loading...

 

Liberal Utopia

What your world would be if everything liberals wanted, they got. Open the door at the bottom of its Elysium fa├žade and take a glimpse of hell.

Obama and Senate Democrats Hate Veterans

 

Judge them by what they do, not what they say.


B

ecause of petty partisan politics, lies-telling lying Øliar and his fellow Veteran-hating Democrooks in the Senate opposed last year's bipartisan House bill that would've reduced the backlog problems that are literally killing our sick Veterans.

But these haters are more interested in scoring political points than saving the lives of any of our Veterans. Yeah, a real shocker.

One area of commonality for [House] Republicans and Democrats was the need to get the VA to reduce its backlog of disability claims. The VA has been widely criticized for making more than 800,000 veterans wait for decisions about their benefits, with most of these veterans waiting longer than the 125-day deadline that the VA has set as a goal for handling claims.

The bill includes new funding to help the VA work through these claims.

"The bill includes funding that will jumpstart efforts to clean up the backlog and force DOD and VA to get moving on a system that should have been in place years ago," House Appropriations Committee Chairman Hal Rogers (R-Ky.) said during the debate.

But in addition to that carrot, the House also include a few "stick" measures, including an amendment that would cut the salaries of senior VA officials unless the backlog is reduced.

The House also approved amendments to block bonus awards for these officials and strip the VA of $10 million in funds it would normally use for conferences. Instead, that $10 million would go to process disability claims more quickly.

"No, we can't cut Secretary Shinseki's salary. No, we can't cut his or his staff's 'conference' trips to the hottest vacation spots. No, we can't cut any of their exorbitant bonuses. He and they are doing such wonderful jobs!" That was one of the two main reasons they opposed the bill. The other is they hate our Veterans.

House passage sends the bill to the Senate, but given the uncertainty about the budget and the process for handling spending bills this year, it's not clear whether or when the Senate will consider it.

Given how much Demøfascists in the Senate and White House hate our Veterans and love their government perks, it's very clear. They'll consider reducing those backlogs as soon as ten feet of snow Climate Change® blanket every square inch of Hell.

Earlier this week, the Obama administration said it would veto the bill....

Because it hates our Veterans and loves its extremely generous perks.

Now go crawl off and die quickly, Veterans. You're cramping Øfascist's and his Senate rubber-stampers' style.



Labels: , , , , , , ,

Bookmark and Share    

Democrats Hate the Constitution

 

Because, Øbama whines, it puts fascist totalitarians like them "at a disadvantage."


M

ake no mistake, the putzident would that it read—

I the Tyrant of the United States, in order to form a more absolute dictatorship, establish just us Democrats in permanent power, insure domestic spying on My political enemies, provide for the gutted defense, promote the generous welfare handout, and secure the bossiness of liberalism to Myself and My Democrat Party, do with My phone and My pen profane and abolish the old Constitution for the United States of America and in lieu thereof insert the following:
Article I.
Section 1.  All legislative, executive, and judicial powers, both of the United States and of the several states, shall be vested in Me.
Section 2.  I shall have power to do anything I wish, at any time and any place and in any manner I may wish to do it.
Article II.
I shall never be removed from office. Period!
Done in a golf course clubhouse by My consent the twenty-fourth day of May in the Year of Me fifty-three and of the despotism of the United States of America the sixth. In witness whereof I have hereunto subscribed My Name,


Labels: , , , , , ,

Bookmark and Share    

Winner of the Official Democrat Party Bumper Sticker Contest

 

"We'll only print this if enough people vote for it..." –@TheDemocrooks




Labels: , , , , , , ,

Bookmark and Share    

Necessities Allowance and the Fair Tax

 

Striking a Faustian bargain.


S

urrendering to liberogressives the total redistribution of wealth they desire, without gaining any concessions from them in return, would be worse than selling our free-market souls to the devil. At least the tragic Dr. Faustus had something tangible, albeit temporary, to show for his diurnalish pact with Mephistopheles. No, our bargain entails only a sip of redistributional hell for the eternal bliss of no more income taxes.

