Protesters rallied and marched on the streets of Minneapolis[i.e., a typical liberofascist "utopia"] on Wednesday after a prosecutor announced that officers involved in the shooting death of 24-year-old Jamar Clark would not face charges.
"Hey, hey, ho ho. These racist cops have got to go," they chanted.
Clark was African-American [i.e., Liberofascist-VoteSlave™]; Mark Ringgenberg and Dustin Schwarze, the officers involved, are white[nonhyphenated Americans].
Schwarze shot Clark only after Ringgenberg scuffled with the young man[criminal woman-beater], according to Hennepin County Attorney Mike Freeman. Clark took control of the officer's gun, the prosecutor said, and Ringgenberg told Schwarze to open fire.
Thus saving innocent lives by stopping St. Jamar of Attacked Girlfriends® after this manifestly violent criminal posed a very real and imminent threat to them.
Freeman's announcement — which Clark's family attended — angered community activists.
"If the city burns down," one woman shouted at Freeman, "it's on your hands."
As opposed to all the hands that mindlessly and slavishly cast votes giving Freeman and every other Demofascist unchecked power over you.
But don't let that stop those same hands from burning down Minneapolis. One less accursed, liberofascist blight on this planet's surface is nothing short of A. Good. Thing.
The investigation included 122 Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension reports, 1,370 pages of autopsy reports, 21 DNA reports and 97 Minneapolis Police Department supplemental reports, all of which Freeman said took him 31 hours to read.
You don't get no matches lit that way, "protesters"!
The reports demonstrated that Clark had attacked his girlfriend [i.e., a violent crime], interfered with paramedics attempting to transport her to the hospital [i.e., another violent crime] and refused officers' demands to remove his hands from his pockets [just a fatally stupid choice], Freeman said.
Ringgenberg and Schwarze then took Clark to the ground in an attempt to place handcuffs on him, but during the scuffle, Ringgenberg landed on top of Clark, who then went for that officer's gun, the prosecutor said.
According to Freeman, Ringgenberg said when he felt his gun move from his right hip to the small of his back, he reached back to the top of his gun and felt Clark's "whole" hand on the weapon.
The officer told his partner, "He's got my gun," Freeman said.
"Ringgenberg believed he was going to die ... because he had no control over his gun," Freeman said. "Ringgenberg felt that Clark didn't care what happened to him and remembered thinking that he didn't want his partner to die with his gun."
You mean St. Jamar of Attacked Girlfriends® wasn't just innocently sitting on the couch after innocently returning from his church's choir practice, innocently getting ready to do his homework for a college course he innocently just enrolled in, when all of a sudden Teh Racist Police™ racistly busted down his door after racistly profiling him and racistly pumped racist bullets into his nonviolent innocent body?
Provided, of course, none of you demand afterwards that the rest of us fork over any of our hard-earned money to you to help you rebuild your stinking hellhole.
No, really. Don't even bother asking.
If you want to raise any for such an unholy and utterly useless purpose, try selling all you got from your lootings. Or sit and rot in your own filth. Won't demonstrate the first actual difference to anyone either way. The only ones who aren't completely tired by now of your murderous mayhem and malevolent mob mentality are self-loathing masochistic liberofascists(birm).
The rest of us have had all yes we can take from you and your Demofascist masters.
...says every freedom-hating racist liberofascist(birm) who, after seeing this video, still "thinks" feels judging you inferior and in need of special "entitlements" because of the color of your skin is something to crow about.
Who Are the Racists: Conservatives or Liberals?To call someone a racist is a serious charge. A racist is someone who believes that one person is superior (or inferior) to another person simply based on their skin color. It’s a belief that is both foolish and stupid. But conservatives are accused by progressives of being racist on an almost daily basis. Is it a fair accusation? Or, is it just political posturing? And, if it is political posturing, what does it say about the people making the charge? Derryck Green of Project 21 has some provocative answers.
emember, in 2010, Hispanic activists in San Antonio said not letting people smoke at work is racist, too.
So what is a control-freak nanny statist to do? Any hiring or employment practice that adversely and disproportionately affects minority groups is prima facie evidence of racial discrimination. Yet being able to tell people what they can't do both at home and at work is orgasmically A Good Thing™. But if activists start claiming that testing for nicotine use amounts to racial profiling, you risk being hauled into courts of law and public opinion, defending yourself against multiple lawsuits and irreparably bad publicity. Picture "Teh Revs." Jackson, Sharpton et al. showing up at your door and saying, "Nice business you have here. Shame if someone like me happened to call it racist!" It's a conundrum.
Sure, you could present facts and data to support your reasons for engaging in this discriminatory practice. But that won't matter. Once it's beset with the "allegedly racist" label, you'll never hear the end of it until — and likely even after — you ditch it.
