Gay fascists and their Intolerable Acts.

ascists are never satisfied. Power instantly goes to their empty heads. Revenge and retribution are the only things that drive them. You stand up in any way to them and their overbearing, tyrannical acts and threats, they will utterly destroy you, then goosestep over anything that remains. Until you submit completely to their every whim, to whatever may be their will this week, you are a mortal enemy of their fascist state.

Go to hell, Gayzis. I'll never submit to fascists — either of the islamonazi variety or of your EvolWins one.

Labels: degenerate Democrooks (BIRM), Democrat War on Americans, Democrat War on Christians, fascist totalitarian liberals (BIRM), godless liberals (BIRM), good versus evil, liberals are always extreme

	11:12 AM   0

Bigotry is bad.

he biological purists argue that marriage is naturally between one man and one woman of different families, that it is meant to support a naturally stable structure in which children are created and raised and by which our species best propagates and thrives.

A few well-shopped jurists have said, in effect, "What do the laws of nature and of nature's God know?" Marriage, they and other non-biological purists counter, is between any two (or more) consenting persons. Whether opposite-sex, same-sex, or even same-kin, it should not matter. The homophobes, incestophobes, and other bigots have no case under the laws of enlightened nations.

With the issue being defined in terms of rights, not nature, it won't be long before all persons are free to choose to marry whomever they respectively wish. A man may marry his father(s), his adult brother(s), and/or his adult son(s); a woman her mother(s), adult sister(s), and/or adult daughter(s). Similarly, a woman may marry her father(s), her adult brother(s), and/or her adult son(s); a man his mother(s), adult sister(s), and/or adult daughter(s). Their right to choose should not be curtailed by bigotry, superstition, or fear.

We all have heard the propaganda of incestophobes that a same-kin marriage is more likely to produce physically or mentally challenged children than a non-kin one. "Inbreeding" is the derogatory term they use. Yet their beliefs are based solely on historical anecdote or biased "studies" that allegedly show the "dangers" of it; and their clichés and stereotypes promote only ignorance and hatred. Of course, such "concerns" are irrelevant with respect to same-sex-same-kin marriages.

Our modern view of tolerance demands that anything goes. Nothing should stop it. This is becoming especially true for the evolving construct of marriage.

Labels: annihilating liberalism, Democrat War on Americans, extremely irresponsible liberals (BIRM), godless liberals (BIRM), greedy and selfish liberals (BIRM), liberals are always extreme, Suicidemocrats

	12:40 PM   0

Extreme censorship of even religious "references."

owever, had this 6-year-old girl in North Carolina wrote that her veteran grandfather prayed to allah, no doubt the government skewl PCensors™ would've allowed her to read her poem at the Veterans Day assembly:

The poem honored her two grandfathers who served during the Vietnam War.

"He prayed to God for peace," she wrote of one of them. "He prayed to God for strength."

Unfortunately, a parent found out about this, and complained to the school district....

After fully examining the issue during the [McDowell County Board of Education] meeting, President and Chief Executive Officer Ken Paulson stated the [government] school did in fact have the right [power* –FIFY, LR] to remove the word "God" from the child's poem.

"Courts have consistently held up the rights for students to express themselves unless their speech is disruptive to the [government] school," stated Paulson according to McDowell News. "When the little girl wrote the poem and included a reference to God she had every right to do that. The First Amendment protects all Americans. She had every right to mention God, (but) that dynamic changed when they asked her to read it at an assembly."

Paulson said that because the students were a captive audience — they were at a mandatory assembly with no place else to go if they didn't want to attend — administrators had the right [power] to remove the word "God."

"Courts have found that religious references at [government] school-sponsored events generally run afoul of the First Amendment," said Paulson. "When a public [government] school knows there's going to be a reference to religion then there is a problem and they have to address it. The reason for these restrictions is to prevent the government from endorsing a specific faith or religion. So public [government] schools have to steer clear of religious references."

Fox News contacted the parents of the student in question for comment, but they declined.

Pray for America, Dear Citizens. Just don't let anyone catch you doing it openly in "our" government skewls.

Labels: death of Freedom, godless liberals (BIRM), liberals are always extreme, more liberal intolerance, Outlaw Government Schools NOW, Separation of Common Sense and State, socialist injustice

	2:33 PM   0

Had just 167,000 switched their votes, Øfascist wouldn't have "won"* the election.

hat's only 36,595 voters in Florida, 51,741 in Ohio, 57,956 in Virginia, and 20,330 in New Hampshire. Given this season's Super Bowl at the Superdome in New Orleans can accomodate 73,000 of them, the margin is actually less than three.

Also, had just 490,000 switched nationwide, Øfascist wouldn't have "won" even a majority of votes.

Moreover, had just 1,020,000 switched, Øfascist wouldn't have "won" a plurality of votes, either.

For somebody who "won" fewer electoral votes, fewer popular votes, a smaller percentage of the popular vote, and fewer states than he did in his first election — an unprecedented feat in American history — only an extremist nutjøbama fascist liberal^(birm) could consider this anything other than a Pyrrhic victory.

Labels: godless liberals (BIRM), greedy and selfish liberals (BIRM), lawbreaking liberals (BIRM), liberals are always extreme, socialist injustice, thieving liberals (BIRM), undocumented lawbreakers, vote fraud

	2:16 PM   0

Listen to the delegates oppose much more loudly any mention of God and Jerusalem in their party politburo platform.

The No's clearly had it. "Boo God."