The fair tax's prebate feature already gives us a drop of that hell by refunding in advance the amount of national retail sales tax families will be paying respectively each month on their purchases of basic needs: The larger the family, the larger the prebate. However, public assistance programs still would be required for impoverished families.

But by taking the full sip, our bargain eliminates those separate entitlements along with all their attendant agencies, not only making government less bloated but freeing lower-income families from their servile dependence on that political class most committed to doling out other people's money. Instead of tax prebates, the fair tax would incorporate payments equivalent to all purchases of essential goods and services by America's families plus the national retail sales tax on them. Each household, regardless its income, receives this necessities allowance based on how many valid Social Security cardholders reside there.

This is our side of the bargain. In exchange, the servants of redistribution give us a land totally purged of all other federal taxes, whether on incomes, gifts, capital gains, or estates, as well as Social Security withholdings.

Finally, by forfeiting a tiny bit more of our souls, we may increase the allowance to include purchase of basic health care plans, thus ridding our land of every Øfascist"Care" malignancy too. Moreover, since every American's basic purchases are compensated, there would be no need to continue separately feeding the Social Security, Medicare, or Medicaid bureaucracies. We'll eliminate those middlemonsters also, and pass the savings on to you, the American people.

There are, nevertheless, several market-force realities that must be taken into account before striking such a bargain. When every citizen or legal resident starts each month with the same minimum amount of money to spend, there's a substantial risk of having too many dollars chasing too few goods and services. The trick is to make the fair tax not just revenue neutral but spending neutral as well. Entitlement programs already transfer an ungodly portion of that amount, either directly or indirectly, to grocery stores, doctors, day care centers, etc., etc. But if we're no longer paying the swarms of federal officers currently sent hither to harass our people and eat out their substance — aka bureaucrats — then the exorbitant salaries, perks, and bonuses they receive won't be coming from their big fat Civil Service paychecks but from their finding and working real jobs in the private sector. That is, the woefully few who can actually become qualified and valuable enough to be paid the same amount there. This would automatically result in a drastic pay cut for almost every member of that swarm, which would help offset the amount of money entering the economy via the necessities allowance. In addition, nearly all of Washington, D.C. would be rendered utterly a barren wasteland after the luscious and luxurious overhead formerly enjoyed by those swarmers falls victim to the bulldozer; although several nice, empty parks could be planted in its place. The total amount of money the federal government may justifiably take from us then would be far less than what it steals, borrows, cheats, and extorts from us now, while the total amount of money hemorrhaging out of it would be correspondingly reduced. It means both a smaller and a much more efficient and effectual federal government. Something every American should welcome.

If the above is able to sufficiently forestall any inflationary effects otherwise stemming from the necessities allowance, ours is a bargain from which we wouldn't have to wait 24 years before seeing very real benefits.



Labels: , , ,

Bookmark and Share    

#BringBackOurMarine

 



I

s Baracrook Øliar "doing everything I can" to secure the release of Sgt. Andrew Tahmooressi, the PTSD-suffering Marine who's been unjustly arrested and cruelly imprisoned by Mexico's corrupt federal police?

Perhaps Øliar should "promise" Mexico, "If you like our Marine, you can keep our Marine, period!" Then, undoubtedly, Sgt. Tahmooressi would be freed from this nightmare tomorrow.

Øliar has already kept our Marine on a secret waiting list for 53 days. Will Øliar "not stand for it" and "not tolerate it, period!" now?



Labels: , , , , , ,

Bookmark and Share    

Only Bigots Oppose Same-Kin Marriage

 

Bigotry is bad.


T

he biological purists argue that marriage is naturally between one man and one woman of different families, that it is meant to support a naturally stable structure in which children are created and raised and by which our species best propagates and thrives.

