we would not be just one day away from fundamentally transforming the usual states of American politics.
N
oon tomorrow in Washington, D.C., our nation's 45th president will be repeating these words—
I, Donald John Trump, do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. So help me God.
He will follow them with his own, conjuring the dreams and hopes shared by millions for our future.
For today, yes we can reflect on what in the course of human events contributed most to impelling that singularly momentous one. Just as the mindless totalitarianism of King George III and President Jimmy Carter each required — nay, outright screamed for — a mighty revolution to counteract and repair the untold damage it wreaked throughout our land, it became our right and our duty to start another to undo all the havoc and destruction which Presentyrant Baracrook Hussein Ødespot's long train of abuses and usurpations has been causing.
And, boy, what a start this revolution has had: No less than 1,030 legislative and executive seats lost by Democrats Demøfascists during Øbraindead's alleged "presidency"! His extremist accomplices now face real opposition from God-fearing, freedom-loving, true-American patriots in all but five coastal states. Their cruel dictatorships are in tatters and crumbling. All thanks, most assuredly, to their fanatical Der Fübar.
Good riddance, decrepit and unbalanced Democrooks' brutal grips on power.
Welcome back, government of the people, by the people, for the people.
STARSHIP CAPTAIN CHRISTOPHER PIKE: Back in my cage, it seemed for a couple of minutes that our keeper couldn't read my thoughts. Do emotions like hate — keeping hate in your mind — does that block off our mind from them? SHIPWRECK SURVIVOR VINA: Yes. They can't read through primitive emotions, but you can't keep it up for long enough. I've tried. They keep at you and at you year after year, tricking and punishing, and they won. They own me. I know you must hate me for that. PIKE: Oh, no. I don't hate you. I can guess what it was like.
C
aptain Pike did keep up his searing hate long enough to catch their keeper off guard and grab him, choking him and threatening to break his neck unless he stopped trying to trick them. When Pike pointed a hand laser at their keeper's big head and told him he'd fire, old balloon brain allowed them to leave their cage and return to the planet's surface. There, Pike still had to threaten mass suicide before the Yuugeheadsians declared them much more trouble than they're worth and that they were free to go.
Had another character from a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away been on hand, he might have warned those keepers, "The hate is strong with this one."
In the end, however, Pike returned willingly. Years later, after a terrible accident left him a physical vegetable, Pike knew his only chance for any kind of meaningful existence was with his former captors. This time, however, there would be neither pain nor torment. He would live out his life, fully restored, in a pleasant but carefully guided illusion of total freedom.
Only time may tell how much of this corresponds to Glenn and others' visceral, if not deranged hatred of Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump.
In the room the losers come and go Talking of Marco Rubio.
I
didn't think I would ever be able to vote for Adolf Hitler. After all, he's been deceased (or hiding out in Argentina) for over seventy years. It'd be another matter had he been listed on the Demofascist primary ballot. Dead candidates, like dead voters, always are somehow counted by that party. No, the vote I cast for this natural born citizen (of Austria) was tallied in a Republican Party primary.
Apparently he's running under an alias. At least that's what some of the more desperate Establishment hoohas are telling me. I can understand that, given his record of unfathomable genocide and interminable warring against all non-Axis nations. It still doesn't explain, however, why a 127-year-old would dye his hair and figure that's the only change he needs to make to convince millions upon millions of Americans — yours truly, included — that we aren't, you know, voting for Adolf Hitler.
Now, most Demofascists would say I've already voted for him — twice. Once in 2000, and again in 2004. Back then it was easier for them to say that, because all they had to do was add itler to his last name. Something only a Demofascist, or semibright four-year-old, could think of doing. What's different is, this presidential election, they're being joined in their surly childishness by the losers who claim to be on our side.
Who would be surprised if they try next month to rig their convention rules so yes they can get their fellow losers considered for nomination too? Certainly not any of us "uncivil" and "unhelpful" "Hobbits" and "Visigoths" whom they want to "crush everywhere."
Retaining their Establishment Privilege™ is, to them, far more important than restoring our country's greatness. So who, again, is behaving more like Hitler?
