Cowardly muslims won't attack the strong.

hat difference, at this point, does it make?™ You failed miserably in both Iraq and Libya, leaving our allies and diplomats shamefully unprotected. They literally begged you to provide them the help they needed. You showed no strength in either case. They foolishly thought they could count on you to do the right thing. You just left them hanging; and they paid for your repeated failures with their lives.

At no point whatsoever did you make any positive difference in their lives.

Labels: aided and comforted enemies, al-Qaeda in Iraq, al-Qaeda in Libya, anti-America liberals (BIRM), dangerously incompetent liberals (BIRM), liberals are always extreme, lying liberals (BIRM)

	2:33 PM   0

...is for the Coward-in-Chief to do nothing but pathetically stammer, lyingly BlameBush!^®, and otherwise make even less sense than he regularly does.

o, now B'Hussein al-Qbama can "shrink" that evil incarnate "to the point where it is a manageable problem"? Or does he think feel with aircraft alone he can "degrade and destroy" it? Perhaps his strategy is simply to keep confusing the enemy with unprecedented nonsense until they become so bewildered they'll have no choice but to throw up their hands, pack away their butcher knives, and slither back to hell.

It took him seven years, but Øtraitor's finally helped turned Senate Democrook Misleader Harry Reid's "this war is lost" pronouncement into a self-fulfilling prophecy. Leave it to these dimmest bulbs of the Dimocrat Party to snatch utter defeat from this war's jaws of all-but-assured victory. After all, they won't even call it the War on Terror. To them it's all just some overseas contingency operation on some man-caused disaster.

Thanks again, fiddy-oners. You have collectivistly earned our enemy's undying gratitude.

Labels: al-Qaeda in Iraq, al-Qaedaqratic Party, Deranged Extremist Moonbat Obdurate Craven Retarded Appeasing Traitorous Slime (DEMOCRATS), liberals are always extreme, World War IV, Worst. pResident. Ever.

	2:56 AM   0

"Terrorists on Teh Run™ Another Rampage™. Period. Full stop."

he Caliphate-enabler-in-Chief has far better things to do than personally lead a visibly strong U.S. response to the islamofascist terrorist enemy's child-beheading blitzkrieg across the Middle East. Like golf. And hobnobbing with one-percenters at Martha's Vineyard. And, of course, attending fundraisers.

Everybody knows the criticizers only criticize him because he's half-white black. They just want to deny him his constitutional right to play at least 200 rounds of golf before he leaves office the congressional midterms.

Look at what all the Øbamilitant extremistration is doing while its beloved führer makes the extreme personal sacrifice of immersing himself for weeks in his own fair share of exorbitant opulence.

OK. Look harder.

No, really hard.

Hey Barack Hussein Obama, way to go fella, now we once again see that your so called "breaking of the siege" at Mt. Sinjar was more of your lies and propaganda — and this time more people had to unfortunately die as ISIS made their point in mocking you. You Sir, Mr. President are a piece of work and as I previously stated, an inhumane coward. Enjoy your vacation, dance the night away, play more golf but just know that you are an abject failure and just like Bill Clinton enabled the Taliban and al-Qaida to rise — so it goes on your watch.

See? It's succeeding at getting the islamofascist terrorist enemy to come up with even stronger ways to mock him than before.

And those criticizers didn't think that could be done. Just proves what a load of equine fecal matter that was!

Labels: aided and comforted enemies, al-Qaeda in Iraq, anti-America liberals (BIRM), Appeaser in Chief, liberals are always extreme, ObAWOL, Suicidemocrats, treason, World War IV, Worst. pResident. Ever.

	9:17 PM   0

The DeMSMoqratiq Party will start ignoring this victory in 5... 4... 3....

An Interior Ministry spokesman said an associate of [AQI leader Abu Ayyab al-]Masri detained in an earlier operation took security forces late on Wednesday to where the al Qaeda leader was hiding.

After being detained, Masri confessed to being the al Qaeda in Iraq leader, he said, adding that his identity still had to be confirmed. Other Iraqi security officials said the suspect was in American custody for identification.

Al Qaeda in Iraq was headed by the Jordanian militant Abu Musab al-Zarqawi until he was killed in a U.S. air strike in June 2006. His successor, Masri, was Zarqawi's close associate, and has a U.S. bounty of $5 million (2.6 million pounds) on his head.

Duraid Kashmula, the governor of Nineveh province, of which Mosul is the capital, also said the detained man had confessed to being Masri.

ike Hillosery “Bill's ‘Wife’” al-Qlinterminated's presidential campaign lying, cheating, stealing effort to seize absolute power for "her"self and "her" same old sociocommunist comrades, al-Qaeda in Iraq is for all intents and purposes dead.