A few well-shopped jurists have said, in effect, "What do the laws of nature and of nature's God know?" Marriage, they and other non-biological purists counter, is between any two (or more) consenting persons. Whether opposite-sex, same-sex, or even same-kin, it should not matter. The homophobes, incestophobes, and other bigots have no case under the laws of enlightened nations.

With the issue being defined in terms of rights, not nature, it won't be long before all persons are free to choose to marry whomever they respectively wish. A man may marry his father(s), his adult brother(s), and/or his adult son(s); a woman her mother(s), adult sister(s), and/or adult daughter(s). Similarly, a woman may marry her father(s), her adult brother(s), and/or her adult son(s); a man his mother(s), adult sister(s), and/or adult daughter(s). Their right to choose should not be curtailed by bigotry, superstition, or fear.

We all have heard the propaganda of incestophobes that a same-kin marriage is more likely to produce physically or mentally challenged children than a non-kin one. "Inbreeding" is the derogatory term they use. Yet their beliefs are based solely on historical anecdote or biased "studies" that allegedly show the "dangers" of it; and their clichés and stereotypes promote only ignorance and hatred. Of course, such "concerns" are irrelevant with respect to same-sex-same-kin marriages.

Our modern view of tolerance demands that anything goes. Nothing should stop it. This is becoming especially true for the evolving construct of marriage.



Labels: , , , , , ,

Bookmark and Share    

Not Hiring Smokers Is Racist

 

Deprived and prejudice.


R

emember, in 2010, Hispanic activists in San Antonio said not letting people smoke at work is racist, too.

So what is a control-freak nanny statist to do? Any hiring or employment practice that adversely and disproportionately affects minority groups is prima facie evidence of racial discrimination. Yet being able to tell people what they can't do both at home and at work is orgasmically A Good Thing™. But if activists start claiming that testing for nicotine use amounts to racial profiling, you risk being hauled into courts of law and public opinion, defending yourself against multiple lawsuits and irreparably bad publicity. Picture "Teh Revs." Jackson, Sharpton et al. showing up at your door and saying, "Nice business you have here. Shame if someone like me happened to call it racist!" It's a conundrum.

Sure, you could present facts and data to support your reasons for engaging in this discriminatory practice. But that won't matter. Once it's beset with the "allegedly racist" label, you'll never hear the end of it until — and likely even after — you ditch it.

Best you can do is make exceptions for any "poorer individuals, including those from minority groups, who, under a ban on employees who smoke, will lose the opportunity to work for an employer that offers health insurance, long-term advancement, and retirement benefits." You still get to tell unprotected non-minority/non-lower income employees what they can't do outside the workplace. Win-win!



Labels: , , , , , , ,

Bookmark and Share    

Democrats Hate Freedom of Speech

 

You see,
If with me
You disagree,
Your speech will be
No longer free.
 
–Democrook Senate Overlord


T

he Heritage Foundation's Hans von Spakovsky explains:

Reid displays no concern whatsoever over the many liberals, such as George Soros and Tom Steyer, who spend enormous amounts of money in the political field. Or the many unions that support Reid and his political party almost exclusively and who, as Kim Strassel of the Wall Street Journal has pointed out, spend far more on political campaigns than the Koch brothers.

Although the amendment sponsored by Udall and supported by Reid would limit fundraising and spending on political speech for Americans, there is one glaring exception in the amendment: It would not apply to the press.

The New York Times and MSNBC could continue to spend as much money, newsprint and airtime as they want supporting liberal candidates and attacking conservatives, but other non-media corporations would be strictly limited in what they could do, including conservative advocacy organizations such as the NRA and Heritage Action, which are nonprofits.

Candidates and ordinary Americans who wanted to fight back against the attacks of the liberal mainstream media would have their hands tied by a Congress filled with members who want to make sure individuals trying to unseat them (and their supporters) are strictly limited in the amount they could spend to publicly criticize them.

Reid seems to disagree with Benjamin Franklin, who wrote that "freedom of speech is a principal pillar of a free government." And for those who say that restricting the money that can be spent on political speech and activity is not the same as limiting speech, that is like saying that the government limiting the amount of newsprint a newspaper can buy does not limit the newspaper's speech.