Best you can do is make exceptions for any "poorer individuals, including those from minority groups, who, under a ban on employees who smoke, will lose the opportunity to work for an employer that offers health insurance, long-term advancement, and retirement benefits." You still get to tell unprotected non-minority/non-lower income employees what they can't do outside the workplace. Win-win!
ave a little patience, Mohammed. We're working hard to make this even easier for you.
Just come on in now, right across our open "borders." Don't forget to bring all your wives.
If any federal agent tries to stop you — which is doubtful — file a discrimination lawsuit against the United States. Claim that "the purpose and practical effect of what the government is doing to us are to impose a disadvantage, a separate status, and so a stigma upon all who enter into polygamous marriages." Add that it's "injuring our personhood and dignity," and you're home free.
Given the legislative and legal chicanery going on, you and your radicalized brethren won't have to wait very long before yes you can take advantage of your special status to get government to stigmatize, disparage, demean, degrade, humiliate, and otherwise burden every person, group, and activity you say offends you. Our courts wouldn't give such polyphobic racist bigoted islamophobes who "desire to harm a politically unpopular group" the time of day, much less any real victory. The purpose and practical effect of that, of course, are to ensure there won't be anybody left who isn't sufficiently submissive to your group.
Once that's done, and with undoubtedly the rampant aid and comfort our media medhimmia will adheringly keep giving you, yes you can use it to intimidate even weaker-minded/lower-information voters into electing a second muslim president.
Mission accomplished. The Great Satan™ is hardly great anymore. Its citizenskafirs, sinking in their own quicksands of deviancy, have subdued themselves and are completely at your mercy.
“While our country remains untainted with the principles and manners which are now producing desolation in so many parts of the world; while she continues sincere, and incapable of insidious and impious policy, we shall have the strongest reason to rejoice in the local destination assigned us by Providence. But should the people of America once become capable of that deep simulation towards one another, and towards foreign nations, which assumes the language of justice and moderation while it is practising iniquity and extravagance, and displays in the most captivating manner the charming pictures of candor, frankness, and sincerity, while it is rioting in rapine and insolence, this country will be the most miserable habitation in the world; because we have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge, or gallantry, would break the strongest cords of our Constitution as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”
John Adams
President of the United States of America
"To the Officers of the First Brigade of the Third Division of the Militia of Massachusetts. 11 October, 1798." The Works of John Adams. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1854. 228-29.
Except that moron Øbonehead sees whenever he looks in a mirror.
S
o now it's all China's fault. Baracrook Øcrybaby gave his extremist Millionaire/Billionaire fat-cat campaign donors a half billion dollars — a half billion he redistributed from stole from us to pay them off — and when they took it ran, leaving us to hold the bag, he predictably blames anyone and everyone else yes he can "think" of for the whole corrupt, stinking mess.
"China's subsidies made it fail.. waaaaaah! wahhhh!! waaaahhhhhh!!!"
"The Congress made me do it... waaaah!! waahhhh!!!! waaaaahhhhhhhh!!!!!!"
Etc., etc., etc.
Does this whiner-in-chief ever take any responsibility himself for anything?
Is there anyone or anything he hasn't blamed yet — besides himself and his corrupt, failed policies, of course — for all the messes he's gotten us and our country into?
It's long past time he at least tried something different, for a change.
Such as just shutting the fluke up.
In the moron's "own" teleprompted words:
"I don't want the folksØbamoron and his 'per se' moronions who created the mess to do a lot of talking. I want them to just get out of the way so we can clean up the mess. I don't mind cleaning up after them, but don't do a lot of talking.
"Am I wrong, Virginia?"
Or put another way:
After Øcrybaby drove the car into the ditch, made it as difficult as possible for us to pull it back, now he wants to keep the keys.
No!
You can't drive.
We don't want to have to go back into the ditch. We're just about to get the car out.
Plus you made our gas prices so extremely high, we can't afford to let you waste any more fuel.
More breaking news: Water Flows Downhill; Demokkkrats Kill Jobs; Sun Rises in East; etc.
K
langresswoman Nancompoop Peloseri (D-KKK) herself has been accused of committing far worse crimes than either Victim Charlie Rangel or Victim Maxine Waters has. But™ do you see Klangresswoman Peloseri (D-KKK)'s "Ethics" Panel Racist Persecution Hit Squad® investigating any of her "alleged" crimes?
Maybe, once she's done, Klangresswoman Peloseri (D-KKK) and her mob of JimoCrow'rats will start installing White/Colored Drinking Fountains™ on KKKapitol Hill, too.
He is no longer at liberty to freelance for terrorists — his client is the United States, which is at war with terrorists pursuant to a congressional authorization approved with overwhelming bipartisan support. His client is not the foreign terrorists: [9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed] already has plenty of lawyers. Holder's client is the American public (i.e., the people KSM wants to kill). Thus, while Holder may not like military commissions, he is obliged to make them work, just as any attorney general who disagrees, as a private citizen, with the policy behind a given law is duty-bound to resist undermining that law in his official capacity.