They'll keep dreaming up such ridiculous stuff. That is, till voters' voices wake them, and they drown.
he following amendment would resolve several critical issues concerning the amending process: Can a state legislature rescind its previous ratification of a constitutional amendment? Can it withdraw any of its applications for a convention of the states? Does Congress have power to control when, where, and how that convention is held? or do the legislatures have such power?
Neither Congress nor any court has ever settled these matters definitively. So, before embarking down the unprecedented path of proposing amendments, it clearly would be best if we could first persuade Congress to propose such an amendment in the normal fashion and our state legislatures to promptly ratify it. To boost that effort, legislatures could make their application to Congress for the call of a convention for proposing it. The more legislatures making that application, the greater the incentive Congress has to propose this amendment to all of them itself.*
Joint Resolution
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to conventions for proposing amendments and ratifications of amendments.
Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States:
“Article —
“Section 1. The legislatures of two-thirds of the several States on whose application the Congress shall call a Convention for proposing amendments shall have sole power to prescribe the times, places and manner of holding that Convention, and each of them may, before the Congress is required to call the same, direct its removal from that application.
“Sec. 2. If the legislature of a State or convention therein shall have ratified an amendment to the Constitution according to the one or other mode of ratification proposed by the Congress, the legislature thereof or the same or another convention therein may void that ratifying act. But this section shall not be so construed as to affect any amendment after it becomes valid as part of the Constitution.”
Speaker of the House of Representatives.
Vice President of the United States and
President of the Senate.
Although each of the present 27 amendments has added at least one new word to the Constitution's vocabulary, the above amendment wouldn't. Since it would be amending the provisions of Article V of the Constitution, that seems most appropriate and prudent. No need to give any branch of the federal government an untoward opportunity to mindlessly promulgate novel definitions for enhancing its already extravagant powers.
One issue left unresolved is whether Congress can simply tack onto its introductory clause any conditions not specifically provided for in the Constitution, such as no amendment it proposes will be valid unless ratified "within seven years from the date of its submission by the Congress." When such is included in the amendment's actual text, there is no ambiguity. But this should be a plain enough matter over which good sense and judgment again prevails.
Another is whether Congress should have power to summarily cancel the ratification process — to, in effect, "un-propose" a submitted amendment — either before a sufficient number of state legislatures have ratified it or retroactively by declaring its adoption isn't permitted because, for example, it wasn't done "within a reasonable time." The courts have sense enough not to touch this. If any members of Congress voting in favor of granting themselves such power are also stupefyingly unaware they've just committed certain electoral suicide, why would anyone wish to waste time trying to enlighten them?
In any event, such an amendment's provisions should help resolve the most critical of these unsettled issues.
* Early last century, during efforts to provide for the direct election of U.S. senators, "many states began sending Congress applications for conventions. As the number of applications neared the two-thirds bar, Congress finally acted."
epublicans will hold 31 of the country's 50 governorships next year [and also up to] 69 of the 98 partisan state legislative chambers — more than at any point in history." This further bodes well for the first-ever convening of a convention of states for proposing amendments to the U.S. Constitution.
If all thirty Republican-controlled legislatures and Nebraska's, along with just three of the remaining states' — eight of which have a Republican-controlled house or senate — send an application for it to Congress, the Congress must call that convention. Then, as Alexander Hamilton says in Federalist Paper 85, "We may safely rely on the disposition of the State legislatures to erect barriers against the encroachments of the national authority."
Their application would provide the time and place of convening the convention for proposing amendments as well as interim rules of its proceedings, such as—
The convention meet for that purpose at the place in which the most numerous branch of the state legislature first making such application is sitting, on the one hundred and twentieth day (Sundays excepted) after application of the legislatures of two-thirds of the several States has been made, and be composed of delegates appointed by the several States, with each State appointing, in such manner as the legislature thereof may direct, at least one delegate (but in no event more than five), provided no Senator or Representative in Congress, or person holding an office of trust or profit under the United States, be appointed a delegate;
All votes in the convention be taken by States, the delegation from each State having one vote, with a quorum to do business consisting of a delegate or delegates from a majority of the States, and a majority of all the States being necessary to an agreement, approval, or adoption of the convention on any question, order, or resolution;
The convention choose its president and other officers, determine the rules of its proceedings, punish delegates for disorderly behavior, with the concurrence of two-thirds of all the States expel a delegate, and keep a journal of its proceedings and publish the same after it adjourns sine die; and
The articles approved by the convention be proposed as amendments to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by the legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other mode of ratification may be proposed by the Congress.
