natiøn's largest cømmuni[s]ty of løw- and møderate-incøme families "wørking tøgether før søcial justice [sic] and strønger cømmuni[s]ties".... The ørganization has been accused by Republicans and conservative activists with fraud in vøter registratiøn drives around the country [including Miami-Dade Cøunty, Florida] and has been under fire since last year for its suppørt of  President Øbama [lying liar lies teller "Present" Øbamboozler] and for its planned participatiøn in next year's census....
On the videotape, "Kenya" [;-] can be seen telling an ØbamACØRN staffer that she earns roughly $8,000 a month. The ØbamaACØRN empløyee then suggests to "Kenya" that ØbamACØRN could submit a tax return for 2ØØ8 showing that she made $9,6ØØ for the entire year — instead of $96,000 — and that ØbamACØRN would charge "Kenya" $5Ø instead of the usual $15Ø fee for preparing her taxes....
The "pimp" later says that he and "Kenya" plan to bring up to 13 "very young" girls from El Salvador to work as prostitutes. Although an ØbamACØRN staffer points out their plans are illegal, she also suggests that the girls can be claimed as dependents....
"You are gonna use three of them," the [ØbamACØRN] staffer says. "They are gonna be under 16, so you is eligible to get child tax credit and additiønal child tax credit."
The ØbamACØRN wørkers also appear to be promoting the grøup's services to the "pimp" and "Kenya."
A second ØbamACØRN empløyee can be heard on the audiotape suggesting that the couple join the ørganization for an annual cost of $12Ø prior to attending one of its first-time hømebuyer seminars, which are underwritten with taxpayer funds.
Later, when the "pimp" asks what would happen if the ørganization is somehow connected to the scheme, the ØbamACØRN staffer replies, "First of all, it's not gonna damage us because we not gonna know. And with your girls, you tell them, 'Be careful.' Train them to keep their mouth shut."
"Keep your mouth shut."™
The øfficial Demøfascist ØbamACØRN møttø.
Labels: criminals' Bestest.Friends.Ever., fascist totalitarian liberals (BIRM), lawbreaking liberals (BIRM), lying liberals (BIRM), miserably failing liberals (BIRM), Washington D(istrict of )C(rooks)
Wednesday, March 18, 2009 |
Democrook Senate roll call vote, number 100, "On the Nomination (Confirmation Ronald Kirk, [Tax Cheat] of Texas, to be U.S. Trade Representative)" — Confirmedenatoppressors Durbin (D-UBL) and Kennedy (D-MAry Jo's Murderer) didn't vote; Byrd (KKK-WV) and Sanders (CCCP-VT) voted against confirmation.
Except for Senators Bond (R-MO), Bunning (R-KY), and Isakson (R-GA), every so-called Republican voted in favor of allowing yet another flagrant tax cheat to slink into Former Senator Øfailure's fascist totalitarian, Most.Corrupt.Ever.® maladministration.
Way to stand up for conservative principles, GOP SOP.
Had "Present" Øbungler's nomination of corrupt lobbyist Charles Freeman been allowed to reach the Senate floor, no doubt he'd be at this moment further overcrowding the Corrupter-in-Chief's petri dish of criminal slimeballs — formerly known as the White House — all thanks to you.
Labels: Impeach.Obama.Now., neither Hope nor Change, Useless Nitwits, Washington D(istrict of )C(rooks)
Tuesday, February 03, 2009 |
Raising taxes on the very people he promised to help — making them even worse off — just so he give a vote-buying handout to those who need it less. Now that's "change" we can believe in!nother Ø'broken promise.
When [B. Husstalin Øbamao] promised that he wouldn't raise taxes on "anybody" but then "looks forward" to signing this [SCHIP-expansion] bill, it seems to make it official that smokers aren't "anybody." Not citizens; not persons. Here's a guy who "cut myself a little slack" for smoking because running for president was stressful who then cuts other indulgers none during the worst, most stressful economic downturn in four generations. So much for "no family making less than $250,000 will see their taxes increase."
The poor will bear the highest burden of Present Øbamao's higher Poor Tax™. Minorities will be even harder hit.
Three out of every ten poor people will be paying this over 250-percent increase in taxes he wants to unfairly impose on them. But they won't receive any additional benefits from his higher taxes on them since their children aren't included in his latest Middle-Class Welfare/Vote-Buying Handout scheme.
By contrast, only one in five people whose votes he's buying with his middle-class handout are going to see their taxes increase. So, in light of the fact that those with higher incomes smoke less and thus can avoid the brunt of the Øbamarx Poor Tax, they won't be paying anywhere near their fair share.
The unprecedentedly high tax burden that Present Ø'promise-breaker wants to impose on minorities is worse. Especially for blacks, since over two out of every five poor blacks, including over half of all poor black men, will be directly hit by Former Senator Øbamarx's tax increase.
It's enough to make someone say,
But the worst thing that has happened to us is that as a nation we have lost our way. We have lost faith that Americans can still be the good guys, that we can... help the poor.... We won't be getting that faith back, either, after Present Øbamao makes sure the poor and minorities see their taxes increase. Talk about a regressive tax:
Democrats are rushing... to impose massive tax hikes of at least 61 cents on every cigarette pack sold in America, in addition to new increases on other tobacco products. The money will fund a long-plotted federal expansion of the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP). Yes, this is Dr. Big Nanny's prescription for recession: punitive tax increases on the poor to feed a universal health-care Trojan horse.
Obama and his liberal Democratic colleagues sure have a funny way of demonstrating "progressive" values, don't they? Health surveys show that smokers are more likely to be blue-collar workers, minorities and have less than a high-school education. The National Taxpayers Union noted that tobacco taxes take a 50 times larger share of income from those earning less than $20,000 than those earning more than $200,000. Put another way: Families making less than $30,000 per year pay more than half of all taxes paid on cigarettes, while families making more than $60,000 pay only 14 percent.
That's the dictionary definition of "regressive," not "progressive." Before delving into what the Øbammunist middle-class vote-buying handout goodies are, let's find out how much they're going to cost the poor and minorities he's excluding from any receipt of those goodies.
The math's so easy, in fact, even a liberal could do it... on a good day... if they had a big-button calculator... and their remedial-math teacher refrained from refusing to have to continually correct their wrong answers for fear of destroying their self-esteem:
Given that Former Senator Øblowa's Middle-Class Welfare/Vote-Buying Handout will be at least $33 billion over the next 4½ years, and that his increased Poor Tax™ is $0.61 on each pack of cigarettes, the number of packs in need of smoking to fund his Middle-Class Bribes for Votes Program® is 54 billion.