Students at a Texas college are demanding that their diplomas not be dated "in the year of Our Lord," prompting school officials to consider removing that phrase while leaving what others consider another obvious reference to Christendom — the school's name, Trinity University....
The debate began in the fall when some students noticed the wording and said it was intolerant of students with non-Christian religious beliefs.
Senior Sidra Qureshi, a Muslim student and president of Trinity Diversity Connection, started a petition that requested that students have the option of having the words removed from their diplomas.
Isaac Medina, a senior who graduated in December, told the San Antonio Express-News in March that he felt like "a victim of bait and switch" because he had applied to the university under the impression that it maintained only a historical bond to the Presbyterian Church.
"A diploma is a very personal item, and people want to proudly display it in their offices and homes," Miss Qureshi told the Express-News. "By having the phrase 'In the year of Our Lord,' it is directlyreferencingJesus Christ, and not everyone believes in Jesus Christ."
A lying National-SSocialist fascist Democrook liberal liar(birm) lie?
Y
es, he can and did when he lied about and bore false witness against our nation's patriotic protesters.
So, yes, the sun rises in the East, water flows downhill, a fascist communist occupies the White House, and lying liar John Lewis lies:
It's time for the allegedly pristine character of Rep. John Lewis to put up or shut up. Therefore, I am offering $10,000 of my own money to provide hard evidence that the N-word was hurled at him not 15 times, as his colleague reported, but just once. Surely one of those two cameras wielded by members of his entourage will prove his point.
And surely if those cameras did not capture such abhorrence, then someone from the mainstream media — those who printed and broadcast his assertions without any reasonable questioning or investigation — must themselves surely have it on camera. Of course we already know they don't. If they did, you'd have seen it by now.
THOUSANDS OF TIMES.
Rep. Lewis, if you can't do that, I'll give him a backup plan: a lie detector test. If you provide verifiable video evidence showing that a single racist epithet was hurled as you walked among the tea partiers, or you pass a simple lie detector test, I will provide a $10K check to the United Negro College Fund.
To date, no one has come forward with any real evidence. (The "word" of proven lying liars doesn't count.)
Unfortunately, many of their brethren fellow snakes are still slithering around Former Senator Øbribable's rubberstamp al-Qongress making "our" laws ... more and more overly complex for their own conflicts of interest "professional" self-interests.
Fri, Feb 13, 2009
Home, Law Firms, Layoffs
"Oh the humanity!"
Yesterday, Thursday, February 12th, 2009, six prominent firms fired over 700 attorneys and legal staffers, in what is becoming known as Black Thursday in the legal industry.
T
he same color now darkening practically every other day of the week, too. No doubt Present Øpromisebreaker's firing of all 93 U.S. Attorneys won't have too long to wait for one similarly shady.
Dechert also confirmed that on Thursday it let go of associates and counsel. In December, the firm laid off 72 staffers in the US and 15 staffers in the UK. It also laid off 13 attorneys in March 2008.
(nuts-covered double fudge sundae ditto with a cherry on top)
Philadelphia's Cozen O'Connor laid off 61 administrative staff and paralegals.
et al., i.e., Esq., ex parte, in camera, et seq., supra....
The only thing that could make all this non-bad news better is that the same thing is happening throughout America's "news"paper industry the Dictatoratic Party's print-propaganda ministries. (Oh, wait... it is! "Oh, the humanity poetic justice!")
Now, one shouldn't consider "good" the misfortune of any fellow human being.
And I wouldn't if a preponderance of such consideration had even the remotest chance of substantially being apposite in some unfrivolous number of these particular cases.
...and its 24-hour toll-free hotline to report any unfairness: 1-800-2-UNFAIR.
A
sked your boss for a raise but he said no? Best friend stole your boyfriend? Didn't get the surprise you were looking for from that Cracker Jack® box?
Then you've just become a victim of unfairness.
Every year, over 305 million Americans are victimized by some form of unfairness. At work, at school, and even in the home.
Don't become another statistic.
If you feel that you or someone you know is the victim of unfairness, report it to the U.S. Department of Fairness. You don't even have to give your name if you feel that giving it wouldn't be fair.
Not only is unfairness... well, unfair, it's now against the law.
Know your rights.
Call the U.S. Department of Fairness or visit fair.gov and request your free copy of the informative booklet, "What to Do When Life Hands You Lemons and You Need the Government to Make You Lemonade."
So the next time someone asks you "who says life is fair?" tell them "the laws do now, and they're saying that it better be!"
This message brought to you by Fairness Awareness By Increments Action Network, the U.S. Commission on Balance, and the Ad Council.
And by "Government," I mean We the Sucked-Dry Taxpaying Suckers of the United States™.
D
ear Qongress-Kowtowing, Union-Whipped, Envirowacko-Sycophantic Chief "Executives" of the Big Bankrupt Three Automobile Manufacturers:
First, read the handy self-help guide at this link then come back here.
Yes, click it now.
(You, too, Mr. Ford CEO.)
. . .