Labels: 2012: end of an err0r, desperate liberals (BIRM), godless liberals (BIRM), idiot liberals (BIRM), liberals are always extreme, more liberal hypocrisy, Obama's War on Christians, Obama's War on Jews, videos

	8:55 PM   0

The United States's official motto? Is it "In God We Trust"? Nope. "Annuit Coeptis (He, [God,] has favored our undertakings)"? Not unless "He" is Øloser. "Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God"? Are you kidding!?

o, we can't have any of that in the Era Error of Øfascism™.

His Røyal Teleprompterness has unlawfully declared to the world that "Our Diversity Is Our [Divide&conquerrats's] Strength" is the national motto now.

Sheikh ul-Hussein Øballah ("Power Be Upon ME!"), in effect, unilaterally repealed the longstanding law passed by our elected representatives which states "In God we trust" is the national motto.

But what else would you expect from this tyrant?

What's next on the Øfascist al-Chopping Block^®?

Labels: fascist totalitarian liberals (BIRM), godless liberals (BIRM), narcissist liberals (BIRM), Obama's War Against the People, Obama's War on America, Obama's War on Christians, treason

	8:27 AM   0

Mmm, mmm, mmm. Adolf Frickin' Hitler. He said we must be fair today, Join his Party or you'll pay! Mmm, mmm, mmm. Adolf Frickin' Hitler. He said that we must take a stand, To do it for the Fatherland! Mmm, mmm, mmm. Adolf Frickin' Hitler. He said red, yellow, black or white, All obey him, yeah, that's right! Mmm, mmm, mmm. Adolf Frickin' Hitler. Sieg Heil! Mmm, mmm, mmm. Adolf Frickin' Hitler.

know. Sounds "better" in the original German.

Labels: fascist totalitarian liberals (BIRM), godless liberals (BIRM), Kommunist Kool-Aid Kult (aka liberalism), National Socialist liberals (BIRM), Obama 'Nation', treason

	6:31 AM   0

Because he thinks feels you haven't had enough of him and his already.

repare to be summarily judged racists yet again. Dumb, ignorant, and misinformed for not obsequiously bowing before his Røyal Screw-You Brilliantestness. "Uncivil" for not taking too kindly to his constantly calling you liars.

All. Weekend. Løng.

Fear-møngering to the max as he brings up over and over and over Our Foreboding Future Filled With Unspeakable Horrors And Utter Hopelessness™ if we don't let him and his death czardøm effectively make all our health care "chøices" for us — because, you uncivilly dumb racists, yes, he, not we, can only know what's best for us. Knows better than you everything you should allow yourselves to have or accept.

Instead of watching and hearing a fake gød continually berate and insult you, I beg you spend this weekend humbly asking the real One to show each of us why, how, where, and when we, with His divine help, can and will need to do all of what pleases Him.

Labels: anti-America liberals (BIRM), DeMSMocrat-dictatorial complex, desperate liberals (BIRM), fascist totalitarian liberals (BIRM), godless liberals (BIRM), miserably failing liberals (BIRM)

	7:45 PM   2

"Judge not, that ye be not judged." Mat 7:1


I Confess My Immorality
by
Baracketeer al-Hussein Øfascist

y grandma, who was a typical white person (i.e., racist), got really old.

In her typical white person fashion, Toot (as I called her, which is not nearly as bad as the racial or ethnic stereotypes she had on more than one occasion uttered which made me cringe) also got really ill.

Now, I felt she would be better off just taking the pain pill. But, no. She selfishly decided to instead get, first, a corneal transplant then, in the very same year, a hip replacement, thus putting yet another major strain on America's health care system.

I wanted to talk to my spiritual adviser about it and hopefully get some guidance. I would tell him, "Reverend Wright, we've known each other for 20 years, and you've always been there for me, showing me the evil ways of typical white persons and so on. Well, in my own life the chickens have come home to roost: I have a sick grandma who, in her typical white person fashion, refuses to see she would be better off just taking the pain pill and so forth. What should I do?"

Only problem is, I had already thrown my spiritual adviser under the bus, even after promising "I could no more abandon him than I could the black community." So I was forced to seek guidance elsewhere.

I turned to my wife. Since she was, for the first time in her life, proud of America, I felt she would understand why Toot's selfish decisions were putting major strains on her newfound pride and joy's health care system.

Only problem is, back when my wife was receiving $273,618 $317,000 a year from the University of Chicago Hospitals, she was mixed up in a heartless scheme to dump poorer patients on community hospitals — an immoral practice known as "redirecting" — just so she and her fellow board members could reserve their hospital's beds for well-heeled patients requiring highly profitable procedures.

This callous disregard for the disadvantaged might also explain why we, from 2000 through 2004, never gave more than $3,500 a year in charitable donations (about 1 percent of our annual earnings).

Now I've heard that the Lord asks 10 percent. But I haven't been able to confirm this with my spiritual adviser, as he has been under the bus weather, so to speak.

Speaking of under the weather, I next turned to my good friends Bill and Bernardine for guidance regarding my typical white person (i.e., racist) grandma. Except I really didn't want to involve Bernardine since she'd once said, "Dig it! First they killed those pigs and then they put a fork in pig (Sharon) Tate's belly. Wild!" For that matter, I really didn't want to involve Bill, either, since he'd once said, "I don't regret setting bombs... I feel we didn't do enough"; and when asked if he'd do it all again, said, "I don't want to discount the possibility."

Knives and forks or bombs, although they could very well get the job done in an extremely efficient and cost-effective manner, wasn't exactly what I had in mind for "honkie" Toot.

Thus I felt my search for guidance had to move on.

But before I could decide to whom I should turn next, it dawned on me. "Barry," I told myself, "you're an evil rich multi-millionaire yourself. Why don't you pay for Toot's hip replacement so she won't have to go around putting any more strain on America's health care system?"