It would resolve, also, that—
This application constitutes a continuing application in accordance with Article V of the United States Constitution until at least two-thirds of the legislatures of the several States have made application to the Congress of the United State to call a Convention for the specific and exclusive purpose of proposing amendments to the Constitution of the United States reading substantially as those contained in this resolution;
If Congress proposes, within 90 days after the legislatures of two-thirds of the States have made that application, all the amendments to the Constitution of the United States identical with those contained in this resolution, then this application shall no longer be of any force or effect; and
This application be deemed null and void, rescinded, canceled, and of no effect in the event that a convention for proposing amendments includes purposes other than providing for amendments to the Constitution of the United States reading substantially as those contained in this resolution.
Finally, every state legislature making this application would request each of the others make it too, and would transmit certified copies of it to them and to both houses of Congress and the U.S. representatives and senators from that state.
After the first legislature sends this application to Congress, the others need send only their concurrence.
As it so happens, Georgia's legislature made an application last March for an Article V convention for proposing amendments that "impose fiscal restraints on the federal government, limit the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limit the terms of office for its officials and for members of Congress." Alaska's then Florida's followed suit a month later using the same language. The strategy is particular subjects rather than particular amendments; and the amendments suggested here for that convention each falls within one of those subjects.
When this application is made by the legislatures of 31 more states, we'll be closer than we've ever been in living memory to "erecting barriers against the encroachments of the national authority."
he parasites on our land have no energy for anything other than sucking, both literally and figuratively. They wait and look for somebody else to sustain their so-called lives. Whether that body be yours or the not-so-honorable office holder's greedily making yours a source of their sustenance, it's all the same to them. The latter provides them HOSTizens to suck dry in exchange for the privilege of being able to provide them more and more such sources. You provide them the necessary veins until, once your own life's blood is completely drained and you're left no other choice, you have to start sucking too. Eventually, yes, only the office holders can be the winners. But since at that point there remains no body for the parasites to hang onto, everybody winds up a loser.
The above has become the story of America. The reason it has is that for too long we the so-called citizens have been letting ourselves and others rewrite it that way. The Founding Fathers drafted and, as Framers, composed the original — a timeless classic that keeps proving to be the best possible story for us. Whenever our forebears lived that story, this became a land full of constructive energy and progress. Whenever they didn't, it quickly devolved into one mired in misery.
Free and independent states aren't built by parasites, only brought down by them. The hard work of paying attention and flicking the parasites off whenever their ravenous sucking jaws try to latch on is the only chance our land has of staying free and independent. True citizens are, yes, the only ones who can make that happen. Indeed, they innately have the upper hand, especially in this year's mid-term congressional elections.
The office holders parasite wranglers, on the other hand, know it's an uphill battle to prod their charges into stop being SIT-ON-YOUR-ASSitens long enough to agree to be dragged into a polling booth and cast a ballot for somebody they never heard of or cared hearing about before. After all, there's no more "Barack-the-vote" to readily zombify the parasites into becoming one mindless, lockstep-marching horde.
No one can deny there's a general, pent-up disgust with how the rewritten story is playing out and with its self-appointed editors who keep insanely red-penning us all into an increasingly unavoidable corner. What kind of ending has the parasites winding up on top, literally crawling out from the desiccated corpses that left them stuffed, but now are no long able to feed them? It would be the end, all right, where no one lives happily ever after or even, for that matter, lives. Needless to say, America — the last, best, most shining hope of mankind — will be gone too. Good thing, because who would want to try living in the bleak and inhospitable world that must remain?
The fundamental question is whether that pent-up disgust bursts before Tuesday, November 4, and leaves the parasites and their prodders scrambling for the safest shadows they can find in its wake. It will decide nothing less than who reclaims or retains full control of the story and all of its content.