Everyone else reading this can go ahead and finally save for and take that long dreamed-of vacation to Europe... then Hong Kong... then — no doubt it's going to take them awhile — Australia... then Rio de Janeiro... then Outer Mongolia... then—
Good. They're back. You can cancel your Siberian Whirlwind Tour™ travel plans.
Besides, I was running out of even implausible vacation spots to recommend.
Wasn't that informative and helpful, B3 "Executives"? (Be quiet, Mr. Ford CEO. I wasn't asking you.)
OK. Now that we're figuratively on the same literal Web page, you can continue reading this open letter.
Ready?
Excellent.
All right, second:
Do you remember the part about "How Chapter 11 Works"? (It was towards the top, Mr. Ford CEO.) No? Well, it says
A chapter 11 case begins with the filing of a petition with the bankruptcy court serving the area where the debtor has a domicile or residence.
That would be "Detroit" for those of you "running" your bankrupt factories in Rio Lindainto the ground in Detroit. Here's the address along with other useful information:
Clerk United States Bankruptcy Court Eastern District Of Michigan Suite 2100 211 West Fort Street Detroit, MI 48226
telephone: (313) 234-0065
hours: 8:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. (M-F)
After you properly file your bankruptcy forms, wondrous and glorious things begin to happen. Harvard economics professor Martin Feldstein explains:
(You) would be able to continue producing cars, and (your) workforce would remain employed while (your) firms reorganized. (Your) firms would also be able to get short-term credit under bankruptcy protection.
The bankruptcy court could require the unions to rewrite contracts, bringing wages down to levels that would allow (your) firms to compete and therefore to maintain employment. Scaling back employee and retiree health benefits would further improve price competitiveness and allow better cash wages.
Before you download and fill out and file those bankruptcy forms, read this third and last thing:
Finally, run your business as a business.
Whatever your customers want, offer them it. No one-seater 300-pound clown cars that require the clown driver to plug his or her "car" into the nearest electrical outlet every third mile. No car bodies made of Japanese rice paper which wouldn't survive a hit from three-year-old Little Johnny's wildly thrown Wiffle® ball, much less a crash at 70 MPH on the Interstate. No car engines fueled by the gaseous waste products that prodigiously belch from Barney Frank's piehole.
Moreover, whatever your workers want, refuse them it if it would mean you not being able to: (1) offer your customers what they want (see last paragraph), or (2) keep your costs comfortably enough below your revenues to ride out inevitable economic downturns or drop-offs in your sales, or (3) any combination of (1) and (2). And don't budge one inch on that refusal.
Now get busy and do it, and leave us already way overburdened taxpayers out of it.
OK. You can stop reading this now.
(Dern it, Mr. Ford CEO. That means you too. I'm tired of seeing your IP skewing my page-reload counts.)
All death threats are taken seriously. But what did our Secret Service find after investigating Jr. 1-term-only Sen. OdumbO's claim that someone threatened him at his opponent's rally?
N
othing. No "kill him!" threats. No witness or recording nor even a confession confirming that anyone ever shouted, mumbled, or even sign languaged any such thing there.
Conclusion: Jr. 1-term-only Sen. Ofib-uh's claim is a false accusation.
Also: The alleged reporter who wrote concocted the "threat" story is so remarkably in the tank for Jr. 1-term-only Sen. OblameO that the Jacques Cousteau Institute has awarded the Scranton Crimes-Buffoon a research grant to adapt the Mariana Trench-rated underwater deep diving wetsuit worn 24/7 by its "reporters," for human use also.
Further: The Scranton Crimes-Buffoon has decided to take down all its "Obamessiah for President Supreme Being" yard signs planted in cement on its property, as well as its 50-foot "We Worship You, OblessedOne" banner wrapped across the front of its building.
Lastly: The Associated (with Odunce,uh) Press, pMSNBC, and other Oblowmanstream Media organizations campaign staff which picked up, salivated over, then widely publicized their Oboss's false accusation have promised to issue a correction... after the election... but only if they feel like it or when Jr. 1-term-only Sen. OdumbO starts telling the truth (i.e., never).
peaking eight days after the "tragedy" of islamic terrorists slitting the throats of our airline passengers, flight attendants, and pilots, slamming our airplanes into our landmark buildings, butchering nearly three thousand of our citizens, visitors, and guests, and plunging our nation and our allies into a long and bloody World War not of any of our choosing, Mr. HØpe,uh,dope — after mentioning the mind-numbingly obvious need to "step up security" and "dismantle the perpetrators' organizations" — gave us these pointers on how to "draw some measure of wisdom" from it:
We must also engage, however,
Thus negating all the security and dismantling he mentioned.
...in the more difficult task of understanding the sources of such madness.
Not difficult at all.