 At present there are 45 million cigarette consumers in the United States. Over half of them are poor (i.e., 28% of 36 million at 100% poverty, plus 26% of 54 million at 100-200% poverty, equals 24 million).
Therefore, each of them would have to buy a total of 1,200 packs. That's 270 packs a year, or a carton (10 packs) every two weeks!
And since the poor are the only ones who come anywhere close to smoking that much — indeed, 47 percent of all tobacco purchasers have an annual household income of less than $30,000 (it rises to 77 percent when you include those having less than only $50,000) — they will bear an even more disproportionate burden of Øbonghit's unfair tax increase.
It also means the poor and minorities will have less money to spend as they're running their homes, working hard trying to support their children, and "needing to cut themselves some slack" against the added stress from Øbamarx's Recession® that's pounding them.
How much less? Since the Øbamao Poor Tax on poverty-stricken minorities and non-minorities' half-carton a week adds up to a total hit of $741 on them, they'll have $165 less to spend every year through at least 2013. That's in addition to the $105 a year they're already going to be forking over to the Government That's There To "Help" Them™ through the steeply regressive federal excise tax currently slapped on them as second-class taxpayers.
So, liberals, choose which one you want these poor and minority parents to cut out for their kids:
That $165 month's worth of food so their hunger-stricken kids can eat more than what your inadequate food-stamp programs provide?
— Headline: Demoqrats want to starve The Children!
That $165 Winter's coat and other clothes so their kids can have something warm to wear when they go to your government schools?
— Headline: Demoqrats want The Children to freeze and even go naked!
That $165 summer month's electric bill payment so their kids can stay cool during the hot afternoons caused by your global warming climate change as well as turn on their desk lamps at night?
— Headlines: Demoqrats want The Children to sit in the dark without electricity! Demoqrats want The Children to not be able to see to do their homework! Demoqrats want The Children to go to bed drenched in sweat!
Before you smug liberals (but I repeat myself) look down your upturned noses and arrogantly say, "Well, then those poor and minority parents shouldn't be smoking!" think about feel what you're saying. Because if they do stop per your customarily racist-sounding demand, where is the revenue going to come from to pay for your "president"'s glorious Middle-Class Welfare/Vote-Buying Handout? Then you'd have no choice but to raise taxes on those very same middle-class folks — and it's bye-bye all their votes.
Of course, this highly regressive Øbamarx Poor Tax™ on low-income minority and non-minority parents means that a significant number of them won't be smoking. So the poor and minorities who still do, including those with children, will have to make up the difference by paying an even higher tax. At least $6 a year more after Present Øbrute's punitive tax on the poor and minorities forces a million and a half to quit or take to the underground economy created as a consequence of, effectively, that Øbamoron Prohibition(©1920-1933) aimed mainly at them and intended to hit them the hardest.
Call it the Øbamao Spread-the-Tax-Around Effect™.
Yes, we can see now that forcing the poor and minorities to pay more than their fair share is about as unfair as you can get. Even for a liberal.
But, hey, what do the poor and minorities matter? It's not like they're going to start voting Republican or any liberty-loving thing like that.
If you're a Dictatorat, you can afford to crap all over them. Same as your party did when it only somewhat more officially advocated making them perpetual slaves.
It's clear your promise-breaking Dear Leader(©Tyrants,Inc.) B. Hitlerian Øbameinführer(©Anti-tyrants,LC) doesn't care about the poor, the minorities, or their children. Why should you?
He also wants to destroy American jobs, especially those in the nation's cigar industry.
First, a 156 percent tax rate increase on cigarettes compounded by tax rate increases of up to 6,000 percent on large cigars, 2,197 percent on little cigars, 710 percent on roll-your-own tobacco, 156 percent on smokeless tobacco and 156 percent on pipe tobacco will lead to declines of 10 percent or more in retail sales of tobacco. This large reduction in sales will have a corresponding impact on industry jobs. According to 2002 U. S. Census Bureau statistics, 1.17 million union and non-union employees are employed by tobacco manufacturers, wholesalers and retailers. With upward of a 10 percent decline in tobacco sales, industry estimates project up to 117,000 jobs will be lost.
Second, the SCHIP tax increases will significantly raise the value of tobacco products held in inventory. The unintended consequence will make warehouses, delivery trucks and retail stores more likely targets for crime.
Third, the escalation of taxes on tobacco products will lead to a corresponding rise in purchases of tobacco products by consumers over the Internet and on the black market, where vendors illegally sell tobacco products tax-free and do not verify a customer’s age to avoid selling to minors.
Finally, because most Americans who buy tobacco are in the low or middle- income range, raising tobacco taxes will affect the poor more disproportionately.
President-elect Barack Obama needs to keep his campaign promise and not raise taxes, including cigarette and tobacco taxes, on any American who earns less than $250,000....
Scott Ramminger is president of the American Wholesale Marketers Association. The piece also reflects the stand of the Southern Association of Wholesale Distributors, the National Association of Convenience Stores, Petroleum Marketers Association of America, the National Association of Tobacco Outlets and the National Association of Truck Stop Operators. It's safe to assume negligible revenues raised from customers of our country's cigar industry, primarily due to the utter certainty there won't be much of one left after the Øbamao Tax Increase™ gets done ravaging it. How ironic that the liberals' boogymen, Eeevil Corporations™, care demonstrably more about the jobs and living wages of struggling American workers. This includes even Big Tobacco:
We're not opposed to SCHIP, but we are opposed to the funding mechanism for it. SCHIP, as a tax of convenience, will tax mostly those who are less able to pay the tax as they choose to use this legal product. Historically, tax increases at the federal level have been passed on to consumers — even as those proponents of increasing cigarette taxes tend to indicate that everybody but the consumer will pay the tax.
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, about 80 percent of the people who smoke make less than $75,000, and 99 percent make less than $250,000. There are more people below the poverty line purchasing cigarettes than those above the poverty line.