Lars Larson

U.S. denies Iraqi reports of al-Masri's capture

By Joseph Giordono, Stars and Stripes
Mideast edition, Saturday, May 10, 2008

U.S. military officials denied reports Friday that Iraqi forces had captured the leader of al-Qaida in Iraq in the northern city of Mosul on Thursday.

Iraqi officials claimed late Thursday they had arrested Abu Ayyub al-Masri — also known as Abu Hamza al-Mujahir — during a raid in Mosul, which has been described as the last urban stronghold in the country for al-Qaida in Iraq and other Sunni insurgent groups.

But the top U.S. military spokesman in Iraq, Rear Adm. Gregory Smith, said Friday that "Neither (U.S. nor Iraqi forces) detained or killed AAM yesterday."

"AAM" refers to al-Masri.

Several other U.S. officials in Iraq said on background that the Iraqis had arrested a man with "a similar or the same name" as the al-Qaida in Iraq leader, leading to the announcement by the Iraqi army late Thursday.

How many of AAM's fellow terrorist leaders put in a phone call to him after hearing about his capture to find out whether it was true? How many of those calls were we able to intercept or trace?

How relieved were those leaders there and the Dhimm'al-qratiq Party's ones here after finding out AAM wasn't captured?

Labels: al-Qaeda in Iraq, al-Qaedaqratic Party, Good News, Troop Victories, World War IV

	10:08 PM   0

Speaking of Executive Orders.

ODEPINKO and al-Qongressmullah Henry Wackoman (D-AQ) conspired to, in effect, provide financial, material, and logistical support for terrorists who are killing our Troops in Iraq. This according to bestselling author Lieutenant Colonel Robert "Buzz" Patterson in his book War Crimes: The Left's Campaign to Destroy Our Military and Lose the War on Terror. (As of last Tuesday, there's an Executive Order that puts a stop to such support for our enemies — PDF here; full text at end of this post.)

Blackfive recounts the specifics.

As for organizations, you probably know about International Answer, but did you know about Code Pink sending over $600,000 in supplies and cash to terrorists while our Marines fought with them during the Battle of Fallujah. Did you know that Congressman Henry Waxman facilitated the delivery of supplies through another country to get them into Fallujah? It is all documented in "War Crimes."

Emperor Misha I, quoting One News Now's Chad Groening, has more.

According to Patterson, Congressman Henry Waxman (D-California) facilitated the transaction for CODEPINK by signing a letter allowing them to get the cash and supplies into Fallujah.

FrontPageMagazine.com's Ben Johnson reported Wackoman's letter in January 2005.

Pillars of the Hate America Left, who have taken great pains to aid the enemy in every American military venture for 20 years, have just returned from Iraq, where they delivered more than half-a-million dollars in aid to "the other side" — with the full knowledge and consent of left-wing Congressman Henry Waxman, D-CA.

Waxman has signed a letter allowing radical leftist Medea Benjamin and a dozen of her cohorts — some of whom had lost relatives in the Iraq War — to slip the $600,000 of cash and supplies into camps housing refugees from Fallujah, with less outside scrutiny of its contents. The letter was given to Fernando Suarez del Solar, an amnestied illegal immigrant from Mexico and antiwar speaker for the leftist organization Global Exchange, who lost his son Jesus Suarez in Iraq. Fernando Suarez lives near Waxman’s congressional district....

Benjamin is best known as the founder of three of the Left's most effective activist organizations: Global Exchange, Code Pink, and International Occupation Watch....

Having natives distribute aid to a village known for its sympathy to anti-American murderers could have been the masterstroke necessary to get this aid into terrorists' hands and at last bolster the hot war against the Great Satan. Locals would be more likely to know which families had ties to terror, or which had traditional sympathies with Saddam, and could steer the aid accordingly.

Medea Benjamin has the motive, and her allies have actively comforted our enemies before. And some in her recent Iraqi caravan have personal ties to terrorism....

Waxman would love to see the president embarrassed over Iraq; the Congressman apparently did not carefully investigate his fellow travelers before vouching for their good intentions. It makes little difference: No responsible congressman would fail to investigate the backgrounds of those carrying contraband into a war zone before signing on the dotted line; and no responsible public steward would have vouched for a group of radicals whose overt goal is to see the U.S. military defeated in the Tigris-Euphrates.

PC Free Zone Gazette's Wild Thing wrote about Wackoman's letter in January 2006.

Democratic Rep. Henry Waxman (California) is reported to have given a letter to antiwar activists to facilitate their delivery of aid to the 'other side' in Fallujah, Iraq.

The leftist online publication Peace and Resistance, in an article published January 1 2005, said that Rep. Waxman had written a letter addressed to the American ambassador in Amman, Jordan to help ease transit through Customs of $600,000 worth of medical supplies and cash collected by the anti-American groups Code Pink and Global Exchange. According to the groups' leader, Medea Benjamin, the aid is destined for the "other side" in Fallujah.