I'm sure the American Association of Retired Persons (AARP) would've formally endorsed it, too, just like they have my single payer "Trojan horse" health care "reform" health insurance "reform" plan (which I still hadn't read even weeks after Acting Presidents Peloseri, Reidtard, et al. "I" proposed it). Especially since this occurred way before AARP started to lose over 60,000 of its members.

Except I didn't know how much that hip replacement would cost. I still don't. Otherwise, I would have paid out of pocket for that hip replacement just because she's my grandmother. Despite her also being a typical white person (i.e., racist).

Perhaps I could've gotten a tax write-off by paying for it. I don't know. I recently asked my treasury secretary about it, but he wasn't any help. He just gave me one of his old TurboTax^® discs and said, "Have at it!"

Well, what else can one expect from a blatant tax cheat?

It's a wonder I ever appointed someone like him to make sure everyone fully complies with our tax code!

Maybe when my political adviser David Axelrod gets that $2 million from AKPD Media via PhRMA (i.e., the special-interest pharmaceutical lobby which I promised would not have to come up with more than $80 billion in projected cost savings or compete with any imported drugs from Canada, and which soon afterwards "coincidentally" launched a $150 million advertising blitz calling for passage of my single payer "Trojan horse" health care "reform" health insurance "reform" plan that, at the time, I hadn't even read), he'll loan me whatever the normal amount of a hip replacement was back in 2008. I could then take that amount and spend it on, say, another New York City Broadway Show "Date Night" but claim on my amended tax return it was actually used to pay for Toot's surgery.

Hopefully I can get my chief-of-staff Rahm to back me up on this. I could tell him it's a serious crisis that, I'm sure, he'd never want to go to waste.

It's unfortunate Toot wasn't a veteran. If she was, and if she were alive today, I could simply require her to read the Death Book that I've reinstated for all aging veterans.

Oh, well.

Anyway, I see now that it's time for me to pull the plug, so to speak, on these confessions of mine regarding my immorality.

But don't worry. I have (and am undoubtedly going to keep having) plenty more where these came from.

Labels: godless liberals (BIRM)

	12:56 AM   0

Roe v. Wade — our generation's Dred Scott v. Sandford.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created [not "pushed/pulled out the uterus"] equal, that they are endowed by their Creator [not "Constitution," not "government," not "womb-equipped parental unit"] with certain unalienable Rights [not "constitutional Rights," not "Rights dependent on the state's generosity or supreme court's opinion respecting whether they should be bestowed"], that among these are Life....

– Declaration of Independence

mancipating all created human beings from the liberal tyranny that consigns them, under allegedly "settled law," a mere part of someone else's body and allows that other person the absolute and arbitrary "right to choose" whether he or she even gets the chance to live, much less any to enjoy liberty or pursue happiness, is the cause of every true Progressive.

To our collective shame, our nation has had devalued and unwanted human beings before — not wanting them to be recognized as human beings, not wanting them to have rights, not wanting them in any way afforded the equal protection of the laws — because we once held they are really, in every significant respect, inferior to us.

Although no one can reasonably deny that a created person has a body with heart, fingers, eyes, and brain that dreams and registers pain, it is by virtue of his temporary uterine residence that Democrats foist on him, as they did every "member of the Negro race," a "degenerating 'nobodiness.'" That is, Democrats deem him effectually a nonentity around whose head, yes, they can literally clamp their tortuously sterilized law in order to pull apart, reduce, and scrape out the very essence of his personhood as if he were some malignant lump of cancerous tissue.

So Democrats won't use words like "person" or "human being" to honor him, but words that only degrade and dehumanize him and, under their "settled law," make him nothing more than a possession of someone whom that inhumane law allows to further devalue in the extreme by choosing for him a cruel and calculated death. "Yes, we can empower ourselves to kill a person created in the Creator's image fetus. And if we could, we'd kill the Creator Himself every 'god' that would deny us such self-serving power."

"Fetus"? Democrats today use it as their direct predecessors did the word "nigger." A subhuman neither entitled to nor worthy of any civil rights.

No doubt, were a baby "fetus" medically able to leap out of the womb and escape from his or her mistress, today's pro-enslavement Democrats^(birm) would be demanding a universal Fugitive Fetus Act that commands "apprehension and return of that fetus for and to its rightful owner." Who cares if the returned "fetus" she subsequently chooses to abort could've been, had he lived, the next Booker T. Washington?

As it did in its Dred Scott decision, the supreme court in Roe summarily dismissed the personhood of the human being which the petitioner had humbly appealed to that court to protect, declaring instead that under "undisputed" "settled" law he and all persons like him were and are merely the private property of their respective owners.

The supreme court justices appointed by effectively pro-enslavement Democrat presidents^(birm) held that a slaveholder's "right to choose" what will happen to any "three-fifths" person belonging to and thus devalued by him is a constitutional one, and that it would violate his fundamental privacy rights to hold otherwise. (Dred Scott knew he was sunk when he saw them all wearing on their robes the official Democrat Party campaign button that said, "My slave, my choice.")

Theirs was no different from their anti-Progressive successors' opinion a hundred years later that a women's "right to choose" what will happen to any zero-fifths person belonging to and thus devalued by her is equally constitutional.