So, the notion that no one under $250,000 will face a tax increase under the new administration will prove to be false within a couple of weeks of the new administration being sworn in. If they made over $250,000, and were Demoqrats, they could get away with cheating on their payment of those taxes and get nominated for a high-level position in the Øbamob administration. However, they aren't afforded such privileged exemption under the Democrooks' Rangel Rule. Certainly even liberals know or should know that slapping any tax on those least able to afford it is never a good idea if your goal is to derive some steady source of revenue from it. Liberals' most beloved group of people of all time — lawyers — are capable of grasping this incongruity:
Therefore, some argue that this places two positive goals for society — reducing smoking and funding children's health care — at odds with each other. After a few years, it's also possible that even if the tobacco tax is implemented for funding of SCHIP, reductions in the number of smokers (and thus, revenue) would lead to the same problem of funding for this significant federally funded program. That is, if your goal actually involves raising funds. But we're talking about liberals here.
With the new bill, Schip will be open to everyone up to 300% of the federal poverty level, or $63,081 for a family of four. In other words, a program supposedly targeted at low-income families has an eligibility ceiling higher than the U.S. median household income, which according to the Census Bureau is $50,233. Even the 300% figure isn't really a ceiling, given that states can get a government waiver to go even higher. Tom Daschle's folks at Health and Human Services will barely read the state paperwork before rubberstamping these expansions. The political purpose behind Schip has always been to capture the middle class [vote]. Every time the program grows, it displaces private insurance. Even before Democrats struck down rules limiting crowd out, research indicated that for every 100 children signed up — now more than 7.1 million — there is a reduction in private coverage for 25 to 50 kids. Exactly the same thing will happen if Messrs. Obama and Daschle [Next Tax Cheat He Nominates To Run Ruin Health And Human Services] end up introducing a "public option," a government insurance program modeled after Medicare but open to anyone of any income. As with Schip, any net increase in insurance coverage will come by having taxpayers gradually supplant the private system.
Schip money is delivered as a block grant, which states are supposed to match, though national taxpayers end up paying 65% to 83% of the total cost. When states make health-care promises they can't afford — such as New York, which expanded the program to 400% of poverty — the feds always step in with, yes, a bailout.....
All this is propped up by a permanent increase in the tobacco tax, which will rise to $1 a pack from the current 39 cents — thus financing a permanent and growing entitlement with a declining corps of smokers. Which brings us to the Øbammunist middle-class vote-buying handout goodies that Present Ømobboss is forcing the poor and minorities to subsidize.
Since its inception, SCHIP has been a case study in everything that's wrong with government — another example of feel-good rhetoric and lofty promises paid for with your money, except the rhetoric never matches the reality and the promises are always too good to be true. Although its proponents are quick to throw up pictures of starving inner city children, the fact is that SCHIP has insured millions of adults, and middle class families over the past decade.
In some cases, SCHIP recipients were earning 300% of the poverty level.
This was famously exposed in 2007, when Democrats selected a middle school student named Graeme Frost to deliver the rebuttal to President George W. Bush's veto of SCHIP reauthorization, only to discover later that the boy attended a $20,000 a year school and his family lived in a 3,000 square foot home valued at over $400,000.
And who pays the most for SCHIP? A disproportionately high number of poor smokers — the very people the program is supposed to be serving. To sweeten his bribe of middle-class parents for their votes — all unfairly funded on the backs of low-income ones — Former Senator Øbamunist offers to define every 19-, 20-, and 21-year-old offspring of theirs as a "child."[T]he term "child" means an individual under 19 years of age, or, at the option of a State, such higher age, not to exceed 21 years of age, as the State may elect. So much for "change," too. This is just more of the same Poor Tax™, jobs-killing garbage zer-0bama and other Demoqrats in al-Qongress tried to stick the American People with back in 2007.
Senator Bunning from Kentucky ably called them on it:
Whatever its other problems, the tobacco tax is a poor foundation for SCHIP. We are matching a declining source of revenue with a growing federal program. This does not make fiscal sense.... And we all say we oppose regressive taxes. But what are we considering today? A highly regressive tax. In fact, this tax is among the most regressive types of taxes we could consider....
Cash receipts for tobacco are projected to contribute between $300 -$350 million to Kentucky's economy this year.
An increase in the excise tax on tobacco will drive down the demand for consumption. This will result in less tobacco being purchased from Kentucky tobacco farmers by manufacturers — both cigarette and non-cigarette.
It will most likely force the specialty growers in my state — Kentucky burley leaf and Kentucky Wisconsin leaf — out of business. These are small family farms in rural Kentucky that rely on the revenue for their crops.
The money they get from tobacco pays their mortgage, puts their kids through school or allows them to keep farming.
The [Congressional Budget Office] has estimated that the SCHIP proposal will result in a 5-6% reduction in demand for tobacco during its first year.
This will most likely cause a $5.4 million reduction in payments to rural farmers in my state next year under the master settlement agreement.
Some people will say there's nothing wrong with all this, because it will force some people to quit smoking and we're using the money to help poor children.
But, who gets credit for this supposed act of charity? This plan would take money from one group of poor people and give it to another. He called the Democretins on it again last week: The Democrat bill allows states to expand the SCHIP program up to 300 percent of poverty — or $66,000 for family of four. Personally, I think 300 percent is too high for SCHIP. The focus of this program should be on reaching those kids who are currently eligible for the program, but not enrolled. This bill also gives New York and New Jersey a special exemption to cover kids in families above 300 percent of poverty. New York could even cover families up to 400 percent of poverty — or $88,000 for a family of four. These are certainly not low-income families. I attempted to keep all states on a level playing field by offering an amendment to strike the special exemption, but it was voted down.
While I do believe the SCHIP program is important to providing quality health care to our nation's most needy kids, I cannot support such a flawed bill. It was crafted in a totally partisan manner. It is not fiscally responsible. And it certainly does not protect the needs of low-income folks in states like Kentucky. Although the Peloseri-run House Plantation™ passed the Øbamarx Poor Tax bill, the Senate insisted on amending it. So a few selected Senators and Representative began meeting to come up with a version of the Øbamarx Poor Tax that both the Senate and Peloseri's House Plantation will have to vote on again.
It's not too late for normal, hard-working Americans to rescue their income and their jobs from this Øbamao Tax Increase.
Email alert from Council for Citizens Against Government Waste president Thomas A. Schatz: Under the guise of helping children without health insurance, the House of Representatives voted 289 to 139 last week in favor of a massive expansion of the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) — paving the way for a government-run, universal healthcare system and dramatically increasing the cost of this program to you, me, and all taxpayers!
Our last line of defense against those who want to impose socialist, Canadian-style healthcare on this country is the Senate, which is expected to consider SCHIP legislation as early as next week. It is urgent that you tell your U.S. Senators today to oppose the expansion of SCHIP and the tax increases that would be required to pay for it.