So, yes, we can believe either that we're all doomed or that true citizens turning out in droves and voting this and every November is going to help completely remove the present massive infestation as well as forever repel the parasites and stop them from infesting our land so again.
Joe Bell, 95, had come out on the drizzly morning to cheer on the runners in the 8-kilometer race from downtown San Jose to Santana Row. The event's charity partner is the Pat Tillman Foundation, which funds scholarships for military veterans and their spouses.
The runners, in turn, showed their appreciation for Bell's long-ago service, detouring from the course to shake his hand.
A convention of the states limited to proposing amendments to the United States Constitution that—
i.
impose fiscal restraints on the federal government
Debt Limit Amendment
"Article —
"All debts incurred in any year after the ratification of this article shall not exceed one tenth of the total revenue raised in the two years immediately prior to that year. But Congress may, during that year, by a vote of two-thirds of each house, increase such limit for that year."
ii.
limit the power and jurisdiction of the federal government
"Section 1. Congress shall make no law respecting education or labor, or abolishing, interfering with, or impairing the power of each of the several States to promote and regulate that of its citizens.
"Sec. 2. After seven years from the ratification of this article, the sixteenth article of amendment to the Constitution of the United States shall be inoperative, and no taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, shall ever be laid by the Congress.
"Sec. 3. Taxes, duties, imposts, excises, fines, penalties, or payments shall not be imposed on citizens of the United States by the United States by reason of failure to manufacture, sell, transport, deliver, import, consume, purchase, own, lease, rent, contract, store, export, keep, hold, have, or use any thing, including any service."
Presidential Powers Amendment
"Article —
"The President shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed, and shall not suspend, alter, or delay or prohibit the execution of any of them or any thing in them."
"Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, or born to a citizen thereof who has been seven years a resident within the United States, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.
"Sec. 2. Every person born in the United States to two citizens thereof is a natural born citizen.
"This section shall not apply to any person who entered on the execution of the office of President of the United States before this amendment becomes valid as part of the Constitution."
"Section 1. The power to give in one State full faith and credit to the public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of another with respect to marriages and other domestic relations contrary therein to the constitution or laws of such State, and to define therein all such relations, is reserved to the States respectively; and the judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States with respect to any such relation whatsoever.
"Sec. 2. Congress shall make no law respecting marriage or other domestic relation, except what may be absolutely necessary for carrying into execution its powers and all other powers vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States or in any department or officer thereof; and nothing in this Constitution shall be so construed as to affect in any way the power reserved to the States respectively by this amendment."
Public Use Amendment
"Article —
"No private property taken for public use shall be made private without the consent of the person or persons from whom it was taken or of his or their lawful heir or heirs."
Secession and Exclusion Amendment
"Article —
"No state or part of a state may secede or be excluded from this Union without the consent of the legislatures of three-fourths of the several states; and in the case of part of a state, such consent shall include the legislature of that state. But no state or part of a state, following its secession or exclusion, nor any portion thereof, may be admitted into this Union as a state or part of an existing state without the consent of the legislatures of three-fourths of the several states; and in the case of part of an existing state, such consent shall include the legislature of that state."
iii.
limit the terms of office for its officials and for members of Congress
"Section 1. No person shall be capable of being a Representative for more than six years in any term of twelve years, or a Senator for more than eighteen years in any term of thirty-six years. But this article shall not be so construed as to affect the election or term of any Representative or Senator chosen before it becomes valid as part of the Constitution.
"Sec. 2. No person shall be capable of being a Vice President who shall not be capable of being elected to the office of the President, or for more than twelve years in any term of twenty-four years.
"Sec. 3. Judges, both of the supreme and inferior courts, shall hold their offices during good behavior. But no person appointed after the ratification of this article shall be capable of being a Judge for more than twenty-four years in any term of forty-eight years."
C
ommentary:
Debt Limit Amendment
The annual limit of new debt is tied directly to an always known and fixed quantity — i.e., last two years' total revenue — instead of one always subject to bureaucratic revision and defining, like Gross Domestic Product. Expecting a judge, much less the people at-large, to understand fully all the economic intricacies involved in the latter is just one more layer, probably too thick a one, that must be added between profligate spending and any enforceable limit. Moreover, circumstances a hundred years from now may render the very term itself obsolete and, in turn, the spending limit based on it a dead letter. But basing that limit on no more plain and irrefutable a fact than the "regular Statement and Account of the Receipts and Expenditures of all public Money... published from time to time" as already required by our Constitution, would place our growth of public debt under much longer lasting constraints.
