Best way to shut down investigations is become the investigators' boss.
O
bviously, Sleepy Joe is already the boss of the media and big tech mob. As we see, the last thing they're interested in is covering his vast and treasonouscrimes. That's because they're all-in for the equally vast and treasonouscover-up of those crimes — most likely in hopes of receiving lucrative favors in exchange for their aiding and abetting "the big guy."
On the books, we see this 44-year public "servant" increase his average income eighteen-fold after leaving office: from $300,000 to $5.5 million a year, including propped up book sales and speaking mumbling fees funneled through S corporations he set up to avoid paying his "fair share."
Now we discover he raked in far, far more off the books.
Thanks to his bagman son Hunter who traitorously hung around the "f***ing spy chief of China," Joe the "Chairman" of Biden Crime Family Unlimited with offices in Moscow, Beijing, Kiev, Nur-Sultan, Bucharest, etc. — areas, coincidentally, conquered and enslaved eight centuries ago by the namesake of one of its shell corporations GK Temujin, i.e., Genghis Khan LLC — has emerged as lead suspect in what is clearly a strong Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) case:
Sen. Ted Cruz's presidential campaign is getting some help from the Bush family.
Neil Bush, the brother of former Florida governor Jeb Bush, who dropped out of the presidential race last month, has joined Cruz's finance team.
My Neil Bu$h,
You're every breath that I take
You're every step I make
Neil Bush's decision to join Cruz's team makes him the first Bush to join a presidential campaign after Jeb Bush's departure from the race.
And I, I
I want to share
All my Bu$h with you
No one el$e will do
"We are seeing incredible momentum around our campaign," Cruz said in a statement. "I am thrilled to welcome these new members to our outstanding team. This race is winnowing down between two candidates, and this is further testament that conservatives are continuing to unite behind this campaign."
Not wanted by the American people, Congress, or the United Nations, Øbendover-for-Putin crawls in bed with the bear.
S
kanky Diplomacy: When you have to totally cheapen yourself to avoid becoming a complete laughingstock.
How embarrassing. Not even whores on the street bother trying to spin their way out of that sort of degradation.
The only "credible force" anybody sees here is the certain, overwhelming demands for Øbeaten's impeachment had he gone it alone and attacked Syria without legal authorization or public support.
The problems we have with war against Syria aren't going to change anytime soon. It's clear that no "unbelievably small" attack would do anything except get numerous innocent civilians killed. Anything more and al-Qaeda terrorists end up taking over that country, including all its chemical weapons. Hasn't Putin's Øboytoy™ leaned anything from his disaster in Egypt? His siding with "moderate" terrorists there and in Syria has been a miserable failure all around. The Øbrothel regime had its chance to stick it to Syria's puppet-master Iran back in 2009, but blew it. Was telling the democratic freedom fighters in Iran to, in effect, drop dead part of Øbimbo's Smarteriest Diplomacy®?
Now Øbutthurt's lying in this filthy bed he made with his John Vlad. What a joke. Sadly, it'll be at all our expense.
If our immigration system is broken, should we be buying any "fix" from the very people who broke it?
C
an anybody be that stupid? Does Mr. Amnesty 1986 Chuck Schumer still think we are?
Last time they "promised" that if we just let them grant amnesty to legalize millions of illegal aliens identity thieves our immigration system will be "fixed," they wound up breaking it even worse. Over four times more broken to be precise.
Now these same people are promising the exact same things. Do they really think feel we're so dumb as to fall for their lying "promises" again?
Fool us twice, shame on us.
What are they going to tell us after 36 million moreillegal aliens identity thieves invade our country? "Oops, our immigration system is broken [again], we need to 'fix' it"?
Fool us thrice, shame on our parents for ever feeling they could have any children with actual working brains.
How about this deal, Messrs. Amnesty 2013? Provide us with an objectively verifiable trigger. Like the hundreds of miles of two-layer border fencing you "promised" us years ago that you'd have fully built by now but, as it unsurprisingly turns out, you haven't yet gotten around anywhere near to even a tenth of the way completing. So finish the remaining 600 miles, then we might — repeat, might, and only if we're in an extremely generous mood — start trying to believe any of the rest of your repeatedly broken "promises."
No, leaving it to the discretion of Janet Napolitano, the one you "promise" will "enforce" your 1986 amnesty rehash new law even after she's already proclaimed "a so-called 'trigger' is not the way to go," won't ever qualify as any sort of objective verification. Our border agents working under her have sworn in court, and the federal judge agreed, that the "very oath they took to enforce the law is being blocked by rules and regulations and policies established from on high, and that this is undermining their ability to do what they are sworn to do." Don't even try to make her your "Miss" Trigger 2013.
None of you are in any position now to make even a single believable promise to anybody but total fools and complete idiots who are both hopelessly stupid and terminally dumb and whose only discernible purpose in life is dramatically lowering humanity's overall IQ.
The seven-year-old startup is already well-respected for guarding its users' privacy. It has fought government subpoenas that other companies, like Google, routinely comply with. The Electronic Frontier Foundation, a privacy group, recently gave Twitter six out of six stars for protecting user data from government monitoring.
"No one wants a pen that's going to rat them out," Alexander Macgillivray, Twitter's top lawyer, said last year.
As for the betrayers of us all:
Eight companies are said to be giving the NSA access to user data as part of PRISMFASCISM[FIFY –LR]: AOL, Apple, Facebook, Google, Microsoft, PalTalk, Skype, and Yahoo. Dropbox was apparently described in an NSA presentation as "coming soon."
Now we see that—
Facebook, Apple, Google, Microsoft and Yahoo have all denied flatly that they allowed the government direct access to their servers or even heard of PRISMFASCISM.
Yeah, we know what your flat denialriver in Egypt was worth:
With providers insisting that they had granted NSA no access to their servers and yet internal documents at NSA showing they had that kind of access, one claim or the other had to eventually collapse....
I imagine this makes the CEOs of Google, Microsoft, AOL, and Facebook a little embarrassed. Twitter, as AP noted, would have been a pretty critical platform to penetrate, given the ability to message privately through the firm's systems (DMs). Apparently, all it took was a refusal to make the NSA go away. On the other hand, perhaps the NSA could find at least some of that traffic routing through some of the servers they did access.
How did the NSA access those data streams? Contrary to the denials last night from Google and others, the NYT's Claire Cain Miller reports that the firms set up systems to allow the NSA to gain access to their content — as the companies themselves dumped it into secure "rooms" for NSA perusal.
n the realm of politics, siding with your enemy in a way that partially stabs in the back friends whom you know can't or won't more than temporarily turn on you, all so you can manipulate both just to your own advantage, is known as triangulation.
In the international-relations arena, siding with the same enemy all your close friends have been siding with anyway, just so you can fully stab in the back a country that all of you not only fundamentally hate but want to permanently destroy, could be called biangulation.