The letter was being carried by Fernando Suarez Del Solar, an antiwar activist whose Marine son, 20-year-old Jesus A Suarez del Solar Novaro, was killed in Iraq on March 27, 2003 when he reportedly stepped on an American cluster bomb fragment.

Mr. Suarez is being accompanied on the trip by fellow parents of soldiers killed in Iraq, as well as several family members of those killed in the September 11 terrorist attacks.

One Iraqi, when informed that parents of American soldiers killed while liberating his country were giving aid to the "other side" in Fallujah, asked, "what kind of people would help those killing their own sons and daughters?"

That's a question the House Ethics Committee should be asking Rep. Waxman.

Wackoman's coconspirator Fernando Suarez del Solar publicly admitted in December 2004, that he possessed this letter.

With the support of Los Angeles Democratic Congressman Henry Waxman, the Solars will travel to the outskirts of Iraq with two mothers who lost their sons in the conflict and a retired social worker whose son, New York firefighter Timothy Welty, died in the 9/11 attack on the World Trade Center....

[CityBeat:] Many of those who have brought aid to Iraq have faced fines from the U.S. government for breaking sanctions. Do you believe you will be prosecuted?

[Fernando Suarez del Solar:] No. I have a letter from Congressman Henry Waxman to the consular officer for Jordan, Daniel Goodspeed, in support of the mission. He also sent a letter to military commanders in Iraq saying we won't go into dangerous areas, only refugee camps.

Not surprisingly, Wackoman's 2004 Letter of Transit and Safe Conduct Behind Enemy Lines is nowhere to be found on his our house.gov's listing of "Letters to and from Rep. Waxman and Administration officials, fellow Members of Congress and others." Wonder why?

It doesn't matter that President Bush issued the Executive Order below years after the Waxman Conspiracy™ set out to sabotage our war efforts, get our Troops killed, and commit outright treason. Under the laws it cites, all of which were in effect when Wackoman facilitated giving aid and comfort to our enemies, "all property and interests in property" of the traitorous al-Qongressurgent should be "blocked" and "not be transferred, paid, exported, withdrawn, or otherwise dealt in."

Wackoman and his fellow al-Qodepinqorats crave power so desperately they'll stop at nothing, including overtly aiding and comforting our worst foreign enemy ever who also shares that extreme craving, to effect America's fatal, monumental defeat in this World War solely because they feel they could get away with blaming such defeat on whoever opposes them and bringing those opponents down with that blame in all the public perception-shaping polls preceding the next election.

He's not just playing politics with this War. Wackoman's willing to commit extreme acts of treason if that's what it takes to help him and his party's other politicians ultimately achieve the one real goal that alone truly matters to them: Total and absolute power.

For those of us who still love our country and freedoms, our goal should be victory over these domestic enemies of America as well. They've worked hard to earn their pink jumpsuits. After our president, using his Executive Order that now better enables him to enforce our laws, blocks their property and donations, they can wear those in either the poorhouse or federal prison.

Labels: aided and comforted enemies, al-Qaeda in Iraq, al-Qaedaqratic Party, treason, World War IV

	1:34 PM   0

When President Bush is right, he's exceptionally right.

ou, he, I, everyone. We all oppose war and want all of them to end now. With the exception of terrorists and extremist Bushhating "progressives" with their wobbly, escapist heads in the sand — each of whom squishily feels that America must always lose every war as an atonement to The World™ for all our "evils" — he, I, and everyone else firmly believe that we have no choice but to win this one.

Choosing surrender and retreat and pretending all would be well and diplomatically manageable and containable afterwards is national suicide. This War will end either with our country's victory or with her defeat. Only the deluded feel that anyone could ever find any middle or common ground with islamist butchers whose one unnegotiable term is the wholesale subjugation or slaughter — makes no difference to them which — of every man, woman, and child on the planet.

On the domestic-enemy front, al-Qaedaqrat Party politicians are desperately trying to force our country and allies to surrender now and lose the War because they feel that will hurt George W. Bush in the polls and thus help them win the next election. Like terrorists, power for them is to them an end that always justifies any means whatsoever, even or especially if it means the assured and resounding defeat of all our Troops whom they say they "support." So the very last thing Dhimmegalomaniac Party politicians ever want to do is work with our president to find any solution to anything, lest he should receive any of the credit. John Hinderaker sums up their unconcealable motives as well as Repollican cowardice in the face of our domestic enemies:

[The president] said again today that he welcomes "a good, honest debate" about the war. Unfortunately, however, there is no honest debate going on. Most Democrats want to lose in Iraq so they can blame the Republicans and gain political advantage. Some Republicans care less about whether we win or lose than about their re-election next year. Neither group is in a position to tell the American people, honestly, what it wants. So President Bush is pretty much alone as a voice of reason and candor on the war.