In time of war or public danger, when limiting new debt could be unwise, Congress has power to temporarily increase the annual limit by a supermajority vote in each house. But both houses must pass that increase in and for the same calendar year, and do so every year until the war or danger ends. Congress may increase the limit in other times as well. But its members must justify those votes to the satisfaction of their electors.
Congressional Powers Amendment
Eliminating the federal education and labor bureaucracy, the income tax, and every clearly dictatorial individual mandate that now plagues us and threatens all of our most deeply cherished liberties, is this amendment's purpose. The first section recovers what never should have been taken outside the sole purview of our states. There certainly is no delegated power enumerated anywhere in our Constitution for doing so. We cannot allow a few generations of federal courts to regard our Tenth Amendment as a mere "truism" any longer. It is the substance of our liberties. We only loan the federal government some of our powers. That is not an invitation for it take whichever of ours it pleases. This correction of that increasing abuse and outright theft of them is way past due.
The second section gives us and our representatives in Congress seven years to take out of service forever the overly misused IRS assault weapon system, and replace it with a taxation method highly respectful towards basic human rights and dignities. That may mean the consumption-based fair tax with its monthly prebates feature, or the more general and minuscule transaction tax. Whatever method we finally decide to adopt, it cannot help but be infinitely more just and equitable than the multimillion-word monster crushing us now.
The final section addresses the latest, most blatant abuse and theft. Nothing undermines more our longest held principle of strong but limited government than a central government that steals our most basic power to decide for ourselves what is right and best for us, then punishes those who choose not to conform to decisions it feels it alone can and should make for all of us with little if any reference to, much less reverence for our will. Such government is no longer limited, not only in terms of unmitigated power, but in its colossally smug, yet wholly unwarranted feelings of infallibility and self-righteousness. That government, in its hubris, has completely isolated itself from the one true source of all of its powers — namely, us — and thus sets itself up as an object of absolute scorn and ridicule, unworthy of any self-respecting person's support, let alone any of that servile deference it must ever increasingly demand. There can be no government more insecure and weak than one that actually believes it has to resort to such unprecedented power grabs.
Presidential Powers Amendment
No president can or should unilaterally and capriciously insert in a just-enacted law, contrary to its written provisions, arbitrary, inequitable, or politically opportunistic postponements, with or without vague or inapposite references to decades-old law containing discretionary language which neither contemplated nor expressly intended such a far-off, future application. "I can do whatever I want" is never sufficient or a valid justification, not even in what is left of our constitutional republic. It is sad we should require an amendment to close loopholes where, before this administration, none ever existed — when we had presidents who were mature enough to take seriously their oath to "take care that the laws be faithfully executed."
Citizenship and Presidential Eligibility Amendment
This is another case in which, before this administration, there existed no gaping loopholes in Article II of our Constitution. Every president not only was born in the United States, but was born to parents who were both at the time United States citizens. This meaning of "natural born citizen" was the one our nation wisely followed and flourished under for eleven score years. But rather than fundamentally transforming its meaning, we would be wise to follow once again — and keep following — the one that always worked for us. Under this amendment, we can.
Domestic Relations Amendment
As stated on this site last July, under present circumstances, the best if not only method available by which our states truly can promote and safeguard our consent, especially with respect to marriages and other domestic relations, is a Convention of the States for proposing amendments like this one. Under it the policy of our respective states would be to each its own, and no branch of the federal government has any say in the matter. In other words, mind your own business and we'll mind ours. Cannot get any more American than that.
Public Use Amendment
This amendment modifies the federal supreme court's order that allows any government to take private property then turn around and sell or give it to some other individual or private concern whom that government feels can pay it more taxes. These robbing hoodlums with public titles may continue to take from the poor and give to the rich, but they will first have to get the permission of their victims before they may profit from their crimes against common decency and fairness.