They hate us, Zer ØdumbØ. They hated us before we sent our Troops into Iraq or even into Afghanistan. They hated us before President Bush, Clinton, Bush, Reagan, Carter, Ford, Nixon, Johnson, Kennedy, Eisenhower, Truman, or even Roosevelt took office. They'll even hate us after the very last squad of our nation's brave Defenders in Iraq and Afghanistan leave those countries. And they'll keep on hating us until either all of us are dead or they are.
All while you're futilely wringing your hands over its "sources."
The essence of this tragedy,
Sic.
War is not a natural disaster or Shakespeare play, Øblowharda. You and other brain-dead liberalsbirm need to stop trying to incessantly therapize its language before any of you can even begin to play a part in helping us win this "goat song":
tragedyn., pl.-dies.1.a. A drama or literary work in which the main character is brought to ruin or suffers extreme sorrow, especially as a consequence of a tragic flaw, moral weakness, or inability to cope with unfavorable circumstances. b. The genre made up of such works. c. The art or theory of writing or producing these works. 2. A play, film, television program, or other narrative work that portrays or depicts calamitous events and has an unhappy but meaningful ending. 3. A disastrous event, especially one involving distressing loss or injury to life: an expedition that ended in tragedy, with all hands lost at sea.4. A tragic aspect or element. [Middle English tragedie, from Old French, from Latin tragoedia, from Greek tragoidia : tragos, goat + aoide, oide, song.]
The first definition of war is here the most accurate: "A state of open, armed, often prolonged conflict carried on between nations, states, or parties." It's synomyns don't include disaster, calamity, or catastrophe.
Man-made and intentional death and destruction is always a "tragedy" only to liberals.
...it seems to me, derives from a fundamental absence of empathy on the part of the attackers: an inability to imagine, or connect with, the humanity and suffering of others.
What was your first clue? When you heard the report of how they kept slitting the throats of flight attendants right outside the cockpit door until those inside couldn't bear anymore to hear anyone else's final, heart-wrenching pleadings and screams? Or of the father on the line who told his loved ones back home he could see the buildings coming up but asked them not to worry because his and his wife and small daughter's deaths were "going to be quick"? Or of the man hanging on to a makeshift rope outside the Tower trying to climb down from a floor that was billowing smoke but soon lost his grip and horrifically fell to his death?
The terrorists did imagine and connect with the suffering of others for the sole and plain fact they deliberately planned and chose to be its cause. For that humanity part, they dealt with it by instructing themselves to "check your weapon before you leave and long before you leave. You must make your knife sharp and you must not discomfort your animal during the slaughter."
In light of many of these things and more, my first instinct after this opening major battle of World War IV was that we need to declare total nuclear war on Syria, Iraq, Iran, and Afghanistan, and thus forever rid the world of islamofascist "countries" that exclusively and continually breed "such madness." Who at the time would've blamed us if we had? Which peace-loving people of the world wouldn't have openly or secretly thanked us afterwards for so permanently and completely crushing international terrorism?
Yours and your fellow liberals' first instinct was more of the same old hand-wringing. "We need to find out why, oh why, do they hate us."
Such a failure of empathy, such numbness to the pain of a child or the desperation of a parent, is not innate;
No, it's generally taught from the earliest ages in such islamofascist "countries":
Out of the mouths of their babes, a three-year-old parroting the claim that "Jews are apes and pigs"; a small boy holding the Qur'an and an AK-47 "toy"; and "Hamas' Mickey Mouse teaches children to hate and kill."
...nor, history tells us, is it unique to a particular culture, religion, or ethnicity.
Although, history tells us, no other culture, religion, or ethnicity in the last half century has been the source of a programmed and practiced terrorism overtly and solely intent on destroying the lives and threatening the freedoms of the most people possible on every inhabited continent on earth.
It may find expression in a particular brand of violence,
"Expression"? So, purposefully beheading people or driving fuel-laden commandeered planes full of innocent civilians, including terrified and traumatized children, straight into large occupied buildings is a form of expression, akin to free speech?
By the ocean-rise slowing Ears of 0dumb0™, were you in the midst of a relapse of your drinking the booze that "helped" you "learn not to care," smoking the pot you "inhaled frequently" when "I was a[n adult, twenty-something] kid," snorting the "blow"cocaine to "flatten out the landscape of my heart, blur the edges of my memory," or doing the combinations thereof which you admitted had you "headed [pun not intended?] to the Final, Fatal Role [titled] Junkie/Pothead[™]," when you spluttered this singularly septic spewage of stupidity? Because it's the only thing I can possibly think of which might excuse you.
Let me try to express this through your thin-skinned thick pointy skull, Zer 0boneheada: "Kill the Americans and their allies — civilians and military.... Kill the Americans and plunder their money wherever and whenever (you) find it, ... launch the raid on Satan's U.S. troops and the devil's supporters allying with them, and... displace those who are behind them so that they may learn a lesson" is not a "particular brand of violence." It's "Allah's order." One with which "every Muslim who believes in Allah and wishes to be rewarded," including the indiscriminate mass-murdering islamofascist butchers that carried out the "martyrdom operation" that literally heated up this World War and dropped it on our heads, has been "call(ed) on to comply" by all their top "non-moderate" leaders, as "an individual duty for every Muslim who can do it in any country in which it is possible to do it."
