Liberal Utopia

What your world would be if everything liberals wanted, they got. Open the door at the bottom of its Elysium fa├žade and take a glimpse of hell.

Here's your chance, Dhimms, to 'support the troops'


Thanks to Blackfive for leading the Blogosphere's charge on pressuring the Senate to pass the "rapid acquisition authority" bill which would ensure our troops get all the equipment they need for protecting their lives, right when they need it. Also thanks to Navy Times for covering the story.

o show the ridiculousness of obstructing one of most necessary and urgent pieces of legislation ever to reach the Senate during this World War, I'll let the bill itself fisk those objections which I imagine Demothargic senators like Carl Levin will have to its immediate passage:

Senators Say Supporting Troops 'Shouldn't Cost Us Anything'
The Obstructionists Times

WASHINGTON - A bill for supporting American troops, which passed the House of Representatives 285-97 just 34 days after it was introduced, is now stalled in the Senate, the victim of election-year political backbiting, sources say.

Several senators claim they haven't even heard of the bill, believing it to be "yet another rumor started by warmongering chickenhawks."

HR 4323 RFS


2d Session

H. R. 4323


June 15, 2004

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services

John Warner, chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, said no member has had a chance yet to read the bill. "We see so many bills of incredible length during the course of each (Congressional) session, that when one as short as this one gets here, it's like a total shock. So I'm not surprised that no one's bothering to read such an unusually concise bill," he said.


To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide rapid acquisition authority to the Secretary of Defense to respond to combat emergencies.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,


The committee's ranking member, Karl Marx Levin (D-FU), said he won't support any bill that "doesn't cover combat emergencies," adding that "my colleagues on our side of the aisle are going to make sure that it (HR 4323) dies a horrible, mangled death in the committee."

    (a) IN GENERAL- Chapter 141 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

`Sec. 2410p. Rapid acquisition authority to respond to combat emergencies

Another member of the committee, Hissingly Radical Qlinton (D-BO), said that, although she hasn't read the bill either, she is "very, very disappointed that the bill may mean there will be less combat fatalities if it passes. I just don't see how that could be beneficial to anyone in my party."

    `(a) RAPID ACQUISITION AUTHORITY- The Secretary of Defense may rapidly acquire, in accordance with this section, equipment needed by a combatant commander to eliminate a combat capability deficiency that has resulted in combat fatalities.

A staff member in the office of Massoqueeretts senator Ted Qennedy, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the senator believes the committee should instead pass the "floating Humvee" bill Mr. Qennedy is sponsoring. "Senator Qennedy cares about the children. Besides, the so-called 'rapid acquisition' bill doesn't include any time frame for processing such acquisitions," the staff member explained.

    `(b) PROCESS FOR RAPID ACQUISITION- Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this section, the Secretary of Defense shall develop a process for the rapid acquisition authority provided by subsection (a) and submit to Congress a detailed explanation of the process, including procedures to be followed in carrying out the process. The process shall provide for the following:

Robert Byrd (D-KKK), another member of the committee, spoke against the bill, claiming "there's nothing to justify sending this kind of help on the way to our troops." He expressed concerns about "not following that provision of the constitution based on the Magna Carta which disallows any rapidness in acquiring military equipment" so long as "a need for it can be fulfilled elsewhere."

      `(1) A requirement that the process may be used only to acquire the minimum amount of equipment needed until the needs of the combatant commander can be fulfilled under existing acquisition statutes, policies, directives, and regulations.

Mr. Byrd's Dem'al-qrat colleagues on the committee generally agreed. Bill Nelson of Florida said the rapid-acquisition process should include "a very short turn-around time between a commander's emergency request and getting the procurement machinery up and running. I don't believe the bill has that in it."

      `(2) A goal of awarding a contract for the equipment within 15 days after receipt of a request from a commander.

Hawaiian senator Daniel al-Qaka compared the rapid-acquisition measure to the two major tax cuts he voted against in 2001 and 2003. "Everyone knows military personnel usually votes Republican, just like rich people do. So I will do everything in my power to obstruct any bill that helps, at the cost of my own party, either such people." he said.

      `(3) In a case in which the equipment cannot be acquired without an extensive delay, a requirement for an interim solution to minimize the combat capability deficiency and combat fatalities until the equipment can be acquired.

The committee's discussion on bringing the bill up for a hearing became raucous after Joseph Lieberman of Connecticut bucked his party's stance against allowing anything rapid to happen in the military. "My colleagues keep saying they support our troops. Well, what better way than to make sure their commanders don't have to follow inadequate procurement rules when lives are most at stake."

      `(4) Waiver of the applicability of all policies, directives, and regulations related to--

        `(A) the establishment of the requirement for the equipment;

        `(B) the research, development, test, and evaluation of the equipment; and

        `(C) the solicitation and selection of sources, and the award of the contract, for procurement of the equipment.

Responding to Mr. Lieberman, Evan Bayh (D-OUT) said he would vote against any bill that gives a "flawed defense secretary" any level of discretion.

      `(5) Such other procedures or requirements as the Secretary considers appropriate.

Mr. Warner had to loudly bang his gavel at least seven times during the committee's discussion in a vain attempt to restore order. During the last attempt, Mark Pryor of Arkansas picked up his pen and used it to mockingly mimic the chairman's gaveling while exclaiming "none shall pass" over and over. Two capitol police officers were required to remove the disruptive, pen-wielding senator.

    `(c) WAIVER OF CERTAIN STATUTES- For purposes of exercising the authority provided by subsection (a) with respect to equipment, laws relating to the following shall not apply:

      `(A) The establishment of the requirement for the equipment.

