If by "tolerant" you mean burning or banishing anybody who doesn't "think" feel the same way they do.
J
ust ask any non-liberal in "tolerant" Hollywood or any non-liberal citizen in the whole "tolerant" state of New York. Yes, they can tell you how much the liberal rulers there are. They understand completely that liberals' idea of an ideal "debate" is one at which only liberals are allowed to speak or, better yet, even show up.
The magistrates of 1692 Salem, Massachusetts showed more tolerance towards those they accused of witchcraft than liberals with that kind of power ever would towards anybody who doesn't totally agree with everything they say and do. The former's "trials" were more fair than the liberals', "Is she now or has she ever been a supporter of anybody other than us!? No?! Then she's a racist/extremist/homophobe/gun-nut/teabagger! Burn her!"
With tolerance like theirs, who needs intolerance?
This is why calling liberals "progressives" is unreasonable. It's like saying that members of the National Socialist German Workers' Party were all just a bunch of fun-loving humanitarians.
Now he's telling your doctor, "If you like your practice, you won't be able to keep your practice if you can't fully comply with all our extremely costly, excessively time-consuming, and egregiously burdensome dictates. Period!"
(WBIR-Kingston) Practitioners have less than a month to meet new standards under the Affordable [sic] Care Act (ACA).
However, some East Tennessee private practices are choosing to leave the business instead.
Dr. Robert Parker of Parker Family Eyecare in Kingston will close his private practice by the end of the month. He spent three years at the Race Street location.
Parker said it is too burdensome to meet the new federal requirements....
"If you don't have a scribe or someone who can input it into the computer while you're seeing the patient, you will find yourself doing a lot of inputting instead of listening to the patient and taking care of the patient. I've already had some doctors tell me that's a problem," he said....
Parker knows of at least two East Tennessee medical doctors choosing to close their practices; he believes private practices will one day be nonexistent.
"When they lose that local person that they've gone to for years and has watched their families grow up, you lose a lot of continuity of the care," Parker said.
Starting in January 2014, doctors who do not use the electronic system could face [business-killing] penalties.
Thanks for tyrannically forcing us to lose our doctors we like, Ø Dictator-in-Chief.
Just goes to show once again your alleged "promises" aren't worth the lie-drenched bad breath they were spewed on.
That's what the lying liar-in-chief Baracrook Øbait'n'switch meant each of multiple times he his teleprompter "misspoke." Right, New York Slimes?
M
ake no mistake: If lying Øliar told this Nixon-grade lie under oath in court, he'd be rotting in jail now for perjury just like any other criminal who willfully and knowingly committed such a grievous offense.
Fact is, the lying liar publicly and repeatedly swore that "if you like your plan, you can keep your plan," even after he knew that statement was a total lie.
Did it depend upon what the meaning of the word "you" is?
Let me be absolutely clear: Had a Republican president signed the manifestly disastrous Unaffordable No-Care Act and said those 10 words, lying Øliar's same leg-humping media lapdogs who're howling "our master misspoke!" would be rabidly promoting demands for the president's prompt impeachment, if not outright demanding it themselves.
The seven-year-old startup is already well-respected for guarding its users' privacy. It has fought government subpoenas that other companies, like Google, routinely comply with. The Electronic Frontier Foundation, a privacy group, recently gave Twitter six out of six stars for protecting user data from government monitoring.
"No one wants a pen that's going to rat them out," Alexander Macgillivray, Twitter's top lawyer, said last year.
As for the betrayers of us all:
Eight companies are said to be giving the NSA access to user data as part of PRISMFASCISM[FIFY –LR]: AOL, Apple, Facebook, Google, Microsoft, PalTalk, Skype, and Yahoo. Dropbox was apparently described in an NSA presentation as "coming soon."
Now we see that—
Facebook, Apple, Google, Microsoft and Yahoo have all denied flatly that they allowed the government direct access to their servers or even heard of PRISMFASCISM.
Yeah, we know what your flat denialriver in Egypt was worth:
With providers insisting that they had granted NSA no access to their servers and yet internal documents at NSA showing they had that kind of access, one claim or the other had to eventually collapse....
I imagine this makes the CEOs of Google, Microsoft, AOL, and Facebook a little embarrassed. Twitter, as AP noted, would have been a pretty critical platform to penetrate, given the ability to message privately through the firm's systems (DMs). Apparently, all it took was a refusal to make the NSA go away. On the other hand, perhaps the NSA could find at least some of that traffic routing through some of the servers they did access.
How did the NSA access those data streams? Contrary to the denials last night from Google and others, the NYT's Claire Cain Miller reports that the firms set up systems to allow the NSA to gain access to their content — as the companies themselves dumped it into secure "rooms" for NSA perusal.
Redefining "marriage" within the borders of a State is no one's business except that State's.
N
o United States district, circuit, or even supreme court has any jurisdiction under what's left of our national Constitution to decide what marriage means in any or every state. Absent a constitutional amendment to the contrary, only the people of each state or their duly chosen representatives may make that decision for themselves. They, of course, may not impose their decision on the people of any other state in a manner that voids or makes meaningless the latter's own decision; and the U.S. Congress has the power to ensure that they don't.