Except the right to choose what happens to a created life ends with the choice to be an instrument in the creation of that life. The rest are responsibilities. The only right that applies afterwards is the always overarching one of self-defense. Although a "fetus" is mortally the most unselfish human being there is — if he dies while attached to a woman he normally won't threaten her life, but if she's the one who dies she'll likely take him with her — there are rare instances in which he may leave her no choice but to defend herself by whatever means then at her disposal, in order to prevent her imminent injury or death. However, the right to choose whether to defend oneself in such instances cannot be exercised by anyone else. Also, anyone who caused her to have no choice but to either be instrumental in that life's creation or risk being so, is guilty of both rape and the crime of an actual or attempted desecration even more heinous, since the violator knows or should know it forces her to make the most unspeakable of choices and forever debases the remainder of her life and all of the child's she may try or be unable to keep; and what she chooses will happen to any life so created, whether a scheduled death or confined for life by shame, should be the sentence imposed on the violator as well.

To recap:

Democrats vigorously supported the supreme court's Dred Scott decision and vigorously opposed the emancipation of any slaves.

Republicans vigorously opposed the supreme court's Dred Scott decision and vigorously supported the emancipation of all slaves.

Which political party was on the side of liberty and represented the progress of freedom?

Even after the Civil War (started by Democrats, by the way), Democrats continually sought and succeeded to oppress the natural and unalienable liberties of all citizens: Where one person can be unjustly denied freedom, all can be denied it.

It wasn't until the Republicans in Congress — who as a party, unlike Democrats, always supported those liberties — had enough votes to defeat the Democrats' majority opposition to all civil rights bills, that these Democrat Party-caused injustices finally came to an end.

No wonder Democrats feel so guilty about acts of racism. It's because they're the ones who committed and even legalized those acts!

Thus, it's neither a wonder that Democrats have continually sought and succeeded to oppress the natural and unalienable liberties of all created human life.

Republicans want to end these Democrat Party-caused injustices as well. Republicans, not Democrats by any stretch, represent the progress of freedom. Again Republicans, unlike Democrats, are on the side of liberty.

If one were able to channel the great pro-life, -liberty, and -pursuit of happiness Progressive Frederick Douglass, no doubt he'd see and oppose the similar stain of inhumanity which marks us all.

Labels: 'all men are CREATED equal...', culture of death and destruction, godless liberals (BIRM), good versus evil, Liberalism Kills, liberalism: THE ideology of hate, more liberal intolerance

	11:38 PM   0

No, just an ungodly, opulent maladministration that considers itself and its fellow Democorrupt Party crooks above the law of either God or man. A malady on our nation that, yes, We the People can hope to change in the very near future.

ere's the evidence that "we do not consider ourselves a Christian nation":

United States Constitution, conclusion to the original articles.

"Our Lord" being the Seventh Incarnation of Hinduism's Vishnu as Rama-Chandra.

President George Washington's Farewell Address.

This "same religion" being islam that, for the first and last time ever in its history, suspended "ideals and a set of values" which otherwise always bind its citizens enslaved subjects, to create our democratic republic.

President John Adams' letter to officers of the Massachusetts Militia's 3rd Brigade, 1st Division.

That's why the Buddhists composing the constitutional convention of 1787, were able to pull off "the greatest single effort of national deliberation that the world has ever seen."

Even the White House's Easter Egg Roll shows "we do not consider ourselves a Christian nation."

Ah, the atheists' famous "Sunday Schools." They've always been a big hit at the White House.

The images below definitely show it.

 
(left: B. Hussein Øbamuslim wearing his traditional religious garb; right: Former Senator Øfascist prostrates himself to muslim king)

Or how about President Thomas Jefferson's letter to Benjamin Rush?

Of course, the president had meant to say, "I am a Deist."

But I'll give our nation's first president the last word.

Labels: aided and comforted enemies, fascist totalitarian liberals (BIRM), godless liberals (BIRM), idiot liberals (BIRM), liberalism: THE ideology of hate, Obama 'Nation'

	2:57 PM   0

Oba


Nineteenth Century Income-Redistribution Dictators

This school of socialism dissected with great acuteness the contradictions in the conditions of modern production .... the crying inequalities in the distribution of wealth. – Karl Marx and Frederick Engels,    Manifesto of the Communist Party, 1848

Twentieth Century Income-Redistribution Dictators

Vlad (Lenin) the Wealth Spreader

Joe (Stalin) the Wealth Spreader

Joe the Time's Man of the Year

Twenty-First Century Income-Redistribution Dictator

	Barackommunistische Husseinternationale   Obamanifesto
The Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth .... because the civil rights movement became so court focused ... (it lost track of) powers through which you bring about (income-)redistributive change. I'm not optimistic about bringing about major (income-)redistributive change through the courts .... a process that essentially is dictatorial administrative. – Communistizen of the World,    Obammunist Manifesto, 2001

hichever century, it's more of the same.

Contemporary communism is not only a party of a certain type, or a bureaucracy which has sprung from monopolistic ownership and excessive state interference in the economy. More than anything else, the essential aspect of contemporary communism is the new class of owners and exploiters....

This is a class whose power over men is the most complete known to history. For this reason it is a class with very limited views, views which are shaky because they are based on falsehoods. Closely knit, isolated, and in complete authority, the new class must unrealistically evaluate its own role and that of the people around it....

When the new class leaves the historical scene — and this must happen — there will be less sorrow over its passing than there was for any other class before it. Smothering everything except what suited its ego, it has condemned itself to failure and shameful ruin.

Milovan Djilas, Totalitarianism and Violence

Labels: anti-America liberals (BIRM), Communist Holocaust, godless liberals (BIRM), liberalism: THE ideology of hate, Union of Soviet-style Socialist States of America

	3:14 PM   0

When Barazor Hoodlum Obarbarian commanded his supporters violent gang members to "get in their face," he obviously meant slash their faces too.

n Obama Slasher is going around mutilating any woman who supports John McCain, carving Barazor's initial into her face:

McCain Backer Attacked, Mutilated in Pittsburgh...