It's known as total war. Which is the kind we need to be fighting if we want to truly win it.
...and may be channeled by particular demagogues or fanatics.
"Channeled" as in openly declaring full-scale war and issuing general orders to "Kill the Americans and their allies — civilians and military — etc., etc."
Most often, though, it grows out of a climate of poverty and ignorance, helplessness and despair.
Were you consciously trying to cause our entire universe to collapse into that unprecedented black hole (racism not intended, moonbats) from whose crushingly chaotic state of complete and absolute meaninglessness no light or any intelligible matter can ever Hope to escape — otherwise known as your "brain"? If not, why were you even risking it with another firing of your "particular brand" of Quantum Torpedoes of Galactic Cluster-Level Cluelessness Mark VIII-Septillion®? Would it've been better had my first question simply stopped right after that second s?
The only ignorance we see from your claim is your claim itself, Zer Øblah-um-uh, since—
three quarters of (forensic psychiatrist and former CIA undercover case officer Dr. Marc Sageman's) sample of Al-Qaeda members are from the upper or middle class. Moreover, he notes, "the vast majority — 90 percent — came from caring, intact families. Sixty-three percent had gone to college, as compared with the 5-6 percent that's usual for the third world. These are the best and brightest of their societies in many ways." Nor were they unemployed or isolated. "Far from having no family or job responsibilities, 73 percent were married and the vast majority had children.... Three quarters were professionals or semiprofessionals. They are engineers, architects and civil engineers, mostly scientists."
Scientists who happen to be extremists.
You know the type. They bully their lesser colleagues with threats of being branded non-conformists and ostracized and even having their livelihoods destroyed, into joining their consensus-or-else jihad against — ironically — the whole modern, technology-driven world, while they issue menacing fatwas declaring "The debate's over! Case closed! Apostasy!" to whoever dares question their zealously held certitudes, all so they can foment prolonged conditions of panic and alarm which would, if enough of their countries' peoples become duped then controlled by their and their witting accomplices' hate-filled, fear-mongering, power-lusting selves, inevitably lead to almost everyone on the globe being affected by a real "climate of poverty and ignorance, helplessness and despair." (Also see, UN's IPCC.)
We will have to make sure, despite our rage, that any U.S. military action takes into account the lives of innocent civilians abroad.
We always have, up to but not including the point where we hand the enemy such a one-sided advantage — especially for an enemy that picks both civilian and military targets, in that order — that we risk the far worst prospect of being defeated by that enemy. (See Dresden, Hamburg, Berlin, Hiroshima, or Nagasaki.)
We will have to be unwavering in opposing bigotry or discrimination directed against neighbors and friends of Middle Eastern descent.
Just who is going to pay for your devoted monumental task? The thoroughly incompetent United Nations? The islamofascist "countries" working so hard to create those embittered children? Of course not. It's us.
a lot of evil has been perpetrated based on the claim that we were trying to confront evil... (in) the name of good. And I think one thing that's very important is having some humility in recognizing that, you know, just because we think our intentions are good doesn't always mean that we're going to be doing good.
More to the point, who's to say whether your devoted monumental task won't be just another "evil perpetrated based on the claim that we were trying to confront evil in the name of good"? As your groveling worshipers in Moonbatdom are exceptionally capable of literally spinning on their heads to point out (pun intended): Isn't it exactly this kind of deeply intrusive interference in the conduct of their cultural, religious, or ethnic affairs which they find so monumentally offensive? So much so that they very much hate us for it? Even enough to commandeer our passenger planes, murder their pilots, and pile-drive them into our heavily populated buildings?
“Pandering to the gullible is Mr. Obama’s stock and trade.”
Kenneth H. Sailley “Just the man for those who don’t” (letter), Washington Times National Weekly, September 8, 2008.
But say we're gullible enough and insanely suicidal enough to so irresponsibly divert our attention away from winning the war to your devoted monumental task. What would you propose we do in the very likely event it starts turning out to be an extremely miserable failure? Tell the embittered children "I, uh, I'm, er, sorry, uh, about, eh, that" immediately before abandoning them, effectively leaving them to their dashed-again hopes, resinking prospects, and worse?
No amount of your wishy-washy, mealy-mouthed platitudes — all insufferably long on "what" but short on "how" — are ever going to do them any good.
...children not just in the Middle East, but also in Africa, Asia, Latin America, Eastern Europe and within our own shores.
Speaking of within our own shores, you know no one can possibly win the presidency without carrying the South. But for whom do your think feel Southerners are going to cast their votes?
A pair of Yankees in the mold of Massachusetts Junior Senator Hanoi John F'in' "Stuck in Iraq" al-Qerry?
Or the two Westerners taking up the mantle of California Governor and U.S. President Ronald "Electoral Landslide" Reagan?
