“Many of the [Socialist/Marxist] ideas we fought for — that just a few years ago were considered radical — are now mainstream [Democrat Party policies].” –Comarade Bernie
I
t was nice of the Demofascist Party's top two candidates to openly confess their "unity" with totalitarianism's perennially failed ideas. Even nicer that one of them proclaimed those ideas "now mainstream" within their party. Liberofascists like them usually don't telegraph their zealous adherence to such merciless killers of personal freedom.
Criminals ready to snap are all in favor of "a civilian corps of unarmed first responders such as social workers" to handle their "nonviolent" crimes, but not freedom-loving Americans who demand and support effectual protection of their safety and security.
Democrooks bent on dividing America into more easily conquerable tribes are all committed to shifting the blame and bruden for their party's "legacy of slavery and Jim Crow segregation" onto everybody else, but not justice-minded Americans who judge the Jimocrow Party solely guilty and responsible, and that the descendants of its many, many victims have exceptionally strong cause as well as the right to sue it into total bankruptcy and ultimate extirpation.
Well-heeled Demotyrants, their donors and their armies of loophole-making accountants and lawyers all promote "shared prosperity" and "investing" other people's money in their countless vote-buying schemes, but not hard-working Americans who actually earn a living and must pay the multitude of hiked taxes those exorbitantly costly schemes require.
Desperate Demofascists and their cheap labor-supporting pals all clamor for the immediate elimination of America's borders and sovereignty, but not We the People who ordained and established her Constitution and value law and order.
Power-hungry globalists and other Democronies all believe they must "embed environmental justice and climate justice at the heart of our policy and governing agenda" and must prepare us to be "citizens of our planet," but not God-fearing Americans who put their eternal trust in Him rather than in some elitist clique of hate-filled, politically-driven control freaks.
Thankfully, we Americans have a president who already stopped these liberofascists from inflicting their freedom-crushing ideas on our country once. When we reelect him, he will do so again.
Namely, New York, California and other miserably failed states.
I
t's the Democrat Way. Throw good money after bad. Except, in this case, there's no "good" money left to throw anywhere. Dollar bills are so overly plentiful now, a sheet of toilet paper would be more valuable than any as currency. Cf. Weimar Republic and its wheelbarrows full of cash.
Not that any of this matters to Demofascists, of course, whose holders of economics degrees include the masterminds Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Paul Krugman and Governor GauleiterJayInslee. They have, after all, a serious crisis they don't want to go to waste. So it's exploit the China Virus to extort from out-of-work American taxpayers multi-trillion-dollar bailouts of states they ran into the ground long before this crisis. Is it any wonder they're doing everything yes they can to prolong their lockdowns that keep Americans out of work? Make no mistake, they always place far greater value on their power to take and spend our money than on their duty to guarantee and protect our liberties.
Effectually, Demotyrants are saying, "Give in to our demands and we'll release the hostages." In the meantime, our lives and livelihoods languish in their ludicrousprisons.
It's time we rise up against our totalitariankidnappers and order them to stay at home instead — forever — away from any office of honor, trust or profit under the United States or any state.
Border Wall or Black Death — Democrats prefer the latter.
“California can‘t handle the current situation, let alone allow tens of thousands of illegal immigrants with no health records to flood its major cities.”
e're now a nation of pandemics, thanks to the Democrat Sanctuary (for Third World diseases) Party.
A veteran Los Angeles City Hall official is one of the latest victims of an epidemic of the infectious disease typhus that continues to worsen across LA County.
For months, LA County public health officials have said typhus is mainly hitting the homeless population.
But Deputy City Attorney Liz Greenwood, a veteran prosecutor, tells NBC4 she was diagnosed with typhus in November, after experiencing high fevers and excruciating headaches.
"It felt like somebody was driving railroad stakes through my eyes and out the back of my neck," Greenwood told the I-Team. "Who gets typhus? It's a medieval disease that's caused by trash."