SCHIP was originally designed to help low-income families who earn too much to qualify for Medicaid gain access to health insurance for their children. The legislation approved by the House would increase the SCHIP income eligibility cap from the current 200 percent of the federal poverty line ($42,400 in annual income for a family of four) to 300 percent of the federal poverty line ($63,600 in annual income), making the eligibility ceiling for this "low-income" program higher than the median household income in this country. What's more, states can apply for a federal waiver to raise the ceiling even higher!
The House bill would more than double spending on SCHIP from $25 billion to $60 billion over four-and-a-half years. It would also permit states to cover legal aliens under SCHIP and Medicaid without the customary five-year waiting period established by the 1996 welfare reform law. [More information here.] In addition, the SCHIP legislation does nothing to prevent parents from transferring their children from private insurance plans to the taxpayer-funded program. According to the Congressional Budget Office, 2.4 million individuals could leave private insurance and join a government-run plan if this bill becomes law.
To pay for this big-government healthcare expansion, its advocates have proposed increasing the federal cigarette excise tax by 156 percent. Trust me, this will be just the first of many tax increases to come as SCHIP, like virtually every other entitlement program before it, ends up costing more than expected and sucking up increasing amounts of your tax dollars!
After the failure of HillaryCare in the 1990s, the universal healthcare proponents have wised up. They know they can't impose a government takeover of America's healthcare system — and the massive tax increases needed to pay for it all at once without provoking a resounding public outcry. Instead, they've adopted an incremental approach, where they will slowly expand existing government healthcare programs until they crowd out private insurance.
The backers of this plan think they can make all Americans dependent on the government for our healthcare before we know what hit us!
Please tell your Senators today to oppose the expansion of SCHIP and the tax increases that would pay for it! Tell your Representatives today the same thing! The sad part of all this isn't how Present Øpromise-breaker is manipulating the people who, even now, are still inclined to support him. It's that they not only want but need someone like him to keep on manipulating them.
Labels: consumer rights, elitist despot liberals (BIRM), liberal racism, lying liberals (BIRM), Obama 'Nation', tax'n'spend liberals (BIRM), Washington D(istrict of )C(rooks)
Saturday, January 31, 2009 |
"[N]o political appointees in an Obama[ bin ]Biden administration will be permitted to work on regulations or contracts directly and substantially related to their prior employer for two years." – B. Husstalin Øbaliar's "Ethics" Plan Lieoliti"Fact".com is calling Present Øbamao's broken promise a "compromise."
Førmer Senatør Øbamarx nominates Lobbyist William Corr and Lobbyist William J. Lynn III for high-level positions in his failed administration. Then he says they don't have to follow the rules banning lobbyists from serving because they're special. As in special interests' Big Lobbyists "whom We'll give a pass regardless what We Ourself promised."
So, Present Øbaron von Münchhausen's lies are "compromises" now. Well, isn't that special?
Too bad Politi"Fact""™" couldn't get away with calling the lying liar's Five-Day Waiting Period Waiver Lie™ one also. Then it wouldn't have had to point to his waiting only two days to sign the so-called Fair Pay Act that Peloseri & Associates Accomplices rushed through al-Qongress, as proof positive of Førmer Senatør Ødumbø breaking still another promise from his "Ethics" Plan Lie:
No. 234: Allow five days of public comment before signing bills
To reduce bills rushed through Congress and to the president before the public has the opportunity to review them, Obama[o] "will not sign any non-emergency bill without giving the American public an opportunity to review and comment on the White House website for five days." Well, maybe allowing fat cat trial lawyers to get rich quicker is part of his economic stimulus package spendulus porkage. A "[Demoqrat] National [Committee] Emergency®" that, if not immediately addressed, would've meant a sharp downturn in campaign donations flooding into the Democrook Party's Politburo's coffers from $p€¢ial int€r€$t Big Trial Lawyer £obb¥i$t$.
Wonder whether the Rangel Rule Act, if it's ever rushed through Qongress (after a lipsticked Nutty Pelooni's "ethical standards" fly anywhere besides out the nearest window, and a racist Harrope-n-tree Reid's racism is frozen some time other than in the Dem KKKrow Era™), would ever get the same Ø'prømise-breaker Waiver™? Or would that be too much "Change® we can believe in"?
What's next? Slipping into the Spendulus Porkage™ a special interest grant for Columbia University to open a Timothy F. Geithner School of Tax Cheating?
Think of all the teaching jobs that would create for Present Øbamarx's high-level political appointees lobbyists after they go through the revolving doors of his miserably failed maladministration.
Labels: anti-America liberals (BIRM), dinosaur media, lawbreaking liberals (BIRM), lying liberals (BIRM), miserably failing liberals (BIRM), tax'n'spend liberals (BIRM), Washington D(istrict of )C(rooks)
The alternative is to print so much money that a loaf of bread will cost $1,903,652.34.reaking promises that, yes, we can never keep." Except I would add to that official motto of the Biden administration: "(And making promises that, yes, we can always keep fooling enough dumb people with to get us elected.)"
If you took every penny from every American who earns* over $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 $125,000, leaving them no income whatsoever, you'd raise steal a grand total of only $1.750 trillion.**
But being the "generous" liberal that you are, you're going to steal only half of their incomes. So your take is now only $875 billion.
The problem is that you've promised all the dumb people you're going to spread a whole lot more wealth around than a mere $875 billion.
What's a liberal promise-breaker (but I repeat myself) to do?
You don't have the money now.
China is losing interest in loaning us any more money. The repressive communist dictatorshipbirm is even considering suspending all future loans.
Now you're an even more panicky liberalbirm.
Do you do what your messiah Teh On(c)e™ has done and make another promise that, no, he can't ever hope to keep? "Uh..., er, well, we'll, uh, spend the, uh, money... faster. Yeah, that's it. Uh, that's, er... the ticket."
Of course that won't work because there's no such money now to spend.
Do you slit your wrist and put yourself out of our misery — the kind you want to totally "spread around"?
It's a viable option.
The only thing you're left with (pun intended) is printing lots and lots and lots of money. Even come out with a three-dollar bill and put your Teh On(c)e™'s mugshot on it.
Then we'll all have million-dollar bread and circuses filled up with brain-dead freaks like yourself that ain't worth a dime chump change.