It is a nonsensical argument — just like the arguments being made by Reid to cull the most important amendment in the Bill of Rights.



Labels: , , , , , , ,

Bookmark and Share    

Do You Like What You See In Your Mirrors, 'Journalists'?

 

The alleged "news" media should be ashamed.



T

he media's handling of Watergate — a small-time burglary during which no one was killed or hurt — amounted to Whoop Nixon's Ass!

The same media's handling of Benghazi — a bloody, full-blown battle during which four very brave and dedicated public servants lost their lives, all because of the White House and State Department's unforgivably willful, gross negligence and extremely dangerous incompetence — amounts to Save Obama's Ass!



Labels: , , , , , , ,

Bookmark and Share    

Over A Foot of Global Warming in Colorado

 

"Top 10 May snow event for the Denver metro area"


G

iven how we're on track to experiencing the coldest year on record in the United States, it's no real surprise. No surprise either that Global Warming True-Believers™ are scrambling to rebrand their "consenscience" religion. For the second time in 17 years, they're replacing the sign in front of their Temple of Global Warming. Instead of "Church of Climate Change," it now says "Tabernacle of Climate Disruption®."

What difference, at this point, does it make? Not much. Their cathedrals of gloom and doom and of controlling the masses are crumbling before their eyes. So it's time to ratchet up Teh Scare™ in order to bring in new worshipers even more gullible than the ones still kneeling before its fiery altar.



Labels: , , , , , , ,

Bookmark and Share    

'Koch Klimate Khange Kausers!'

 

"They are one of the main causes of [glowbull worming climate change®]," babbled the insane Democrat Senate Overlord, Harry Mason Reid.


E

ight years of Liberogressive control of our Senate. Eight years of extremist "leadership" like this.

Had enough, America?

We need a change now, before these extremist Demøcrazed liars(birm) do any more damage to our country. Their clocks we need to clean in 2014.



Labels: , , , , , ,

Bookmark and Share    

Liberal Utopia

LC Local 666, VRWC
Solidarity!
V A
Victory
Blog
Never Submit

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?


LUmail

Liberal Utopia
WWW


Site Feed

Subscribe to Liberal Utopia by Email

Posts

  Saturday, May 31, 2014
  Sunday, May 25, 2014
  Saturday, May 24, 2014
  Friday, May 23, 2014
  Thursday, May 22, 2014
  Wednesday, May 21, 2014
  Saturday, May 17, 2014
  Tuesday, May 13, 2014
  Monday, May 12, 2014
  Friday, May 09, 2014

Archives

March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009
April 2009
May 2009
June 2009
July 2009
August 2009
September 2009
October 2009
November 2009
December 2009
January 2010
February 2010
March 2010
April 2010
May 2010
June 2010
July 2010
August 2010
September 2010
October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011
March 2011
April 2011
May 2011
June 2011
July 2011
August 2011
September 2011
October 2011
December 2011
January 2012
February 2012
March 2012
April 2012
May 2012
June 2012
July 2012
August 2012
September 2012
October 2012
November 2012
December 2012
January 2013
February 2013
March 2013
April 2013
May 2013
June 2013
July 2013
August 2013
September 2013
October 2013
November 2013
December 2013
January 2014
February 2014
March 2014
April 2014
May 2014
June 2014
July 2014
August 2014
September 2014
October 2014
November 2014
December 2014
January 2015
February 2015
March 2015
May 2015
June 2015
July 2015
August 2015
September 2015
November 2015
December 2015
January 2016
March 2016
April 2016
May 2016
June 2016
July 2016
August 2016
September 2016
October 2016
November 2016
January 2017
February 2017
March 2017
May 2017





G o o g l e
b o m b s
miserable failure
culture of corruption
sus barbatus
unelectable
wicked witch of the east
liberals
peckerwood
jew
great president