Except there's a better term for it:
Treason.
Because that country is the one to whose constitution you've formally — if not solemnly — sworn allegiance.
After warmly shaking hands with a fellow totalitarian fascist, Former Senator Øfascist gladly accepts his favorite anti-America book.
"The former half-term senator seems to be saying, 'I order you to buy my great friend's book now — or else!'" an expert on interdictatorial relations told LU News®.
The book's Amazon.com sales rank before this photograph of Tyrants Shaking Hands™ was snapped: #54,295. It's rank after "Present" Øtyrant apparently commanded his fellow citizens enslaved subjects to buy it: #2.
"Now that's an effective endorsement!" the expert added.
Coddle and legitimize absolute depots your friends who declare our country their mortal enemy. That's not standing up for us or our interests.
Declare war on American citizens who clearly see the tremendous damage you're inflicting on this country they profoundly love and who thus deeply and honestly believe it is nothing short of their highest patriotic duty to oppose your dangerously irresponsible, shortsighted, and self-interested acts and woefully out of touch and incompetent policies.
That's downright anti-America.
Continue going around the world apologizing to our enemies. Just from now on do it not in our name but in yours alone, for the total and shameful disgrace you are to a country that I and all your other declared enemies would never — could never — hate or betray in any way like you so do.
Zer Øbama's Three Crooketeers: "All for Teh One™, and Teh One™ for all!"
F
ormer Senator Øbama's picks to -run- ruin "our" departments of justice, treasury, and state have backgrounds that read like rap sheets compiled by INTERPOL. Given his own shady background, what else could anyone expect?
Zer Øbama's Crooketeer #1, Eric Holder:
Before being elevated to Janet Reno's right hand [in BiIsIs al-Qlinton's "justice" department], he ran the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia.... But in all the years that he ran the D.C. office, that office never initiated a single public corruption case against a D.C. official. Sworn to enforce federal anti-corruption laws in a city with one of the most notoriously corrupt governments in the county, Holder displayed his political acumen by letting D.C. corruption run rampant.
As deputy attorney general, Holder played a key role in President Clinton's pardon of the fugitive terrorist financier Marc Rich. Rich fled to Switzerland in 1983 to avoid prosecution for tax evasion and for arranging oil deals for the terrorist dictatorship in Iran while it was holding Americans hostage. According to the book Metal Men by Craig Copetas, Rich gave the Iranian terrorists small arms, automatic rifles and hand-held rockets in exchange for the oil....
[A U.S. House oversight] committee observed, "Holder has failed to offer any credible justification for his support of the Rich pardon." Accordingly, "his desire to be appointed [al-Gore's] attorney general provides a much clearer and more believable motivation than any offered by Holder to date." (The report is available [here])....
Liberal (and very anti-gun) Washington Post columnist Richard Cohen called Holder's story about the pardon "disingenuous" and wrote that the Rich pardon alone shows that Holder is unfit for "a post that ought to be reserved for a lawyer who appreciated that while he reports to the president, he serves the people." (Dec. 2, 2008)....
[He also lied to the American people in] one notorious case in which his purported concern "for the children" led to some very aggressive use of firearms. Holder was deeply involved in the gunpoint, nighttime kidnapping of Elian Gonzalez in 2000. Elian and his mother fled Fidel Castro's tyranny in Cuba and the mother died at sea during the escape. Elian was welcomed and sheltered by his relatives in Florida, but Castro wanted him back; Reno and Holder were happy to oblige.
Holder had publicly promised that there would be no nighttime home invasion. After the nighttime home invasion occurred, he claimed that he had kept his promise because the attack had actually taken place an hour before dawn....
Although a Pulitzer Prize-winning photo showed a federal agent dressed like a soldier pointing a machine gun at the man who was holding the terrified child, Holder actually claimed that Gonzalez "was not taken at the point of a gun" and that the federal agents whom Holder had sent to capture Gonzalez had acted "very sensitively."
If Holder believes that breaking down a door with a battering ram, pointing submachine guns at children (not just Elian), and yelling, "Get down, get down, we'll shoot!" is an example of acting "very sensitively," his judgment about the responsible use of firearms is grossly insufficient for a cabinet officer who would be in charge of thousands and thousands of armed federal [BATFE] agents, many of them paramilitary agents with machine guns.
Holder's lack of integrity about the Rich pardon and the Gonzalez abduction would make him a poor choice for any law enforcement position. He is especially unsuited for attorney general — a position that, more than any other in the Cabinet, requires the rectitude to stand up to political pressure from the White House to bend the rule of law.
Dave Kopel, "The Holder Distortion," America's 1st Freedom, February 2008, pp. 35-36.
Since when have crooks like Eric Holder ever cared about "the rule of law"?
Zer Øbama's Crooketeer #2, Timothy Geithner:
The man Barack Obama selected to head Treasury failed to pay about $34,000 in taxes. Timothy Geithner was selected to run the Treasury and he is unable to do what he will expect the rest of us to do. I guess he got his training from Charlie Rangel....
Geithner was informed by the IRS that he owed money in 2006 which was two years ago. Additionally, he failed to pay his taxes on more than one occasion. The truth is that he went for years owing taxes to the government....
Geithner also employed an illegal, or as the spokesman calls her, a person without documents.
Geithner also didn't realize a housekeeper he paid in 2004 and 2005 did not have current employment documentation as an immigrant for the final three months she worked for him, the transition official said.
Big Dog, "Treasury Selection Fails To Pay Taxes," Big Dog's Weblog, January 14, 2009.
Since when have tax-cheating crooks like Timothy Geithner who illegally employ illegal aliens ever cared about "the truth"?
Zer Øbama's Crooketeer #3, Hideously Rotten al-Qlinton:
[Hildabeast's husband and criminal partner] Bill Clinton has recently and rather disingenuously offered to submit his own foundation to scrutiny (see the work of my Vanity Fair colleague Todd Purdum on the delightful friends and associates that Clinton has acquired since he left office), but the real problem is otherwise. Both President and Sen. Clinton, while in office, made it obvious to foreign powers that they and their relatives were wide open to suggestions from lobbyists and middlemen....
[Terrorist financier Marc] Rich's ex-wife, Denise Rich, gave large sums to Hillary Clinton's re-election campaign and to Bill Clinton's library, and Marc Rich got a pardon. Edgar and Vonna Jo Gregory, convicted of bank fraud, hired Hillary Clinton's brother Tony and paid him $250,000, and they got a pardon. Carlos Vignali Jr. and Almon Glenn Braswell paid $400,000 to Hillary Clinton's other brother, Hugh, and, hey, they, respectively, got a presidential commutation and a presidential pardon, too....