In both cases now before it, the orders of the Supreme Court of the United States ought to be unanimous: We must let each state decide. No state may be forced to accept another state's decision.
Consent of the governed is the only principle a government can follow to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers. No just or legitimate power can ever be derived from any attempt to transcend that principle, no matter what the cause. At every level it is so fundamental to our form of government, there would be no ground of public confidence in the government once its violation is allowed. Indeed, it is the beginning and the end of the American story:
When it became necessary, the laws of nature and of nature's God entitled us to assume among the powers of the earth a separate and equal station, one within which we alone have authority to institute, together for our nation and respectively for our states, new governments. In each case, we were determined to lay its foundation on such principles and organize its powers in such form as to us seemed most likely to effect our safety and happiness. The general result was a "system approaching so near to perfection as it does" that it "can only end in Despotism, as other forms have done before it, when the people shall become so corrupted as to need despotic Government, being incapable of any other."
Eighty years later our consent was required to abolish slavery and to make it unconstitutional for any government to deny or abridge a citizen's rights on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude. In light of that consent, the U.S. Supreme Court belatedly but unanimously overturned all laws prohibiting miscegenation, which by 1967 were on the books in only a third of the states. A man and a women, regardless either's skin color, now could marry each other anywhere in the United States. That decision, however, prohibited discrimination based on physical attributes, not behavioral choices.
So what if two sisters want to "marry" each other? If a state's law or highest court says they have the "right" to, what effect should that have on the laws against incest in other states? Can there be any constitutional grounds for prohibiting those states the power to enforce such laws if "Mrs. and Mrs. Doe-Doe" choose to reside in any of them?
So what if more than two persons want to "marry" each other? Are all laws against polygyny, polyandry, or group marriage rendered unenforceable in every state when one state decides they should be? (And if a state decides that all animals and/or plants have the same rights as human beings, what then?)
Must we seek to impose these views by force of law on our fellow citizens? If so, what is the point of enacting any marriage "law"?
If a mere five judges of the Supreme Court either fail to realize that the real goal of these views' proponents is not to redefine "marriage" but to render that term substantively meaningless, or otherwise decide to activistly promote that goal, how much more corrupted must the American people become before they themselves decide that the term "despotism" can never again retain with them any meaning at all?
"If your family earns less than $250,000 a year, you will not see your taxes increased a single dime. I repeat: notonesingledime." –Baracrook Øliar
“I
'm going to increase all middle-class Americans' taxes," the lying liar really meant to say. "I'm going to tax the crap out of the middle class! Yes I can!"
According to pollster Scott Rasmussen, 54 percent of likely U.S. voters want Obamacare repealed. Those numbers will go up, not down, as citizens realize that this 2,801-page monstrosity is an unworkable, bloated, Washington power grab turbocharged by a near-universal tax hike.
His Lyingness has not only run of out folks to lie to, he's now run out of things to lie about.
Neither the Social Security/Medicare Analogy™ nor the Automobile Insurance one applies to the purely partisan "Affordable" "Care" Act Dictatorship.
E
veryone breathes, therefore, ipso facto, everyone must be forced to sign contracts and to otherwise participate in commerce.
What country do Demøfascists, who alone foisted that unprecedented monstrosity on us, think feel they live in? Communist China? The "former" Soviet Union?
Only in their wettest dreams.
Where in that "living, breathing" all but dead document known as the Constitution is it written that yes we can be compelled, under color of law — especially one they first have to pass before yes "you can find out what is in it" — to buy any object of commerce approved solely by Demøfascists?
The No Right to Choose Clause®?
Our Constitution begins to lose its essential meaning when the fascist schemes of strictly partisan hacks in two branches of "our" government can progress this far without any semblance of checks and balances, much less sanity.
It is the real hope of the American people the third branch will change all that.
“Rebellion to Tyrants is Obedience to God”
“At what point then is the approach of danger to be expected? I answer, if it ever reaches us, it must spring up amongst us. If destruction be our lot, we must ourselves be its author and finisher.”
Mitt "Two Knobs" Romnetchasketchy top adviser Eric Fehrnstrom:
“Well, I think you hit a reset button for the fall campaign. Everything changes. It’s almost like an Etch a Sketch. You can kind of shake it up and we start all over again.”
C
ue Ginger Rogers:
Nothing's impossible I have found, For when my chin is on the ground, I turn my two knobs, Shake myself up, Start all over again.
Don't lose your confidence if you slip, Be grateful for a pleasant trip, And turn your two knobs, Shake yourself up, Start all over again.
Work like a soul inspired, Till the battle of the day is won. You may be sick and tired, But you'll be a sketch, my son!
Will you remember the famous men, Who had to fall to rise again? So do a flip-flop, Turn your two knobs, Shake yourself up, Start all over again.
ØbaMitten's fellow "progressives" in the mainsewer media and the Demøcrook Politburo ("severely" redundant, I know) are all over this.