Since the mainly Dhimmi media overwhelmingly support the al-Qaedaqrat Party with their votes and campaign contributions along with their unethical and unprofessional spin, it should surprise precisely no one that the polls and surveys those very same Dhimmediacrats incessantly commission regarding the War proportionately parrot the relentlessly one-sided All Bad, All the Time® theme of their stories about it.

Al-Qaeda and other terrorist gangs in Iraq appreciate not only the extreme surplus of overly unfavorable coverage our side receives but also the constant scarcity of any unfavorable coverage at all theirs receives from "our" media. Their main sponsor Iran very much appreciates it too (NonParty Politics).

The Islamofascistic Reich of Iran and its islamoterroristic confederates also appreciate the enormous help they're all receiving from al-Qaedaqrat Party politicians ruling the al-Qongress.

First, Ninny Peloseri's House tried to set April Fools' Day as our country's Official Surrender Date™.

This week, Haji Reid's Senate will try to sneak in a series of their own Official Announcements of America's Surrender to Tryants and Terrorists in the form of amendments to our country's defense budget. Senator Joe Lieberman, who believes "these amendments regarding Iraq... are untimely, they are unwise, and they are unfair," explains their implications:

They are untimely in the sense that they are premature and should await September, when, as ordained by this Congress itself in the supplemental appropriations bill, General Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker will come back to report to us fully.

They are unwise, if ever adopted, because they would essentially represent a retreat from Iraq, a defeat for the United States and the forces of a new Iraq, a free Iraq, and a tremendous victory for Iran and al-Qaida, who are our two most significant enemies in the world today.

Offering these amendments at this time, in my opinion, is unfair: unfair, most of all, to the 160,000 Americans in uniform over there — men and women, brave, effective, in my opinion, the new greatest generation of American soldiers, committed to this fight, believing we can win it, putting their lives on the line every day. They have made tremendous progress already in the so-called surge, counteroffensive. To snipe at them from here is, in my opinion, unfair.

That is why I will oppose all the amendments I have heard about thus far....

So I appeal to my colleagues, let's not undercut our troops and legislate a defeat in Iraq where none is occurring now, where hope is strong, where the momentum is, in fact, on our side. If you question that, at least show the fairness and respect for General Petraeus, Ambassador Crocker, and all the people working for us there to wait until September, which is what we said we would do, until we take a serious look at these amendments. If we go down the path the amendments entice us toward, what awaits us is an emboldened Iran, a strengthened al-Qaida, a failed Iraq that will become not just a killing field but will destabilize the entire Middle East and also, I fear, imperil our security here at home.

Announcing, for example, a Unilateral Nonaggression Pact with Iran, whose theocratic rulers supply the weapons al-Qowarda terrorists in Iraq and Afghanistan use to kill and maim our Troops, is more than unwise. It is the sort of appeasement that makes Neville Chamberlain look like a reckless warmonger. Same with announcing a Unilateral Declaration of Terrorists' Rights (a la al-Leaky & al'Specter), a Unilaterally Set Date for America's Surrender (al-Finqgold, al-loseReid, et al.), a Unilateral Cessation of Combat Operations (al'Collins & al-Nelson), a Unilaterally Imposed Expiration Date on War Authorization (al-Qlinton & al-KKK), a Unilateral Release of Terrorists from Guantanamo Bay (al-Harkin & al-Feinkenstein), and a Unilateral Downsizing of America's Wartime Military (al-Headinthe Sanders).

No victory, no peace. That should be our national chant. Not the al-Qaedaqrats' No surrender, no appeasement.

However, attempting to get stuck-on-stupolls "progressives" to feel that a change of course away from their self-serving plan of total capitulation to the enemy is what's needed here would be a bigger waste of time than scanning those pointy skulls of theirs for any detectable level of brain wave activity, as the following Senate-floor exchange between John McCain and Barbed Boxhead demonstrates.

Mrs. BOXER. [BOXHEAD. . . .] I am so glad we are going to be doing the Defense authorization bill and have our opportunity to actually put our ideas into action. I will be supporting every single amendment that will result in a change of course, accountability, starting to bring the troops home.

I thank the Chair and I thank the Senator from Delaware [The Plagiarist Biden] for allowing me to go before he goes.

I yield the floor at this time.

[Applause in the Gallery.]

The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Sergeant-at-Arms will restore order in the gallery. The expression of approval or disapproval is not permitted.

The Senator from Arizona is recognized.

Mr. McCAIN. Madam President, I certainly appreciate the passion of the Senator from California and her concern for the men and women serving in the military and those who have sacrificed a great deal already. The fact is, according to Lee Hamilton and Henry Kissinger, General Zinni, and according to literally almost every — not all — respected national security expert in this country, it is acknowledged that we will have a lot more casualties.