“America never had much of a history of typhus, but Mexico did. And our brief episodes of typhus invariably involved immigrants and migrants carrying the disease from Europe or Mexico.”
Bad enough the Democramnesty Party wants to replace American citizens' votes they keep losing with "Undocumented Americans™"'s ones. Now it wants to physically get rid of us pesky non-Democrook voters by way of the medieval diseases it's welcoming with open arms (and absolutely no medical screenings) into our nation.
It wasn't Trump's idea to build a wall against microscopic invaders.
The Immigration and Nationality Act mandates medical screening exams for legal immigrants and refugees from around the world. The tests are performed by authorized physicians in either the applicants' countries of origin or in the United States. The process includes "a physical examination, mental health evaluation, syphilis serologic testing . . . and chest radiography followed by acid-fast bacillus smears and sputum cultures if the chest radiograph is consistent with tuberculosis (TB)."
Legal immigrants and refugees must provide mandatory proof of vaccination for measles, mumps, rubella, polio, tetanus, diphtheria, pertussis, hepatitis A and B, rotavirus, meningococcus, chicken pox, pneumonia, and seasonal flu.
Moreover, "most experts agree that testing for TB, hepatitis B, and HIV should be performed for most new arrivals to the United States," the Centers for Disease Control (not Fox News or the Trump White House or any other evil conservatives) reports. "Clinicians should also make a habit of ensuring that this screening has been done for every new non-US-born patient they see, regardless of time since the person's arrival."
Actual public-health experts across the Southwest have noted rises in drug-resistant TB and dengue fever. In June, Australian public-health researchers reported that "scabies, long considered a disease of the past in the developed world, is making its way back." The scientists pointed to mass global migration as a leading factor, noting scabies outbreaks among refugees to the European Union and along America's southern border.
But we have to tolerate our getting wiped out by never-vaccinated, disease-carrying illegal aliens or we're bigots and "RACISTS!!!!1!!!"
In 2020 and beyond, vote like your life depends on it. Because, in reality, it does.
Due to migration from northern Mexico into the southern US, imported cases of RMSF [Rocky Mountain spotted fever] have played an important role in recent years. RMSF infections among migrants were either not recognized by emergency room personnel or they were inadequately treated with (ineffective) broad-spectrum antibiotics. More than once has this resulted in fatal outcomes.
ongress should call itself into session now and pass a bill that would exempt every American motorist from any criminal prosecution or civil action arising from his or her vehicle striking, injuring, or killing one or more braindead, safety-pinheaded crybullying "protesters" rioters who intentionally obstruct or otherwise deny his or her right of travel upon any American roadway. Whether they were struck, injured, or killed accidentally or not would be immaterial. Moreover, all those "protesters" rioters (or their estates) would be fined an amount equal to the costs of repairing or replacing the motorist's vehicle plus all of the motorist and his passengers's medical and funeral expenses; and all such costs and expenses would be paid by the United States out of highway trust-fund monies. Finally, any such obstruction or denial that results in the death of the vehicle's operator of any of its occupants would be a federal capital offense.
Of course, "President" Puddy Tat will, as he always does, stand up for whoever's terrorizing law-abiding Americans, and thus will veto that bill. Voters will remember in 2018 and beyond not only his deplorable betrayal, but also that committed by all his liberofascist accomplices in Congress who voted against the bill's passage.
Fortunately for all peaceable, law-abiding Americans, Congress may pass the same bill when it convenes next year, in time for President Trump to sign it into law right after he's sworn into office. Then America's roadways will be safe again for you and me as well as for our children.
An executive department illegally deleted like Hilliary Rotten al-Qlinton's felonious emails.
In CONGRESS, July 4, 1776.
The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,
When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.__________We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.__That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,__That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.__Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world._____He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good._____He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them._____He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only._____He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures._____He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people._____He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within._____He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands._____He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers._____He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries._____He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance._____He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures._____He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power._____He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:__For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:__For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:__For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:__For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:__For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:__For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences:__For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:__For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:__For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever._____He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us._____He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people._____He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation._____He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands._____He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions. In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people. Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our Brittish brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.__
We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do._____And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.