In matters of foreign policy, it has been proved time and again, the Clintons are devoted to no interest other than their own. A president absolutely has to know of his chief foreign-policy executive that he or she has no other agenda than the one he has set.
Christopher Hitchens, "Serving the Clintonian Interest: The last thing we need is a Clinton in charge of foreign policy," Slate, November 24, 2008.
It's significant that Zer Øbama's Three Crooketeers' misdeeds are rooted in foreign persons or entities. The same sort of people and things they'd be beholden to after members of "our" Senate, being so soft-headed and bereft of ethics as to sharpen and steady that first knife of Juan MqQain's now sticking out of our backs, confirm them.
Nothing's changed.
It's the same old crooked Washington that, yes, we can and must expect anytime it's run by Democrooks.
“How will Barack Obama and friends fund their plan to spread Joe the Plumber’s wealth? They intend to beat our swords into welfare checks, leaving America exposed to its mortal enemies.”
Second, I will cut tens of billions of dollars in wasteful spending. I will cut investments in unproven missile defense systems. I will not weaponize space. I will slow our development of future combat systems, and I will institute an independent defense priorities board to ensure that the Quadrennial Defense Review is not used to justify unnecessary spending.
Third, I will set a goal of a world without nuclear weapons. [How about — first, second, and third — a world without anti-America ignoramuses calling their kumbaya selves "citizens of the world"
at fanatical outdoor rallies in foreign countries?] To seek that goal, I will not develop new nuclear weapons; I will seek a global ban on the production of fissile material, and I will negotiate with Russia to take our ICBMs off hair-trigger alert and to achieve deep cuts in our nuclear arsenals. ["Deep cuts" for us, no matter what Russia, China, or anyone else does.]
"And we s— we are spending millions of dollars on missile defense.
"Uh, and I actually believe that we need missile defense because of Iran...
"Iran, Cuba, Venezuala. These countries are tiny. They don't pose a serious threat to us."
...and North Korea, and the potential for them to obtain, uh, uh, uh— or to launch nuclear weapons."
"I will cut investments in unproven missile defense systems. I will not weaponize space."
"Uh, and I actually believe that we need missile defense because of Iran...
"Iran, Cuba, Venezuela. These countries are tiny. They don't pose a serious threat to us."
...and North Korea, and the potential for them to obtain, uh, uh, uh— or to launch nuclear weapons."
"I will cut investments in unproven missile defense systems."
Barack Obama The 45-Year-Old Political Virgin He's Come Too Soon
Barack Obama It's okay to learn on the job
Obama If he can divide us, he'll conquer us!
"I'm Barack Obama and I approve this message."
Jr. 1-term Sen. Gøvt. Dø-Nøthing (besides seeking a tax hike on every citizen of the world too) couldn't pass a background check to get the least sensitive job in our Department of Defense because of his extensive ties to known terrorists. But he wants you to let him be its Führer boss so, yes, he can gut it and unilaterally disarm our country. If he'll do this to all branches of our military, he'll also move on to causing more of the same extremist change at "the FBI, the CIA, the Justice Department, the State Department, in fact, every department, branch, and bureaucrat in the government."
Mr. Obama has supported handgun bans even when they trap people who defend themselves. In a 2003 case, a resident of Wilmette, Ill., used a handgun to defend himself from a burglar with a drug habit and a long criminal record, breaking into his home for the second day in a row. Though authorities found the shooting justified, the armed citizen was charged with possessing a handgun in violation of Wilmette's handgun ban.
Illinois lawmakers proposed legislation that would make self-defense an "affirmative defense" against prosecution for handgun possession in towns like Wilmette. Mr. Obama voted four times against the measure, which passed over his opposition, and over a veto by Illinois' anti-gun governor, Rod Blagojevich, a long-time Obama ally.
Self-defense at home or outside the home — it's all just as bad to Mr. Obama.
In 2004, he said he was "consistently on record and will continue to be on record as opposing concealed carry," and that he'd back "federal legislation that would ban citizens from carrying weapons, except for law enforcement." Mr. Obama had already put that anti-self-defense belief into action in 2001, voting against a state Senate bill that would have allowed people who receive protective orders — such as domestic violence victims — to carry firearms. Why? Because, in Mr. Obama's world, "authorizing potential victims to carry firearms would potentially lead to a more dangerous rather than less dangerous situation ... It was a bad idea and I'm glad it failed," he said.
Mr. Obama also claims he's no threat to hunters.
But in 2005, he voted for a ban on all but the smallest rifle ammunition used for hunting (or for anything else). If the measure had passed, it would have classified most rifle ammunition beyond the low-powered .22 caliber as "armor piercing ammunition," prohibited for civilian manufacture by federal law. The ammunition ban was hardly Mr. Obama's first act against hunters, either. In 1999, Mr. Obama proposed increasing firearm and ammunition excise taxes by 500 percent. Right now, a rifle that a manufacturer sells for $500 carries an excise tax of $55. Under Mr. Obama's proposal, that amount would rocket to $330. This would turn a tax willingly paid by sportsmen, which funds many of our wildlife conservation programs, into a tool to punish gun buyers.
Also, while Mr. Obama promises hunters, "I will not take your shotgun away," his votes tell a different story.
In 2003, while serving on the Illinois state Senate's Judiciary Committee, Mr. Obama voted for a bill that would have banned (as so-called "semi-automatic assault weapons") most single-shot and double-barreled shotguns, along with hundreds of models of rifles and handguns. If the bill had passed, any Illinois resident who possessed one of these guns 90 days after legislation went into effect, would have faced felony charges. What was that about not taking shotguns away?
As if voting for anti-gun plans wasn't bad enough, Mr. Obama also helped pay for them. He was a board member from 1994 to 2001 of the anti-gun Joyce Foundation, which is the largest source of funding for radical anti-gun groups in the country. On Mr. Obama's watch, Joyce donated $18.6 million to approximately 80 anti-gun efforts, including $1.5 million to the Violence Policy Center, the nation's most aggressive gun-prohibitionist group. Many of the Joyce Foundation's projects were aimed at editing the Second Amendment out of the Constitution.
Disarming us all is where Jr. 1-term-only Sen. Øbøvernment stands.
MSNBC, CNN, LAT, NYT, ABC, CBS, NBC, WaPo, NPR, et al. and the "pollsters" manipulative mind-controllers they hire have been nothing but one long 24/7 infomercial for Their Chøsen Øne™.
The cheapest thrill ever to run up The Liberal Media's collective leg was when Their Chøsen Øne™ came on TV and promisedlied that "I can no more disown (the pastor of my church Jeremiah 'God D*** America!' Wright) than I can disown the black community."
Why is the Los Angeles Times sitting on a videotape of the 2003 farewell bash in Chicago at which Barack Obama lavished praise on the guest of honor, Rashid Khalidi — former mouthpiece for master terrorist Yasser Arafat?