Secession and Exclusion Amendment
Our great, great, great grandfathers could have avoided much agony and bloodshed had they directed their energies instead towards ratifying and utilizing such an amendment. But all that is water under the Burnside Bridge. Of concern now is whether any state, against its people's ardent wishes duly expressed through their democratically chosen representatives, should be forced to maintain a political connection between it and a union whose government, as they have themselves determined, has irreconcilably become incompatible with or even inimical to their most solemn and enduring aspirations and is thus unfit to command ever again their allegiance, and otherwise seems less likely to effect their safety and happiness than their own government could were theirs a free and independent state.
Expressed through their respective ratifying conventions, it was the choice of the people of two-thirds of the original states to enter into "a more perfect union" which established our federal government. The people of the remaining states soon chose to enter into it as well. Under that government, Congress admitted new states. Moreover, unlike the previous union, states are absolutely prohibited from entering into any treaty, alliance, or confederation; and it took a disastrous war between them to settle the question of whether the people of a state may even choose to exit from the union alone, without entering into anything else. The union's highest court opined they could not.
This amendment provides our states a mutually agreeable exit mechanism. It also provides for a former state's reentry into the union, as well as expulsion of an existing state. These provisions apply to parts of states, too.
Once a state's succession or exclusion is consented to by three-fourths of the state legislatures, it is no longer part of the union. For all intents and purposes, it has become a foreign nation — a free and independent state that has "full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do." This is true for any seceded or excluded part of a state, provided those consenting legislatures include that state's legislature. Subsequently, that state or part may be admitted back into the union if the legislatures of three-fourths of the existing states consent. Joining it to any existing state as an enlargement of the latter's territory is permitted. Finally, a legislature may withdraw its consent any time before the secession, exclusion, or admission occurs. It may also submit the question of granting or withdrawing its consent, or both, to a vote of the electors in the state, and condition that grant or withdrawal on the result.
This amendment effectually establishes a check of last resort by our state governments on the federal or an errant state's one, alleviating or more constructively channeling any otherwise extremely serious and insoluble disaffection within our ranks. As the number of legislatures consenting to a particular secession or exclusion grows, so too does the incentive to explore and enact acceptable reforms. Should this fail to produce agreeable reforms before the secession or exclusion occurs, it will be forever clear that the offended or offending party's exit from our union was at the time in the best interests of both.
Without such an amendment, there is available to no group of people any possible exit from our union except by winning a civil or revolutionary war.
Term Limits Amendment
The first two sections are from an amendment suggested on this site six years ago. Quoting its relevant notes: "Term-limits language taken from Articles of Confederation, Article V. The terms of delegates in Congress was for one year, but 'no person shall be capable of being a delegate for more than three years in any term of six years.' Similarly, representatives and senators may serve no more three times their normal term during any period of six times their normal term.
"The amount of time served by those in Congress before the amendment's ratification is not counted."
The last section limits the number of years a federal judge appointed after this amendment's ratification may serve in the judicial branch. The lifetime appointments of sitting judges are not affected.
These limits are tabulated below.
No person shall be capable of being a–
For more than–
In any term of–
Representative
6 years
12 years
Vice President
12 years
24 years
Senator
18 years
36 years
Judge
24 years
48 years
The Twenty-second Amendment already sets the maximum number of years a person may hold the office of the President: ten (two after a succession plus two 4-year elected terms).
Another change we need is an amendment that restricts the Commerce Clause so it may never be used again as a bludgeon to pound the people into submission.
Thankfully, as our movement progresses, we are getting closer and closer to adding a new bill of liberties to the supreme law of our land.
hen the Georgia House passes the application, the Senate secretary will transmit copies of it to the presiding officers of each of the legislative houses in the several states, requesting their cooperation.
[T]he General Assembly of the State of Georgia hereby applies to Congress, under the provisions of Article V of the Constitution of the United States, for the calling of a convention of the states limited to proposing amendments to the United States Constitution that impose fiscal restraints on the federal government, limit the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limit the terms of office for its officials and for members of Congress.
Since the states control everything that happens in their convention, and three-fourths of them must ratify whatever amendments it proposes before they become adopted, there's no danger of a so-called runaway convention that ends up fundamentally transforming our Constitution into Øbamarx's ejaculate-crustified copy of the The Communist Manifesto.