Button Gwinnett Lyman Hall Geo Walton.
Wm Hooper Joseph Hewes, John Penn
Edward Rutledge.
Tho Heyward Junr. Thomas Lynch Junr. Arthur Middleton
John Hancock
Samuel Chase Wm. Paca Tho. Stone Charles Carroll of Carrollton
George Wythe Richard Henry Lee Th Jefferson Benj Harrison Tho Nelson Jr. Francis Lightfoot Lee Carter Braxton
Robt Morris Benjamin Rush Benj. Franklin John Morton Geo Clymer Jas. Smith Geo. Taylor James Wilson Geo. Ross
Caesar Rodney Geo Read Tho McKean
Wm Floyd Phil. Livingston Frans. Lewis Lewis Morris
Rich. Stockton Jn. Witherspoon Fra. Hopkinson John Hart Abra. Clark
Josiah Bartlett Wm. Whipple
Sam Adams John Adams Robt Treat Paine Elbridge Gerry
Step. Hopkins William Ellery
Roger Sherman Sam. Huntington Wm. Williams Oliver Wolcott
1. Name: State full name (include any former names used).
Gonzalo Paul Curiel
2. Position: State the position for which you have been nominated.
United Sttes District Judge for the Southern District of California
9. Bar Associations: List all bar associations or legal or judicial-related committees, selection panels or conferences of which you are or have been a member, and give the titles and dates of any offices which you have held in such groups.
American Bar Association Hispanic Advisory Committee of the Commission on Public Understanding about the Law (1993 - 1994)
Hispanic National Bar Association, Life-time Member
La Raza ["THE Race"] Lawyers of San Diego
Latino Judges Association
National Hispanic Prosecutors Association
C
learly an alleged judge who seeks not justice but racist, political vengeance and ugly partisan gain:
awyer Ted Cruz should know better than allegedly thinking anyone other than liberofascists are in any way responsible for their terrorist attacks against America's democratic election process. Open and fair elections threaten them. They feel they must destroy ours completely by any means necessary in order to remove permanently any and all meaningful opposition to their gaining and forever retaining total and absolute political power. Whoever leads most effectively such opposition becomes, automatically, their number-one target.
Now that desperate liberofascist terrorists(birm) have made Donald Trump the hugest target of their clearly criminal and violently anti-democratic attacks, what does Lawyer Cruz do? He makes excuses for them.
Lawyer Cruz: "When you have a campaign that affirmatively encourages violence[defending ourselves against violent liberofascist terrorist(birm) attacks], you create an environment that only encourages this sort of nasty discourse[Liberofascist George Soros-funded War on American Democracy]."
In any case, Lawyer Cruz has joined Establishment candidates Lifelong-Politician John Kasich and Lawyer Marco Rubio in their derangement.
Lifelong-Politician Kasich: "The seeds of division[defeating Establishment quislings] that Donald Trump has been sowing this whole campaign finally bore fruit[a Soros-funded War on American Democracy]."
Lawyer Rubio: "I do think Donald needs to realize and take responsibility for the fact that some of the rhetoric he has used [like 'Stand up to political bullies! Don't let them intimate, silence, or threaten you!'] can potentially be contributing to this environment[Soros-funded War on American Democracy]."
Members of the Establishment are sensing its impending, long-overdue demise, and so are getting as extremely desperate as the liberofascist terrorists they're excusing.
ho hates normal Americans? Liberofascist Demøcrooks(birm), the lapdog mediots humping their legs, and every other degenerate, deviant, demented demagogue desperately trying to turn America into a third-world-overrun, weak-kneed, debt-crushed, overly taxed and bureaucratized hellhole in which yes they can tyrannically reign rather than a heaven in which, Ohhnoooes!, they might have to selflessly serve — along with all the craven "Republicans" wittingly enabling these destroyers of our country and our very way of life.