At the time Khalidi, a PLO adviser turned University of Chicago professor, was headed east to Columbia. There he would take over the University's Middle East-studies program (which he has since maintained as a bubbling cauldron of anti-Semitism) and assume the professorship endowed in honor of Edward Sayyid, another notorious terror apologist.
The party featured encomiums by many of Khalidi's allies, colleagues, and friends, including Barack Obama, then an Illinois state senator, and Bill Ayers, the terrorist turned education professor. It was sponsored by the Arab American Action Network (AAAN), which had been founded by Khalidi and his wife, Mona, formerly a top English translator for Arafat's press agency.
Is there just a teeny-weenie chance that this was an evening of Israel-bashing Obama would find very difficult to explain? Could it be that the Times, a pillar of the Obamedia, is covering for its guy?
Gateway Pundit reports that the Times has the videotape but is suppressing it.
Back in April, the Times published a gentle story about the fete. Reporter Peter Wallsten avoided, for example, any mention of the inconvenient fact that the revelers included Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn, Ayers's wife and fellow Weatherman terrorist. These self-professed revolutionary Leftists are friendly with both Obama and Khalidi — indeed, researcher Stanley Kurtz has noted that Ayers and Khalidi were "best friends." (And — small world! — it turns out that the Obamas are extremely close to the Khalidis, who have reportedly babysat the Obama children.)
Nor did the Times report the party was thrown by AAAN. Wallsten does tell us that the AAAN received grants from the Leftist Woods Fund when Obama was on its board — but, besides understating the amount (it was $75,000, not $40,000), the Times mentions neither that Ayers was also on the Woods board at the time nor that AAAN is rabidly anti-Israel. (Though the organization regards Israel as illegitimate and has sought to justify Palestinian terrorism, Wallsten describes the AAAN as "a social service group.")
Perhaps even more inconveniently, the Times also let slip that it had obtained a videotape of the party.
When the Democrats took over the House of Representatives and the Senate back in January of 2007, the Dow Jones Industrial Average was at an all-time high of 12,400 and gas prices hovered around $2.15 per gallon. The Republican-led Congress of the previous 4-years had left a strong economy in the hands of Socialist Democrats.
Fast-forward two years, under Democrat-controlled Congress. Just last week the Dow Jones hit a 5-year low of 10,485 and gas prices loomed near $4 dollars a gallon.
These harmful economic events all took place during a Democrat controlled Congress in Washington, led by Harry Reid and Nancy Pilosi [and the do-nothing (besides running to get even more personal power) Barack Hussein Obama].
This is an infomercial we've been forced to watch over and over the last two years every time we filled up our cars or applied for any loans.
No infomercial ever made could be more disturbing than this Phoniest Show on Earth which The Liberal Media and Their Chøsen Øne™ have painstakingly scripted and been continuously airing throughout the 35,000-plus half hours between February 10, 2007 and today.
In 1932, Herbert Hoover pushed through a tax increase in the heart of the depression on "rich" taxpayers, in the "Economic Recovery Act" of that year. At that time the median household income was $1,000 annually. Like Obama's economics plan, Hoover's tax increase applied to only the top brackets making more than $4,000 per year, or roughly 4x the median income. This would be equivalent today to an Obama's tax increase affecting only households making $200,000 and above, or 4x the national median.
What happened then is now something that all economists agree upon. The increase was a disaster that served to deepen the depression into a new phase of despair. The few companies that were making money laid off even more workers. Unemployment rose. Incomes fell. The economic disaster was deepened and prolonged.
Somebody should have told Obama before he aired an ill-fated infomercial/commercial that proposes throwing oil on fire. You do not raise aggregate taxes during a recession, and then call it a tax decrease for 95% of Americans. Obama's proposed tax decrease to lower income Americans does nobody any good when they are laid off from work.
Or we finally change that same old channel and select for us and our country a new and far better and more reasonable and hopeful one, with programs that make sense and work for every American and always show experienced and tested people doing exactly the jobs we hire and expect them to do, completing only the tasks we want and entrust them to complete, and believing at all times that, yes, We their Number One Bosses can and will most unfailingly demonstrate the best innate ability and personal resourcefulness and enough of a work ethic and self-respect and love of freedom for doing and completing all the other jobs and tasks everyplace else in our God's Blessed America — the Beautiful Land of the Freest and Home of the Bravest People Ever — of, by, and for ourselves.
We don't need a stinking Øbamericial to inform any of us true lovers of liberty at all about any portion of that.
Both those government sponsored failures are the root cause of this housing-based economic crisis, which John McCain warned us about years ago and tried to toughly regulate. But his opponent and other top Democulprits were receiving unprecedented campaign donations from these tax-funded boondoggles and had to fight Senator McCain's efforts if they wanted to stay on that take.
E
ven after the crisis hit us in August, junior one-term Democorrupt Senator Bigbuck Obamae was still not convinced that there was any clear need for the tough, new regulations Senator McCain had been proposing during Sen. Oshirka's watch in Congress.
Sen. Oblahblah was holding on to the hope of raking in more of the same record-breaking Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac donations that had been flowing into his campaign coffers since the day he entered the Senate.
The Washingtøn Pøstank, although so in the tank for B. Hussein Øfrauda that it's desperately trying to play down its own report that the Hussein-Ø campaign called FranklinFannie Raines "seeking his advice on mortgage and housing policy matters," still had to conclude in its own fact check that
By Raines's own account, he took a couple of calls from someone on the Obama campaign, and they had some general discussions about economic issues.
While you're waiting for the Pøstank to provide "more details on these calls" (and for Oliver and Wilbur Pig to make their first take-off and landing tests during the next Kitty Hell record blizzard), you could pass just the tiniest part of that time reading the following details already provided by this same alleged "news"paper:
Obama also has ties to the firms. James A. Johnson, the former head of his vice presidential vetting panel, was a chief executive of Fannie Mae, as was Franklin D. Raines, who said this week that he has been consulting with the campaign on housing issues. Maria Echaveste, a top Clinton White House official whose husband, Christopher Edley Jr., is a close Obama friend and adviser, has lobbied for Freddie Mac, and former commerce secretary William M. Daley, a top Obama backer, was an in-house lobbyist.
Former Fannie Mae C.E.O. James Johnson, who was advising the candidate on selecting a vice president, had resigned from the campaign after the Wall Street Journal reported on his own V.I.P. loans [from Countrywide Banking & Home Loans].
FOR ALL THE talk about energy, taxes and health care, the first economic policy challenge to face the next president could be coping with a crisis at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac — and the related job of reforming them to make sure they never put the global financial system at risk again. Republican John McCain, longaskepticofthetwogovernment-sponsoredenterprises, has said that, if the government must bail them out, it should fire their current boards and managers en route to full privatization. Untilnow, Democrat Barack Obama has been more circumspect, agreeing with Mr. McCain that taxpayers should come before shareholders and managers but offering few concrete ideas about the ultimate dispensation of the companies. But this week he's given an encouraging hint of fresh thinking about the problem.