According to Pittsburgh cops, around 9:30 PM last night, a female was robbed after she went to the ATM. The victim says during the robbery, the assailant saw the McCain/Palin sticker on her car and became "enraged." He struck her and knocked her down, and allegedly carved a "B" on her cheek.

The assailant is still at large. Police tell us all they have is a description — a man, 6'4", with dark skin and dark clothes.

A McCain spokesman confirmed to TMZ the victim volunteered in McCain's Pennsylvania office.

How many women will become the next brutalized victims of Obama's violent slashers?

“He tore up a McCain campaign sign (unprovoked) and then took the stick from the sign and HIT me across the side of my head and face when I reached for our sign. All I said to him was, ‘You can’t do that.’ But, I guess he felt that he could because that’s when he grabbed another sign (that was stacked in a bag) and ripped that one, too! Then he broke the stick. I repeated, ‘You can’t do that.’ I reached for the torn sign and he started beating me with the stick about my head and face as I tried to stop the blows with my right hand.” – Woman victim of Obarbarians in New York

Is carving Barazor's initials into their mutilated faces or beating them over the head with sticks supposed to be the "Change They Need"?

A "new direction" towards escalation of B. Hoodlums' "forceful responses"? "crush the Republicans in every way"? provoked lawlessness? inquisitional smears? even a crystalnacht?

Does this mean the Obarbarian supporters' promised riots in the streets are starting now? If so:

Bring it on, Obamurderers.

Go ahead and riot when, or even before, your godless socialist big-government high-taxes narcissistic all-talk-no-do treacherous terrorist-befriending dangerous vile racist bigot fascist lying corrupt Chicago-gangland felon-loving election-stealing crooked Soros-beholden shady despotic constitution-hating extremist inciter of blood-spilling violence loses the election.

The next person you hurt or kill will be the last one any of you hurt or kill.

We'll hunt all of you down. We'll pour in from every state of the Union.

We'll pour into your cities. Into your headquarters. Your institutions. Your meeting places. We'll pour into your neighborhoods and into your communities. There'll be no place any of you can even hope to regroup, change plans, recover, or ever hide.

We will be armed, angry, and awake to the real and present dangers you and your fascist thug party always pose to each and every one of us and our families.

We will grab it, hold it down, and kill it forever.

When we're done there won't be a one of you standing.

You and your violent political party will become only a bad memory.

But before even one more person is again threatened by you or your irresponsible allies in the Obamedia, know that we will hold your whole party and all of its leaders entirely and personally responsible for each and every death or injury any of you cause.

Lose peaceably, or die.

It's your choice.

Whichever you pick is fine with us.

“Our movement took a grip on cowardly Marxism and from it extracted the meaning of Socialism. It also took from the cowardly middle-class parties their nationalism. Throwing both into the cauldron of our way of life there emerged, as clear as a crystal, the synthesis — German American National Socialism.” – Barack Hermann-Göring Obama

Labels: al-Qaedaqratic Party, anti-America liberals (BIRM), godless liberals (BIRM), good versus evil, liberalism: THE ideology of hate, our Freedoms' Defenders, World War IV

	12:53 PM   0

He hates election laws forbidding his use of phony donors, foreign contributions, and fraudulently registered "voters."

ith no less than the Associated (with Obamessiah) Press running headlines like " Obama money from abroad could total $3.3 million," it's enough to make a junior freshman do-nothing senator go back to snorting cocaine again.

Do anything to win — or, exactly like any other thing of a Democrook's doing, just more of the same.

Of course, "rules are meant to be broken and the laws don't apply to everybody" whenever they present even the slightest obstacle to any Dictatorat's all-consuming pursuit of absolute and unassailable personal power.

To start with the tip of this dicey Obergama, this hazard to democracy into which the stateliest of its ships — the first and still best of those ultimately helmed by and for all the people aboard her — is about to plow because the arrogantly self-blinded lookouts once entrusted by them to be her reliable watchdogs are purposefully refusing to either shine any truly illuminating spotlight on that very hazard or submit none but the most delusory reports in general about it, thus actively assisting its impending collision with her—

• Florida:
  
  

  Last week, Florida Secretary of State Kurt Browning said that between September 8, when the no match no vote law began to be applied, and October 3 there were nearly 229,000 new registrations. Of those, nearly 33,000 had match problems at first. More than ten thousand of the voters were notified by mail and 3,000 of those problems had been resolved. [Leaving a whopping 13 percent with unresolved problems!]
  

  The deadline to register to vote on November 4th has passed. Early voting begins on October 20th.

  
  
  
• Nevada: ACORN, the Demofraudic Party's extremist front group paid over $800,000 by do-nothing Jr. Sen. Obigbucks' campaign to register alleged "voters,"
  
  

  their office was raided Tuesday morning by agents of the Nevada Secretary of State and Attorney General who alleged in an application for a search warrant that ACORN had hired 59 felons through a work release program as canvassers and submitted nearly 300 apparently fraudulent voter registration cards as part of the drive.
  

  The submitted voter cards included addresses and names that do not exist in Nevada, duplicate registrations, names culled from telephone books and names of Dallas Cowboys players, an investigator for the Secretary of State alleged in his affidavit for a search warrant.
  

  One ex-employee of ACORN reached by the state investigator told him she began making up names for her forms on days when it was too hot to work outside. ACORN canvassers are paid by the hour. Ex-employees also said they were expected to collect 20 complete forms a shift or risk probation and termination, the investigator said in his affidavit.