* "Earn" means "I worked hard for it because I knew at the time I would get to keep it." The word doesn't mean, liberals, "I don't deserve it because I'm not paying my 'fair share.'"
** U.S. Labor Statistics Bureau and U.S. Census Bureau 2005 data extrapolation. Men: $300B (~$125-150K) + $300B ($150-200K) + $150B ($200-250K) + $600B ($250K+) = $1,350B (~$125+). Women: $150B (~$125-150K) + $100B ($150-200K) + $50B ($200-250K) + $100B ($250K+) = $400B (~$125+). Men + Women = $1,750B (~$125+).
Labels: lying liberals (BIRM), spread the misery around, tax'n'spend liberals (BIRM), Washington D(istrict of )C(rooks)
Thursday, January 22, 2009 |
Zer Øbama's Three Crooketeers: "All for Teh One™, and Teh One™ for all!"ormer Senator Øbama's picks to -run- ruin "our" departments of justice, treasury, and state have backgrounds that read like rap sheets compiled by INTERPOL. Given his own shady background, what else could anyone expect?
Zer Øbama's Crooketeer #1, Eric Holder:
Before being elevated to Janet Reno's right hand [in BiIsIs al-Qlinton's "justice" department], he ran the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia.... But in all the years that he ran the D.C. office, that office never initiated a single public corruption case against a D.C. official. Sworn to enforce federal anti-corruption laws in a city with one of the most notoriously corrupt governments in the county, Holder displayed his political acumen by letting D.C. corruption run rampant. As deputy attorney general, Holder played a key role in President Clinton's pardon of the fugitive terrorist financier Marc Rich. Rich fled to Switzerland in 1983 to avoid prosecution for tax evasion and for arranging oil deals for the terrorist dictatorship in Iran while it was holding Americans hostage. According to the book Metal Men by Craig Copetas, Rich gave the Iranian terrorists small arms, automatic rifles and hand-held rockets in exchange for the oil....
[A U.S. House oversight] committee observed, "Holder has failed to offer any credible justification for his support of the Rich pardon." Accordingly, "his desire to be appointed [al-Gore's] attorney general provides a much clearer and more believable motivation than any offered by Holder to date." (The report is available [here])....
Liberal (and very anti-gun) Washington Post columnist Richard Cohen called Holder's story about the pardon "disingenuous" and wrote that the Rich pardon alone shows that Holder is unfit for "a post that ought to be reserved for a lawyer who appreciated that while he reports to the president, he serves the people." (Dec. 2, 2008)....
[He also lied to the American people in] one notorious case in which his purported concern "for the children" led to some very aggressive use of firearms. Holder was deeply involved in the gunpoint, nighttime kidnapping of Elian Gonzalez in 2000. Elian and his mother fled Fidel Castro's tyranny in Cuba and the mother died at sea during the escape. Elian was welcomed and sheltered by his relatives in Florida, but Castro wanted him back; Reno and Holder were happy to oblige.
Holder had publicly promised that there would be no nighttime home invasion. After the nighttime home invasion occurred, he claimed that he had kept his promise because the attack had actually taken place an hour before dawn....
Although a Pulitzer Prize-winning photo showed a federal agent dressed like a soldier pointing a machine gun at the man who was holding the terrified child, Holder actually claimed that Gonzalez "was not taken at the point of a gun" and that the federal agents whom Holder had sent to capture Gonzalez had acted "very sensitively."
If Holder believes that breaking down a door with a battering ram, pointing submachine guns at children (not just Elian), and yelling, "Get down, get down, we'll shoot!" is an example of acting "very sensitively," his judgment about the responsible use of firearms is grossly insufficient for a cabinet officer who would be in charge of thousands and thousands of armed federal [BATFE] agents, many of them paramilitary agents with machine guns.
Holder's lack of integrity about the Rich pardon and the Gonzalez abduction would make him a poor choice for any law enforcement position. He is especially unsuited for attorney general — a position that, more than any other in the Cabinet, requires the rectitude to stand up to political pressure from the White House to bend the rule of law.
Dave Kopel, "The Holder Distortion," America's 1st Freedom, February 2008, pp. 35-36. Since when have crooks like Eric Holder ever cared about "the rule of law"? Zer Øbama's Crooketeer #2, Timothy Geithner:
The man Barack Obama selected to head Treasury failed to pay about $34,000 in taxes. Timothy Geithner was selected to run the Treasury and he is unable to do what he will expect the rest of us to do. I guess he got his training from Charlie Rangel.... Geithner was informed by the IRS that he owed money in 2006 which was two years ago. Additionally, he failed to pay his taxes on more than one occasion. The truth is that he went for years owing taxes to the government....
Geithner also employed an illegal, or as the spokesman calls her, a person without documents.
Geithner also didn't realize a housekeeper he paid in 2004 and 2005 did not have current employment documentation as an immigrant for the final three months she worked for him, the transition official said. Big Dog, "Treasury Selection Fails To Pay Taxes," Big Dog's Weblog, January 14, 2009. Since when have tax-cheating crooks like Timothy Geithner who illegally employ illegal aliens ever cared about "the truth"? Zer Øbama's Crooketeer #3, Hideously Rotten al-Qlinton:
[Hildabeast's husband and criminal partner] Bill Clinton has recently and rather disingenuously offered to submit his own foundation to scrutiny (see the work of my Vanity Fair colleague Todd Purdum on the delightful friends and associates that Clinton has acquired since he left office), but the real problem is otherwise. Both President and Sen. Clinton, while in office, made it obvious to foreign powers that they and their relatives were wide open to suggestions from lobbyists and middlemen.... [Terrorist financier Marc] Rich's ex-wife, Denise Rich, gave large sums to Hillary Clinton's re-election campaign and to Bill Clinton's library, and Marc Rich got a pardon. Edgar and Vonna Jo Gregory, convicted of bank fraud, hired Hillary Clinton's brother Tony and paid him $250,000, and they got a pardon. Carlos Vignali Jr. and Almon Glenn Braswell paid $400,000 to Hillary Clinton's other brother, Hugh, and, hey, they, respectively, got a presidential commutation and a presidential pardon, too....
In matters of foreign policy, it has been proved time and again, the Clintons are devoted to no interest other than their own. A president absolutely has to know of his chief foreign-policy executive that he or she has no other agenda than the one he has set.