Who threatens those who hate normal Americans? That is, who best shows yes he can thwart them and undermine their holds on power? That's right. The Donald.
Normal Americans have been able to figure it out. Not surprised the haters haven't.
...instead of trying to get to the bottom of his willful failure to catch and deport repeat violent violators of our laws.
L
ying Øliar's lawlessness is literally getting us killed.
Two months ago, it was his knowing refusal to go after a known violent cutthroat that allowed said cutthroat to kidnap and brutally murder 10-year-old Phillip Savopoulos' parents Savvas and Amy and their housekeeper Vera Figueroa in their own home and burn little Phillip alive in his own bed.
No, Dictator Øbamalfeasance was too busy faithlessly not executing our immigration laws so yes he can flood our country with his unvaccinated "dreamers."
Last week, it was his knowing refusal to go after sanctuary-city officials who allowed a known violent invader to wander around free and cold-bloodedly gun down Kathryn Steinle to death right in front of her dad Jim.
very God-fearing, America-loving citizen who happens to be a public servant has both the right and the patriotic duty to ensure his entrusted powers are never exercised in any way that would cause the government we instituted, either for our state or more locally, to act in direct violation of our common morality and personal consciences, whether based on religious convictions or not. No power so exercisable can ever be just, because no such power can ever be or has ever been derived from the consent of the governed.
In a sovereign state where the people have determined among themselves the provisions of natural marriage most societally proper and meaningful for them, under our present Constitution no one else has power to alter or abolish any of those provisions. They know they are not being hateful but factual when they declare that promoting genealogical dead-ends is not nor could ever be in their or their society's best interests. Any public servant who assists some outside attempt to promote such is betraying their sacred trust. Indeed, the oath of office every public servant in this country takes to support our Constitution, so help him God, means his only legitimate response is to use all his powers to effectually render void and a nullity any and all such attempts. As former Congressman John Hostettler points out:
In explaining the supportive role that the states would play in the proper operation of the federal government, Alexander Hamilton put it this way in Federalist Paper No. 27:
"the legislatures, courts and magistrates of the respective members [i.e., states] will be incorporated into the operations of the national government, AS FAR AS ITS JUST AND CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY EXTENDS; and will be rendered auxiliary to the enforcement of its laws." [Capitalization original.]
Thus, properly understood, preemption only applies to the "JUST and CONSTITUTIONAL authority" of the federal government. Given that (i) the law of domestic relations and marriage policy has never been made the "JUST and CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY" of the federal government (except for the District of Columbia and federal territories) and (ii) the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment applies only to a limited set of protections in state-administered legal processes, there is no "lawful" basis for a claim of preemption in this case.
The duty to disregard any federal judicial usurpation of the states' lawful jurisdiction of marriage policy flows from another constitutional clause which invokes a duty to an even higher authority than any temporal legal system, federal or state. Immediately following the Supremacy Clause, Article VI of the Constitution provides that "the members of the several state legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers... of the several states, shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to support this constitution." Known as the "Oath or Affirmation Clause," this provision requires every state official to swear or affirm their fidelity to the U.S. Constitution. In explaining the profound relationship between the Supremacy and the Oath or Affirmation Clauses, Alexander Hamilton highlighted the limited application of both. Once again in Federalist Paper No. 27, Hamilton remarked:
"the laws of the Confederacy, as to the ENUMERATED and LEGITIMATE objects of its jurisdiction, will become the SUPREME LAW of the land; to the observance of which, all officers legislative, executive and judicial in each State, will be bound by the sanctity of an oath." [Capitalization original.]