  
  
  
• The same extremist ACORN that endorsed Jr. Sen. Oshama in return for his $800,000 bribe:
  
  

  For starters, Obama paid ACORN, which has endorsed him for president, $800,000 to register new voters, payments his campaign failed to accurately report. (They were disguised in his FEC disclosure as payments to a front group called Citizen Services Inc. for "advance work.")

  
  
  
• Connecticut:
  
  

  Joseph Borges, Bridgeport's Republican registrar of voters, filed the complaint. He said he has found problems with numerous voter registration cards submitted by the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, or ACORN, which works to register low-income people.
  

  In one instance, he says a card was filled out for a 7-year-old girl, whose age was listed as 27 on the card.
  

  ACORN filed more than 8,000 cards in Bridgeport. The complaint involves 10, but Borges said there were problems with many others.
  

  The group, which said it has registered some 1.3 million voters nationwide this year, is facing similar allegations in several other states including Nevada, Wisconsin, North Carolina, New Mexico, Michigan, Ohio and Missouri.
  

  ACORN works in low-income communities that trend Democratic. [Is anyone surprised?]
  

  . . .
  

  "It is our policy to turn in all cards, even those we know to be problematic [fraudulent (there, fixed it for you)], to the local Board of Elections," Sharon Patterson-Stallings, a member of the Connecticut ACORN Board, said in a written statement Thursday.

  
  
  
• Further, according the Los Angeles Times,
  
  

  The Democratic candidate's donors also include "Derty Poiiuy," an individual with a scatological sense of humor who has given $950. "Mong Kong" has contributed $1,065 and lists an address in a nonexistent city. "Fornari USA" gave $800 and listed the address of an apparel store of that name near San Francisco.

  
  
  
• Donation limits? What donation limits?
  
  

  On Aug. 31, for example, the Obama campaign filed a report listing a single donation from a Debra Myers in "Rancho Palos Verde, Calif.," for $28,500 — more than 10 times the amount the law allows per election....
  

  The Obama campaign also identified Woodrow Myers Jr. of Indianapolis, Ind., on Aug. 31 as having given $28,500 to the campaign.
  

  . . .
  

  Obama spokesman Ben LaBolt e-mailed Newsmax to say that the contributions had been "reattributed" to the Obama Victory Fund, a joint fundraising committee with the Democratic National Committee, and that the excess had been refunded.
  

  That still put both Debra Myers and Woodrow Myers over the federal limits — unless the Obama campaign refunded their entire checks, since Debra gave another $28,500 earlier in the year to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, and Woodrow was way over the $108,2000 overall election cycle limit for individuals.
  

  Individuals can give $2,300 to a federal candidate in both the primary and the general election, for a total of $4,600 in a single election cycle. They also can give $28,500 to a national party committee, $10,000 to a state or local committee, and $5,000 to other political committees.
  

  If a candidate loses the primary, any money counted toward the general election must be refunded, a wrinkle in the federal election laws that can sink losing candidates deep in debt.
  

  In exchange for receiving federal funding, the McCain campaign agreed not to take any money from individual donors for the general election [unlike the ever flip-flopping Jr. Sen. "Parallel Public Financing System™" Obreakhispromises], so its donors are limited to $2,300.

  
  
  
• More of the same:
  
  

  The Obama campaign has already had to deal with several FEC complaints about fraudulent donors and illegal foreign contributions, and the FEC says it has no record that those complaints have been resolved or closed.
  

  . . .
  

  Obama was forced to return $33,500 to a pair of Palestinian brothers who bought T-Shirts on the campaign's website — a clear violation of FEC rules and the law. The campaign claims to have returned the money but the brothers deny they have received a refund.

  
  
  
• Even more of it:
  
  

  The 2008 Democratic presidential nominee had worked not just alongside ACORN, but also as a key operative for the organization.
  

  He was its lawyer in several pivotal ACORN cases.
  

  Obama funded a number of its activities, as well. When he sat on the board of the prestigious Woods Fund for Chicago alongside former Weather Underground terrorist William Ayers, he oversaw and approved many grants for ACORN.
  

  As the National Review's Stanley Kurtz reported, one Woods committee report boasted that the fund's "non-ideological" public image "enabled the Trustees to make grants to organizations that use confrontational tactics against the business and government 'establishments' without undue risk of being accused of partisanship." [How convenient.]
  

  Obama was the Illinois director of ACORN's controversial voter registration operation, and he trained the group's leaders in the ways of radical, sometimes illegal, confrontational politics.

  
  
  
• Can you stand any more?
  
  

  Over the weekend, Newsweek reported of two donors who used the names "Doodad Pro" and "Good Will." Two other questionable donors used a combination of letters that did not form a name. One gave a total of $7,500 and the other contributed $14,200, both sums greater than what is allowed for a general election. The Obama campaign returned all but about $200 to these donors. [Returned to who? "Sreya Llib"? "Okzer"? "NROCA"?]
  

  ...Republican John McCain's campaign lists all donors, including those contributing less than $200, on his Web site.
  

  Any United States election is just that — American — and outside influence should not be a part it. A campaign is expensive and time-consuming, but contributions from foreign sources are not only against the law, but also against who we are as a country. [This ought to be tattooed across Jr. Sen. Oboughtoff-n-paid-for's pointy head where his worshipstream media might read it.]

  
  
  
• Is it any wonder now why junior do-nothing Sen. Obribeya won't list his contributors the way true national hero Senator McCain always and completely does?
  
  

  Who Is Buying The White House?
  
