Can we impeach him now? dictator secretively spies on his subjects so, yes, he can know at all times where they are and what they're doing. How else can he always keep a tight leash on them and control whatever they do? Otherwise, he can't have absolute power over the people. (Doctor of Democracy)
Tragically, no one from either party is objecting to the health provisions
slipped in without discussion. These provisions reflect the handiwork of
Tom [Tax-Cheat] Daschle, until recently the nominee to head the ["]Health["] and [In]Human Services Department.
Senators should read these provisions and vote against them because they are dangerous to your health. (Page numbers refer to H.R. 1 EH, pdf version).
The bill's health rules will affect "every individual in the United States" (445, 454, 479). Your medical treatments will be tracked electronically by a federal system....
Not even al-Qaeda terrorists are subjected to this level of warrantless and extremely intrusive searches of their most private personal information.
But the bill goes further. One new bureaucracy, the National Coordinator of ["]Health["] Information Technology, will monitor treatments to make sure your doctor is doing what the federal government deems appropriate and cost effective. The goal is to reduce costs and "guide" your doctor's decisions (442, 446). These provisions in the stimulus [Spendulus Porkage™] bill are virtually identical to what Daschle prescribed in his 2008 book, "Critical: What We Can Do About the Health-Care Crisis." According to Daschle, doctors have to give up autonomy and "learn to operate less like solo practitioners."
That's right. Doctors should learn to operate and "think" more like entrenched, power-hungry, big-government bureaucratsbirm. "Just what the doctor dictator ordered" is not something you want to hear when, God forbid, you're sick.
Keeping doctors informed of the newest medical findings is important, but enforcing uniformity goes too far.
New Penalties
Hospitals and doctors that are not "meaningful users" of the new system will face penalties. "Meaningful user" isn't defined in the bill. That will be left to the ["Health" and (In)human Services] secretary, who will be empowered to impose "more stringent measures of meaningful use over time" (511, 518, 540-541)
Frog-marching your physician out of his office in hand- and ankle-cuffs for opposing Obameinführer® will make them all "Goot Leettil Germans Doktorz."
What penalties will deter your doctor from going beyond the electronically delivered protocols when your condition is atypical or you need an experimental treatment? The vagueness is intentional. In his book, Daschle proposed an appointed body with vast powers to make the "tough" decisions elected politicians won't make.
Doctors' typical "medical" decision: (A) Treat patient as my training and oath dictates and get fined and/or go to jail; or (B) Don't treat patient at all, as Obameinführer® dictates.
It's the textbook "no brainer."
The stimulus [Spendulus Porkage™] bill does that, and calls it the Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research [or Geheime Staatspolizei (Gestapo) in the original German] (190-192). The goal, Daschle's book explained, is to slow the development and use of new medications and technologies because they are driving up costs. He praises Europeans for being more willing to accept "hopeless diagnoses" and "forgo experimental treatments," and he chastises Americans for expecting too much from the health-care system.
No, we can't be "expecting too much." Because the big-government Gestapocrats — not we — are the ones we have been waiting for to make all the medical decisions we and our doctors used to make, especially when some Gestapocrat arbitrarily declares you have "no hope" and the "change" he needs is for you to no longer be a "same old tired" living human being but be a very dead one so he doesn't have to spend any more money on you so, yes, he can give more money to "stimulate" his "president"'s special-interest lobbyist buddies.
And speaking of forced euthanasia:
Elderly Hardest Hit Daschle says health-care reform "will not be pain free." Seniors should be more accepting of the conditions that come with age instead of treating them. That means the elderly will bear the brunt.
"Your usefulness to The State is insufficient to justify any expense that Its totally monitored and controlled 'medical' 'services' would incur to even maintain your health, much less try to restore it whenever you become ill. So do us all a favor now and take this pill. No, just ignore its bitter-almond scent. It's just what the doctor Obameinführer® ordered."
That is, Cyanide We Need™.
Medicare now pays for treatments deemed safe and effective. The stimulus [Spendulus Porkage™] bill would change that and apply a cost-effectiveness standard set by the Federal Council [Gestapo] (464).
In other words, Obameinführer® gets to decide who lives and who dies.
Sieg Heil!
The Federal Council [Gestapo] is modeled after a U.K. board discussed in Daschle's book. This board approves or rejects treatments using a formula that divides the cost of the treatment by the number of years the patient is likely to benefit. Treatments for younger patients are more often approved than treatments for diseases that affect the elderly, such as osteoporosis.
In other words, Liberalism Kills!
In 2006, a U.K. health board decreed that elderly patients with macular degeneration had to wait until they went blind in one eye before they could get a costly new drug to save the other eye....
Hope! Change!
Hidden Provisions If the Øbama[rtinet mal]administration's economic stimulus [Spendulus Porkage™] bill passes the Senate in its current form, seniors in the U.S. will face similar rationing. Defenders of the system say that individuals benefit in younger years and sacrifice later.
"Sacrifice"; or, if you prefer the original German, gehen Sie zu den Öfen (go to the ovens).
The stimulus bill will affect every part of health care, from medical and nursing education, to how patients are treated and how much hospitals get paid. The bill allocates more funding for this bureaucracy than for the Army, Navy, Marines, and Air Force combined (90-92, 174-177, 181).
Control the people's health and you control the people.
When "you will do what I say or you won't get any health care" is just what the Obameinführer®'s Gestapocrats ordered, what choice do you have but to unquestioningly obey?
Hiding health legislation in a stimulus [Spendulus Porkage™] bill is intentional. Daschle supported the Clinton administration's health-care overhaul in 1994, and attributed its failure to debate and delay. A year ago, Daschle wrote that the next president should act quickly before critics mount an opposition. "If that means attaching a health-care plan to the federal budget, so be it," he said. "The issue is too important to be stalled by Senate protocol"....
"Too important (for our seizing absolute power) to be subject to any transparent democratic process," Herr Tax-Cheat Daschole meant to say in German.
The health-care industry is the largest employer in the U.S. It produces almost 17 percent of the nation's gross domestic product. Yet the bill treats health care the way European governments do: as a cost problem instead of a growth industry. Imagine limiting growth and innovation in the electronics or auto industry during this downturn. This stimulus [Spendulus Porkage™] is dangerous to your health and the economy.
(Betsy McCaughey is former lieutenant governor of New York and is an adjunct senior fellow at the Hudson Institute....)
Article of Impeachment I — Crimes Against Liberty: Spying on the American people's private medical communications, information, and activities without any judicial warrant, in clear violation of the Constitution.
Article of Impeachment II — Crimes Against Humanity: Creating a Nazi-like Gestapo that keeps doctors and other medical professionals "in line" with its arbitrary dictates and threatens the health and lives of every American.
The vote today in the Senate shouldn't have been on whether to pass the Obameinführer®'s Spendulus Porkage™.
It should've been to convict him and remove him from office for high crimes and misdemeanors against the American people.
Labels: consumer rights, culture of death and destruction, lawbreaking liberals (BIRM), lethal liberalism (BIRM), Liberalism Kills, lying liberals (BIRM), spread the misery around
Comments (registered users)
Post a Comment