Meanwhile, Øbamney merely wants us conservatives tied up in a crate strapped to the top of his station wagon as it goes barreling down the campaign trail. When out of shear terror we soil both ourselves and — more importantly to him — his back window, he'll simply pull into a gas station just long enough to hose us down before returning us to his cruel crate, making us suffer even more that harrowing ride. To him we're nothing but a forgettable piece of luggage that he thinks feels yes he can willfully neglect.
The worst part of this whole debate is the ObamarxAdministration'sRegime's decision to hold military pay hostage to the budget debate. For the last few decades, government shutdowns have been guided by an OMB directive issued during the Reagan Administration. Under this directive, military personnel would continue to receive the paychecks while politicians argued about the budget. The Clinton Administration, during the last government shutdown, kept the paychecks flowing.
The Obama AdministrationNational Socialist Dictatorship has overturned the old OMB directive and has decided to suspend military paychecks if there is a government shutdown. No reason to do it ... but they have decided to. Reprehensible.
emember this tug at your heartstrings blather just before Øfascist"Care" Teh Bill None May Read™ was passed and signed into law by Mo, Larry, Curly Øbamao, Peloser, Reidtard, and their criminally bribed accomplices?
(Reuters) – Nearly 45,000 people die in the United States each year — one every 12 minutes — in large part because they lack health insurance and can not get good care, Harvard Medical School researchers found in an analysis released on Thursday.
Sounds horrible.
"Shut up and pass [TBNMR™] now!!11!!ELEVENHUNDREDELEVENTY!!!111!!!" bleated Demmøbsterrats and other fascist liberals.
An estimated 15,000 Medicare patients die each month [i.e., 180,000 each year — one every 3 minutes!] in part because of care [sic] they receive in the hospital, says a government study released today.
Kill the Øfascist"Care" bill now or be killed by it.
The first story of the day comes from the Fort Worth Star Telegram in Texas, where a health insurer called Health Markets has laid off 70 workers and expects up to 180 more as it braces for the costs of Obamacare and other government mandates....
The second story of the day comes from the Worcester Telegram in Massachusetts, where a local hospital will slash about 50 full-time jobs.
W
hat's worse, that and much more are all intentional.
Soon the only "jobs" out there will be in Civil "Service."
Everyone entirely dependent on Big Government™ for everything.
That's how we're being controlled.
The worst part is we're the ones who put those power-hungry controllers (Ds-USSA) in such high positions to control us.
Mercifully for us, the Lord Almighty created something each of us most needs to put an end to their despotic regime once and for all.
Enabling their evil fatcat union cronies to live off stolen Food Stamp funds.
Madison — The U.S. House on Tuesday passed and President Barack Obama signedDemøcrook Regime rammed down the American people's throats a bill that will provide states with $26 billion for teachersthe Regime's fatcat union buddies and health care programs, helping ease Wisconsin's budget deficit and allowing school districts here to hire an estimated 3,000 teacherswell-off union members....
Democrats said it was essential to help the needy (by cutting their Food Stamp benefits?!) and protect schoolstheir rich Big Union special interests that have had to lay off teachersDemøcrook voters because of the recessionØbungler's lingering "Great" Depression. But Republicans called the bill a giveaway to teachers' unions and an example of wasteful spending that voters will punish the Democrats for in this fall's elections (from their lips to our infinitely just and merciful Lord's Ears).
The legislation was approved mainly along party lines by a vote of 247-161. Wisconsin's delegation split along party affiliation.
The aid for the statesDemøcrooks' bribed Big Union lobbyists and special interests is to be paid for mostly by closing a tax loophole used by multinational corporations (but not the ones used by Øbribeya's boss George $oros) and by reducing food stamp benefits for the poor.
political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition."
Backlash against his and his fellow desperate violent terrorists' outrages.
M
ove over, al-Qaeda. America has much more clear and present terrorist threats to contend with on her own soil. Right now from Baracist Obigot's personal terrorist brownshits at al-National (Socialist) Association for the Advancement of Colored People and al-National (Socialist) Council of La Raza The Race.
LOS ANGELES | A group of gay rights activists disrupted President Obama's speech at a fundraiser here for Sen.Ma'am Barbara Boxer Monday night, decrying what they describe as Mr. Obama's inaction on overturning the military's ban on gay service members and calling on him to submit repeal language to Congress.
The activists interrupted Mr. Obama in the middle of his remarks to high-value Democratic donors during a reception at the California Science Center, with one protester shouting from the audience, "What about 'Don't ask, don't tell?'"
Mr. Obama yelled back, "We are going to do that."
He kept talking, increasing his volume to be heard over the protesters as the crowd took up a chant of "Yes, we can," to drown them out.
...all of his weekly approval averages since late February have been below 50%.
Obama's latest quarterly score of 48.8% is below average by historical standards, ranking in the 35th percentile of all presidential quarters for which Gallup has data, dating to 1945. The average historical quarterly approval average is 54%....
[That makes him one of only three] elected presidents after World War II whose fifth quarter approval averages were below the 50% mark.
Keep digging, Master Racist Øfascist. Maybe you'll find your mystical "bump" way down there somewhere.
Packages and school supplies raised through these organizations are transported to Iraq, free of charge, by FedEx, then distributed to Iraqi children by our brave freedom fighters.
Paula Priesse