It's clear that state officials are "bound by the sanctity of an oath" to observe "the laws of the Confederacy." However, that oath is limited in its application to the "ENUMERATED and LEGITIMATE objects of" the Confederacy's jurisdiction. The power to overrule the states' restrictions on marriage policy has never been added to the "ENUMERATED and LEGITIMATE objects of" the jurisdiction of the United States. Therefore, without the future addition of such authority through the process set out in Article V for amending the federal Constitution, no order pursuant to any such opinion is "lawful."
Finally, it cannot be overemphasized at this juncture that no provision of the U.S. Constitution elevates an opinion issued by the federal judiciary — including an opinion issued by the U.S. Supreme Court — to the level of the "supreme law of the land." Indeed, there is only one time that I have ever heard that the U.S. Supreme Court was so consumed with pride to have even uttered such a radical principle. SeeCooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1, 18 (1958) ("[T]hat the interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment enunciated by this Court in the Brown case is the supreme law of the land, and Art. VI of the Constitution makes it of binding effect on the States 'any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.'").
This aberrational statement of the Supreme Court should be viewed as a very lonely exception to the view of Blackstone as embraced generally by our Framers that "the law and the opinion of the judge, are not always convertible terms, or one and the same thing; since it sometimes may happen that the judge may mistake the law." I.W. Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England 71 (Univ. Chi. facsimile ed. 1765).
Additionally, no provision of the U.S. Constitution obligates any elected official — federal or state — to "be bound by oath or affirmation, to support" an opinion issued by the federal judiciary.
If it had been the intention of the Constitution's framers to exclusively delegate all questions of Constitutional finality to the unelected, life-tenured members of the U.S. Supreme Court — and to relegate every other elected office, federal and state, to a position of subservience to the decisions of that Court, Article VI of the United States Constitution would have been the place in the U.S. Constitution where this peculiar doctrine would have been made obvious. From its omission, it is clear that this was never the Framers' intent.
Therefore, state officeholders remain bound by the sanctity of the oath they took which binds them to uphold their respective state constitutions and the laws which define and regulate marriage in their particular member of the Confederacy. They cannot be considered "good soldiers" by doing anything else.
Supreme Court and the law v. the political branches' bad ideas
C
enter for Individual Freedom contributing editor Ashton Ellis explains:
Despite all the machinations engaged in by the Obama administration, the intent of the law is evident in its text. The feds tried to entice states into a pay-to-play scheme that would hide the true cost of health insurance, let ObamaCare's backers claim they had covered millions of uninsured Americans and pad state budgets just long enough to make those new bureaucracies seem affordable.
It's often said that the Supreme Court's job is to say what the law is. There's no better way to honor that duty than to hold Congress and the president accountable for the laws they pass. If the political branches lose on the gamble to tempt a majority of states to trade away financial sustainability for a few years' worth of good press, then it's not the Court's job to bail them out.
San Francisco resident and former Obama supporter Melissa Klein exposed her ordeal with Covered California last week. The state exchange botched her 1095-A and then insisted she had never enrolled despite invoices she showed them documenting her premium payments. After hours in OPH [Obamacare Phone Hell], her case remains unresolved, and she can't file her taxes. How is it, she wondered, that "Amazon can ship something to NYC in an hour," but the White House and Covered California "can't create a health care system that functions"?
Klein concluded, better late than never: "I no longer believe that the government should mandate health care. ... A great idea is just an idea if you can't execute. And the government has proved time and time again, it can't execute."
er Nibs™ said lied that she used her special custom-made, non-public server to combine, "for convenience," her personal and State Department communications on a single device. She emailed her husband BiIsIs al-Qlinton with it, for example.
Hillary Clinton deepened the suspicions of her critics on Tuesday when she said that the private server she kept in her home to store her email "contains personal communications from my husband and me".
There is only one problem with that: just this week a spokesman for Bill Clinton said the former president does not use email at all.
"The former president, who does regularly use Twitter, has sent a grand total of two emails during his entire life, both as president," Matt McKenna, the spokesman, told the Wall Street Journal.