This is not an easy one for the Illinois senator because of thecompanies'closetiestohisparty. To be sure, both Republican and Democratic politicos have held well-paid positions in the two firms or have partaken of the tens of millions that they spend on lobbying. But a few Republicans, such as Mr. McCain and Sen. Richard C. Shelby (Ala.), who has been chairman and ranking Republican on the Senate Banking Committee, have taken them on over the years, warning about their use of an implicit government guarantee to pursue private profits. Meanwhile, Democrats were not only politically but intellectually committed to the companies, seeing them as innovative public-private institutions that have been a boon to homeownership. In the current crisis, their biggest backers have been Democrats such as Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher J. Dodd (Conn.) and House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank (Mass.). Two members of Mr. Obama's political circle, James A. Johnson and FranklinD.Raines, are former chief executives of Fannie Mae.
Now, however, Mr. Obama may be inching away from the conventional wisdom. On Monday [August 25, 2008], he hinted for the first time that he thinks [sic] the GSEs' current model is unsustainable.
Now Sen. Øbraindeada sees a problem. John McCain saw the current crisis coming all along and amply warned Jr. 1-termer Sen. Oblivious and his Demograft Party's "leaders" in Congress about the unsustainable Fannie model. John McCain also offered them real solutions for avoiding this very Democulprit-induced calamity, which their corruptly blind selves vehemently rejected, of course.
As a voting co-owner of this great nation, I want my next employee in the White House to be someone who, like John McCain, has already shown he has the experience and knowledge to foresee and propose practicable, concrete steps to avert economic crises long before they even have the chance to blow up in all our faces. Not someone who, like B. Hussein-Ø the Fannie Raines consultee, has to wait until one actually does blow up in our faces before he can even begin to be seen "inching away" enough from his stubbornly self-imposed, self-serving "wisdom" blind spot to finally resort "for the first time" to any kind of fresh "thinking."
“If Congress does not act, American taxpayers will continue to be exposed to the enormous risk that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac pose to the housing market, the overall financial system, and the economy as a whole.”
–
John McCain addressing the U.S. Senate May 26, 2006
He hates election laws forbidding his use of phony donors, foreign contributions, and fraudulently registered "voters."
W
ith no less than the Associated (with Obamessiah) Press running headlines like "Obama money from abroad could total $3.3 million," it's enough to make a junior freshman do-nothing senator go back to snorting cocaine again.
Do anything to win — or, exactly like any other thing of a Democrook's doing, just more of the same.
Of course, "rules are meant to be broken and the laws don't apply to everybody" whenever they present even the slightest obstacle to any Dictatorat's all-consuming pursuit of absolute and unassailable personal power.
To start with the tip of this dicey Obergama, this hazard to democracy into which the stateliest of its ships — the first and still best of those ultimately helmed by and for all the people aboard her — is about to plow because the arrogantly self-blinded lookouts once entrusted by them to be her reliable watchdogs are purposefully refusing to either shine any truly illuminating spotlight on that very hazard or submit none but the most delusory reports in general about it, thus actively assisting its impending collision with her—
Last week, Florida Secretary of State Kurt Browning said that between September 8, when the no match no vote law began to be applied, and October 3 there were nearly 229,000 new registrations. Of those, nearly 33,000 had match problems at first. More than ten thousand of the voters were notified by mail and 3,000 of those problems had been resolved. [Leaving a whopping 13 percent with unresolved problems!]
The deadline to register to vote on November 4th has passed. Early voting begins on October 20th.
Nevada: ACORN, the Demofraudic Party's extremist front group paid over $800,000 by do-nothing Jr. Sen. Obigbucks' campaign to register alleged "voters,"
their office was raided Tuesday morning by agents of the Nevada Secretary of State and Attorney General who alleged in an application for a search warrant that ACORN had hired 59 felons through a work release program as canvassers and submitted nearly 300 apparently fraudulent voter registration cards as part of the drive.
The submitted voter cards included addresses and names that do not exist in Nevada, duplicate registrations, names culled from telephone books and names of Dallas Cowboys players, an investigator for the Secretary of State alleged in his affidavit for a search warrant.
One ex-employee of ACORN reached by the state investigator told him she began making up names for her forms on days when it was too hot to work outside. ACORN canvassers are paid by the hour. Ex-employees also said they were expected to collect 20 complete forms a shift or risk probation and termination, the investigator said in his affidavit.
The same extremist ACORN that endorsed Jr. Sen. Oshama in return for his $800,000 bribe:
For starters, Obama paid ACORN, which has endorsed him for president, $800,000 to register new voters, payments his campaign failed to accurately report. (They were disguised in his FEC disclosure as payments to a front group called Citizen Services Inc. for "advance work.")
Joseph Borges, Bridgeport's Republican registrar of voters, filed the complaint. He said he has found problems with numerous voter registration cards submitted by the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, or ACORN, which works to register low-income people.
In one instance, he says a card was filled out for a 7-year-old girl, whose age was listed as 27 on the card.
ACORN filed more than 8,000 cards in Bridgeport. The complaint involves 10, but Borges said there were problems with many others.
The group, which said it has registered some 1.3 million voters nationwide this year, is facing similar allegations in several other states including Nevada, Wisconsin, North Carolina, New Mexico, Michigan, Ohio and Missouri.
ACORN works in low-income communities that trend Democratic.[Is anyone surprised?]
. . .
"It is our policy to turn in all cards, even those we know to be problematic[fraudulent (there, fixed it for you)], to the local Board of Elections," Sharon Patterson-Stallings, a member of the Connecticut ACORN Board, said in a written statement Thursday.
The Democratic candidate's donors also include "Derty Poiiuy," an individual with a scatological sense of humor who has given $950. "Mong Kong" has contributed $1,065 and lists an address in a nonexistent city. "Fornari USA" gave $800 and listed the address of an apparel store of that name near San Francisco.
On Aug. 31, for example, the Obama campaign filed a report listing a single donation from a Debra Myers in "Rancho Palos Verde, Calif.," for $28,500 — more than 10 times the amount the law allows per election....
The Obama campaign also identified Woodrow Myers Jr. of Indianapolis, Ind., on Aug. 31 as having given $28,500 to the campaign.
. . .
Obama spokesman Ben LaBolt e-mailed Newsmax to say that the contributions had been "reattributed" to the Obama Victory Fund, a joint fundraising committee with the Democratic National Committee, and that the excess had been refunded.
That still put both Debra Myers and Woodrow Myers over the federal limits — unless the Obama campaign refunded their entire checks, since Debra gave another $28,500 earlier in the year to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, and Woodrow was way over the $108,2000 overall election cycle limit for individuals.