Christopher Hitchens, "Serving the Clintonian Interest: The last thing we need is a Clinton in charge of foreign policy," Slate, November 24, 2008. And if that's not crooked enough, the Saudi monarch's donation of $10 million to the Qlinton Library and Foundation, and the Emir of Dubai's connection to the fund that pays BiIsIs and "her" $10 million per year, will bolster even more the fact that "our" state department is now just another foreign-lobbyists firm. (Thanks to Juan MqQain stabbing all Americans in the back yet again.) But since when have foreign-bribed crooks like Hideously Rotten al-Qlinton ever cared about numerous and deep "conflicts of interest"? It's significant that Zer Øbama's Three Crooketeers' misdeeds are rooted in foreign persons or entities. The same sort of people and things they'd be beholden to after members of "our" Senate, being so soft-headed and bereft of ethics as to sharpen and steady that first knife of Juan MqQain's now sticking out of our backs, confirm them.
Nothing's changed.
It's the same old crooked Washington that, yes, we can and must expect anytime it's run by Democrooks.
All hopelessly criminal.
Labels: lawbreaking liberals (BIRM), lying liberals (BIRM), Obama 'Nation', treason, Unabashed Sellouts of America, undocumented lawbreakers, Washington D(istrict of )C(rooks)
Tuesday, January 20, 2009 |
Yeah, that's a "Change™." eginning of an error with questions only a few in the media have any guts to ask our misleaders in Acting President Biden™'s maladministration and al-Qongress:
- Where is the money coming from?
Liberal answer: "The Rich®!" Reality answers: Everybody — including Americans not yet born.
- What happens when only "The Rich®" pay all the taxes?
Liberal answer: "They're paying their fair share!" Reality answers: Misery officially "Spread Around™."
- Why are Øbamaoists repeating Franklin Roosevelt's mistake of imposing so much Big Dumb Socialismbirm on the country that it destroys every incentive our economy has to find and implement smart solutions itself for a quick, real, and full recovery?
Liberal answer: "Because FDR did it!" Reality answers: Idiots never learn.
- When are Americans going to wake up and see through this utter fraud?
Liberal answer: "Hope®-a-bye, babies, on the Change® top / When the seas sink the Climate Change® stops.... Zzzzz®" Reality answers: When it's too late.
- Who do our Troops capture more than once on the battlefield?
Liberal answer: "One of those 234,620,897,698,743 civilians Bush killed in Iraq!" Reality answers: Terrorist detainees released from Guantanamo Recidivism Bay.
- How much more crooked, corrupt, and incompetent does Former Senator Øbama and his
advisors masters have to show they are before the Øbamainstream Media™ start reporting that fact? Liberal answer: "It's all Bush's fault!" Reality answers: That's the only quantity known to be larger than infinity.
- Is God answering Jeremiah "I'm Øbamarx's Pastor" Wright's prayer?
Liberal answer: "What's this 'god' of which you speak?" Reality answers: Sure looks that way.
Labels: anti-America liberals (BIRM), DeMSMocrat-dictatorial complex, tax'n'spend liberals (BIRM), Union of Soviet-style Socialist States of America, Washington D(istrict of )C(rooks)
 nly three weeks ago, Senate Demoqrat Misleader Hoody Reid swore up and down that "anyone appointed by Gov. Blagojevich cannot be an effective representative of the people of Illinois and, as we have said, will not be seated by the Democratic Caucus."
Now the Democrook al-Qaucus condones the corrupt, impeached, and recently arrested governor's illegal selling of a United States Senate seat.
Not like the breaking of our laws ever matters to Corruptorats any time it's one of themselves doing the breaking. If a law gets in their way, threatening the least bit their hold on power, that law doesn't apply... to them.
Very convenient.
If you're a sleazy law-breaking member of ObaMao's Crime Family, that is.
Labels: anti-America liberals (BIRM), criminals' Bestest.Friends.Ever., lawbreaking liberals (BIRM), lying liberals (BIRM), treason, Washington D(istrict of )C(rooks)
Thursday, January 15, 2009 |
How can you have a "confirmation hearing" with someone who hasn't been officially nominated yet?h, that's right. Outmoded things like laws and constitutions don't matter to Demoracist racists.
Nothing to see here.
Move along Go back to sleep.
Labels: anti-America liberals (BIRM), lawbreaking liberals (BIRM), lying liberals (BIRM), Washington D(istrict of )C(rooks)
Saturday, January 10, 2009 |
"Had the governor appointed a white man like me, I wouldn't be standing in this public institution's door like (Demoracist) George Wallace keeping the black man out."here is no requirement that Illinois' secretary of state countersign the governor's appointment of African-American Senator Roland Burris (D-Durbin's Noose).
There is, however, the Constitution's requirement that the governor's appointment must be allowed before the people of Illinois can fill their vacant U.S. Senate seat by special election.
When vacancies happen in the representation of any State in the Senate, the executive authority of such State shall issue writs of election to fill such vacancies: Provided, That the legislature of any State may empower the executive thereof to make temporary appointments until the people fill the vacancies by election as the legislature may direct.  Demoracist Senate leaders Harry Reid and Dick Durbin holding up Illinois junior Senator Roland Burris' lawful appointment. "Maybe we can claim he whistled at white senatress Barbara Boxer," Reid pondered. But according to Senator Dick "Whites-only Drinking Fountain" Durbin (D-Illinoose) and Senate Majority Lyncher Harry "Hoods'R'Good" Reid (D-Noosevada), a "recommended form" appended to a vague Senate "rule" trumps our Constitution.
That is, it does only when it involves the appointment of an African-American senator.
As Examiner.com's Dan Spencer reports,
Durbin also said the "Senate cannot waive a 125-year-old rule requiring the signatures of both the governor and the secretary of state on any election or appointment." Unbelievably, Durbin made his comments after the Illinois Supreme Court ruled against the Senate Democrats. In its decision, the court found that Senate Rule II, the rule that Reid and Durbin cited as justification for the Democrat's refusal to seat Senator Burris, is merely a recommendation, not a requirement the "Senate cannot waive"....
In any event, Illinois Secretary of State Jesse White signed a separate statement on Friday certifying that Burris' appointment letter was legally filed with the state. The Illinois Supreme Court decision and Secretary of State certification aren't good enough for Reid and company. That is, Racist and kkkompany. Not just racist and unconstitutional, what these two racists are doing is denying the people of Illinois — 15 percent of whom are black — their right to vote in an election to permanently choose one of their own representatives in Congress.
But what's the right to choose to The Party of Racists™'s racist leaders when it comes to keeping an African-American out of their literally Exclusive All-White Club®?