Oops. Unless that device doubles as a time machine and either BiIsIs's pet name for Hilliary is "John Glenn" or she was stationed in the Adriatic while wearing our country's uniform, everything that woman Ms. Clintonsky said is a lie.
Speaking of crooks and liars, lying liar Presidespot Øbola lied that he only found out about the Hildabeast's illicit email server after reading about it in a newspaper.
A day after Obama told an interviewer that he first learned details of Clinton's unusual[illegal] email arrangements from media reports, his press secretary confirmed that the president had none the less communicated with Clinton through her @clintonemail.com address.
Uh-oh. So we're supposed to believe that, no, the "tech-savvy" Øliar can't tell the difference between @state.gov and @clintonemail.com?
Do these slithering, forked-tongue lying liars "think" feel yes they can still count on the "stupidity of the American voter" to help them as they continue to trample us citizens underneath their endless parade of lies, law-breaking, and cover-ups?
Three muslims trying to join ISIS from Brooklyn have been arrested for planning to kill FBI agents and police officers in New York City, authorities say — and one of the men allegedly offered to assassinate President Obama and bomb Coney Island.
Federal prosecutors in Brooklyn identified Abdurasul Juraboev, 24, Akhror Saidakhmetov, 19, and Abror Habibov, 30, as having planned to orchestrate a terror outrage in New York City and hijack a commercial plane for ISIS, according to court papers filed on Wednesday.
Juraboev, who is also known as Adbulloh Ibn Hasan, came to the attention of authorities after he posted threatening messages to an Uzbek-language website in August 2014, according to a criminal complaint filed in US District Court in Brooklyn.
'We too wanted to pledge our allegiance and commit ourselves while not present there,' Juraboev wrote while using the name Abdulloh ibn Hasan.
'I am in USA now but we don't have any arms,' he wrote.
'But is it possible to commit ourselves as dedicated martyrs anyway while here?
'What I'm saying is, to shoot Obama and then get shot ourselves, will it do?'
During a meeting with law enforcement officials at his Brooklyn home, Juraboev said he would kill the president because 'of Allah,' and that he would also bomb Coney Island if asked to do so.
Juraboev also said he 'wanted to be a martyr' against the 'polytheists and infidels.'
During today's press conference, it was revealed that while all three men had been in the US legally, Habibov had overstayed his visa.
"Had been." Was that before or after these radical muslim aliens planned to murder our country's top misleader?
'By pledging allegiance to ISIL, these defendants allegedly conspired to fight for a designated foreign terrorist organization, either in Syria or even New York.'
Violent muslim extremist illegal aliens joining islamic terrorists who "are not islamic" and pledging allegiance to a foreign state that's "not a state"? Somebody must be confused.
hese invading lawbreakers are already stealing our identities. Now, thanks to Demøcrooks, they'll be stealing our votes too:
President Obama's temporary deportation amnesty will make it easier for illegal immigrants to improperly register and vote in elections, state elections officials testified to Congress on Thursday, saying that the driver's licenses and Social Security numbers they will be granted create a major voting loophole.
While stressing that it remains illegal for noncitizens to vote, secretaries of state from Ohio and Kansas said they won't have the tools to sniff out illegal immigrants who register anyway, ignoring stiff penalties to fill out the registration forms that are easily available at shopping malls, motor vehicle bureaus and in curbside registration drives.
Anyone registering to vote attests that he or she is a citizen, but Ohio Secretary of State Jon Husted said mass registration drives often aren't able to give due attention to that part, and so illegal immigrants will still get through....
Mr. Husted has written the Obama administration asking for help in identifying the name and date of birth of all noncitizens who get Social Security numbers, which he said would allow states to go back and clear illegally registered voters from their rolls.
He said the administration hasn't responded.
Øliar's lawless fascistration said they'll respond — after the 2016 elections.
f this lying lawbreaking power-abusing liar weren't half-white, his own party would've been clamoring for his impeachment and conviction a long time ago.