(Something for you to try to put gobs of lipstick on while you ponder the real reasons the weakness-seeking islamofascist butchers hate us enough to want, without exception, you, your whole family, and everyone else within our own shores all dead.)
…if they want to "beat Coulterism," so suggest Johns Hopkins University's Samuel A. Chambers and Swansea University's Alan Finlayson. (Sweetness & Light via Chairman Ann)
B
ut there are a few questions that need to be answered before they dirty themselves in their grotesquely mistaken desperate cause without end based on lies and deception not in our name.1
Being the generous sort, ever willing to hand liberals a really good shovel any time they set out on such digging projects, I'm offering to help them with those answers:
Of what elements are Coulterist constituencies composed?
Buyers and actual readers of books. Known in the private sector as "the employed." (Or in Liberalese, "Christofascist, racist, misogynist, homophobic hayseeds.")
By what appeals, tropes and interests are they bound together?
Respectively life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. (If you were playing the Social Security $25,000,000,000,000 Pyramidgame scheme, they'd be within the category of "Things Liberals Deem Obsolete.")
In what way does Coulterism seek to reconfigure the dimensions of political space?
Knock out the den wall and add a large family room with fireplace and new master bedroom complete with walk-in closet and bath. (In $2.5×1013 Pyramid [Scheme], it's a legal clue for the box "Try Doing That Under the Heavily-Policed Limits of Liberalism.")
Where might these dimensions be expanded?
Large kennel in the backyard for incessantly barking moonbat liberalsbirm? (Just a suggestion.)
How might these appeals be turned against it?
"That baby inside you, it doesn't need to live." — OK, not nuanced enough. — Against Coulterism Turner #2: "Give me liberty and give my fetus death!" — What? Oh, all right. — ACT #3: "Abort It... For The Children®" (Yeah, I thought you'd like it.)
How might the constituencies be broken up and reordered?
Re-education camps, of course. (That's the Liberal Way™.)
But like a battered, frightened, and intimidated spouse, every al-jazeernalist rationalizes it all away and says to herself, "My spouse really loves me. Look, I have the cuts and bruises to prove it!"
M
ichael Crowley, in his New Republicarticle subtitled "Clinton's strategy for crushing the media," says,
In January 1993, Hillary Clinton granted her first newspaper interview as First Lady. But, rather than agreeing to sit down with a national reporter to discuss issues of substance, Hillary would only meet with a food reporter from The New York Times — and then only to discuss her hostess duties. Later, other reporters who wanted to question her about policy were told to submit written questions. "Her ground-zero assumption is that [a reporter is] an asshole," a senior Hillary aide told her biographer, Carl Bernstein.
Clinton's wariness was forged by her husband's nightmarish experience on the 1992 campaign trail. Battered by stories about Bill's mistresses and financial dealings, Hillary seethed at the press and resolved to control their coverage. Bill disliked the press, too — but not with the loathing of his wife, who even tried to throw the press out of the White House itself. In January 1993, she and her friend Susan Thomases proposed to move the White House press room next door, to the sleepy Old Executive Office Building. When that scheme was deemed untenable, aides closed off a hallway connecting the press room to the West Wing. Outraged reporters pounced on press secretary George Stephanopoulos, who later recalled thinking, "I'm not your problem; Hillary is. ... [Bill] Clinton seems to be on my side. He asked me again this morning why we were closing the door. Um, have you talked to your wife about this, Mr. President?"
Hillary's first instinct was usually to stonewall the press. When New York Times reporter Jeff Gerth was first reporting on Whitewater in early 1992, rather than work with Gerth, Hillary insisted on giving him the figurative finger. Likewise, Hillary balked when The Washington Post asked to see private Whitewater documents in 1993. Bill Clinton favored compliance with the Post — but was overruled by Hillary, who implied she would rather "throw them all in the Potomac." [Or "off with their heads!" in the original German.] Former Clinton White House adviser David Gergen has called the decision "the decisive turning point" that convinced Washington the Clintons had something to hide.
To be fair, when Hillary did engage the press, she often got burned. When she ruminated to the The New York Times Magazine's Michael Kelly about spirituality, he produced a mocking cover story titled "Saint Hillary." Hillary later wrote that she had been "raw with grief" over her dying father, implying that Kelly had exploited her emotional vulnerability. In 1994, with questions swirling about a big profit she turned selling cattle futures, she agreed to meet with a clamoring media. Donning a memorable pink suit, she endured an hour of harsh[softball] questioning. Afterward, according to Gerth and Don Van Natta's recent book Her Way, Hillary told her aides the exercise had been futile. "They're not going to let up. They're just going to keep coming at us, no matter what we do." The sordid Monica Lewinsky scandal only affirmed Hillary's firm belief that the "vast right-wing conspiracy" had immense power over mainstream media coverage.