One has to wonder why Durbin and his Democra[cis]tic colleagues care so much about this one Senate seat. We've seen numerous corrupt politicians come and go and the democracy has survived. So why do they want so badly to stop this one appointment of an otherwise apparently clean politician with just the vaguest whiff of corruption trailing him? Is it race — as some have suggested? When Senator Burris tries to see Demoracist Massa-ity Leader Reid, will the Illinois senator have to come in through the Capitol's new "Colored Entrance" in the back?
Labels: lawbreaking liberals (BIRM), liberal racism, liberalism: THE ideology of hate, lying liberals (BIRM), more liberal intolerance, Washington D(istrict of )C(rooks)
 Harry Reid doesn't care about black people!acism and the Racist Racists Who Show It: A Fair and Balanced Look at the Left.
Liberals would want to cover up this one in book stores so much they'd put even Ann Coulter's Guilty in front of it.
What they can't hide is the fact their racist party is again standing in front of yet another public institution's door to prevent the admittance of a lawfully qualified African-American.
Until Democrats allow him to take the oath of office and his seat on the Senate floor, Governor Rod Blagojevich's (D-Ill. St. Pen.) constitutionally appointed successor to Former Senator B. Hatassein Øbama (D-Mombasa) continues to have his head in the not so proverbial noose.
So long as their hands still rest on the trap door's lever, the chances that Demoracists are ultimately going to pull it, making Senator Roland Burris (D-Lynching Victim) do more than just twist in the wind, remain more than good.
Swing high, sweet Roland Burris
Comin' for to send you back home
(In a [figurative?] pine box)
Swing high, sweet Roland Burris
Comin' for to send you back home Senate Majority Lyncher Harry Reid (D-"Not In My Neighborhood") should take off that black hood and go back to wearing his normal white one.
This Strung Up Hoisted By Their Own Petard Moment™ brought to you by MassaCard®.
Price tag on Illinois' vacant U.S. Senate seat: $1,000,000.00. Cost of "no contact" phone calls about that seat between Former Senator Øbama (D-Kenya) and Governor Blagojevich (D-Pay to Play): $105.15. Demoqrats' racism once again on full display: Priceless.
There are some blacks Harry can't lynch. For everyone else, there's MassaCard®.
Demoqrat: The Party of Racists
“Run Like a Plantation”™
Labels: elitist despot liberals (BIRM), lawbreaking liberals (BIRM), liberal racism, liberalism: THE ideology of hate, more liberal intolerance, Washington D(istrict of )C(rooks)
Wednesday, October 01, 2008 |
Which part of "all" do you "adult" Senators not understand?uy or seize mortgage assets. Sell mortgage assets. Put money from sales of mortgage assets in general fund so corrupt Demoqrats can get their grubby hands on it and dole it out in the form of "assistance" to numerous "hurting homeowners" welfare recipients and a plethora of shady "non"partisan special interest groups in order to create and raise, in essence, a "publicly"-funded bloc and army of very grateful and supportive Demoqrat voters and campaign workers, respectively.
If that isn't a bill for raising revenue for very clearly generalized purposes, I don't know what is.
But corrupt Demoqrats (but I repeat myself), always on the lookout for a way to beat some rap or another pending against them, think feel they've found a loophole — albeit an extremely tiny and flimsy, and what nonetheless reasonably should be held a blatantly unconstitutional one:
Hastily cut and paste a random House-passed bill, namely H.R. 1424, so everything in it's replaced by the above revenue raising and general funding of such generously corrupt Demoqratbirm vote buying and campaign spending.
That way the bill, whose original and intended primary subject is — appropriately enough — "provision of mental health and substance-related disorder benefits," looks only superficially like it "originated in the House." (Leave it to corrupt Demoqratsbirm to turn an obscure mental health parity measure into the biggest socialist power grab in human history.)
This the corrupt Demoqratsbirm in "our" Senate plan to do a few short hours from now.
The only ones standing in their way — the only ones with the power to stop them from so disrespectfully violating and abusively shredding our Constitution — are We the People.
Call those employees you hired and are paying to serve only you in your Senate, so they can find out what their sole bosses want and expect them to actually do instead for all our sakes.
Senate switchboard: 202-224-3121
Labels: anti-America liberals (BIRM), government over beyond and forsaking the people, Unabashed Sellouts of America, Union of Soviet-style Socialist States of America, Washington D(istrict of )C(rooks)
Sunday, September 28, 2008 |
ACORN, La Raza, "National" Urban League, etc., etc., etc.aracelet,too! Obusha & Communists. wreck our entire economy, making it "worst since the Great Depression," then force us taxpaying suckers to pay for their extremely miserable economic-policy failures. Sweet.
But wait... there's more!
To top it all off, they funnel hundreds of Billions of "our" money straight into the coffers of their comrades' "non"partisan special-interest Democommunist front groups so they can keep right on taking and misusing more and more of "our" money to bribe voters with "free" handouts and line the pockets of their party's big donors and contributors. Talk about job security (just theirs, not any of ours, of course).
Democommierats really must feel we're all as socialist dumb as they look.
If we let them get away scot-free with their orchestrating the Greatest "Public" Treasury Heist in Human History™, then we're much dumber than they could ever Hope®.
If ever we needed a Supermaverick to fly in, grab this villainous Luthorian monstrosity by the tail and fling it right out of the earth's atmosphere on a direct course to the fiery heart of our sun, it's now. Exactly the Change We Need.
John McCain: 703-418-2008 While Obusha's disorganized gang is re-seeding the housing mess with the loot they're robbing from "our" Treasury, will conservatives embrace socialism? And given how Dems bailout proposal redirects "Paulson's Profits" to left-wing groups... will media notice?
Labels: anti-America liberals (BIRM), government over beyond and forsaking the people, tax'n'spend liberals (BIRM), treason, Washington D(istrict of )C(rooks)
Friday, September 26, 2008 |
Stand up and fight for us. We've got your backs.reshman Junior Senator OBusha and his comrade Democommunist Party members control al-Qongress. They and President George Bush, with whom they're butt nakedly in bed now, have the dictatorial power to enact by themselves any "plan" they like for ramming down our throats the biggest big-government takeover of America's free market system since our all but forgotten Constitution established this Republic.
They don't need to plant America-loving Republicans' fingerprints on or near any part of that bloody crime scene.