The Senator's concern is emotional and well-founded and very moving. I am also moved by the fact that Henry Kissinger and Lee Hamilton say Congress should drop fixed deadlines for the withdrawal of U.S. forces. As Commander in Chief, the President needs flexibility on troop withdrawals. He will accept no bill that has a timeline or a fixed date for withdrawal. Lee Hamilton says:

The American people have the war in Iraq figured out. They know American troops cannot settle Iraq's sectarian conflict, and they want to withdraw responsibly. They do not want a messy or sudden withdrawal to prompt wider sectarian strife and an escalating humanitarian disaster.

To some degree, I have seen this movie before. I remember when the debate was going on on the floor of the Senate on our withdrawal from Cambodia on December 15, 1970. Mr. Gravel, now one of the candidates for President of the United States, said:

We come back to the argument of protecting American forces. It is simple. Take the forces out and we do not have any problem. It is simple. Do not get into Cambodia. Do not get involved. Then we do not get into anything.

Yes, there was an argument on the floor of the Senate about withdrawal. There was an argument that prohibited the United States from being involved in Cambodia. Three million people were slaughtered — one of the great acts of genocide in modern history. Yes, we cared about American casualties after Vietnam and we withdrew. The North Vietnamese attacked and millions of people got on boats, thousands were killed in reeducation camps, and thousands were executed. I have seen this movie before. I have seen this movie before from the liberal left in America, who share no responsibility for what happened in Cambodia when we said, no, as I quote Senator Gravel:

We come back to the argument of protecting American forces. It is simple. Take the forces out and we do not have any problem. It is simple. Do not get into Cambodia. Do not get involved. Then we do not get into anything.

Then a Dictatorat, not surprisingly, rudely interrupts Senator McCain.

Mrs. BOXER. [BOXHEAD.] Madam President, will the Senator yield for a question?

Mr. McCAIN. I would like to finish my comments, and then I will be glad to yield to the Senator from California.

Continuing to quote Senator Gravel:

What would happen if Cambodia fell tomorrow? It may well fall. . . . Obviously, it would become communistic. We would have some gnashing of teeth, but life would go on. We would have our traffic jams and everything else.

There were no traffic jams in Phnom Penh, Madam President, not a one. In fact, all of the people were killed or told to walk out of the city.

Life would go on. Basically, that would increase the casualties of Americans in South Vietnam. That would be the difference, except the American people are going to get up and say, "We do not want Americans getting killed at that rate."

. . . it means we are going to put more money in, and if there is a danger that Cambodia will be overrun 6 months from now, we would have to escalate to the next higher step, and they will devise some way of getting American troops in there. Or they would go the mercenary route until they butcher enough of those people.

Interesting.

This, to my mind, is wrong, and adds nothing to our security. Supposing South Vietnam fell, and became totally Communist tomorrow, and then Cambodia fell and became totally Communist; would that appreciably change the life of my colleague from Kansas? Would that change his life?

The debate goes on and on. It is very worthwhile reviewing the debate that went on about Cambodia and Vietnam, not to mention, as I mentioned earlier, the impact of losing a war on America, our military, and others.

The Senator from California and I am sure the Senator from Delaware will speak very movingly about the strain on the families of the men and women and the strain on our troops.

By the way, we do in this authorization bill before us increase the size of the Marine Corps and the Army, and we need to increase it even more because of the challenges around the world — something that some of us have sought to achieve for a long period of time.

But the fact is, when you lose a war, the consequences of failure are far, far more severe on the military than the strain that is put on the military when they are fighting. It is a fact. It is a fact of military history. It is a fact of the war that we lost in Vietnam, which took us well over a decade to restore any kind of efficiency in our military.

I will be glad to yield to the Senator from California.

A lesson in history from one man who most suffered its consequences.

Does the Dhimmiqrat get it? Sadly, no. She's too busy wetting her fingers and sticking them in the air.

Mrs. BOXER. [BOXHEAD.] Madam President, I thank the Senator for yielding. The Senator made the point that the liberal left wants us out of Iraq. I want to make sure the Senator is aware that the latest polls show 70 percent of the American people want us to have a strategy to leave. And my question is, A, is the Senator aware of that? And, B, the followup to that question is, has the Senator read the various proposals, the Levin-Reed proposal, which I strongly support? There is no precipitous withdrawal.

I think the Senator is setting up a straw man, if you will, here. The fact is, those of us who want to leave want to do it in the right way—

Apparently the liberal mob in the peanut gallery is, not surprisingly, ignoring the rules and making rude noises — again.

Mr. McCAIN. I ask for the regular order.

Mrs. BOXER. [BOXHEAD.] And we also change the mission to continue training the troops, and so on. I want to make sure the Senator is aware of that point.

The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Arizona.