Ours is supposed to be a nation of laws, not of mendacious despotic scumbags. The only thing protecting the top bag of scum polluting the office of president now is his skin color. Øbully and the First Fraudy know this and use it to frighten and silence anyone in the press or other party who might otherwise stand up and hold them accountable. The latter fears being called a racist by proven liars much more than being judged an absolute coward by future generations.
We are allowing Barack Obama to get away with this because he is [half-]black. That's it, and that's all. To say if he were white he would have been impeached already is a non-sequitor; if he were white a man of his inexperience and radical background would never have been elected in the first place. America voted for him to prove they were not racist, and now we will let him destroy this government for the same reason.
Shouldn't cost Øbola anything to do nothing about lawbreaking anyway.
B
ackbones, Republicans. Grow some.
If Presidespot Øbola "thinks" feels yes he can "change the law" all by himself like a tyrant, does that mean yes he can also force all of us and our representatives to fork over to him the money he needs to carry out his tyranny?
What good is Congress's power of the purse if it doesn't use it to stop this entirely lawless action of a two-bit tinhorn dictator who not only won't enforce our laws but makes his own up as he goes along? If it won't then, why not just let him highhandedly single-handedly propose and ratify a constitutional amendment repealing the rest of Article I, too, and be done with it? Might as well throw in Article III while we're at it. Think how much simpler our lives would be with only one person acting as judicial, legislative, and executive branch in this country! Then, we won't have to anymore — about anything. Yes we can merely do whatever he says or else.
Call it putting the American people on a path to subjectship. Or slavery, for short.
Compared to what Lincoln faced in 1861, or Roosevelt in late 1941, or Truman in 1950, or, yes, Bush in 2001, Obama's challenges are relatively modest. Government is not working because Obama subverted entire cabinet agencies and federal bureaucracies — from Homeland Security to NASA to Justice — to make them tools of larger efforts to advance the Obama multicultural therapeutic message rather than to honor and keep faith with their traditional agendas.
When the president uses emphatics like "really" or "actually" or "make no mistake about it," "let me be clear," "in point of fact" or "this is unacceptable," we know that what follows will be untrue and others will be blamed for the president's own self-induced blunders.
ake no mistake: The naked-power-grabbing wimperor has let himself be absolutely clear. Yes he can violate existing law outright as well as personally suspend undermine it.
(1)(A) Any person who... (iii) knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, conceals, harbors, or shields from detection, or attempts to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection, such alien in any place, including any building or any means of transportation;
He directly affords these violators safety and comfort throughout our country, beyond any fear of arrest and prosecution, by his knowing, willful, and ongoing failure to perform his personal duty to take care that the laws of the United States be faithfully executed.
(iv)encourages or induces an alien to come to, enter, or reside in the United States, knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such coming to, entry, or residence is or will be in violation of law;
What better encouragement or inducement could any such alien have than the utter certainty there won't be any legally meaningful consequences whatsoever, all directly because of His Lawlessness' knowing, willful, and ongoing failure to perform his personal duty to take care that the laws of the United States be faithfully executed?
or(v)(I)engages in any conspiracy to commit any of the preceding acts,
He is directly collaborating with and "paying a debt" off to others who together and individually solicit, facilitate, provide cover for, and derive private financial gain from his knowing, willful, and ongoing failure to perform his personal duty to take care that the laws of the United States be faithfully executed.
or(II)aids or abets the commission of any of the preceding acts,
His accomplices couldn't have gotten away with committing the above criminal acts either but for his knowing, willful, and ongoing failure to perform his personal duty to take care that the laws of the United States be faithfully executed.