The plan we need is a total tax holiday on all corporate income and capital gains so the best of our free market can be left totally free to fix and recover from the crisis themselves without anymore failed big-government socialistic meddling or other overburdensome control, the total disbandment of Fannie Mae and other so-called Government Sponsored "Enterprises" so another such crisis caused by the Demoqrat cronies running them can't ever occur again, a restrengthening of our currency so the rest of our economy will have the strongest and securest foundation possible on which to weather this crisis, and a vastly stepped up private-sector thrust to responsibly explore and extract our domestic energy resources wherever without exception they may exist so our country will have the largest possible independent supply of fuel which her economy and the lives of her citizens need to not only make it through the crisis but come out stronger when and long after it's been fixed.
That's a plan we can believe in. A plan we would actually trust.
Labels: a Republic if we can keep it, Deranged Extremist Moonbat Obdurate Craven Retarded Appeasing Traitorous Slime (DEMOCRATS), Washington D(istrict of )C(rooks)
Wednesday, September 24, 2008 |
Sen. Busharack OBushama probably thought felt all these warnings about his beloved Fannie Mae were just "distractions":- President Bush publicly called for GSE reform 17 times in 2008 alone before Congress acted.
Unfortunately, these warnings went unheeded
y Freshman Junior Senator Obushama and his fellow Demoqrats al-Qommunists.
Same goes for the three major warnings President Bush gave Sen. Øbuma & Co(mrades). between 2005 and 2007 — i.e., during Obambi's Watch™.
Twenty warnings. Twenty times Jr. Sen. OdumbO and his do-nothing Demoqrat qolleagues said, "No Change! Let's Hope for More of the Same!1!!`!"
Corruption we can believe Obama bin Biden are up to their necks in.™
Labels: Deranged Extremist Moonbat Obdurate Craven Retarded Appeasing Traitorous Slime (DEMOCRATS), Washington D(istrict of )C(rooks)
Obama is The One who wants to be Bush 44!here are now at least 700 Billion similarities — with a ¢apital B — between Busharack BusHussein OBushama and George Bush.
Both Pre$. Bu$h Jr. and Jr. $en. 0Bu$hama want to take all of us to the cleaners by taking those 700 Billion $imilaritie$ between them straight out of our pockets and using them to fully take over Jr. $en. 0Bu$hama'$ favorite financial corporate-welfare institutions so that, yes, they can take us all for suckers.
Take. Take. Take. Take. And more of the same.
Jr. $en. oBu$hama wants the legislative branch of "our" festeral government to control all that taking for the benefit of his corrupt corporate pals. Pre$. Bu$h Jr. wants the executive branch to do it for his.
The only difference between the two is exactly what We the Severely Overtaxed People are going to be getting out of either one's deal-making.
Nothing.
"Change," my Fannie-stolen decreasing assets.
There's no "Hope®" for these two Ø'Bu$hie$.
Nor for us and our free-market way of life unless we all stand up and stop them.
House switchboard: 202-225-3121
Senate switchboard: 202-224-3121
White House switchboard: 202-456-1414
Labels: government over beyond and forsaking the people, Unabashed Sellouts of America, Union of Soviet-style Socialist States of America, Washington D(istrict of )C(rooks)
Tuesday, September 23, 2008 |
Whether about government-backed mortgages or China's "emerging market," no truer words were ever spoken.hile we're waiting on Freshman Junior Senator zer-O'bagman for Fredd/Fannie MacMae's parachuting fat cat CEOs (aka his campaign's meltdown's "advisors"/donors) to stop his waiting on someone else to come up with enough fluffy text regarding Teh Crisis™ to fill more than a couple of scroll-throughs on his empty pointy skull's surgically attached teleprompter, I suggest we petition Congress to pass a law requiring that every House and Senate Demoqrat Qommunist, before he/she/other may ever again say anything at all about said Crisis™, have this post's title permanently tattooed across their sloping foreheads so every time any alleged "reporter" gets ready to ask any of them yet another softball "question" right after they've invariably proffered more of the same denial of their own direct responsibility right after blaming everyone and everything else for Teh Crisis™, said "reporter" might read for the very first time in his/her/other socialist-indoctrinated life that bedrock principle of free markets, slip up, and ask his/her/other fellow said Demoqrat Qommunist the following instead:
Senator (or "Representative"), do you think feel the cause of this Crisis™ may have something to do with you and your fellow lawmakers forcing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to make "loan" after unrepayable "loan" to people with low incomes who, by defintion, don't have any money to pay back such loans? At the very least Senator Dodd should be forced to recuse himself from ever participating in — much less chairing — any hearings on the Fredd/Fannie MacMae bailout, since
- Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.), chairman of the Senate banking committee, has received the most from Fannie and Freddie's PACs and employees ($133,900 since 1989).
Top Recipients of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac
Campaign Contributions, 1989-2008| Rank | Name | Office | Party/State | Total |
|---|
| 1. | Dodd, Christopher J | Senator | D-CT | $133,900 | | 2. | Kerry, John | Senator | D-MA | $111,000 | | 3. | Obama, Barack | Senat0r | D-IL | $105,849 | | 4. | Clinton, Hillary | Senator | D-NY | $75,550 | Nothing sounds like more of the same Washington-insider corruption, lobbyist kickbacks, special-interest favors, and outright bribes, more than those four out-of-touch crooks. “Yes, we can hope that in the future someone will change my diapers the moment when we must smell how filled they are with more of the same stuff we can believe is in them. “Then I am absolutely certain that generations from now, we will be able to look back and tell our children that this was the moment the rise of that ocean began to slow and my planet-sized rash began to heal.”
Labels: agenda driven mainstream media (BIRM), lying liberals (BIRM), Unabashed Sellouts of America, Union of Soviet-style Socialist States of America, Washington D(istrict of )C(rooks)
|
|
 |
Site Feed
Subscribe to Liberal Utopia by Email
Posts
Sunday, June 15, 2014
Monday, July 01, 2013
Monday, April 26, 2010
Friday, September 11, 2009
Wednesday, March 18, 2009
Tuesday, February 03, 2009
Saturday, January 31, 2009
Friday, January 23, 2009
Thursday, January 22, 2009
Tuesday, January 20, 2009
Monday, January 19, 2009
Thursday, January 15, 2009
Saturday, January 10, 2009
Friday, January 09, 2009
Wednesday, October 01, 2008
Sunday, September 28, 2008
Friday, September 26, 2008
Wednesday, September 24, 2008
Tuesday, September 23, 2008
Archives
|
|