Senator McCain now tries to give the Dhimmiqrat a lesson in courageous leadership — a concept obviously completely foreign to her.

Mr. McCAIN. Madam President, I thank the Senator from California for that thoughtful question. The fact is, I do read the polls, and if the Senator from California had paid attention to my opening statement, she would have known that I made it very clear that I understand the frustration and sorrow of the American people. I also know a lot of us are not driven by polls. A lot of us are driven by principle, and a lot of us do what we think is right no matter what the polls say.

The Dhimmiqrat is stung by this bucket full of truth and screams, "Oh! You cursed brat. Look what you've done. I'm melting! Melting! Oh, what a world! What a world! Who would have thought a good little senator like you could destroy my beautiful wickedness. Oh, I'm gone, I'm gone, I'm going. Oh. Oh."

Senator McCain continues:

So I appreciate the concern of the Senator from California about whether I read the polls. I appreciate that greatly. But I do know also that when you send a signal, and I appreciate the Senator's concern — I was talking about the liberal left addressing the war in Cambodia, is what I was speaking of. The record is clear, and I will be glad to provide other quotes of a similar nature. But I do also know that those of us who study history, those of us who spend time in Iraq, those of us who spend time with various leaders, such as General Zinni, such as General Scowcroft, such as Secretary of State Baker, such as many others, we all know what the consequences of a date for withdrawal will be. And it isn't my opinion alone. It is shared by a broad variety of national security experts in this field.

I also point out that it does have an effect on the troops in the field when they see effort after effort after effort to withdraw, to force them to be withdrawn and, obviously, a failure of their mission.

I welcome this debate, as I said earlier. I think it is important to inform the American people. I think it is important to have a respectful exchange of views. And I will continue to respect the views of the Senator from California, but I will tell her that I have seen this movie before, and I have seen what happens when we have a defeated military and we have people who assure us that a withdrawal is without consequences.

I believe, as Henry Kissinger as recently as a few days ago said:

. . . precipitate withdrawal [from Iraq] would produce a disaster. It would not end the war but shift it to other areas, like Lebanon or Jordan or Saudi Arabia. The war between the Iraqi functions would intensify. The demonstration of American impotence would embolden radical Islamism and further radicalize its disciples from Indonesia and India to the suburbs of European capitals.

Natan Sharansky says the same thing. A person who knows about oppression, who knows about freedom, who served as a beacon to me and a hero in my entire life says:

A precipitous withdrawal of U.S. forces could lead to a bloodbath that would make the current carnage pale by comparison.

All of these are statements by people for whom I have the greatest respect. I hope we will heed some of their admonitions.

Madam President, I yield the floor [after mopping it with Dhimmiqrats' treasonous little "brains"].

After calling him their "good and valuable friend," Al-Qaedaqratic politicians summarily dismissed everything Senator McCain — who's speaking from terrible first-hand experience — warned them about, and proceeded with their betrayal of our country and all her citizens.

The ones who'll benefit the most from this week's overt acts of treason are, of course, America's enemies. They could not wage their holy war against all of us with any hope of success absent the aid and comfort Dhimmiqrats continually give them.

Encouraged by these Duplicitic Party politicians' Profiles in Discouragement, Iran and its terrorist clientele are ramping up their own plans for America's defeat.

WASHINGTON - Al-Qaida is stepping up its efforts to sneak terror operatives into the United States

Why? It already has hundreds willingly helping it out in the 101st 1st al-Qongress and "U.S." State Department.

...and has acquired most of the capabilities it needs to strike here, according to a new U.S. intelligence assessment, The Associated [with tyrants, terrorists, and traitors] Press has learned.

Capabilities beyond House and Senate bills calling for America's total surrender? Isn't that rather redundant?

The draft National Intelligence Estimate is expected to paint an increasingly worrisome portrait of al-Qaida's ability to use its base along the Pakistan-Afghan border to launch and inspire attacks, even as Bush administration officials say the U.S. is safer nearly six years into the war on terror.

"Expected" to be Bad News (© Asshaturated Press), just like al-jazeernalists gleefully "expected" President Bush to give up and outline some "'post-surge' phase," as they billed it, in his speech last Tuesday? Is anyone expected to ever trust "our" press to ever report anything truthfully anymore?

Among the key findings of the classified estimate, which is still in draft form and must be approved by all 16 U.S. spy agencies:

"Draft," translated from Liberalese Progibberessive Speak®, means "any textual matter, scribbling, or even crayon drawing, penned on stolen agency stationary by a Democrat Party donor 'working' at that agency, which immediately afterwards was handed over, in violation of law, professional ethics, and 'solemn' oaths, to another Democrat Party donor 'working' as a reporter at any mainstream media outfit willing and eager to publish it, provided such publication either furthers in whole or part the power-grabbing agenda of the Democratic Party or hurts in any way one or more Republican office holders, or both."