When Hillary embarked on her 2000 run for Senate in New York, she brought her antipathy toward the press with her and set new standards for media control. After the campaign, AP reporter Beth Harpaz wrote a book about her experience in which she described feeling at various times "humiliated," "paranoid," and "so worn down and so exasperated by the lack of access and the lack of news in this campaign that I'd given up fighting." Once, when Hillary sent a candy basket to the press van, the downtrodden reporters were incredulous, Harpaz wrote: "[N]one of us could believe that Hillary was being so nice to us."
[Emphases and links supplied.]
More about the Victim Candidate™:
Sieg Heil!ary
Hillary has been angry for over 40 years. It's not my job to make up for her poor marital choices by electing her President. Instead of owing her my vote because she's female, I owe the rest of my gender a vote against her because she sets a terrible example for all. — Mary McLemore Pike Road, Alabama
It was a maneuver that seemed suspiciously aimed at detracting from Hillary's lackluster showing whilst simultaneously shoring up her female support. But, ironically, it has had the opposite effect. Rather than fostering a sense of solidarity between women and the first credible female presidential candidate, Hillary's cries of discrimination have left many women cold, and with good reason. We've come a long way, baby — and Team Hillary seems not to have noticed. — Liz Mair "Big Girls Don't Cry," American Spectator (11/9/2007)
Despite an orchestrated Hillarygate defense, the American public seems not to be buying the argument that all is aboveboard when it comes to Whitewater and the 1993 firings and prosecutorial harassment of the White House Travel Office staff. In a just published NBC opinion poll, 53 percent of respondents agree with New York Times columnist William Safire that the first lady is lying about her personal finances and involvement in Whitewater, with just more than a quarter believing she is telling the truth. — Susan Crabtree, Jamie Dettmer et al. "Hillary and Bill: what is the state of their union?" Insight on the News (2/12/1996)
Then there's Her Nibs' victimization by, of all people, a little old lady. According to the New York Slimes,
A spokesman for Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton declined to comment on Mr. McCain's response [to a little old lady calling Mrs. B.J. al-Qlinton a b*tch]. But some of her advisers said they were surprised that he had not defused the moment more artfully [Like this, perhaps?], given the possibility that it might stir sympathy or outrage on Mrs. [BiIsIs] Clinton's behalf in some quarters.
Some of her allies have accused her male Democratic opponents of ganging up on her in their last televised debate.
"Whaaaaah. A bunch of wussified males and a little old lady are victimizing me! Whaaaaah."
Way to show you're "tough," Your Nibs.
If you can't stand the heat, go back in your kitchen and bake a few more cookies for your lying, cheating "husband" on whose career you've been riding piggyback all these years.
If slings and arrows from either these "males" or a little old lady are enough to wither you and leave you crying, what're going to do when terrorist-in-chief Osama bin Laden starts flinging very real ones at you?
Maybe we can find you a frailer, 100-year-old lady who won't have any chance of turning you into a complete and total wreck. Or, better yet, simply let you again beat up a battered and abused spouse "a**hole" reporter, like you did Wolf Bootslicker & "Gang" last night in your rigidly scripted, questions-plantedpresidential "debate" al-Qlinton Nibs Network "God Save Our Queen" sycophancy.
That'd be more your speed, Ms. HillI-R-Victim al-Qlinton.
Never forget that the first woman ever chosen prime minister of Great Britain could be no one less than the independent, self-made Iron Lady, Margaret Thatcher. Lest we become embarrassingly shallow and frivolous by comparison, the first woman president of the United States of America and first woman leader of the free world (rather than disgraceful laughingstock of it) should at the very least and truly be just as self-made and independent.
ny questions before we roll the tape? No? Then take this audience-member-specific card so you'll have a comfortable one to ask the Jr. senibsator when she targets calls on you later....
With apologies to Jeff Foxworthy, not to mention all real victims.
I
f the ACLU's telephone number is the first one on your speed dial, you might be a victim.
If your name has ever been heard foaming past the lips of Je$$e Jack$on, al-$harpton, or anyone at CAIR, you might be a victim.
If you're not rich, white, tall, skinny, sober, big-bosomed, a straight-A student, out of jail, or a man, you might be a victim.
If your child has ever recited the Pledge of Allegiance, you might be a victim.
If Hanoi John F'in' al-Qerry says you're among those who R Stuk Inn Irak, you might be a victim.
If you ever voted for Pat Buchanan but there's a faded Ralph Nader bumper sticker on either side of your Florida license plate, you might be a victim.
If someone's been monitoring every telephone conversation between you and Osama bin Laden, you might be a victim.
If you have a job interview in El Paso but the only way you can get there is to swim across a river clutching a forged Social Security card, you might be a victim.
If any man has opened a door for you, you might be a victim.
If you've ever listened to an al-Demoqrat and actually believed what he, she, or other said, you may very well be a victim.
Packages and school supplies raised through these organizations are transported to Iraq, free of charge, by FedEx, then distributed to Iraqi children by our brave freedom fighters.
A Line of Sight