  Newsmax reported last week that Sen. Barack Obama's campaign has collected "the largest pool of unidentified money that has ever flooded into the U.S. election system, before or after the McCain-Feingold campaign finance reforms of 2002."
  

  Federal Election Commission data show that some $222 million of the cash Obama has collected came in the form of contributions of $200 or less, with the Democratic nominee's campaign identifying the donors of less than $40 million of that sum. [ = at least 910,000 unidentified donors]
  

  Campaigns may accept donations of less than $200 without providing the donors' names and addresses in campaign finance reports, but Sen. John McCain's camp has made its full donor database available on the Internet [which true national heroes are wont to do]. Independent campaign finance watchdog organizations have asked the Obama campaign to list all its donors, as well, but it's refused [which shady national disgraces are wont to do]. What is Obama hiding? (Just a taste of his 'change'– stonewalling the voters–LH)

What B. Howshady Obigtaxincreases is hiding lies underneath the waves of phony donors, foreign contributions, and fraudulently registered "voters" from which his servilestream media are neck-breakingly averting their binoculars.

The task of coming on deck and helping our ship of state avoid a disastrous collision with that dicey Obergama now falls to us, the people who can't afford to remain merely passengers aboard her any longer.

Labels: agenda driven mainstream media (BIRM), anti-America liberals (BIRM), dinosaur media, godless liberals (BIRM), lying liberals (BIRM), megalomaniacal liberals (BIRM), Unabashed Sellouts of America

	2:06 AM   0

And He definitely isn't any kind of "was" either.


ing of kings, and Lord of lords. That's how we "bitter clingers to religion" — as you've mockingly labeled us — refer to Him, O ye of exclusive, gargantuan faith in big anti-freedom government, high anti-growth taxes, and extreme Europeon-style socialism communism.

Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end. Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace.

Our Lord and Savior is Organizer of the entire universe, as well as its Ruler and very Creator, and of everyone and everything in it, including you and that community you disorganized into just more of the same hellish, crime-ridden, boarded-up cesspools of drugs and gangs and despair we've too often seen misled by shady, crafty-tongued "change" merchants like yourself and your race-monger mentor of twenty years Jeremiah Wright who each does all he can to effectively turn its inhabitants not towards but away from Christ with blame- or hate-filled speech that only serves to corrupt their consciences while peddling the falsest of hopes of a mere worldly Government Salvation™ based on nothing but the unfulfillable promises made by the same power-hungry, bigoted, small-minded bunch of crooks, cheats, liars, and frauds whom his elitist self regards to be his real "community."

Do you want to equate our Lord organizing His perfect Kingdom with anything either of you have "done"? Take your most recent shows of utter disunity and disorganization and see how they compare:

We have supported state terrorism against the Palestinians and black South Africans, and now we are indignant because the stuff we have done overseas is now brought right back to our own front yards. America's chickens are coming home to roost.

Jeremiah Wright
September 16, 2001

I'm still in Bible country. I am still in the text. Jesus was a poor, black man who lived in a country and who lived in a culture that was controlled by rich white people.... I am sick of Negroes who just do not get it!

Jeremiah Wright
member of Obammunist for America(, My A**)'s
African American Religious Leadership Committee
Christmas "sermon" 2007

"But Hillary (Clinton) is married to Bill, and Bill has been good to us." No he ain't! Bill did us just like he did Monica Lewinsky. He was riding dirty.

Jeremiah Wright
January 13, 2008

I can no more disown (Jeremiah Wright) than I can disown the black community. I can no more disown him than I can my white grandmother.... These people are a part of me.

B. "No, I Can't Disown You" Obigot
March 18, 2008

The person I saw yesterday was not the person that I met twenty years ago.... And the fact that Reverend Wright would think that somehow it was appropriate to command the stage, for three or four consecutive days, in the midst of this major debate, is something that not only makes me angry but also saddens me.... And what I think particularly angered me was his suggestion somehow that my previous denunciation of his remarks were somehow political posturing.... I don't think that he showed much concern for me.

B. "Yes, I Can Disown You" Obame-me-me-me-me-.....
April 29, 2008

That's some mighty fine community organizing you two have going there.

Next, let's see how those in Chicago fared when you were "representing" a large portion of it from 1997 to 2004 in the state senate:

	Obungler's Chicago	Illinois statewide
Murder/Manslaughter	22.3	7.9
Robbery	699.5	224.7
Aggravated Assault	916.6	433.7
Total Violent Crime	1,638.4	700.7

Those are the averages per 100,000 population over the eight years you sat took up space in the Illinois senate. Illinois itself was bad enough, because in 2000, during your fourth year (mis)representing the people of Chicago, it had the 8th highest occurrence for violent crime among all the states, the 8th highest rate for murder, the 4th highest for robbery, and the 8th highest for aggravated assaults. Just the year before, Chicago had the most murders of any big city in the U.S. Such extremely high crime rates on your watch is hardly the kind of change we can believe in.

Christ would never organize any "community" of His like that. Sounds more like how that old serpent, which is the Devil, and Satan, might have left a community after being its "organizer."

Christ would never support a legal regime that permits tossing any baby who survives a botched abortion in the garbage pale to die, either.

Indeed, I know I'm not alone among voters who are now saying, "Senator Oblasphema, I serve Jesus Christ: I know Jesus Christ; Jesus Christ is a friend of mine. Senator, you're no Jesus Christ."

The extreme hubris and that messianic complex you continually exhibit is more than disturbing. It's outright dangerous for anyone wanting to "organize" our country the same way you have those still broken communities in Chicago.