That is, pure partisan propaganda.

_ Al-Qaida is probably still pursuing chemical, biological or nuclear weapons and would use them if its operatives developed sufficient capability.

Correction to the previous definition: "any textual matter, scribbling, crayon drawing, or statement of the mind-numbingly obvious, penned on stolen agency stationary by a retarded Democrat Party donor...."

_ The terror group has been able to restore three of the four key tools it would need to launch an attack on U.S. soil: a safe haven in Pakistan's tribal areas, operational lieutenants and senior leaders. It could not immediately be learned what the missing fourth element is.

That "haven" consists of exactly two or three caves shared by those lieutenants, leaders, and other flea-infested rats who are each scheduled to go on a date soon with 72 virgins raisins all draped in pigskin burqas. The fourth element is running al-Qongress. So the draft should've read "able to maintain one of the four key tools...."

_ The group will bolster its efforts to position operatives inside U.S. borders.

Al-Qaeda's trying to get more Defeatistic Party politicians elected to al-Qongress? Either that or the Iranian-supplied terrorist cabal, like its not so strange bedfellows on the left, is very dissatisfied with Peloseri's progress getting our Troops to tuck tail and run. (Camp Sheham can just smell her first international endorsement!)

In public statements, U.S. officials have expressed concern about the ease with which people can enter the United States through Europe because of a program that allows most Europeans to enter without visas.

They could do the same thing with far greater ease through Mexico. Too bad we don't hear as much concern expressed inside the Beltway Doltway about that.

The document also discusses increasing concern about individuals already inside the United States who are adopting an extremist brand of Islam.

Democapitulatic Party politicians adopting a dhimmitudinal appeasement strategy is another example of their extremism. They're also increasingly concerned that a few individuals inside their party are still having some reservations about it. Perhaps this is what the document Exhibit 1 in an unauthorized-disclosure prosecution is really discussing, since "an extremist brand" of The Religion of Decease is the same as saying a wetter brand of water.

National Intelligence Estimates are the most authoritative written judgments that reflect the consensus long-term thinking of senior intelligence analysts.

That is, when they aren't just drafts.

Government officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity because

...disclosing classified information to any unauthorized person is a felony punishable by up to ten years in federal prison.

...the report has not been finalized,

That won't save you, Accomplices (to crime) Press. Draft or not, it's still classified information you're not authorized to have.

...described it as an expansive look at potential threats within the United States and said it required the cooperation of a number of national security agencies, including the CIA, FBI, Homeland Security Department and National Counterterrorism Center.

Is Google a banned site at AP? Did any of the ace reporters there fail to recall we already have an Office of the Director of National Intelligence that "oversees and directs the implementation of the National Intelligence Program" and whose officials "continue to emphasize integration across the [Intelligence] Community"? Apparently that's not nuanced enough for the smartier-than-thou braindead trust cranking out these insipid stories BushFailed! Narratives.

National security officials met at the White House on Thursday about the intelligence estimate and related counterterrorism issues. The tentative plan is to release a declassified version of the report and brief Congress on Tuesday, one government official said.

Another biased libstream media wishful expectation. Why don't you just hire some of those remaining al-Qaeda lieutenants as "journalists" to accept all future unauthorized disclosures? Would save the terrorists the time and trouble of having to go out and read their intellegence reports online or in a newspaper.

Ross Feinstein, spokesman for National Intelligence Director Mike McConnell, declined to discuss the document's specific contents.

Knowing that his doing so would be a felony and all.

But he said it would be consistent with statements made by senior government officials at congressional hearings and elsewhere.

Public statements, as opposed to treasonous disclosures by any of "our" federal employers more loyal to their Dhimm al'Qrat Party than to our country. Of course they wouldn't be able to commit those felonies without the help of their accomplices at AP.

The estimate echoes the findings of another analysis prepared by the National Counterterrorism Center

NCTC is under the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, by the way.

...earlier this year and disclosed publicly on Wednesday. That report — titled "Al-Qaida better positioned to strike the West" — found the terrorist group is "considerably operationally stronger than a year ago" and has "regrouped to an extent not seen since 2001," a counterterrorism official familiar with the reports findings told The Associated [with traitors] Press.

Regrouped so much that it's resorting to carbomb-driving doctors in the U.K. National Health Service. Not much operational strength was evidenced there.

But enough about al-Qaeda owing Iran's mad mullahs a refund.

Al-Qaedaqrat Party politicians have been so busy focusing on political benchmarks in Iraq they're once again completely failing to even glance in the mirror and examine some of their own in Washington:

Where is al-Qongress' "Plan B" for meeting all its own benchmarks?

Meanwhile, Iranian aggressors observe al-Qongress' internal wringing of hands and gnashing of teeth and thinks, "Keep it up, losers, and it'll be our side that's going to win this War."