      `(B) The research, development, test, and evaluation of the equipment.

      `(C) The solicitation and selection of sources, and the award of the contract, for procurement of the equipment.

Other senators strongly protested Mr. Pryor's removal, causing Mr. Qennedy to awaken from his nap. "So this is how the committee operates under new management—Republican management," the groggy senator said. "Now you know why our side has no intention of ever supporting this woefully ill-conceived bill. It's totally unnecessary."

    `(d) LIMITATIONS- The rapid acquisition authority provided by subsection (a) may be used only--

      `(1) after the Secretary of Defense, without delegation, determines in writing that there exists a combat capability deficiency that has resulted in combat fatalities; and

      `(2) to acquire equipment in an amount aggregating not more than $100,000,000 during a fiscal year.

Dhimmicrat member Jack Reed of Rhode Island complained that the bill would add to the budget deficit. During a particularly heated exchange with the committee chairman, Mr. Reed asked, "How can we be expected to have a hearing on—much less pass—something that will just lead to entirely brand new expenditures in addition to and separate from the funds already available in the defense budget?"

    `(e) SOURCE OF FUNDS- For acquisitions under this section to be made during any fiscal year, the Secretary may use any funds made available to the Department of Defense for that fiscal year.

Mr. Warner responded that he believed that wasn't the case, although later admitting that he still hadn't read the bill.

Before the committee adjourned, Dingyrat E. Benjamin Nelson of Nebraska tried to offer a motion for killing the bill. In explaining his "motion to table," Mr. Nelson said he was not at all satisfied with HR 4323's total lack of notification requirements.

    `(f) NOTIFICATION TO CONGRESS AFTER EACH USE OF AUTHORITY- The Secretary of Defense shall notify the congressional defense committees within 15 days after each use of the authority provided by subsection (a). Each such notice shall identify the equipment to be acquired, the amount to be expended for such acquisition, and the source of funds for such acquisition.

The motion was defeated along party lines. However, that did not stop Mark Dayton (D-Moonebata) from asking for a recount of the vote. "This isn't Florida, you know. We should make sure that every vote is counted," he said. When Mr. Warner denied his request, all the remaining Dementedrats got up and walked out of the committee room, chanting on their way out "We shall overcome."

    `(g) COMBATANT COMMANDER- In this section, the term `combatant commander' means the commander of a unified combatant command with authority for the conduct of operations in a specific area of responsibility or who otherwise has authority to conduct operations at the direction of the President or Secretary of Defense.'.

    (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT- The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item:

      `2410p. Rapid acquisition authority to respond to combat emergencies.'.

Passed the House of Representatives June 14, 2004.


Sources close to Mr. Byrd's office said the motion and walk-out was planned in advance. "The senator's staff knew the bill would come up for a hearing unless their side did something drastic," one source said. "Still, we didn't expect them to break out into song as they left. Qennedy has such a rotten voice."

Pat Chouli contributed to this report.

The Congressional Budget Office's assesment of the bill includes this table:


The estimated budgetary impact of H.R. 4323 is shown in the following table. The costs of this legislation fall within budget function 050 (national defense). This estimate assumes that the bill will be enacted near the start of fiscal year 2005.

  By Fiscal Year, in Millions of Dollars

Spending Under Current Law for National Defense 
 Estimated Authorization Levela440,881453,231461,520472,177483,749496,230
 Estimated Outlays434,108450,484456,701462,610477,664489,781
Proposed Changes 
 Authorization Level [zeros across the board because the annual cost of all "rapid acquisitions" stays within the existing defense budget]000000
 Estimated Outlays [cost of these "rapid acquisitions"]043261164
Spending for National Defense Under H.R. 4323 
 Estimated Authorization Levela440,881453,231461,520472,177483,749496,230
 Estimated Outlays [even with the "rapid acquisition" expenditures, all defense spending still remains within the budget]434,108450,527456,727462,621477,670489,785

a. The 2004 level is the amount appropriated for that year. No full-year appropriation has yet been provided for fiscal year 2005. The current-law amounts for the 2005-2009 period assume that appropriations remain at the 2004 level with adjustments for anticipated inflation.

Bookmark and Share  

Comments (registered users)

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

Liberal Utopia

LC Local 666, VRWC
Never Submit

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?


Liberal Utopia

Site Feed

Subscribe to Liberal Utopia by Email


March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009
April 2009
May 2009
June 2009
July 2009
August 2009
September 2009
October 2009
November 2009
December 2009
January 2010
February 2010
March 2010
April 2010
May 2010
June 2010
July 2010
August 2010
September 2010
October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011
March 2011
April 2011
May 2011
June 2011
July 2011
August 2011
September 2011
October 2011
December 2011
January 2012
February 2012
March 2012
April 2012
May 2012
June 2012
July 2012
August 2012
September 2012
October 2012
November 2012
December 2012
January 2013
February 2013
March 2013
April 2013
May 2013
June 2013
July 2013
August 2013
September 2013
October 2013
November 2013
December 2013
January 2014
February 2014
March 2014
April 2014
May 2014
June 2014
July 2014
August 2014
September 2014
October 2014
November 2014
December 2014
January 2015
February 2015
March 2015
May 2015
June 2015
July 2015
August 2015
September 2015
November 2015
December 2015
January 2016
March 2016
April 2016
May 2016
June 2016
July 2016
August 2016
September 2016
October 2016
November 2016
January 2017
February 2017
March 2017
May 2017
June 2017
July 2017
August 2017
January 2018
February 2018


G o o g l e
b o m b s
miserable failure
culture of corruption
sus barbatus
wicked witch of the east
great president