NRO's Jim Geraghty has personally seen the type before:

The only "community organizer" I knew growing up was Al Sharpton's work in New York City, and he seemed to define his job as going into a bad situation and making sure it got worse, sometimes to the point of murderous arson. If our friends on the other side of the aisle really want to get into an argument about that...role (I hesitate to call it a job)...Isn't there something inherently undemocratic about self-appointed "community organizers?"[...]

Who the heck ever elected or appointed community organizers to their positions? By what metrics do they measure their success? To whom do they answer? Who removes them from their positions for insufficient results?

There are probably fine people who claim that title, but even by Obama's own description, he didn't accomplish much in his three years in that work. I don't doubt that when young Obama ventured to the South Side, he walked the streets with the best of intentions. But they're insufficient when contrasted with results. In fact there's a particular road that's paved with those intentions.

That is, the kind of transportation project "community organizers" would be fully behind.

Finally, to blast your second Messianic Meme™ totally out of the muddy water — whose level you no doubt think feel you have the divine power to "change," too: The Roman governor of Judea, Pontius Pilate, found "no fault at all" in our Lord, and even kept trying to secure His full pardon after Caiaphas the death penalty-seeking high priest (aka, a "community organizer") bound Him over to the governor's hall of judgment early Good Friday morning:

and they themselves went not into the judgment hall, lest they should be defiled; but that they might eat the passover.

Pilate then went out unto them, and said, What accusation bring ye against this man?

They answered and said unto him, If he were not a malefactor, we would not have delivered him up unto thee.

Then said Pilate unto them, Take ye him, and judge him according to your law. The Jews therefore said unto him, It is not lawful for us to put any man to death:

That the saying of Jesus might be fulfilled, which he spake, signifying what death he should die.

Then Pilate entered into the judgment hall again, and called Jesus, and said unto him, Art thou the King of the Jews?

Jesus answered him, Sayest thou this thing of thyself, or did others tell it thee of me?

Pilate answered, Am I a Jew? Thine own nation and the chief priests have delivered thee unto me: what hast thou done?

Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence.

Pilate therefore said unto him, Art thou a king then? Jesus answered, Thou sayest that I am a king. To this end was I born, and for this cause came I into the world, that I should bear witness unto the truth. Every one that is of the truth heareth my voice.

Pilate saith unto him, What is truth? And when he had said this, he went out again unto the Jews, and saith unto them, I find in him no fault at all.

But ye have a custom, that I should release unto you one at the passover: will ye therefore that I release unto you the King of the Jews?

Then cried they all again, saying, Not this man, but Barabbas. Now Barabbas was a robber.

To show the community organizers seeking Jesus' death just part of what would be in store for Him if they got their way, Governor Pilate had Him roughed up before presenting Him again to the community organizers:

Pilate therefore went forth again, and saith unto them, Behold, I bring him forth to you, that ye may know that I find no fault in him.

Then came Jesus forth, wearing the crown of thorns, and the purple robe. And Pilate saith unto them, Behold the man!

When the chief priests therefore and officers saw him, they cried out, saying, Crucify him, crucify him. Pilate saith unto them, Take ye him, and crucify him: for I find no fault in him.

The Jews answered him, We have a law, and by our law he ought to die, because he made himself the Son of God.

¶When Pilate therefore heard that saying, he was the more afraid;

And went again into the judgment hall, and saith unto Jesus, Whence art thou? But Jesus gave him no answer.

Then saith Pilate unto him, Speakest thou not unto me? knowest thou not that I have power to crucify thee, and have power to release thee?

Jesus answered, Thou couldest have no power at all against me, except it were given thee from above: therefore he that delivered me unto thee hath the greater sin.

Our Lord is referring to the community organizers.

And from thenceforth Pilate sought to release him: but the Jews cried out, saying, If thou let this man go, thou art not Cæsar's friend: whosoever maketh himself a king speaketh against Cæsar.

¶When Pilate therefore heard that saying, he brought Jesus forth, and sat down in the judgment seat in a place that is called the Pavement, but in the Hebrew, Gabbatha.

And it was the preparation of the passover, and about the sixth hour: and he saith unto the Jews, Behold your King!

But they cried out, Away with him, away with him, crucify him. Pilate saith unto them, Shall I crucify your King? The chief priests answered, We have no king but Cæsar.

Then delivered he him therefore unto them to be crucified. And they took Jesus, and led him away.

And he bearing his cross went forth into a place called the place of a skull, which is called in the Hebrew Golgotha:

Where they crucified him, and two other with him, on either side one, and Jesus in the midst.

¶And Pilate wrote a title, and put it on the cross. And the writing was JESUS OF NAZARETH THE KING OF THE JEWS.

This title then read many of the Jews: for the place where Jesus was crucified was nigh to the city: and it was written in Hebrew, and Greek, and Latin.

Then said the chief priests of the Jews to Pilate, Write not, The King of the Jews; but that he said, I am King of the Jews.

Pilate answered, What I have written I have written.

So it was the "community organizers" — those screaming "yes, we can crucify Him!" over and over — who chose to release hardened criminal Barabbas and sentence instead our totally innocent Christ to death. (Similar to the way you, while a state senator, voted to keep allowing early releases of convicted criminal sexual abusers; except that you were the only member in favor of such releases.)

Community organizers killed Jesus.

Governor Pilate wanted Him pardoned.

You might want to start mentioning this to your extremely ignorant disciples.

Obama bin Biden
2008  A.H. 1429

Labels: clue-challenged liberals (BIRM), elitist despot liberals (BIRM), godless liberals (BIRM), liberal racism, liberalism: THE ideology of hate, liberals unhinged, megalomaniacal liberals (BIRM)

	9:46 PM   0