Anyone saying our Troops "terrorize children and women in the dead of night" is calling them "terrorists." Can't get semantically more clear than that.
T
his morning, Fox & Friends cohost Greg Kelly was arguing semantics with a high ranking combat veteran over what Hanoi John F'in' al-Qerry — you remember, that long-face, French-looking loser who kept reminding every animal, vegetable (i.e., fellow Democretins), and mineral he came across that By The Way I Served In Vietnam™ — told Face the Nation host Bob Shieffer on December 4, 2005:
...there is no reason, Bob, that young American soldiers need to be going into the homes of Iraqis in the dead of night, terrorizing kids and children, uh, uh, uh, you know, women, breaking sort of the customs of the, of, of, of, of, of, uh, historical customs, religious customs, whether you like it or not. Iraqis should be doing that.
Mr. Kelly flat-out said Jr. Senator Stuck'N'Irak wasn't calling our Troops "terrorists."
Let's see. "Terrorizing" kids and children and women. Now what does one call people who terrorize civilians? That's right. One calls them "terrorists."
Al-Qerry called our Troops "terrorists." Just like Iran's rubber stamping parliament just did.
Mr. Kelly and a few other journalists simply want to deny that a sitting member of Congress, in the middle of a World War, would so blatantly equate our Troops with the bloodthirsty enemy they're fighting. But it has happened. Multiple times.
Some lowlights:
Sen. Osama bin Bama: We've got to get the job done there (in Afghanistan) and that requires us to have enough troops so that we're not just air-raiding villages and killing civilians, which is causing enormous pressure over there.
Sen. Ticked Turbin: If I ... did not tell you that it was an FBI agent describing what Americans had done to prisoners (at Guantanamo) in their control, you would most certainly believe this must have been done by Nazis, Soviets in their Gulags, or some mad regime, Pol Pot, or others that had no concern for human beings. Sadly, that is not the case. This was the action of Americans in the treatment of their prisoners.
Sen. Tedboat al-Qennedy: On March 19, 2004, President Bush asked: "Who would prefer that Saddam's torture chambers still be open?" Shamefully, we now learn that Saddam's torture chambers reopened under new management — U.S. management.
Congressional Record, 5/10/04, p. S5058.
Rep. Jack MurderthaTroops: Our troops overreacted (in Haditha, Iraq) because of the pressure on them, and they killed innocent civilians in cold blood.
Then we have Representatives al-Qonyers, al-Honda, al-Jones (OH), al-Lee, al-MqDermutt, al-Rangel, al-Sqott (VA), al-Starq, al-Towns, al-Waters, and al-Watson voting "No!" to a 2003 resolution "Expressing the Support and Appreciation of the Nation for the President and the Members of the Armed Forces Who are Participating in Operation Iraqi Freedom."
All of the above are — surprise, surprise — al-Qaedaqratic Party politicians.
Wake up and smell the treason, Mr. Kelly et al.
I never thought I'd live to see the day when "leading" members of a purportedly American political party would, over and over, lyingly trash our Troops for strictly partisan purposes, especially when those same Troops are fighting a World War to defend us all and all our freedoms. Now that I have I refuse, for our Troops' sake, to ever live in any state of denial about it like Mr. Kelly's obviously doing.
Post a Comment