Labels: agenda driven mainstream media (BIRM), aided and comforted enemies, al-Qaeda in Iraq, al-Qaedaqratic Party, Religion of Decease, treason, World War IV

	12:13 AM   0

Custer's last stand is nothing compared to al-qowarda's.

urrender, or die. That's the complete list of options the terrorists now have, thanks to our Freedoms' Defenders and our Iraqi allies.

Michael Yon reports

The combat in Baqubah should soon reach a peak. Al Qaeda seems to have been effectively isolated. The initial attack on 19 June achieved enough surprise that al Qaeda was caught off guard and trapped. They have been beaten back mostly into pockets and are surrounded and will be dealt with. Part of this is actually due to the capability of Strykers. We were able to "attack from the march." In other words, a huge force drove in from places like Baghdad and quickly locked down Baqubah.

After describing embedded media's difficulties trying to get the stories out about our Defenders' "days in one of the most important battles of this war," he notes that

the battle is going very well. A big fight seems to be brewing. As of about noon in Baqubah on the 22nd, there seems to be a lull in the fighting. A calm. This is about to get wet. At the going rate, al Qaeda in Baqubah will soon have two choices: Surrender, or die.

CNN's Friday headline "U.S. reports 68 al Qaeda militants killed in Iraq" and the story's last heading "General: Three reasons for optimism in Iraq" paint a bleak picture for all remaining al-qowarda militants terrorists.

Labels: al-Qaeda in Iraq, Good News, Troop Victories, World War IV

	10:34 PM   0

So what do Denialrats propose? Fight the terrorist butchers where they are?

o, of course not. It's let al-Qaeda cowardists enjoy our leaving Iraq to them.

Expert: Iraq new epicenter for al-Qaida

Staff and agencies
15 May, 2007

By PAISLEY DODDS, Associated Press Writer

LONDON - Iraq has become the new epicenter for al-Qaida cells waging holy war against the West, one of the world's foremost experts on terror said Tuesday.

Al-Qeada in Iraq? It's their epicenter, no less?

What was it you were saying not too long ago we should do about this, Madam Screecher?

Pelosi replies. "If the president wants to say the war in Iraq is part of the war on terror, he's not right."

"Do you not think that the war in Iraq now, today, is the war on terror?" [CBS's Lesley] Stahl asks.

"No. The war on terror is the war in Afghanistan," Pelosi says.

"But you don't think that the terrorists have moved into Iraq now?" Stahl continues.

"They have," Pelosi agrees. "The jihadists in Iraq. But that doesn't mean we stay there. They'll stay there as long as we're there."

So if our Troops leave Iraq, al-Qaeda will follow suit? When and how did you acquire such a uniquely prescient insight regarding the terrorist-deployment strategies of al-Qaeda (aka Jihadi Inc.)? Woman's intuition? Wishful "thinking"? DUily MoveOn.kos?

"The epicenter has shifted from Afghanistan to Iraq," he told a (Lloyd's of London insurance market security) conference of business leaders on how to prepare for terror threats.

An al-DNC spokesperson said top Dhimmiqratic Party leaders' reception to this sort of news has been, is, and always will be as follows: "Lala lala lalala We can't hear you. Lalala lalalala. No, don't show Us a printout of it either. Lalala la lala Our eyes are closed. Lalalalala...."

Abu Ayyub al-Masri, who replaced Abu Musab al-Zarqawi in the al-Qaida chain of command, has been building a support base in Europe, he said. Al-Masri, an Egyptian militant, was endorsed by Osama bin Laden after Zarqawi was killed last June by a U.S. airstrike.

That support base in Europe wouldn't include "minority youths" who rioted all across France after her citizens elected a self-professed Friend of America instead of a self-professed appeaser of terrorists, would it?

(Rohan Gunaratna, the head of the International Center for Political Violence and Terrorism Research at Nanyang Technological University in Singapore) said most al-Qaida cells, including north African cells, had people in Iraq.

Maybe it's where they all go on vacation or something. Like a "terrorist Disneyland."

Actually, it sounds like the international terrorist network we're at war with, the same one responsible for killing thousands of our fellow citizens and guests on our own soil while leaving a big gaping hole in the side of our Pentagon and in the New York City skyline, is centered in Iraq.

Just don't bother the Pelosereid al-Qongress with this epic news. They'll do nothing but say "it's Bush's fault!"

They present a real risk because they see the West as a threat to their way of life, he said.

As long as we stay in Iraq, their epicenter, our Troops will make it much more than a threat for every one of these al-Qaeda terrorists. It will spell their way of "life's" complete extinction.

Only to an election-epicentered al'Qaedacratic Party leader would such be considered a Bad Thing.

Labels: al-Qaeda in Iraq, al-Qaedaqratic Party, World War IV

	4:26 PM   0