Individuals can give $2,300 to a federal candidate in both the primary and the general election, for a total of $4,600 in a single election cycle. They also can give $28,500 to a national party committee, $10,000 to a state or local committee, and $5,000 to other political committees.
If a candidate loses the primary, any money counted toward the general election must be refunded, a wrinkle in the federal election laws that can sink losing candidates deep in debt.
The Obama campaign has already had to deal with several FEC complaints about fraudulent donors and illegal foreign contributions, and the FEC says it has no record that those complaints have been resolved or closed.
. . .
Obama was forced to return $33,500 to a pair of Palestinian brothers who bought T-Shirts on the campaign's website — a clear violation of FEC rules and the law. The campaign claims to have returned the money but the brothers deny they have received a refund.
The 2008 Democratic presidential nominee had worked not just alongside ACORN, but also as a key operative for the organization.
He was its lawyer in several pivotal ACORN cases.
Obama funded a number of its activities, as well. When he sat on the board of the prestigious Woods Fund for Chicago alongside former Weather Underground terrorist William Ayers, he oversaw and approved many grants for ACORN.
As the National Review's Stanley Kurtz reported, one Woods committee report boasted that the fund's "non-ideological" public image "enabled the Trustees to make grants to organizations that use confrontational tactics against the business and government 'establishments' without undue risk of being accused of partisanship." [How convenient.]
Obama was the Illinois director of ACORN's controversial voter registration operation, and he trained the group's leaders in the ways of radical, sometimes illegal, confrontational politics.
Over the weekend, Newsweek reported of two donors who used the names "Doodad Pro" and "Good Will." Two other questionable donors used a combination of letters that did not form a name. One gave a total of $7,500 and the other contributed $14,200, both sums greater than what is allowed for a general election. The Obama campaign returned all but about $200 to these donors. [Returned to who? "Sreya Llib"? "Okzer"? "NROCA"?]
...Republican John McCain's campaign lists all donors, including those contributing less than $200, on his Web site.
Any United States election is just that — American — and outside influence should not be a part it. A campaign is expensive and time-consuming, but contributions from foreign sources are not only against the law, but also against who we are as a country.[This ought to be tattooed across Jr. Sen. Oboughtoff-n-paid-for's pointy head where his worshipstream media might read it.]
Newsmax reported last week that Sen. Barack Obama's campaign has collected "the largest pool of unidentified money that has ever flooded into the U.S. election system, before or after the McCain-Feingold campaign finance reforms of 2002."
Federal Election Commission data show that some $222 million of the cash Obama has collected came in the form of contributions of $200 or less, with the Democratic nominee's campaign identifying the donors of less than $40 million of that sum. [ = at least 910,000 unidentified donors]
Campaigns may accept donations of less than $200 without providing the donors' names and addresses in campaign finance reports, but Sen. John McCain's camp has made its full donor database available on the Internet[which true national heroes are wont to do]. Independent campaign finance watchdog organizations have asked the Obama campaign to list all its donors, as well, but it's refused[which shady national disgraces are wont to do]. What is Obama hiding? (Just a taste of his 'change'– stonewalling the voters–LH)
What B. Howshady Obigtaxincreases is hiding lies underneath the waves of phony donors, foreign contributions, and fraudulently registered "voters" from which his servilestream media are neck-breakingly averting their binoculars.
The task of coming on deck and helping our ship of state avoid a disastrous collision with that dicey Obergama now falls to us, the people who can't afford to remain merely passengers aboard her any longer.
"U.S." House of "Representatives": "Up Yours, America!"
A
ll 450-plus pages of pure socialism, all the way up. No hearings. No amendments allowed. No time alloted for appropriate debate. Higher taxes and surtaxes on our oil and gas producers. Payroll tax hikes. Excise tax hikes. Too much power concentrated in too few hands. Price and wage controls. Tax code made even more complex. Huge tax cuts for wealthy environmentalists. Huge tax cuts for wealthy Hollywood production companies. Huge tax cuts for wealthy Big Agriculture. Higher public debt. Make-work projects and kickbacks for wealthy environmentalists and other special interests. Higher health-insurance costs. Higher health-care costs. Higher business-reporting costs. Underlying primary causes and evils not only repeated but expanded.
In sum, the largest and most insufferably intrusive and expensive government any generation of Americans has ever been forced to heavily bear, despotically culminating in the longest train of abuses and usurpations they as a people have ever been forced to perpetually witness.
The recent votes of most of the present members of the "United States" House of "Representatives," being votes in favor of yet another repeat of these injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over our states, prove them to be in fact—
Traitors
Levying economic War against the United States:
Neil Abercrombie (Hawaii, 1st district)
Gary Ackerman (New York, 5th district)
Rodney Alexander (Louisiana, 5th district)
Tom Allen (Maine, 1st district)
Robert E. Andrews (New Jersey, 1st district)
Michael A. Arcuri (New York, 24th district)
Joe Baca (California, 43rd district)
Spencer Bachus (Alabama, 6th district)
Brian Baird (Washington, 3rd district)
Tammy Baldwin (Wisconsin, 2nd district)
J. Gresham Barrett (South Carolina, 3rd district)
Melissa L. Bean (Illinois, 8th district)
Shelley Berkley (Nevada, 1st district)
Howard Berman (California, 28th district)
Marion Berry (Arkansas, 1st district)
Judy Biggert (Illinois, 13th district)
Sanford D. Bishop, Jr. (Georgia, 2nd district)
Timothy Bishop (New York, 1st district)
Roy Blunt (Missouri, 7th district)
John A. Boehner (Ohio, 8th district)
Jo Bonner (Alabama, 1st district)
Mary Bono Mack (California, 45th district)
John Boozman (Arkansas, 3rd district)
Dan Boren (Oklahoma, 2nd district)