shall be punished as provided in subparagraph (B). (B) A person who violates subparagraph (A) shall, for each alien in respect to whom such a violation occurs— (i) in the case of a violation of subparagraph (A)(i) or (v)(I) or in the case of a violation of subparagraph (A)(ii), (iii), or (iv) in which the offense was done for the purpose of commercial advantage or private financial gain,
He holds off "paying a debt" that a whopping 73 percent of Americans oppose, for the purpose of affording his rubberstamping Demøcronies in Congress a better chance of winning their reelections and thus retaining their extremely good-paying "jobs" and private salaries. Also, be on the lookout for the lenders of that debt making contributions to his library after he leaves office, paying him exorbitant speaking fees, and offering him and his extremely indictable coconspirators cushy lobbyist positions, just to name a few clear examples of anticipated private financial gain.
be fined under title 18, imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both;
Five million harbored/encouraged/induced aliens multiplied by 10 years each, equals the maximum 50,000,000 years of imprisonment His Criminal-in-Chiefness thoroughly and richly deserves. Which means he'll be eligible for parole in A.D. 40002014, give or take a few millennia. Our descendants then, no doubt, will be trying to still pay off the additional debt he's saddled us all with.
(ii) in the case of a violation of subparagraph (A)(ii), (iii), (iv), or (v)(II), be fined under title 18, imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both;
Tack on another 25,000 millennia to his sentence.
(iii) in the case of a violation of subparagraph (A)(i), (ii), (iii), (iv), or (v)during and in relation to which the person causes serious bodily injury (as defined in section 1365 of title 18) to, or places in jeopardy the life of, any person,
be fined under title 18, imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both;
Centipedes will have evolved and colonized the entire known universe with their starships before His Feloniousness can be released from prison.
and(iv) in the case of a violation of subparagraph (A)(i), (ii), (iii), (iv), or (v)resulting in the death of any person,
I.e., civilians and public safety officers being murdered as a direct result of his knowing, willful, and ongoing failure to perform his personal duty to take care that the laws of the United States be faithfully executed.
be punished by death or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, fined under title 18, or both.
He definitely deserves the needle for all the murderous havoc and mayhem directly attributable to every one of his heinous crimes.
(b) Seizure and forfeiture
"Gross proceeds" of His Slimeballness' continuous crime spree, including his salary, pension, and other ill-gotten wealth, should be redistributed to those whose lives and livelihoods he's been wrecking and destroying by his serial violations. It would be partial justice.
Of course, none of them will be receiving any from this totally lawless misadministration, due to the following subsection:
(c) Authority to arrest
No officer or person shall have authority to make any arrests for a violation of any provision of this section except officers and employees of the Service designated by the Attorney General, either individually or as a member of a class, and all other officers whose duty it is to enforce criminal laws.
This horror movie the America people are either haplessly living or mercilessly dying in is called Guilty & Guiltier, and it stars Baracrook Øtyrant and his AG in the title roles.
hey're not even good lies in anyone's view, either. Unless you're one of the approximately two Americans left who still believe, under ØbolaCare, they can keep their health care plans and doctors if they like them. Period. Then yes you can consider all of Øbola's lies "good."
You no doubt also believe your lying liar-n-thief when he tells you Jonathan Gruber — the ØbolaCare asshatect whom he paid nearly $400,000 to show him how yes he can rely on the "stupidy of the American voter" to get that completely Democrooked law passed so yes he can lawlessly shove it right down everybody's throat — is just "some adviser who never worked on our staff." Of course, if you believe it's "no reflection on the actual [ØbolaCare] process that was run," you'll certainly believe Øbola never said this about that exorbitantly overpaid adviser of his:
You have already drawn some of the brightest minds from academia and policy circles, many of them I have stolen ideas from liberally. People ranging from Robert Gordon to Austan Goolsbee; Jon Gruber; my dear friend, Jim Wallis here, who can inform what are sometimes dry policy debates with a prophetic voice.
If you're still swallowing anything that spews out of Øbola's liehole, you don't require the willing suspension of disbelief. You require an emergency addabrainomy.
Packages and school supplies raised through these organizations are transported to Iraq, free of charge, by FedEx, then distributed to Iraqi children by our brave freedom fighters.