For now, this appears the best alternative to some short-lived Civil War II in which beta/blue states wind up conquered and occupied by alpha/red ones.
f that Teh Horror™! means We the People's true representatives in Congress get to smite and forever bury Demøtyrants' Øfascist"Care" just as We the People demand, We the People won't mind living in a rare state of unabridged Freedom for a few weeks or months before having to "live" again under this government's unending tyranny.
Teh Horror™!
Except, without Demøtyrants' Øfascist"Care", this government's unending tyranny won't be as utterly intolerable as it would be with it.
Teh Horror™!
...only for Demøtyrants and their Øfascist"Care", that is.
Fortunately for the American people, he's not the only public servant who takes his solemn oath very seriously. (LANGUAGE WARNING)
A
lthough Chief Mark Kessler was fired by the borough council after he posted this video, he and his many thousands of liberty-loving supporters continue to stand up for all of our rights, "even for those who oppose our constitution."
ommunism is directly responsible for the murders of a tenth of a billion innocent people — roughly one percent of all the persons who have ever lived since that lethal evil was first allowed to exist.
The governments of Chicago and Washington, D.C. have all but disarmed the law-abiding citizens now oppressed by those liberal regimes. The result: highest murder rates in the county.
More gun control isn't what we need. We need to control the governments that obviously don't care about people like us, but are doing everything yes they can to allow even more of us to be murdered.
“Theirs Stood Because They Stood Their Ground”
Now who needs an Ar-15 with 30 round magazines? That question has also been brought up. I would like to put forward that had the Koreans in the LA Riots not had AR-15s and AK-47s with 30 round magazines, and Rugers 30s, their businesses would have been burned to the ground like all of the other businesses in their neighborhood. Theirs stood because they stood their ground.
ødorats are the latest Victims® of their own bitterly clung-to Darwinism.
As the reality of their having sunk lower than polluted pond sludge continues to sink in somewhere immeasurably deep inside those empty, slope-foreheaded skulls of theirs, all in a hopelessly endless search for any kind of even nominally living brain matter way down there, Defeatedrats are poise(iu)d to cling just as bitterly to their same old tired status quo of dangerously incompetent, epicly failed misleadership.
Projectionist-in-Chief Naggy "Every Month 500 Million Americans [sic] Will Lose Their Jobs" Peloseri, soon to be former Screecher of her soon to be former Demøcrook-benighted House of Reprobates, is, of course, not only "a total failure, losing all credibility with the American people on the economy, on the war, on energy, you name the subject," but "an incompetent leader. In fact, she's not a leader. She's a person who has no judgment, no experience and no knowledge of the subjects that she has to decide upon." Clearly "oblivious. In denial. Dangerous." Indeed, "the empress has no clothes. When are Dumbørats going to face the reality? Pull this curtain back." Moreover, "her activities, her decisions, the results of her actions are what undermines her [mis]leadership, not this statement. These statements are just a statement of fact."
Liberal League of Demøcrook Womyn Fascist Communist Anti-America Voters™ should be ashamed of itself. Although there's more chance that a rattlesnake would be for biting people, or a maggot for feeding off some fetid carcass. (M/M)
The annual recalibration of his Super Double-Secret Mind Control Device™ was an epic fail.
D
efeated RINØcrats et al., focus on something other than yourselves for a change. Like our country:
Take a deep breath and this advice from that wise momma grizzly of what is truly our common cause and struggle:
We have some great common sense conservatives who are putting it all on the line. These candidates and their supporters, fighting, fighting for what is right — and a lot of them just fought some tough primary battles.
That's good. Contested primaries are good. It's good for the system. It's great for voters: Democracy at work. Competition is good.
Healthy competition breeds success, and it makes us all work harder; and this all rebuilds character.
But the time for primary debate is over. It's time for unity now. That's the time upon us, because the time for choosing is near.
In just 46 days Republicans will put their ideas and their experience on the line, and they'll let the voters decide.
Packages and school supplies raised through these organizations are transported to Iraq, free of charge, by FedEx, then distributed to Iraqi children by our brave freedom fighters.
OUATITW