Leonard Boswell (Iowa, 3rd district)
Rick Boucher (Virginia, 9th district)
Charles W. Boustany, Jr. (Louisiana, 7th district)
Allen Boyd (Florida, 2nd district)
Kevin Brady (Texas, 8th district)
Robert Brady (Pennsylvania, 1st district)
Bruce L. Braley (Iowa, 1st district)
Corrine Brown (Florida, 3rd district)
Henry Brown (South Carolina, 1st district)
Vern Buchanan (Florida, 13th district)
Ken Calvert (California, 44th district)
Dave Camp (Michigan, 4th district)
John Campbell (California, 48th district)
Chris Cannon (Utah, 3rd district)
Eric Cantor (Virginia, 7th district)
Lois Capps (California, 23rd district)
Michael E. Capuano (Massachusetts, 8th district)
Dennis Cardoza (California, 18th district)
Russ Carnahan (Missouri, 3rd district)
André Carson (Indiana, 7th district)
Michael N. Castle (Delaware, At Large district)
Yvette D. Clarke (New York, 11th district)
Emanuel Cleaver (Missouri, 5th district)
James E. Clyburn (South Carolina, 6th district)
Howard Coble (North Carolina, 6th district)
Steve Cohen (Tennessee, 9th district)
Tom Cole (Oklahoma, 4th district)
K. Michael Conaway (Texas, 11th district)
Jim Cooper (Tennessee, 5th district)
Jim Costa (California, 20th district)
Robert E. "Bud" Cramer (Alabama, 5th district)
Ander Crenshaw (Florida, 4th district)
Joseph Crowley (New York, 7th district)
Barbara Cubin (Wyoming, At Large district)
Henry Cuellar (Texas, 28th district)
Elijah Cummings (Maryland, 7th district)
Artur Davis (Alabama, 7th district)
Danny K. Davis (Illinois, 7th district)
Susan Davis (California, 53rd district)
Tom Davis (Virginia, 11th district)
Diana DeGette (Colorado, 1st district)
Rosa L. DeLauro (Connecticut, 3rd district)
Charles W. Dent (Pennsylvania, 15th district)
Norman D. Dicks (Washington, 6th district)
John Dingell (Michigan, 15th district)
Joe Donnelly (Indiana, 2nd district)
Mike Doyle (Pennsylvania, 14th district)
David Dreier (California, 26th district)
Chet Edwards (Texas, 17th district)
Donna F. Edwards (Maryland, 4th district)
Vernon J. Ehlers (Michigan, 3rd district)
Keith Ellison (Minnesota, 5th district)
Brad Ellsworth (Indiana, 8th district)
Rahm Emanuel (Illinois, 5th district)
Jo Ann Emerson (Missouri, 8th district)
Eliot Engel (New York, 17th district)
Anna G. Eshoo (California, 14th district)
Bob Etheridge (North Carolina, 2nd district)
Terry Everett (Alabama, 2nd district)
Mary Fallin (Oklahoma, 5th district)
Sam Farr (California, 17th district)
Chaka Fattah (Pennsylvania, 2nd district)
Michael Ferguson (New Jersey, 7th district)
Vito Fossella (New York, 13th district)
Bill Foster (Illinois, 14th district)
Barney Frank (Massachusetts, 4th district)
Rodney Frelinghuysen (New Jersey, 11th district)
Jim Gerlach (Pennsylvania, 6th district)
Gabrielle Giffords (Arizona, 8th district)
Wayne Gilchrest (Maryland, 1st district)
Charlie A. Gonzalez (Texas, 20th district)
Bart Gordon (Tennessee, 6th district)
Kay Granger (Texas, 12th district)
Al Green (Texas, 9th district)
Luis Gutierrez (Illinois, 4th district)
John J. Hall (New York, 19th district)
Phil Hare (Illinois, 17th district)
Jane Harman (California, 36th district)
Alcee L. Hastings (Florida, 23rd district)
Wally Herger (California, 2nd district)
Brian Higgins (New York, 27th district)
Rubén Hinojosa (Texas, 15th district)
Mazie K. Hirono (Hawaii, 2nd district)
David Hobson (Ohio, 7th district)
Pete Hoekstra (Michigan, 2nd district)
Rush Holt (New Jersey, 12th district)
Mike Honda (California, 15th district)
Darlene Hooley (Oregon, 5th district)
Steny H. Hoyer (Maryland, 5th district)
Bob Inglis (South Carolina, 4th district)
Steve Israel (New York, 2nd district)
Jesse L. Jackson, Jr. (Illinois, 2nd district)
Sheila Jackson Lee (Texas, 18th district)
Eddie Bernice Johnson (Texas, 30th district)
Paul E. Kanjorski (Pennsylvania, 11th district)
Patrick Kennedy (Rhode Island, 1st district)
Dale Kildee (Michigan, 5th district)
Carolyn Kilpatrick (Michigan, 13th district)
Ron Kind (Wisconsin, 3rd district)
Pete King (New York, 3rd district)
Mark Kirk (Illinois, 10th district)
Ron Klein (Florida, 22nd district)
John Kline (Minnesota, 2nd district)
Joseph Knollenberg (Michigan, 9th district)
John R. "Randy" Kuhl, Jr. (New York, 29th district)
Ray LaHood (Illinois, 18th district)
Jim Langevin (Rhode Island, 2nd district)
Rick Larsen (Washington, 2nd district)
John B. Larson (Connecticut, 1st district)
Barbara Lee (California, 9th district)
Sander Levin (Michigan, 12th district)
Jerry Lewis (California, 41st district)
John Lewis (Georgia, 5th district)
Ron Lewis (Kentucky, 2nd district)
David Loebsack (Iowa, 2nd district)
Zoe Lofgren (California, 16th district)
Nita Lowey (New York, 18th district)
Daniel E. Lungren (California, 3rd district)
Tim Mahoney (Florida, 16th district)
Carolyn Maloney (New York, 14th district)
Ed Markey (Massachusetts, 7th district)
Jim Marshall (Georgia, 8th district)
Doris O. Matsui (California, 5th district)
Carolyn McCarthy (New York, 4th district)
Betty McCollum (Minnesota, 4th district)
Jim McCrery (Louisiana, 4th district)
Jim McDermott (Washington, 7th district)
James McGovern (Massachusetts, 3rd district)
John M. McHugh (New York, 23rd district)
Buck McKeon (California, 25th district)
Jerry McNerney (California, 11th district)
Michael R. McNulty (New York, 21st district)
Kendrick Meek (Florida, 17th district)
Gregory W. Meeks (New York, 6th district)
Charlie Melancon (Louisiana, 3rd district)
Brad Miller (North Carolina, 13th district)
Gary Miller (California, 42nd district)
George Miller (California, 7th district)
Harry E. Mitchell (Arizona, 5th district)
Alan B. Mollohan (West Virginia, 1st district)
Dennis Moore (Kansas, 3rd district)
Gwen Moore (Wisconsin, 4th district)
Jim Moran (Virginia, 8th district)
Christopher S. Murphy (Connecticut, 5th district)
Patrick J. Murphy (Pennsylvania, 8th district)
John Murtha (Pennsylvania, 12th district)
Sue Myrick (North Carolina, 9th district)
Jerrold Nadler (New York, 8th district)
Richard E. Neal (Massachusetts, 2nd district)
James L. Oberstar (Minnesota, 8th district)
David R. Obey (Wisconsin, 7th district)
John Olver (Massachusetts, 1st district)
Solomon P. Ortiz (Texas, 27th district)
Frank Pallone, Jr. (New Jersey, 6th district)
Bill Pascrell, Jr. (New Jersey, 8th district)
Ed Pastor (Arizona, 4th district)
Nancy Pelosi (California, 8th district)
Ed Perlmutter (Colorado, 7th district)
John E. Peterson (Pennsylvania, 5th district)
Charles W. "Chip" Pickering (Mississippi, 3rd district)
Earl Pomeroy (North Dakota, At Large district)
Jon Porter (Nevada, 3rd district)
David Price (North Carolina, 4th district)
Deborah Pryce (Ohio, 15th district)
Adam Putnam (Florida, 12th district)
George P. Radanovich (California, 19th district)
Nick Rahall (West Virginia, 3rd district)
Jim Ramstad (Minnesota, 3rd district)
Charles B. Rangel (New York, 15th district)
Ralph Regula (Ohio, 16th district)
Silvestre Reyes (Texas, 16th district)
Thomas M. Reynolds (New York, 26th district)
Laura Richardson (California, 37th district)
Harold Rogers (Kentucky, 5th district)
Mike Rogers (Alabama, 3rd district)
Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (Florida, 18th district)
Mike Ross (Arkansas, 4th district)
Dutch Ruppersberger (Maryland, 2nd district)
Bobby L. Rush (Illinois, 1st district)
Paul Ryan (Wisconsin, 1st district)
Tim Ryan (Ohio, 17th district)
John P. Sarbanes (Maryland, 3rd district)
Jim Saxton (New Jersey, 3rd district)
Jan Schakowsky (Illinois, 9th district)
Adam Schiff (California, 29th district)
Jean Schmidt (Ohio, 2nd district)
Allyson Y. Schwartz (Pennsylvania, 13th district)
David Scott (Georgia, 13th district)
Pete Sessions (Texas, 32nd district)
Joe Sestak (Pennsylvania, 7th district)
John Shadegg (Arizona, 3rd district)
Christopher Shays (Connecticut, 4th district)
Bill Shuster (Pennsylvania, 9th district)
Mike Simpson (Idaho, 2nd district)
Albio Sires (New Jersey, 13th district)
Ike Skelton (Missouri, 4th district)
Louise Slaughter (New York, 28th district)
Adam Smith (Washington, 9th district)
Lamar Smith (Texas, 21st district)
Vic Snyder (Arkansas, 2nd district)
Hilda Solis (California, 32nd district)
Mark E. Souder (Indiana, 3rd district)
Zachary T. Space (Ohio, 18th district)
Jackie Speier (California, 12th district)
John Spratt (South Carolina, 5th district)
John Sullivan (Oklahoma, 1st district)
Betty Sutton (Ohio, 13th district)
Tom Tancredo (Colorado, 6th district)
John Tanner (Tennessee, 8th district)
Ellen Tauscher (California, 10th district)
Lee Terry (Nebraska, 2nd district)
Mike Thompson (California, 1st district)
Mac Thornberry (Texas, 13th district)
Pat Tiberi (Ohio, 12th district)
John Tierney (Massachusetts, 6th district)
Edolphus Towns (New York, 10th district)
Niki Tsongas (Massachusetts, 5th district)
Fred Upton (Michigan, 6th district)
Chris Van Hollen (Maryland, 8th district)
Nydia M. Velázquez (New York, 12th district)
Greg Walden (Oregon, 2nd district)
Jim Walsh (New York, 25th district)
Zach Wamp (Tennessee, 3rd district)
Debbie Wasserman Schultz (Florida, 20th district)
Maxine Waters (California, 35th district)
Diane E. Watson (California, 33rd district)
Mel Watt (North Carolina, 12th district)
Henry Waxman (California, 30th district)
Anthony D. Weiner (New York, 9th district)
Peter Welch (Vermont, At Large district)
Dave Weldon (Florida, 15th district)
Jerry Weller (Illinois, 11th district)
Robert Wexler (Florida, 19th district)
Charles A. Wilson (Ohio, 6th district)
Heather Wilson (New Mexico, 1st district)
Joe Wilson (South Carolina, 2nd district)
Frank Wolf (Virginia, 10th district)
Lynn Woolsey (California, 6th district)
David Wu (Oregon, 1st district)
John A. Yarmuth (Kentucky, 3rd district)
(Congressional districts of DemObamatic traitors in roman, Republican traitors in italic.)
Of these 264 traitors, 204 voted in favor of both versions of the DemObamatic-controlled Congress' declaration of economic war against the United States: House bill number 3997, which the House failed to pass following roll call number 674, on September 29; and House bill number 1424, which it passed following roll call number 681, on October 3.
After the DemObamatic traitors led by Traitor Pelosi changed the first bill's title and contents from a Heroes Earnings Assistance and Relief Tax Act to the so-called Emergency Economic Stabilization Act, they tried using it as the House's steamroller "vehicle" for Congress' hundred-page declaration of economic war against the United States.
Even with the 204 traitors and Traitor McDermott voting in favor of that version, or 140 DemObamarat traitors but only 65 Republican ones so treasonously voting (and Traitor Weller not voting), it failed. Claiming a need for "adult supervision" of those House members who patriotically defended our states against the traitors' economic war of aggression, Traitor Pelosi and her fellow traitors — joined now by their aiders and comforters in the Senate — were undaunted.
The traitors' progressive move on the "United States" Senate had their aiders and comforters there changing the second bill's title and contents furiously from a Paul Wellstone Mental Health and Addiction Equity Act to their declaration of economic war against the United States, but all the while plotting with them to create and unleash a far more monstrous version that would weigh in at well over four hundred pages, then using all that as the Senate's mega-steamroller "vehicle" for their overt and expanding acts of treason. The "U.S." Senate, of course, being long synonymous with treason anyway, swiftly passed this buck — now laden not only with their vote-buying pork and kickbacks, but with their economic letters of marque and reprisal as well as rules concerning their captures of our once-free markets — back to Traitor Pelosi and her treasonous House.
That done, the only thing left for the House's 204 hard-core traitors to do was recruit into their treasonous ranks a sufficient number of additional traitors, using as bait the vote-buying bribes strewn throughout that second version of their declaration of economic war against the United States.
They accomplished their treasonous goal when 33 more DemObamarat traitors (after losing Double Traitor McDermott who apparently got cold feet) and 26 more Republican ones (including Traitor Weller) accepted those bribes, turned coat, and voted in favor of the most widely witnessed, most overt, and so far most unpunished acts of treason ever committed against the United States of America.
Not surprisingly, in the so-called "people's house" more DemObamatic members were in favor of than opposed to each version of this treason. Which is the exact opposite of how Republican members voted.
Until we as a people have determined for ourselves that a "United States" House of "Representatives" controlled as it has been these last mere twenty-one months by a party so composed mostly of traitors to our country, is not at all in our best interests, especially our economic ones, not only will it never be "our" House but it will never be "our" country.
Packages and school supplies raised through these organizations are transported to Iraq, free of charge, by FedEx, then distributed to Iraqi children by our brave freedom fighters.
